The Taleban will not let the the killers of Afghan women and children rest in peace and will continue to target them.’,

you see the Taliban is jealous they want to be known as the true killers of women and children, it's somtheing they honed in when they were in power. NATO understands the BS of the taliban, and send them on their way to see allah.

Posted by: ZenaWarriorPrincess at October 27, 2006 8:42 AM

Genocide? You really can tell that these crazies have no clue about reality when they start making such claims. Had the West wanted to engage in genocide Afghanistan would be barren of any life by now. The fact that Dadoodoo is still around making such laughable claims proves that what he says is indeed doodoo.

Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS at October 27, 2006 8:43 AM

You're absolutely right Zena. muslim males ARE jealous that someone else beats them to the kill.

How else do they get that "feel good feeling"?

Posted by: freewoman at October 27, 2006 8:54 AM

I hate it how words are constantly redefined to suit someone's agenda. Genocide = kill the human shields of the Taleban. Racism = demand more restrictive immigration or criticise Islam. Tolerance = apartheid. Apartheid = lack of tolerance.

Posted by: Jesus Christ Supercop at October 27, 2006 9:19 AM

Tolerance = apartheid. Apartheid = lack of tolerance

Reminds me of doublespeak. Doublespeak is thought control created by IngSoc. English Socialism. Political Correctness is thought control created by the Communists.

Posted by: FREE LEE at October 27, 2006 9:35 AM

Here we have "Taleban" in the title. Below is another article with "Taliban" in the title.

Which should it be? "I" before "E"? Or "E" before "I"? Shouldn't it be ours to reason why?

Or is the felt need here for orthoepic sameness merely a matter of reaching irritably for foolish consistency, which might be explained as a subliminal need, on October 27, to get into the holiday mood, and to summon up, four days early, that hobgoblin of little minds?

Posted by: Hugh at October 27, 2006 9:37 AM

Quoting Jesus Christ Supercop:

I hate it how words are constantly redefined to suit someone's agenda. Genocide = kill the human shields of the Taleban. Racism = demand more restrictive immigration or criticise Islam. Tolerance = apartheid. Apartheid = lack of tolerance.

Yeap, they do that. All these muslims and far-left anarchists are trying to manipulate the public opinion with distorting the meaning of words. Their basic methods are verbal attacks and continues and untrue accusations. The political speech of the left-wing bastards is the same as the religious speech of the mullahs of the Islamic. Full of accusations, unprovoked attacks, propaganda of Nazi-Stalinic type and hatred against what the Western Civilization stands for. All a big plot against the most advanced human civilization.

Posted by: AllahIsDead at October 27, 2006 9:48 AM

Re Taleban vs Taliban

My preference is for Taleban. It seems to suggest a prophylaxis for the prevention of taqqiyah: "Tale Ban: Helping to make those implausible accusations of genocide a thing of the past. Ask your doctor."

Posted by: Chatillon at October 27, 2006 10:16 AM

Genocidal Nazis/Taleban terrorize Jewish students at University of California Irvine.
Vice Chancellor of Student Affairs Manuel Gomez; (puke)
Gomez emphasized that though hate speech may be present, he would not seek to curtail it, as “one person’s hate speech is another person’s education.”
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=23112_UC_Irvine-_One_Persons_Hate_Speech_is_Another_Persons_Education&only
Forget about Afghanistan, they are here. Time to get busy.

Posted by: tgusa at October 27, 2006 10:24 AM

What's in a word --tally up the ban, or ban the tallies- what the heck since the word cannot be found in the Funkenwagler, or the Webster.
-- Any provocation concocted will do as long as we have someone to fight so that we can die and go off to our heaven that awaits us.

" Oh Allah has promised if we fight the infidels and fight them well to the death". But most of all we need an enemy so that we can try to walk in the image of our great warrior prophet Muhammed so that we will be martrys, and shaheeds to the rest of our brothers in the umma.

After all life really sucks out here on this 10th century desert we have created in the name of allah.

Posted by: Mackie at October 27, 2006 10:48 AM

'I hate it how words are constantly redefined to suit someone's agenda.'

This is called 'word magic, or 'word trickery'. They are designed to 'trick' the audience into a particular mind set. If the tricksters idea had any merit, he would not use tricks. Every statement, speech, article or sermon I ever heard comming from a muslim, is chuck full of 'word magic'. Taqiyya/kitman only exist because Islam must defend, not just one absurdity, but many of them. The politically bent in the west use this also...it's called political correctness, or PC. Eiter way we are being lied to and tricked. The way to get over being tricked is to get over being tricked.
Most of the posters here have done that...

Posted by: duh_swami at October 27, 2006 10:49 AM

Same Old, Same Old...

I can well imagine this is the exact same, old, tired Modus Operandi Muslims used from 600AD onward to justify their insatiable thirst for blood.

"We were driven out of here or there so we have every right to avenge the evil crusaders."

I can imagine that 100 years from now Muslims will be talking about the unjust invasion and occupation of Afghanistan that killed so many peaceful brothers and sisters of the Islamic faith.

Who can blame them. It appears to be working in our PC environment.

Same Old, Same Old...

Posted by: Sir Oinks Alot at October 27, 2006 11:43 AM

Sorry but I couldn't resist one more comment:

From the article and the Taliban:

"...latest in a series of civilian combat deaths, and said they would step up already rising suicide attacks..."

How then do they reconcile their own suicide attacks which kill Afghan Muslims indiscriminately? Perhaps the Taliban view these dead Muslims as martyrs that died by their hands.

Hypocrisy at its finest.

Not one argument or doctrine made by a Muslim for Islam can withstand critical analysis. Not one.

Posted by: Sir Oinks Alot at October 27, 2006 11:58 AM

Genocidal Nazis/Taleban terrorize Jewish students at University of California Irvine.
Vice Chancellor of Student Affairs Manuel Gomez; (puke)
Gomez emphasized that though hate speech may be present, he would not seek to curtail it, as “one person’s hate speech is another person’s education.”
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=23112_UC_Irvine-_One_Persons_Hate_Speech_is_Another_Persons_Education&only
Forget about Afghanistan, they are here. Time to get busy.

Maybe the Minutemen need to have their meetings at Irvine instead of at Columbia. Seems like the good folks at Irvine are open to "free speech".

You say they are here and let's get busy. What do you have in mind? What ever happened to the JDL?

Posted by: germaninamerica at October 27, 2006 12:33 PM

Before I read the comments, my initial reaction to this item was, "Genocide? Fourteen deaths? And yet the Turks won't allow the word to apply to the Armenians? Talk about Orwellian use of words!"

After I read the comments, my reaction was "Great minds think alike!"

Posted by: Kate at October 27, 2006 12:36 PM

‘The Taleban will not let the the killers of Afghan women and children rest in peace and will continue to target them.’

Hmmm. Given that the multi-national are, when they aren't fending off attacks by the Taliban, engaged in nation-building, and the attacks on Afghan civilians have been perpetrated by the Taliban, either intentionally for crimes like girls being allowed to attend school, or merely as collateral damage, does this then mean that the "Taleban" will start targetting themselves?

Posted by: waterdragon52 at October 27, 2006 12:42 PM

Militant Islamic groups have slaughtered untold millions of innocent non-Islamic civilians over the centuries; genocide has never inany way deterred Muslim people from continuing their quest for global domination.

Unless of course it happened to have been genocide perpetrated against THEM. Moreover, if Islamic accusations in this case had any grounds I STILL wouldn't lose any sleep over them. But since they don't, I'll go celebrate that NATO is successfully going to get them apes!

NATO: GO GET THEM APES!!!!

What goes around comes around. Too bad this isn't taught in the Kuran.

Posted by: pythagoras at October 27, 2006 12:45 PM

re: my comment about "nation building", I was not being sarcastic. This is what is sooo painful to me about the various moonbat Canadian politicos demanding that our troops be brought home because they are not being used as "peace keepers" and "nation builders", when, in fact, most of the soldiers killed were actually deployed pursuant to activities like building roads to areas that the Taliban was trying to keep isolated (and vulnerable to their control).

Posted by: waterdragon52 at October 27, 2006 12:45 PM

What we really need to do is just take off the kid gloves. They know that they can hide behind civilians. We are just going to have to accept the colateral damage of innocents getting killed. It is a war and the bad guys have us by the balls. They want a toe to toe fight, well come on out and play. We will show you what real war is all about.

Furthermore.. a lot of these "civilians" are basically of a similar mindset. Maybe they don't get into the fight directly, but at the very least they give ideological support and often they shelter these beasts.

Heavy bombings would serve for the general poluation to realize they are better off without the Taleban, Taliban.. I say Tomato, Stan! Potato.
They may begin to turn them in to our forces more than now.. for fear for their own safety. Right now they have more to fear from the T-ban than from us. See Nazi Germany. The populace followed Hitler until the Allies came in and then most of them sided with whatever Allies came in and accepted a new form of Government. De-Nazification was part of the program. well, you need to do-islamify these folk!! That's what history should teach us. But you need insurtmountable force and savagery before pople realize they and their leaders have been defeated and that it's in their own best interest to change their ways.

Why we don't do that in this case and in Iraq I have no idea! well, I do.. PC PC PC PC PC PC

The Left wants us to lose!

Posted by: germaninamerica at October 27, 2006 12:45 PM

germaninamerica,
You could send a message to the UC Board of Regents expressing your views.
http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/regents/
And as Hugh likes to write you can do anything you can, no matter how small or seemingly insignificant, to make it difficult for them to impose their ideology here in the West. Lawfully/legally, of course.

Posted by: tgusa at October 27, 2006 12:51 PM

Taliban Chief is the one-eyed Mullah Omar. Now we learn that their military commander is one-legged Mullah Dadullah. What next?

Posted by: pagandkapitat at October 27, 2006 1:16 PM

Taliban Chief is the one-eyed Mullah Omar. Now we learn that their military commander is one-legged Mullah Dadullah. What next?

Posted by: pagandkapitat at October 27, 2006 01:16 PM

The supreme exalted mystic poobah of the faith-Mule-ah No Nuts.

Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS at October 27, 2006 1:25 PM

'The Taleban will not let the the killers of Afghan women and children rest in peace and will continue to target them.’

[See: http://www.rawa.org/gallery.html]

Some of the restrictions the Taliban have placed upon Women (before the previous Taliban regime was dismantled):

Complete ban on women working outside their homes, including teachers, doctors and engineers.

Complete restriction on women's movement outside of their houses without a mahram (father, brother or husband).

Ban on dealing with male shopkeepers.

Ban on being treated by a male doctor.

Ban on studying at school, university or any other educational institution.

Compulsory wearing of a long veil (Burqa) which covers women from head to toe.

Whipping, beating and verbal abuse of women whose Burqa is not worn in accordance to Taliban rules. The same applies to women found in public without a mahram.

Whipping of women in public for having non-covered ankles.

Public stoning of women for having sex outside marriage (a number of lovers are stoned to death under this rule.)

Ban on all use of make-up (a number of women's fingers have been amputated for having painted nails).

A ban on women from talking or shaking hands with non-mahram males.

A ban on women for laughing loudly (no stranger should hear the voice of a women).

A ban on wearing high heeled shoes which would produce sound while walking as hearing the sound of a women's step is forbidden.

A ban on women using a taxi without a mahram.

Banning women's presence in radio, television and gatherings of any kind.

Banning women from playing any sport or entering a sports centre or club.

A ban on women riding a bicycle or a motorcycle even with their mahrams.

A ban on women wearing brightly coloured clothing (in their terms "sexually attracting colours").

Banning women's gatherings on festive occasions such as the Eids or for a recreational purpose.

Banning women from washing clothes next to rivers or at public places.

All place names with the word 'women' in it have been changed. For example "women's garden" has been renamed "spring garden".

Banning women from appearing on the balcony of their apartments or houses.

Compulsory painting of all windows so women can not be seen from the outside.

Banning male tailors from taking measurements or sewing women's clothes.

Banned from using female public baths.

Public buses have been separated into male and female buses.

A Ban on being photographed or filmed.

A Ban on women's pictures being printed on newspapers and books or even hung their own houses.

Ban on listening to music not for women but for men as well.

Total ban on watching movies, television and video for everyone.

copyright © RAWA 1999

Posted by: pagandkapitat at October 27, 2006 1:40 PM

germaninamerica:

According to senior Canadian NATO troops in Afghanistan, Taliban sympathy is actually very local to a relatively small portion of the country. It has also been posited that the up-tick in attacks has been, in part, the result of an influx of the non-Iraqi jihaddists from Iraq, including some Shiites courtesy of Iran who don't mind joining the fight, but not as suicide bombers, which is primarily what the "tour of duty" in Iraq consists of.

At the moment it seems there is an inexhaustible number of Muslims willing to become martyrs, but I'm not sure the pleged support is quite what certain people would have us believe, or we'd be seeing, for instance, a lot more of Iran's 20,000 women who were told were pledging to become martyrs for the Palestinian cause about a year ago exploding themselves in Gaza and the West Bank, n'est pas?

Posted by: waterdragon52 at October 27, 2006 3:02 PM

Find them and kill them. All Taliban wherever they camp.

Posted by: A_Plague_on_Both_Houses at October 27, 2006 3:19 PM

The politically bent in the west use this also...it's called political correctness, or PC. Eiter way we are being lied to and tricked. The way to get over being tricked is to get over being tricked. Most of the posters here have done that... Posted by: duh_swami

It's worse than that, it is a tactic used by Rove, Republicans and "conservatives", such as calling Estate Taxes (which applied only to the wealthiest of Americans, and not to us middle class) "death taxes". Calling a fetus an unborn baby, and as I saw Tucker yesterday calling a zygote, an "itty bitty tiny human"..in fact it seems that the Right has a monopoly or has perfected the propagandistic misuse of language.. and of course Islam is a rightist conservative ideology.

Posted by: Nariz at October 27, 2006 4:04 PM

Reminds me of doublespeak. Doublespeak is thought control created by IngSoc. English Socialism. Political Correctness is thought control created by the Communists. Posted by: FREE LEE

Talking of which Orwell Rolls in his grave

"A marvel of passionate succinctness, Robert Kane Pappas' docu critically examines the Fourth Estate, once the bastion of American democracy. Docu asks, "Could a media system, controlled by a few global corporations with the ability to overwhelm all competing voices, be able to turn lies into truth?..."

-- Variety

Posted by: Nariz at October 27, 2006 4:10 PM

Nariz,
Is that what is on your mind in these critical time's? Estate taxes, what to call a fetus, how to equate conservatives with jihazis? Is Carl Rove ruining your life? As is said, If you can’t make it in America you probably can’t make it anywhere. I’m middle class and I am doing ok considering lunatics are trying to blow us up and impose sharia all over the world. Most of the US Military are conservative, they are doing the fighting and dying. But I have an idea you know that. Tell me when the conservatives start calling for the stoning of homosexuals or justifying gang rape. I do agree with you on the Orwellian nature of some media today. But the wave is building, open your eyes and ears to what is being said. It can not be stopped. Tucker? Please! I bet you watch ogleman too.

Posted by: tgusa at October 27, 2006 5:20 PM

Hugh

When the Taliban was in power, they had an official website that was spelt with the 'e', and listed business opportunities in Afghanistan. If one typed 'taliban.com' instead, one would be directed at ummah.net/taliban, where one could read all the rants of one Pakistani writer about everybody else - the Soviets, the Indians, Masood, Hekmatyar, Dostum, et al. The site also plugged the al Rashid Trust, which was banned from operating in the US after 9/11.

Too bad nobody thought of caching that page, so that one can only take my word for it - or not. It was worth more than a few laughs.

Posted by: Infidel Pride at October 28, 2006 1:23 AM

Hugh, Emerson was responsible for most of whatever mush there is in the American mind (see for example to look no further Sikhy in the previous post re Bruce Thornton), so as for me at the risk of seeming shallow not to say cynical and with no philological dog in the fight as to the correct spelling of the word in question I'll take the consistancy every time. What was it that Joyce said when asked if he had become a Protestant?

Posted by: Marc at October 28, 2006 1:56 AM

It was all so predictable. He who says A must say B. A straight line from Luther to Calvin to the American puritans, to Transcendental ladies in Boston and Concord scaring the cows, to Unitarianism and thence to our New Age, with Episcopalians giving up Cranmer and Tallis for raves, and even we Catholics singing "Morning Has Broken" at mass (and liking it too, I'm sad to say), and the next thing you know Johnnie Jihad from Marin figures he's got to pick up his gun and light out for Waziristan ahead of the rest. Quicumque vult . . .

Posted by: Marc at October 28, 2006 3:38 AM

"genocide" against muslims. yawwwwnnnnnn.

Posted by: ujaklija at October 28, 2006 9:21 AM