![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
This sort of discord is good for Israel, and for Infidels in general, as the warring factions waste energy fighting over who gets to take credit for waging jihad for the sake of Allah (jihad fi sabil Allah).
Also, Rahman's rant again underscores the fact that the conflict over Israel is religious in nature rather than being based on some nationalistic grievance, as is also the case with the Sunni-Shi'ite conflict, and every other front of jihad -- many of which Rahman enumerates at the end of the article.
Sunni-Shi'ite Jihad Update from YNet News: "Al-Qaeda member: Hizbullah backed by evil"
A speech allegedly made by Sheikh Abu Abdul Rahman has surfaced on a jihadi pro al-Qaeda website in which Rahman is cited as condemning the "infidel Hizbullah" and "the most corrupted regimes of Syria and Iran."
The speech was posted on the Islamist Muntada internet forum, frequently used by British Muslim al-Qaeda sympathizers, and was described as being a "summary of an address by Sheikh Abu Abdul Rahman speaking from Lebanon."
It is unclear whether the speaker identified as Rahman on the forum is a reference to al-Qaeda's second in command in Iraq, Abu Abdul Rahman al-Iraqi, and whether the senior al-Qaeda figure actually delivered the message from Lebanon.
The statement does, however, represent the seething resentment of Sunni al-Qaeda, directed at what it sees as an attempted Shiite takeover of the jihad campaign in the Middle East.
In the speech, Rahman espoused anti-Semitic conspiracy theories inspired by the Russian forgery, the protocols of the elders of Zion: "We know very well from our history that the Jews target to occupy Lebanon, Syria and even the north of the Arabian peninsula even up to Iraq to the river of Furaat (Euphrates)."
However, he then turns his wrath to Hizbullah, Iran, and Syria, calling them "infidel entities," and arguing that they are preventing Sunni jihadis from attacking Israel.
'Hizbullah not fighting for Allah'
"We need to know the reality, and we already know how Hizbullah do not fight for the sake of Allah. They declare themselves that they fight for the sake of Lebanon, are backed by the most corrupted regimes -- Syria and Iran -- and backed by the most evil people," Abdul Rahman was cited as saying.
"We cannot be fools to die for nationalism and tribalism, if two entities of Kuffar (infidels) fight that does not bother us. What bothers us is if we side with any one of them," he added. "Hizbullah has been the shield for the northern border of Israel, just like the eastern and southern shield is Jordan and the western shield is Egypt. These shields are all to prevent any Mujahideen (holy warriors) from entering Israel or to attack them," the message said.
Abdul Rahman claimed that Israel was actually focusing on "the Sunni and Palestinian Mujahideen in Lebanon rather than Hizbullah who will escape disarmament by joining the Lebanese army."
"We remember when al-Qaeda launched rockets from southern Lebanon, it was Hizbullah who rose to defend Israel and condemned it and threatened to cut the hand of those responsible if they caught them," the statement said.
Rahman also complained that Muslims were being led to disregard warfronts launched by Sunni jihadis around the world: "The mistake of many Muslims is that because of this one story, they have forgotten about Somalia while the enemy forces are preparing to enter Mogadishu, they forgot about Sudan and Darfur, they forgot about Afghanistan, China, Iraq, Kashmir."
"Lebanon is a battle between two kuffar (infidel) entities but those losing out are the innocent people caught in between who are not part of the conflict. The people should be patient, we do not fight for land or rock; we fight for the word of Allah to be the highest in that land, we fight in the Muslim lands to make the word of Allah the highest, not for the word of the kuffar regimes to be the highest. We need to believe decisively that all of Muslim land is our land: Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon and Palestine and all others," the message said.
"We should let Israel and Hizbullah weaken each other so that the Muslims can benefit in the long run and will use the opportunity to prepare for the future. The Muslims need to invest this war for the long war to liberate the whole of Palestine and all Muslim lands, and not to let the kuffar choose our battlefield nor let the media set our agenda," the statement concluded.
Posted by Marisol at August 27, 2006 11:59 PM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
|
The Al-Qaeda jihad training manual supposedly says that no member shall make disparging remarks about the Shia despite the Sunni roots of the organization and the enmity between the sects. So it is possible this rant is taqiya designed to make us think we are driving the terrorists against each other when actually they are uniting under the aegis of Iran.
Posted by: NativeSon
at August 28, 2006 1:15 AM
What wouldn't they like about the horrific Iran regime?? This does look like taqiyya, I agree.
Posted by: Lili
at August 28, 2006 2:53 AM
We hope it isn't taqiyya, but the thought of Al Qaeda, Hizbollah, Syria and Iran going hammer and tongs at each other would be a very appealing one. If only.
Posted by: Spirit Of 1683
at August 28, 2006 4:51 AM
The war on terror is a war of attrition, Last one standing wins.
Quoting the old Indian chief in a Clint Eastwood movie when he told Clint about the Indians being forced to leave their land being relocated to Oklahoma. The Indians were told "Endeavor to persevere"
Try to survive, sometimes if you are unwilling to fight the epic all out battle to win, you are destined to endeavor to persevere. To do so you are destined to continue fighting all your life. Your children will be fighting all their life, your grandchildren will be fighting all their life.
On day you may realize, it is better to fight to win or die trying.
Posted by: exsgtbrown
at August 28, 2006 6:35 AM
Another reason why the House of Islam is the real House of War.
Posted by: Kepha
at August 28, 2006 7:16 AM
"We should let Israel and Hizbullah weaken each other so that the Muslims can benefit in the long run and will use the opportunity to prepare for the future."
-- from the statement by an Al-Qaeda spokesman above
Erratum Sheet:
For "Israel" read "Sunnis"
For "Hizbullah" read "Shi'a"
For "Muslims" read "non-Muslims"
Posted by: Hugh
at August 28, 2006 7:36 AM
I have wondered for some time if Bin Laden might be in Iran working with Iran to cause problems for the West.
at August 28, 2006 9:14 AM
Indeed, it might be taqiyya,
a trick to confuse us unbelievers.
But we shouldn't forget what al-Zarqawi did,
he slaughtered lots of shi'ites in Iraq,
and contributed for a great part to the coming
civil war there.
Al-Zarqawi was commonly regarded as bin Laden's
lieutanant in Iraq, and the speech from the
al-Qaeda executives after his death would
indeed seem to confirm that this was true.
I indeed don't believe that al-Qaeda would
stimulate sectarian strife among the shi'a and
the sunni's, but you shouldn't forget that by
far the most sunni's regard or even despise
the shi'a as heretics and non-muslims.
This view of shi'a is very common, even among
moderate muslims, and it is certainly common
among the al-Qaeda members, who are almost all
radical sunni's.
I would say that after Afghanistan's liberation,
the al-Qaeda executives have lost a lot of power
over their own organisation, and that even if
people like al-Zarqawi would move againest
such important directives, the leadership simply
lacks the power and authority to replace or
excommunicate him.
And I think this Rahman character is another
good example of that.
at August 28, 2006 9:31 AM
Typical Muslim gang turf warfare. Islam has always been about who is the baddest kid on the block. Islam is all about death, even to their own.
Posted by: exsgtbrown
at August 28, 2006 12:24 PM
The USA should be providing the 'thunder'--in the form of fireballs wiping out Islam across the planet!
Posted by: pythagoras
at August 28, 2006 1:21 PM
Bitch, bitch, bitch, they sound just like two old women.
Posted by: Bohemond_1069
at August 28, 2006 3:28 PM
If they want to fight, lets hold their coats and who cares who wins.
Posted by: pismopal
at August 28, 2006 6:58 PM
Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.


(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)