Instead of bland denials from Hooper, it would be refreshing to see him offer some constructive way to counter this phenomenon.

To expect Iblis Hooper to say something sensible one might as well expect Allah to come down and tell his followers they've all been wrong for the last 1400 years. Hooper can't help himself-as a convert he's more zealous than even Bin Loser. He has to be-being so pasty faced he has to prove his credentials to his satanic masters by going the extra mile in screeching BS.

By the way, is it safe to say that that "Naseem" character would approve of this "blond boy"?

Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS at October 30, 2006 9:25 AM

Look. Its time Islam was put in the dock. The evidence is mounting. Which amounts to saying that the truth has always been there, but thanks to real scholars of Islam such as Robert Spencer, it is slowly getting out there into public consciousness. We need to start formulating strategies and examining the remaining obstacles to laying the facts bare: its easy for us to shout and hollow from the sidelines that Islam is a religion - or ideology - of evil, supported by the reality on the ground all over the world, but we also have to formulate positive plans of action incorporating the adjustments needed for such a brutal acknowledgement to be made by policy makers etc. We have to be one step ahead not just of those hatemongers and apologists, but also those who are in a position to make a change. We need to do the thinking for them, to propose ways around the obstructions of fear and inertia. But who are those that are in a position to make concrete changes, and how can we support them?

Posted by: exfidel at October 30, 2006 9:36 AM

CAIR poll: "55% of Moslem voters war on terror is war on Islam."

Unarticulated in CAIR poll: "66% of worldwide Moslems think the Jihadi war is Moslem war against the infidels."

I believe that the 11% difference is that the CAIR polled Moslems think the infidel is too stupid to know what is happening.

Posted by: David England at October 30, 2006 9:43 AM

I hope they keep trottin' out Hooper. He's not the sharpest knife in the drawer. He will begin to look foolish after a while. After all Denial is a river somewhere.

Posted by: credit man at October 30, 2006 9:48 AM

"I hope they keep trottin' out Hooper.... He will begin to look foolish after a while."

Goal met.

Posted by: KillHankKill at October 30, 2006 9:58 AM

Mr.Hooper:

What other religion are we familiar with in the world that is going around and committing acts of terrorism in the Phillipines,Indonesia,Spain,Britain,America,Russia Darfur,the Sudan, and a host of other countries and in fact has committed over 9,000 documented terrorist attacks throughout the world in the past 20 years?

After Hooper tries to not answer the question directly twice.

Tucker:

no no that is not the question! Do you think that Muslims are more likely to commit terrorist acts than non-Muslims.

Hooper:

Ah, ah, I don't believe that that is the case.

I have a bridge for sale!!

Posted by: Mackie at October 30, 2006 10:01 AM

Isn't it time that they are asked if Islam is in a war against the West? Then follow up with specific questions from the attack out of Arabia in 633 AD to now. Questions to follow up are:

(1) Was the Islam in 633 AD, the true Islam?

(2) Was the attack on the Eastern Roman Empire in 633 AD an expression of true Islam?

(3) Wasn't that the Western superpower?

(4) Didn't Islamic states attack the Western superpower from 633 AD to present? Byzantium, France, Austria, Britain (e.g. WWI), US (Barbary pirates and WWI to present.)

(5) When did that stop being true Islam?

(6) Is Saudi Arabia true Islam?

(7) Does Saudi Arabia fund the attacks on US troops in Afghanistan and Iraq?

(8) Is that the same true Islam that attacked the Eastern Roman Empire, the Western superpower, in 633 AD out of Arabia?

Posted by: Old Atlantic at October 30, 2006 10:02 AM

Robert

Now that picture is just down right scary but it is close to holloween..

Sorry to repeat but looks like this fits here too!!

WONDER IF THEY HAD THESE PARTS IN THEIR BOOKS??

Ishaq:464 “The Jews were made to come down, and Allah’s Messenger imprisoned them. Then the Prophet went out into the marketplace of Medina, and he had trenches dug in it. He sent for the Jewish men and had them beheaded in those trenches. They were brought out to him in batches. They numbered 800 to 900 boys and men.” Tabari VIII:40 “The Messenger commanded that furrows should be dug in the ground for the Qurayza. Then he sat down. Ali and Zubayr began cutting off their heads in his presence.”

Tabari VIII:38 “The Messenger of Allah commanded that all of the Jewish men and boys who had reached puberty should be beheaded. Then the Prophet divided the wealth, wives, and children of the Banu Qurayza Jews among the Muslims.”

WELL AFETR ALL WE SEE HIS FOLLOWERS DOING THE SAME TODAY

Qur’an 5:33 “The punishment for those who wage war against Allah and His Prophet and make mischief in the land, is to murder them, crucify them, or cut off a hand and foot on opposite sides...their doom is dreadful. They will not escape the fire, suffering constantly.”

WONDER IF THEY WROTE ABOUT THIS??

Qur’an 9:5 “When the sacred forbidden months for fighting are past, fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, torture them, and lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.”

NOW THIS I WONDER IF THEY TOLD THE TRUTH??

Qur’an 8:12 “Your Lord inspired the angels with the message: ‘I will terrorize the unbelievers. Therefore smite them on their necks and every joint and incapacitate them. Strike off their heads and cut off each of their fingers and toes.”

SO THAT GUY IN THE 14TH CENTRY WAS RIGHT!!

Qur’an 8:1 “They ask you about the benefits of capturing the spoils of war. Tell them: ‘The benefits belong to Allah and to His Messenger.’”

SO IT IS ALL ABOUT CONTROL AND MONEY

Tabari IX:74 “Indeed, Allah has guided you with His guidance. If you wish to do well [capture booty], obey Allah and His Messenger. You must perform the prayers, pay the zakat tax, and give a fifth share of Allah’s booty to His Messenger. The required zakat is: from the land one tenth of that watered by springs and rain, and one twentieth of that watered by the leathern bucket. From camels, a milch camel for every forty camels, and a young male camel for every thirty camels. From sheep, one for every five camels; and from cows, one from every fourth… If anyone pays more, it is to his credit. He who professes this, bears witness to his Islam and helps the faithful [fight] against the polytheists, he has the protection of Allah and His Messenger.”
Tabari IX:75 “He who holds fast to his religion, Judaism or Christianity, is not to be tempted from it. It is incumbent on them to pay the jizyah protection tax. For every adult, male or female, free or slave, one full denarius, or its value in al-ma’afir [fine cloth]. He who pays that to the Messenger has the protection of Allah and His Messenger, and he who holds back from it is the enemy of Allah and His Messenger.”

SO IS THE WORLD SO STUPID TO PAY A JIZZI TAX TO A BUNCH OF THUGS???

Part of the American Tribe
Squirrel Hunter
Spider Killer
GOD BLESS THE USA AND HER FIGHTING FORCES AND ALL WHO FIGHT WITH HER GIVE THEM STRENGTH, WIDOM, SIGHT, AND COURAGE TO DESTROY ALL ISLAMIC TERRORIST AND ALL WHO SUPPORT THEM LET NOT THE WORLD BE DECIEVED BY THEM AMEN

PS
Just wonder if these books told the ruth or more mulsum lies because they were to coward to tell the truth??

http://humor.beecy.net/videos/karaoke/

Posted by: Catherine at October 30, 2006 09:41 AM

Posted by: Catherine at October 30, 2006 10:08 AM

Only an imbecile like Carlson would have even had dougie on his show. Trying to get dougie to diss his homies would be like trying to get a crip or blood to do likewise. dougie joined mahomet's cult for the same reasons --

"When you're a Jet you're a Jet all the way,
from your first cigarette to your last dying day"

Posted by: Infidel33 at October 30, 2006 10:59 AM

Watch the video and watch his body language, most especially the eyes. I would not want to be at his mercy and I don't think he would want to be at mine. Hooper is a violent, true believing thug.

Posted by: pismopal at October 30, 2006 11:13 AM

“If you have made a treaty with infidels who are honorable, do not break the treaty until after the holy months are past. Then fight them and kill them wherever you find them, and take them captive, and besiege them, and ambush them.” — Qur’an 9:4-5 .

“Fight those who do not believe in Allah or the Last Day, or acknowledge that Islam is the religion of Truth, even if they are Jews or Christians, until they submit to slavery to you willingly and feel themselves subdued.” — Qur’an 9:29

“We are clear of you . . . and have rejected you; and there has arisen between us and you enmity and hatred for ever, unless ye believe in Allah and Him alone.” — Qur’an 60:4

Muslims aren't more likely to cause mayhem Doug?

Posted by: Carolyn2 at October 30, 2006 11:39 AM

Hoopers should be the democratic presidential nominee. He has all of the qualifications:

1.) Unable to see reality clearly.

2.) Poll Driven.

3.) Anti-American.

4.) Can also lie with a straight face.

Posted by: Monkeywho at October 30, 2006 11:46 AM

CAIR is an young organization that has one hell of a background and while the evidence is mounting we are keeping tabs:

Professional Deception

CAIR very effective at silencing media

DC Watson takes aim

Are Islamic organizations operating inside our borders honestly trying to tell us that Muslims aren’t committing the overwhelming majority of terrorist acts around the world? The following is a list of Muslim militants and convicted criminals. This is a list that certain Islamic groups had hoped Americans would never gain access to. Here are examples of what the Muslim community in America has produced and injected into the heart of our nation. Is it possible that any of these names will be mentioned at the "Islamophobia” Conference"? Or is this list of Muslim criminals just a mirage?

Randall "Ismail" Royer
Sami Al-Arian
Ghassan Elashi
Nuradin Abdi
Bassem K. Khafagi
Sami Ibrahim Isa Ardel Hadi
Abdurahman Alamoudi
Karim Iraq
Ahmed Omar Abu Ali
Ahmed Barodi
Sadeq Naji Ahmed
Mukhtar al-Bakri
Bashir Noorzai
Faysal Galab
Ali al-Timimi
Shafal Mosed
Ibrahim Al-Niqrish
Sahim Alwan
Fawaz Damra
Yahya Goba
Ahmed Ressam
Yasein Taher
Ali bin Mussalim
Hasan Akbar
Nemr Ali Rahal
Clayton Morgan, aka Isamu Dyson, aka Cayson Bin Don

DISCOVER THE NETWORKS - CAIR

A CAIR Miscellany by Daniel Pipes

Posted by: justamomof4 at October 30, 2006 12:00 PM

Looking at that picture of Iblis Hooper makes me wish he was wearing a veil. Looks like he's ready to bite someone!

Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS at October 30, 2006 12:30 PM

More driving while jihadist:
[note the PC treatment throughout]

Crime/Accident : White victim may have been killed by Asian youths
Posted by admin on 2006/10/30 5:38:02

London, Oct 30 (IANS) A young white man who was run over and killed after a gangland fight may have been the victim of a racial attack by Asian youths.

David Lees, 23, was found dead in a busy street in Greater Manchester early Saturday. Investigators are treating his death as murder.

Police said Lees, who was white, had been among the people involved in a row with a group of Asian youths, just before the incident. Lees was hit by a car, which then drove off, after trouble flared up between a group of white and Asian people.

"The incident has a racial element to it, however I would like to make it clear that the motive is still under investigation," a police spokesman told the Mirror.

"It seems like a disturbance or a low-level disorder has escalated out of all proportion," Superintendent Mark Robinson of Greater Manchester police said.

Police detained two youths Sunday for questioning. Investigators are also closely examining CCTV footages for further leads.

Posted by: germaninamerica at October 30, 2006 1:28 PM

Click on that link. 6,276 Islamic terrorist attacks since 9/11.

1) Does that link (I haven't looked at it yet) include aborted attacks? They should count the same as actual attacks.

2) Does that link count each separate victim of the Beltway snipers as a separate attack? That kind of counting would be deceptive and would put others on the list in a potentially questionable light.

Posted by: remote_control at October 30, 2006 1:31 PM

From the video above:

Why do most muslim "Americans" back the Dhimmicrats? (I mean Democrats)

Simple.

They will back down from any conflict in the Middle East.

They will back all muslim organizations in the United States, (like C.A.I.R.)

They will work against American Christian citizens and their traditions. Muslim holidays will probably take the place of Christian ones.

They will be more than happy to open the immigration floodgates and extend invitations to moslem thugs from all over the world.

More money will be sent to islamic nations to help them fight against Israel.
Posted by: americaningermany

Uhhh.. the Repubes are doing all of the above. They're just better at it then the dhims since they talk a better game.

1. We are in a conflict in the ME, but our forces' handds are tied and our own soldiers are put on trial back home, see Abu Ghraib and Camp Pendleton. PLUS they've been restraining Israel at evry turn of the way. See also under Condi Rice.

2. Nothing George W. hasn't been doing. He even had the muftis over for dinner. Turning the white House into the Ramadan Inn. See also under close SOWdi ties to the House of Bush. And who let all the bin Ladens out of the country a day after 9/11. They flew them out on a private jet with all comforts of course. Wasn't the Dhims. IMHO there is NO difference between Dhims and Repubes. They WANT you to think there is, of course. Only the foot soldiers and hotheads like Howard Dean really think there's a difference. Right now the money for the border fence is being held up. They had a BIG BILL SIGNING and then quietly backed down on funding. DON'T TRUST ANY OF THEM!! THEY ALL LIE!!

3. All I can say is see above.. Bush just had a lot of muftis at the White House [Ramadan Inn] while the enemy was celebrating murder in Iraq and in Afghanistan. So much for that.

4. The Immigration Floodgates have nevver been open wider.. while Bush is fiddling.. and they just made a deal to let in 30,000 SWOdi "students" a year. That was BUSH, ok?

As you can see I have proven that the Repubes are just as bad as the Dhimwits. They are just BETTER at fooling you!

They talk out of both sides of their mouths.

Posted by: germaninamerica at October 30, 2006 1:48 PM

Hoopers should be the democratic presidential nominee. He has all of the qualifications:

1.) Unable to see reality clearly.

2.) Poll Driven.

3.) Anti-American.

4.) Can also lie with a straight face.
Posted by: Monkeywho

Those four points can be just as easily applied to King George. Just because he waves a flag doesn't mean he's not guilty on 3.)

Posted by: germaninamerica at October 30, 2006 1:50 PM

Ibrahim of CAIR wants respect...

http://www.reelwavs.com/movies/godfather_2/steppedover.mp3

Posted by: Frank at October 30, 2006 2:28 PM

Copy and paste the link to hear Ibrahim..Savage has it right about this guy..

http://www.reelwavs.com/movies/godfather_2/steppedover.mp3

Posted by: Frank at October 30, 2006 2:43 PM

Dougie Hooper is one guy I will always watch on TV. Between his inept lies and spin and ruddy Anglo face topped off improbably with a Muslim beanie, it's pure performance art. One day that beanie is gonna sprout propeller blades and old Dougie is gonna fly off into the ether once and for all.

Posted by: dennisw at October 30, 2006 3:07 PM

Why hasn’t Robert been on Bill O'Reilly's show? I can't imagine Bill being too intimidated(he uses the term "islamofacist" regularly now and even said it to the president), but who knows. I think we owe it to Robert and that everyone here should email Bill with a message similar to this:

Bill, you as "Culture Warrior" need to have Robert Spencer, author of the new bestselling book "The Truth About Muhammad", on your show. The cultural struggle with Muslims(who seek to emulate "the perfect man") is the most important issue today and will continue to define the 21st century. The book, while being controversial and politically incorrect, is very factually correct. Please do not be intimidated by the alliance of our enemies and the champions of political correctness.

To oreilly@foxnews.com

Posted by: charles martel at October 30, 2006 5:55 PM

dennisw-

I think you are a perceptive man. He's an opportunist who even lies to himself. It's a living, if making a living means selling one's self-respect. There is something wrong with him. He's not a real man. Something is very inadequate with "Ibrahim". I'll bet he even gives some Muslims the creeps.

Posted by: Frank at October 30, 2006 6:35 PM

Rock on Tucker! You done good here. Mr.O'Reilly you are to silent about this. Why?

Posted by: fox1 at October 30, 2006 6:45 PM

Ibrahim Hooper is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but what would you expect from a convert. you would have to be a total loser to become a muslim in the first place. chair just needs to be more confident and send in a real mooslim who can show more passion. you cant take islam seriously when you have a clown like face as hopper. he belongs in a fea circus with those answers. lol

Posted by: ZenaWarriorPrincess at October 30, 2006 10:21 PM

Hooper, we know thee! We in the west will never bow to you and yours. Try as you will the west and free thought is ruled with sanity and sense. Things you know nothing about. Oh, and you really are nasty looking.

Posted by: fox1 at October 30, 2006 10:51 PM

A lot of you are focusing upon what Hooper said, but not Carlson. Pay close attention to what Carlson says at the very end of the conversation. Notice how quickly he resorts to the typical PC line. His exact quote:

Hooper: "Muslims obviously don't believe that Islam is inherently violent."

Carlson, fumbling, almost desperate to assure the PC line: "I'm not saying that. I'm not suggesting that, nor do I think--have I ever suggested. Islam is not inherently violent! I'm not saying it is."

Posted by: Jonas Salk at October 31, 2006 12:26 AM

Yes I know that Carlson went PC at the end. I'm just thrilled that he got anything out of Hooper at all. These days that's a plus. And you're right Jonas, he did fumble.

Posted by: fox1 at October 31, 2006 12:51 AM

"Are Muslims more likely to commit acts of terror than members of other faiths?"

A flat no from Hooper.

GAME --- SET --- MATCH!

Tucker Carlson is closer to getting it right than most of the talking heads on TV.

Posted by: alexon at October 31, 2006 1:29 AM