![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||
|
18 years old. Say, what was she voted "most likely" to do after high school? British Jihad Update from the BBC: "Woman charged over 'bombs plan'"
An 18-year-old woman has been charged in connection with last summer's alleged attempted bombings in London. She is accused of helping Yassin Omar, one of six men facing trial over the 21 July alleged incident, evade arrest.
Two men, aged 19 and 24, who were arrested along with the woman at a north London address, have been freed.
The woman will appear before Westminster Magistrates on a charge of assisting an offender and failing to disclose information.
'Conspiracy to murder'
It is alleged that between 21 and 27 July she "knowing or believing that Yassin Omar, 24, had committed offences of attempted murder, conspiracy to murder, and offences contrary to the Explosives Substances Act 1883" assisted him in evading arrest.
The second charge alleges during the same period she was in possession of details which "might be of material assistance" in apprehending, prosecuting, or convicting Mr Omar over "the commission, preparation or instigation of an act of terrorism" and "failed to disclose it as soon as reasonably practicable".
Six men, all from the London area, are facing trial charged with conspiracy to murder and conspiracy to cause explosions on 21 July 2005.
The other five are: Adel Yahya, 23, Hussain Osman, 27, Manfo Asiedu, 32, Ramzi Mohammed, 23 and Muktar Said Ibrahim, 27.
Posted by Marisol at October 4, 2006 8:24 PM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
If she's found guilty she should be tossed into London Tower and given ye olde painful justice of times past. What of the 2 guys who were released? Were they of the "peaceful ones"? If so, why were they not deported?
Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS
at October 4, 2006 8:54 PM
We have found a witch, may we burn her?
\channeling Monty Python
Posted by: km
at October 4, 2006 8:55 PM
So young and so radical (better to say so Islamic.) This should signal to the politicians that Islam is not heading for change.
Posted by: ofcourse
at October 4, 2006 9:49 PM
What of the 2 guys who were released? Were they of the "peaceful ones"? If so, why were they not deported?
Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS
I doubt they were deported.. but I AGREE they should have been. I'd like to know if there's a way to SUE the government for MALPRACTICE?!
All Western Governments have committed treason and crimes of sedition away from the interests of their constituents.
Posted by: germaninamerica
at October 4, 2006 9:49 PM
I'm shocked, stunned, and stupified. I don't believe it. She is a wonderful girl, studious, kind, etc. This is completely out of the ordinary. The infidel pigs must be framing her. I bet some Jews are involved in this.
Posted by: Galloglass
at October 4, 2006 9:50 PM
So if the ACLU here in the USA can sue over all sorts of frivolous things in order to influence government action - WHY CAN'T WE??!!! What would it take to form an American Common Sense Union [ACSU] or similar - staffed with PATRIOTIC Lawyers who have Common Sense besides brilliant legals minds.. WORKING for the COMMON GOOD?!
The Government is derelict in its duty to safeguard its citizens here in the USA and in Europe it's even worse!
WE NEED TO SUE them to keep them FROM RELEASING captives from Guantanamo Bay.. prevent them from giving them Korans.. their killing manuals.. IMHO they should be subject to de-islamification. See also under De-Nazification.
Since they dig forcible conversion so much.. they can choose whethere they'll be forciby converted to Judasism or Christianity. How deliciously benevolent of me to give them a choice:-)
Seriously.. the ACLU and their ilk are [ab]using the legal system - it is time for us to enter the battleground where the war is being fought.
I am NOT pro-Bush.. but VOTE REPUBLICAN.. it's because of the Supreme Court we must hold our noses and do so.
Posted by: germaninamerica
at October 4, 2006 9:57 PM
"She was voted "Most Likely To Go BOOM" in highschool!" by crusader619
If she gets a prison sentence, she certainly won't be going bang any time soon.
Posted by: Pelayo
at October 4, 2006 10:18 PM
By the way.. I hear the Guantanamo 'detainees' have use of staionary bicycles and other exercise equipment because some 'human rights' groups sued the govt. because some of the inmates were overweight.
I AM **NOT** KIDDING!! THIS IS **NOT** A JOKE!!!
It's LGW - Liberals Gone Wild!
Oh, they also get meals after dark right now in order with their "holi"day. The gurads hand them their kill-rans wearing gloves so as not to 'besmirch' this UN'holy' book!!!
WHAT IS ***WRONG*** WITH OUR GOVERNMENT??!!!
did they hand german POW's copies of Mein Kampf during their internment in WW2 ? What a freaking JOKE!!!
Can Monty Python or someone please make a movie about all of this? But NOT a LIBERAL movie, PLEASE!!
Posted by: germaninamerica
at October 4, 2006 10:18 PM
The thing that gets me about a silly girl like this one is that instead of being greatful for being born in a country like England, she chooses to plot against its good citizens in the name of some strange cult for which she probably doesn't understand anyway.
Send her to Iran which is such a fair place for women. They stone them for less than what she is guilty of. Now that would be a punishment.
at October 4, 2006 10:26 PM
In Iran they stone them to DEATH is what I left out.
Posted by: pigtails not veils
at October 4, 2006 10:33 PM
does anyone know if she is a caucasian convert, a home grown muslim or whatever?
Many years ago, when terrorism was not recognised for what it is, a young British girl was made pregnant by a jihadist.
He then planted a bomb inside her portable radio. El Al discovered the explosive device before she boarded.
At the time we were all flabergasted that an arab could be so evil.
How things have changed since then.
at October 4, 2006 11:40 PM
The conspirators in the 21st July plot were all Somalis as far as I can remember. She has the same surname as one of them.
Posted by: wallyUK
at October 5, 2006 1:02 AM
Sounds like France is taking a beating, the war is on its way.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/10/05/wmuslims05.xml
at October 5, 2006 2:18 AM
This is rather of topic but........
I am sometimes concerned about the standards of justice applied to Muslims.
So this young woman is to be charged with "failing to disclose information."
Well there are a lot of people who fall into that category without having to face criminal charges.
An obvious example - how about Christian Bishops who failed to report to the police the activities of Christian priests who were practicing child rape?
If the West wishes to act with any authority on these matters perhaps they should apply the same standards of justice to themselves?
at October 5, 2006 5:24 AM
km, France will soon have no choice but to declare martial law and deploy the military. I hope.
Posted by: Jesus Christ Supercop
at October 5, 2006 6:12 AM
Sorry about mistakenly saying that the woman had been named as had same surname as conspirator. It must have been some garbled memory from the time of the arrests - they seemed to pick up an awful lot of people at the time.
Perhaps the west should cover itself against tu quoque charges by equating child molesting with religiously inspired, indiscriminate mass murder but at least these things get out in the end. I shudder to think what goes on in those Pakistani madrassas.
at October 5, 2006 7:34 PM
I shudder to think what goes on in those Pakistani madrassas.
wallyUK
http://www.theasiannews.co.uk/news/s/210/210926_warning_over_madrassa_abuse.html
Posted by: D'Albini
at October 5, 2006 9:38 PM
"The conspirators in the 21st July plot were all Somalis as far as I can remember. She has the same surname as one of them."
Posted by: wallyUK
It's interesting to me that so many of the most recent jihadists come from Somalia. Of all majority-Muslim countries, Somalia is one of the sickest of the sickest. Read Betty Balsam's The Veil of Terror to learn more than you probably wanted to know about the sad and short lives of girls and women in a country where almost all young girls are genitally mutilated and infibulated in early childhood and where young newlywed grooms (so Balsam claims) celebrate their nuptials by first viciously beating their wives (who, one would hazard to guess, did not choose to marry them) and then cutting them open with a knife and repeatedly raping them, all while members of the wedding party cheer him on in the next room. So one shouldn't wonder why such damaged children are importing their social pathologies to the West.
It's not Islam alone that's to blame for a sick culture. Female genital mutilation isn't mentioned anywhere in the Koran, and in fact most Islamic countries don't practice it at all. It was practiced in North Africa long before Islam. But it's true that all countries that practice it now are Muslim, so clearly the religion has failed to stop destructive behaviours. If anything, it's used to legitimize them. Muslims from non-mutilating cultures are deafeningly silent on the whole issue, with a few courageous exceptions.
It's a testament to extreme naivete that the West believed that by opening their doors to the people fleeing these festering wastelands, they would erase all the cancerous elements of those cultures. It doesn't work that way. We need to either close the doors on immigration from these places or aggressively transform them not through war but through colonization, a practice that has long lost its legitimacy. But I can't see any other way.
Posted by: angloirishslav
at October 7, 2006 10:10 PM
angloirishslav
Yes the BBC reported some years ago there are 3000 cases of genital mutilation a year in Britain, mainly in the "Somali community" . Doctors have been told to deal with them "sympathetically”.
Contrast this with an experienced Headmaster told me that today he dare not put his arm round a crying child and Scout leaders who must ask the childs permission before they touch a Scout with, say, a twisted ankle.
at October 8, 2006 2:28 AM
Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.


(Note: Comments on articles are unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jihad Watch or Robert Spencer. Comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying may be summarily deleted. However, the fact that particular comments remain on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Robert Spencer of the views expressed therein.)