Nancy Pelosi should not be in the white house. Politics isn't her thing.

Posted by: EliasAlucard at November 16, 2006 6:30 PM

Ack!!! I just saw Nancy Pelosi on the CBS Nightly News saying, "Like we say in church, let there be peace on Earth, and let it begin with us."

As if she even believes in God! She's a Commie-Socialist-Jew hater!

What? Don't believe me? Check this out:

http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/us-house-now-run-by-a-socialist

Posted by: Doctor Bulldog at November 16, 2006 6:39 PM

Maybe she needs to convert to Islam, It is the coolest thing. Write it down, take a picture, talk Koran in government. Sharia solves all problems, sorry if you get your head chopped off, lest alone a hand!

Posted by: zooboomafoo at November 16, 2006 6:41 PM

Let us take France's lead and let Islam, and Sharia, form our society, it has done so well with theirs. Ok, that is why they come here, but anyways, Islam and Muslims know how to play nice! OK, maybe that is a farce. They know how to blow everything up!. That is not farce.

Posted by: zooboomafoo at November 16, 2006 6:46 PM

Did someone yell "takfir" before the "Allahu Akbar" chant?! If Jefferson were alive today he'd order the Marines to Minnesota with orders to take no prisoners.

Posted by: Beagle at November 16, 2006 7:11 PM

Conyers says that certain "acts" against islam should be procescuted as bigotry?

What kind of "acts?" does he have in mind?

Reading books critical of islam could be "acts" deemed as bigotry; so could posting on this site; so could asking questions of any kind.

People like Conyers and Pelosi should be hanged for treason against the Constitution; as it is, they will now have the power to use that same Constitution that they wish to overthrow -- to hang anyone that runs afoul of them by pointing out their treason and demanding their removal from office.

You must give these socialist traitors credit; they have succeded in overthrowing the government of the United States by becoming the agents of the very government that they seek to destroy.

No military power on earth, in any age, could have destroyed this nation; yet these people will do it through legislation in the same way that Blair destroyed the remnants of the British empire in ways that Hitler's military could never of hope for.

It is a bloodless revolution; and the rebels have won.

Tragically, stupidly, the sheeple will be blind sighted as they always are and go along with it thinking that they do not wish to violate that law, which ironically, has already been overthrown.

It is altogether brilliant; but evil nevertheless.

Posted by: witness at November 16, 2006 8:22 PM

"We must make it illegal" that quote stands up there with the Gettysburg address. What a maroon.

Posted by: Carolyn2 at November 16, 2006 8:31 PM

I have a complaint to lodge, where do I go? For decades before 9-11 I flew unmolested by repeated searches. Since that day, the Airports have become like temporary detention camps and I get searched every time. Now I only fly when I must. It sucks. Where do I go to get my country back? Congress?

Posted by: tgusa at November 16, 2006 8:37 PM

Thank you.

How timely this is. Spencer,
tonight you will speak
to my brother-in-law
and tell him why his brother
shouted on the phone.
No, I'm not alone
and drinking,
only pondering
the ways of this world.

Posted by: the poetess at November 16, 2006 8:48 PM

well said, witness.

Posted by: the poetess at November 16, 2006 8:50 PM

would someone please mail Rep. Pelosi pictures of the 19 from 9/11 and pictures from the 7/7 bombers, pictures of Osama bin Laden, Dr. Ayman Zawhiri and so on until she begins to see a pattern.

19-35, male, middle eastern.... use statitics too.

Posted by: A_Plague_on_Both_Houses at November 16, 2006 9:10 PM

These people won't stop until they bring America to its knees. What's sad is that when the shootin' starts, most Americans still won't have a clue as to what's happening. Most of them have their head in the sand. I predict that it will start off slowly in communities that are densely populated with Muslims--such as Dearborne, Michigan. Most of the whites will leave. The Muslims will rally, protest, try to make some wacky city-wide Sharia laws. I know it sounds outlandish, but it reminds me of some southwestern communites who want to speak Spanish at the city-hall meetings. The Muslims will say, we are the majority population in this particular city, so we should have the FREEDOM to vote in Sharia law if we choose. Just imagine a whole state where the Muslims had the majority vote. Would you hang around, or move to the next state?

Posted by: SpongeMom at November 16, 2006 9:21 PM

"It is a bloodless revolution; and the rebels have won."

I can understand your reasoning, Witness, but I must disagree. This is not a "revolution" but a "usurpation" and the usurpers have a temprorary advantage. They cannot prevail, at least not for long.

Now, as in all ages, the real "rebels" are those who believe individuals have the right to carve out their own destinies. Both the Left and Islam deny this right. This is their only point of convergence. Once this is realised, blood will flow. Stock up on drop-cloths and keep your powder dry.

Posted by: USBeast at November 16, 2006 9:26 PM

Witness,

Go to John Conyers' website:

http://www.house.gov/conyers

Scroll down, and notice that he provides a link for translating his website to Arabic!!!

Ronin had a great comment about that:

"Did anyone explain to that idiot most muslims are not arabs can not read arabic?"

Yup, John Conyers is a dhimmi-fool!!!

http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com

Posted by: Doctor Bulldog at November 16, 2006 9:34 PM

The inmates are about to run the asylum. God help us all.

Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS at November 16, 2006 9:42 PM

I spotted a typo....someone wrote illegal when it should read, "We must make it legal".

Posted by: champ at November 16, 2006 9:48 PM

Okay, my second prediction about the coming war...I don't think American's will fight until our backs are against the wall. Not because we are weak, but because we are polite! We like being nice to people and obeying the "Golden Rule." But when the chips are down, there will be mayhem in the streets. And people better have their stash of food, water, and weapons.

While I was home last Christmas (this was before I started reading Spencer's books) I was talking with my father about the Muslim immigrants. He said we shouldn't let them into the country. I said, "Why not? Don't your believe in freedom of religion?" (Remember I had been brainwashed in college.) Anyway to make a long story short, my dad said that the Muslims were just "waiting for their orders." Now my dad is a college-grad, been around the block, fought in Vietnam, book-smart, etc... When he first said that they were waiting for their orders, I just laughed it off. No more! They are WAITING FOR THEIR ORDERS. When there are enough Muslims to swing the balance, we'd better be prepared.

Posted by: SpongeMom at November 16, 2006 9:53 PM

Go to John Conyers' website:

http://www.house.gov/conyers

Scroll down, and notice that he provides a link for translating his website to Arabic!!!

Did that; got this:

http://www.systranbox.com/systran/box

Then you put in http://www.house.gov/conyers in the box for the website selecting English to Arabaic:

The page did not work; Good! So, if a person can read Spanish or Arabic enough to follow the instructions, they should not need to translate -- unless Conyers has a message that he believes everyone else is too stupid to figure out.

This is not a "revolution" but a "usurpation" and the usurpers have a temprorary advantage.

Perhaps, but one persons revolutionary could be another's usurperter.

They cannot prevail, at least not for long.

True, once they get shariah law in these usurpters will fall to the immams who will not be eager to share power.

May Pelosi's burka be made of the scratchiest and stinkiest wool!

Posted by: witness at November 16, 2006 9:54 PM

Sorry about the few typos. I'm dealing with a toddler while typing...

Posted by: SpongeMom at November 16, 2006 9:57 PM

The traitorous idiots should be hung by the thumbs and horsewhipped right after the next 9/11 type event happens. And it WILL happen thanks to the efforts of these Islamaniac lapdogs.

Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS at November 16, 2006 10:30 PM

CAIR - 1, FREE SPEECH - 0
Islamonazi CAIR Intimidates Yet Another American Business In Dhimmitude

http://www.terrorfreeoil.org/videos/MS092506.php - MSNBC video

Free Patriotic Corner Banners: http://www.terrorfreeoil.org/cb/

Posted by: Terror-Free Oil at November 16, 2006 10:36 PM

Sorry about the few typos. I'm dealing with a toddler while typing... -SpongeMom

Ramon is with you?

Posted by: JadeDragoness at November 16, 2006 10:39 PM

JadeDragoness,
No, we dropped him off at the orphanage. LOL

Posted by: SpongeMom at November 16, 2006 10:49 PM

Witness,

RE - John Conyers in Arabic

Hmmm, that is weird...
Yup, the problem is with the SysTranBox.com

Good!!! Now maybe John Conyers will lose his Arabic constituents!!! *Evil LOL*

http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com

Posted by: Doctor Bulldog at November 17, 2006 12:25 AM

Sorry about the few typos. I'm dealing with a toddler while typing... -SpongeMom

Ramon is with you?
Posted by: JadeDragoness

Now 'thats' funny...

Posted by: duh_swami at November 17, 2006 1:24 AM

Nancy is a heart throb...a real looker...smart too, almost as smart as Rosie OOOH, who said that 'we dont need to fear terroists, they are mothers and fathers like the rest of us'...Now thats profound...expect Nancy to make remarks almost as profound as Rosies, she came close in the quote above...

Posted by: duh_swami at November 17, 2006 1:32 AM

Nothing like 9/11 will ever happen again because it's not required, they've got us over a barrel (oil) and they will eventually install sharia amungst the chaos their billigerent youth will cause in the future. It's not enough for individuals like ourselves to blog and tell everyone we know about the blight on humanity this vile ideology represents. The ripples in the ocean are not enough.

Posted by: eloivsdiablo at November 17, 2006 2:43 AM

Interesting piece over at LGFs.

Americans Voted for Nothing in Particular

From the piece:
Though voters apparently embraced the Democratic mantra of changing course in Iraq, a majority of the public did not detect a clear Democratic blueprint for ending the war.

It is not my thing to call the American people stupid, like the British media did when they re-elected Bush. It really shows that the Democrats are masters of spin over substance.

In my eyes, Socialism is something that is undead: it expired ages ago, but refuses to stop walking. Naturally, it stinks to high heaven, and thats why it applies a whole perfume bottle of "eau de free market", and a whole trowel full of make-up by "individual liberty." This way, it gives the appearance of rationality and decency, and beguiles its way into power. I hope to God the British people put it to eternal rest in the next election when they vote IngSoc (Labour) out.

My suspicion is, you cannot be a Leftist (Democrat, IngSoc) and a anti-jihadist at the same time.

Posted by: FREE LEE at November 17, 2006 3:38 AM

At last, someone in power gets what it is all about. Melanie Phillips has Conservative MP Paul Goodman's Islamism speech to Parliament in full:
http://www.melaniephillips.com/diary/?p=1393

Posted by: FREE LEE at November 17, 2006 3:52 AM

The speech by Paul Goodman is close, but no cigar.

"I suggest to the House that that missing something is the ideology of Islamism. As my right hon. Friend the Member for Penrith and The Border (David Maclean) said, Islamism is not Islam. Islam is a religion-a great religion at that and one, it seems to me, as various, as complex, as multi-faceted and as capable of supporting a great civilisation as Christianity. Islamism, however, is an ideology forged largely in the past 100 years..."

Once again, Nick Griffin, by contrast, is a lot closer to the robust Churchillian cigar needed. Griffin doesn't parse the problem of Islam into an absurd "Islamism".

Posted by: remote_control at November 17, 2006 4:14 AM

Nancy Pelosi should not be in the white house. Politics isn't her thing.

Unfortunately, political correctness is hers. How long before nuns get strip-searched whilst 23-year-old Muslim Arabs get waved through in the braqve new Pelosi-world, which will make all manner of sitting ducks out of us. Only one dempographic carried out 911, Madrid, London etc - attacks on the transport network - and it certainly wasn't white 80-year-old Christian grannies. If a dog is terrorising the neighbourhood, you don't go around rounding up cats. The next time an atrocity takes place involving planes leaving US airports, you know who to blame. You talk about European countries being politically correct - after Pelosi, you need to look closer to home.

Posted by: Spirit Of 1683 at November 17, 2006 5:21 AM

Paul Goodman can't say things like Islam is not a real religion. It's all to do with what you can say that is appropriate to your role, and what is expected of you. I can come on here and rant and say that Islam is not a real religion, and so can you.

Paul Goodman is an elected representative of the people of the UK, and should act like one. He has a duty to protect minorities, and he should address his peers in approriately couched terms. So what he can safely say is that there is a politicisation of Islam. In this careful way he avoids being tarred with the same brush with which the loonys paint Griffen.

And anyway, whether Islam is a religion or not is not the point. The point is that this represents the first time that there is some official recognition in the halls of power that the source and the cause of the trouble is Islam, and not Islamaphobia, and not Iraq, and not poverty or any of the other pap they use.

Griffen will become irrelevant again. Oswald Moseley, pal, not Winston Churchill. I don't care what they say in their literature, if they ever got in - it's an awful fantasy, I know, but it will happen only over my dead body (you betcha! some skinhead gonna have to kick my p**i lovin' ass)- I can't see how they can avoid cohersion to enforce their racial segregationist policies. Forcing people to live with limited freedoms is fascism. I think that the BNP just hate brown people, and it just so happens that some brown people in the UK are Muslims.

Posted by: FREE LEE at November 17, 2006 6:18 AM

Pelosi like other liberal Democrats like to give off the image that they are for the little guy. meanwhile there are more multimillionaire democrats than Republicans. Pelosi and her husband own a multi million dollar whinery, with out union workers. they have a chain of restuarants they also own and supple the restauranst with their wines. all their workers are non unionized! so much for the vote for me, l feel your pain. if Americans thought it was so bad before, well when these Democrats come into power, God help us! hopefully in two years Americans will wake up throw out those Democat bums and a smarter better breed of true conservative Reupblicans will come into office! a silver lining after all!

Posted by: ZenaWarriorPrincess at November 17, 2006 6:51 AM

What the dhimmicrats should do is start campaigning on a human rights and feminist platform for the establishment of real human rights and real equality for women throughout the muslim world (and that now includes those parts of the muslim world residing in the West). Start funding initiatives that already exist in the muslim world in order to strengthen them. Help the women's movements in those countries - they do exist. Women in the muslim world carry a moral and social burden very similar to that carried by medieval Christian women. There are lots of muslim women who would like a better deal. If we can undermine the loyalty of muslim women, we've immediately reduced the size of the enemy. A lot of the men are like emotionally helpless boys anyway.

We should also be campaigning strongly to abolish the law on apostasy because there are lots of muslims who would leave the fold if it carried less severe consequences. This too can reduce the size of the enemy. Muslim states must be pressurised to abolish these laws.

No one can seriously argue (only the most doltish dhimmicrat) that muslim women should not be allowed more freedom, independence and equality of opportunity. No one can seriously argue that people should not be free to choose their faith.

Both of the above sit squarely within the aims of the Left and yet would also help to destroy Islam.

We can chip away at important structures within this edifice of violence and lies in a less overtly hostile manner and thereby bring about its downfall.

Posted by: Malta_1565 at November 17, 2006 9:36 AM

Malta_1565,
Good post, however, what we are dealing with in the muslim family structure is pathological. If you research serial killers you will find that they “all” came from families that are extremely similar to muslims. Violence, hatred, physical abuse, prostitution, all manner of dysfunctionality. Could we reform a group of ted bundys?
And it is worse, these women and children idolize, put on a pedestal, these ted bundy like men. It is a structure that breeds bundy like behavior. The apparent smooth talking nice guy who is in reality a murderous bloodthirsty sexfiend. The FBI knows this, it is in the profile of serial killers. The question is, why are they choosing to remain silent?

Posted by: tgusa at November 17, 2006 11:03 AM

I think this is a good thing because alot of Muslims are also Americans. It would be a tragedy to lump them all into the status of a terrorist...they need protection from witchhunters

Posted by: ironshayke at November 17, 2006 11:32 AM

Malta...nice thoughts, womens issues in Islam are real...But, it will be an up-hill and losing battle to try and make illegal, anything that Allah has made legal, in his book The Quran.
The Quran, dontcha know, is uncreated, the very words and thoughts of Allah. Who, in the muslim world can make Allahs words, or acting on them, illegal? Allah has a copyright on all his material and gets pzzed if anyone violates it, and He will send Iblis with a big stick after any muslim who tries.

Posted by: duh_swami at November 17, 2006 11:50 AM

tgusa,
What are the key characterisitics of the muslim family structure and are they pretty much universal or are there regional variations? I would imagine it is quite homogenous but there are other variations within muslim culture that might be reflected in family structure (eg. deobandi, barelwi, sufi, sunni). These vary in their puritanical flavour and presumably vary in the austerity of the family atmosphere. Do you know of any sources on this?

Children do internalize the dynamics of early experience and family structure is an important dimension of this. These internalized dynamics are subsequently reflected in later expectations, attitudes, belief, and behaviour.

From my muslim contacts I've heard that mothers are keen to see their sons succeed by fair means or foul. It almost sounds Mafia-like. Mothers-in-law are frequently very dominating and cruel. There are many stories of women who have gone to live with in-laws (as is the custom among many muslims) and have been treated as little more than slaves who have to get up before everyone else and get the house and breakfast ready and be the last to go to bed. Many women look to suicide as their only way out. There are quite a few gruesome tales of women setting fire to themselves in desperation. (How these incidents, along with other suspicious deaths, are recorded officially would be well worth finding out.)

It was reported from Afganistan just recently that many women are becoming desperate as they see their brief glimpse of greater freedom and opportunity melt away again with the resurgence of hardliners.

As for why they choose to remain silent, I really don't know but given that they tend to lead rather isolated lives; getting used to doing what they're told; often have pretty restricted freedom of movement (like having to be accompanied when going out of the house); poor literacy (often non-existent) and thus a limited range of ideas and thought; little in the way of an organised movement to either hear about or participate in. We also have to remember that when you're brought up within a certain belief system (especially one that purports to address just about every aspect of existence) it can be very difficult to think 'outside the box', to question one's view of reality, especially when all around appear to share that view and the penalties for questioning it or rejecting it are so severe.

We tend to forget the history of free-thinkers, rebels, and philosophers (who most of us haven't even heard of) who paved the way for our freedoms.

Posted by: Malta_1565 at November 17, 2006 11:51 AM

No, I don’t. But since they prefer to use sharia as their guide, I have to assume that many of the rules are similar.
What I meant was why is the FBI remaining silent on this issue? Why would they hide such a thing? I know why the women stay silent, out of paralyzing fear. If they left, it would have to be like the Witness Protection program. That is how far they would have to go to hide. Horrible!

Posted by: tgusa at November 17, 2006 12:07 PM

She needs a one-way ticket to Iran. Maybe she can get a taste of what she is supporting. The "do as i say, not what i do" crowd. Moonbat traitor!

Posted by: squire at November 17, 2006 12:14 PM

FREE LEE,

"Paul Goodman can't say things like Islam is not a real religion. It's all to do with what you can say that is appropriate to your role, and what is expected of you."

Goodman's egregious fault was not merely to say that Islam is a, as you put it, "real religion". His egregious fault is in bending over backwards to say that "Islam is ... a great religion at that and one, it seems to me, as various, as complex, as multi-faceted and as capable of supporting a great civilisation as Christianity."

"He has a duty to protect minorities, and he should address his peers in approriately couched terms.

At this late stage of the game, after 7/7 and then after the recently aborted plot to mass-murder thousands, in addition to all the other crap Muslims have been doing in the UK in the meantime, to officially bend over with ass on high to say that Islam is a "great religion" which forms the basis of civilization on a par with Christianity is not, in fact, to "couch" the matter "appropriately" at all. It is highly and repugnantly inappropriate, and unnecessary to boot. Goodman can say Islam is a "real" religion without adding all that other disgusting lather and frosting. Withholding all that nauseating whipped cream would not make him vulnerable the Griffin tarbrush.

"And anyway, whether Islam is a religion or not is not the point."

It certainly is not the point -- and it was not the point I made; which makes your response to me all the more curious.

Posted by: remote_control at November 17, 2006 12:38 PM

Malta...I think you are right about being conditioned to NOT think outside the box. Islam is a closed system, anything outside this system is treated brutally. Brainwashing, I think they call it. The other factor is fear. Fear of the men close to them, fear of physical punishment, even for minor infractions. But most of all, fear of Allah, and fear that they may not get into paradise. Most muslimahs have been oppressed for so long, they think it's normal.

Then there is this little bit reported by Tabari 1:280, because of what Eve did in the garden: "Allah said, ‘It is My obligation to make her bleed once every month as she made this tree bleed. I must also make Eve stupid, although I created her intelligent.' "Because Allah afflicted Eve, all of the women of the world menstruate and are stupid.

There you have it, stupid menstruating women. Good for nothing but cooking, sex, breeding...and pushing around...

Posted by: duh_swami at November 17, 2006 1:16 PM

Ms. Pelosi could actually (and unintentionally) start a global conflict with her wide-eyed ideas of protecting Muslims against searches at airports.

All we need is for some 9-11 hijacker types to get some explosives on foreign-owned jetliners traveling through the US, succeed in blowing one or more of them to smithereens along with several hundred (or even thousand) foreign travelers aboard them from places like China or India or Russia or the UK and America would be in deep sh*t (since it would have been OUR responsibility). Making it illegal to search Muslims at airports could lead to something as disastrous as the aforementioned scenario. After all, how many jetliners have Muslim groups blown up over the past twenty years or so? (Answer: too many).

Under Ms. Pelosi's plan, the national government wouldn't be living up to its responsibilities to stop terrorists from using the country as a base of operations as its hands would be tied up and kept from doing so. Ms. Pelosi's policies would leave our national territory wide open to such abuse by Islamic terror organizations, and the results could be absolutely catastrophic. I seriously doubt this lady is bright enough to comprhend how dangerous what she is suggesting really is.

Oh God. What a ding-a-ling!

Posted by: pythagoras at November 17, 2006 2:05 PM

I'm a liberal and Dems like Pelosi I should be able to talk with (Conyers is a lost cause, his constituents are Muslims and Blacks..two groups that have been -historically-marginalized or (as in the case of muslims) marginalize themselves- so he kisses their ass, just like Republicans have kissed fundamentalist ass...it's called politics.

But conservatives should understand one thing, to the degree that there exist such a thing as liberals or leftists,, those who call themselves "conservative" can accept personal responsibility..given that so called conservatives have had, and still have, a high time, ranting against and demonizing so called liberals (seculars, women, gays, the poor etc).

And by the way this "liberal" is a close the border, second amendment, Islamophobic liberal, who is also of the opinion that gays should have the same rights as the rest of us, and that women are owners of their own body and have sovereign rights over their bodies.. and that America is not a god ordained Christian country (theocracy) or anything like it...this god in government or god/government thing is the problem with Islam.. so why do Christians emulate muslims then condemn muslims for emulating them..

It's called hypocricy.

Yours in a strong secular, educated and intelligent west.. the only way to defeat the brain dead god bots...ain't no winners in a battle for god..and Islam will most certainly win that battle (though the victory will be pyrrhic).

Islam will win, because they love death, and you can't win a war with people who will die rather than give up..

The only solution is to isolate or annhilate.. no other option seems to be available.

I head Benjamin Netanyahu today, he said that Islam can only change when despair sets in, that at the moment they are triumphant.. every attack is considered a nasdeen (victory for the faith).

Netanyahu also said (on the Glen Beck Show) that it is a minority of extremists that are perverting Islam (of course a minority..say even 10% out 2 billion) is a lot of insane and violent Jihadis.

I think what will wake up the west is an outbreak of violence worldwide (but especially in America and Europe) by these insane and immature believers.

Posted by: Nariz at November 17, 2006 10:52 PM

remote_control

You brought the Great Religion portion of the quote up for reasons to deflect the message. Whether Islam is a Great Religion or not, or a real religion or not, is definitely not the point. My original point was that Paul Goodman had brought it to the attention of the house that politicised Islam was of a danger to our way of life.

My point was that someone in power was getting it. You yourself dregged up a piece of the speech and you attempted to use it, in your first and in your second response, to show Paul Goodman not so much as a man with a concern with Islam, but more as a weakling who cannot stand up to it.

You do this because this trait is what you attribute to Griffen. If others who were actually in power showed the same resolve, it would make Griffen irrelevant.

One other thing, you seem to object that Paul Goodman speaks in a way that shows that he can include everyone and invite them to listen to his argument. When you open your mouth and speak like you automatically hate, then you are not going to achieve anything.

Anyway, what I find curious is, if you think the BNP are so great and lovely, why didn't you address my acusation that the BNP hate brown people? Why didn't you respond to my implication that Skinheaded bother boys would have to beat me up, and many like me, in order to impose their rule of law on us?

Posted by: FREE LEE at November 18, 2006 9:21 AM

Happy to let that go unchallenged, eh? The BNP hate brown people. Remote-control, while you deny that, I would be interested to know what you think the BNP thinks about jews.

Posted by: FREE LEE at November 18, 2006 9:31 AM

Nancy Pelosi's, Karen Armstrong's and Keith Ellison's dream of the future USA. Here is a fiction below in the form of play:

A MIDSUMMER NIGHT’S DREAM.

ACT 1.THE CRUSADER’S NIGHTMARE.

The play starts with a group of traveling Eurabian dhimmis aboard a plane which soon will be landing in New York City, U.S.A (United States of Arabia).

[Narrated by one of the travelers]

Upon the announce by our veiled and burqa clad hostess over the intercom, we fastened our seat belts and waited in our seats. The announce was shortly followed by a prayer from the Holy Koran.

Exiting the gates, we proceeded to the passport control. The control booths are filled with bearded men who ordered the women in the group to move to woman-only section.
The checks normally proceeded without any major incident except for a person which was detained by the religious police (the Mutawain) for his overly European physical appearance: blond, neatly shaven and smelling clean and elegant looking. I heard later that he had been released upon paying a jizyah for disturbing the public order. Someone even said that the police made some sexual advances to him, but anyway that was only rumor…

We were picked up by our guide in a bus painted in Pakistani style, i;e with flecks of color all over the deck. We had some minor problem there too; like getting aboard the bus because it was already jam-packed with people (the dhimmi tourist groups are not allowed each separate bus services and there was only one bus allotted for the incoming dhimmi tourist groups.). The airport guards helped us to squeeze ourselves in by pushing us forward.

On our way to the city, I noticed muslim prayer beads dangling out from the front mirror in the bus and the radio was airing out a song by Umm Gulsum, a once and still favorite egyptian female singer. Quotes from the Koran in arabic were inscripted all over the bus.

BTW, I had thought that the name of the airport was JFK but our guide corrected me by telling me the new name: Al- Zarkawi airport.

When we arrived in New York City (new name: New Mecca), I was astounded to see how the city had been transformed. On my way from the airport to the NYC, I counted 340 mosques. Our guide told me a mega mosque project was under way and its place was chosen to be where once the world trade center had been before it was demolished by “the holy warriors of islam”. We did not tour that part of the city but those who had already visited that quarter told me there were posters of jihad martyrs on the walls who had died in the 9/11 attack.

While passing through what had been Wall Street, I felt relief (secretly) to see that the area was preserved. There were businessmen-looking people along with people dressed in traditional arab style. The guide told us that these were a few dhimmis who are allowed to work because of their technical expertise, that is, they were specialists in financial computing or financial mathematics, topics which were too specialized or difficult for muslims to substitute them (also to understand). The guide, later, whispered to my ear that these dhimmis are in fact “Jews”. But “sshh” , he said, “no one is supposed to know this”. Speaking about the jews, I asked him whether we could also visit Brooklyn as well, for the song “Brooklyn by the sea” was among my favorites in my youth days. He told me that the area was “Out of bounds” for the moment as its inhabitants were in the process of being “resettled”. I recalled with horror that the area had once been predominantly Jewish. “Nooo” I said (whisper to myself), could the horrors of the past are recurring?

With a friendly tap on my shoulder, our smiling guide told me that we were now heading for Broadway which now became Al Jazira TV headquarters and tonight there would be the TV broadcast of “Intifada” to be followed by “the Conquest of the Constantinopolis”. “You absolutely shouldn’t miss particularly the executions (by beheading) and stonings which would be broadcast live from AhmadiNajad square (old Rockfeller Center)”, he said. I was shocked.. The fellow sitting next me told me that , though horrifying to watch, it would still be change from watching things like how King Fahd wipe his ass in the toilet or TV shows such as “69 ways of beating and raping your vomen: the islamic style”. “During my last visit here, they made us watch similar things in the hotel and I have had enough of that”, he said.

Our sympathetic guide also apologized for not being able to take us to visit the Statue of Liberty, or rather what it had been for now it was being “restructured” to become the statue of Osama Bin Ladin holding a submachine gun in his right hand.

NOOOOO! This time I yelled out loud and the whole people in the bus turned around to look at me.
…….

I woke up in horror and perspiring…. My wife was trying me to shake me up.. Come on Jim, she told me.. you have had a nightmare…

I glanced at the clock and decided to call my son who is serving in the army in Iraq. Our troops there will soon be pulling out, but I will be damned if I won’t use my relations up in the administration to make sure that he is transferred to Guantanamo.

NEXT: ACT 2. THE JIHADIST’S NIGHTMARE.
To post under a related topic..

PLEASE STAY TUNED…

Posted by: Icarus_Project at November 18, 2006 1:02 PM

Nariz: You have no ability to think outside the box. Criticism are no substitute for comprehension of how human nature works and how to work with it.

'Liberal' and 'conservative' are merely labels. They mean much less than you realize.

Otherwise liberals could not become conservatives, and conservatives would not become liberals. Yet, I see both happen. Ronald Reagan was once a flaming liberal and did a 180 turnaround. Malcolm X came back to America from the Middle East a fundamentalist Muslim bent on destroying America and gave up on the idea.

AS forwho "you can talk to" it doesn't mean squat. Because you have yet to produce an idea worth anyone's time (or if you have, it hasn't been evident on this website).

Posted by: pythagoras at November 18, 2006 2:12 PM

FREE LEE,

"You brought the Great Religion portion of the quote up for reasons to deflect the message."

No, not to deflect the message, but rather to show that the message is being crippled by the terms in which it is couched. We the people should no longer tolerate our representatives assuming that Islam is a great religion and foundation of a great civilization just like the West. Again, I'm not saying that Goodman needs to couch his statement in blatantly inflammatory anti-Islam language; there is a spectrum in between of nuanced shadings, and he can be cautiously and cleverly critical without bending over backwards fawning all over oh so wonderful Islam.

"Whether Islam is a Great Religion or not, or a real religion or not, is definitely not the point. My original point was that Paul Goodman had brought it to the attention of the house that politicised Islam was of a danger to our way of life."

No, he didn't do that. He raised the spectre of a non-existent fiction called "Islamism" -- a fiction that has been created (either out of ignorance or out of deceit or a mishmash of the two) conveniently to make sure that Islam itself remains protected and sanitized from all criticism. And the "politicized" angle is also another way to deflect causation away from Islam itself and its fanatical religiousity, and redirect it to political (and economic) causations, which can easily become ways to blame the West, or at best, to find solutions whereby the West can modify its political/economic behavior, and that will somehow magically make the Muslim jihadists calm down and stop exploding.

"My point was that someone in power was getting it."

He's getting a small bit of it, and not enough of it.

"to show Paul Goodman not so much as a man with a concern with Islam"

Again, Goodman's speech blatantly and lucidly demonstrates that he has no concern about Islam, other than to protect it as a great religion. His concern is only with that idiotic fiction, "Islamism".

As for your charges against the BNP, I'm not going to believe your bald assertions on their face. Show me evidence backing up your charges.

Posted by: remote_control at November 18, 2006 3:26 PM