Ummm, they keep misspelling FatWad.

Posted by: jcom972 at November 29, 2006 7:41 PM

If some Persians wish to be lackeys and slaves of the Arab religion, some radio station sponsored by Infidels can point out, that is their affair. The Azeris, on the other hand, that same Azeri-speaking broadcaster can say, have fortunately put Islam "in its place" in the purely religious sphere, and are too advanced to be kept back by the troglodytic Islamic Republic of Iran. And that goes for the Azeris oppressed in Iran, and they might be better off, and their "sacred Azeri soil" in what is now "northern Iran" better integrated into, the Republic of Azerbaijan.

Ideas whose time has come, are coming, will come.

Posted by: Hugh at November 29, 2006 7:42 PM

"They accuse the Azeri writer of portraying Christianity as superior to Islam and Europe as superior to the Middle East."
--------

Christianity IS superior to islam, and Europe IS superior to the middle east. Just look at the result, it speaks for itself.

Posted by: EliasAlucard at November 29, 2006 7:43 PM

2) Squash free speech through that fear.

http://www.foehammer.net/2006/11/strategy-of-global-jihad.html

Posted by: Foehammer at November 29, 2006 7:47 PM

"Wife, pack your bags. We are moving to Europe."

"But why?"

"Do not question! I am the husband I say we must leave this Muslim paradise and move to a festering cess pit filled with infidels...and I can get a job there."

Posted by: USBeast at November 29, 2006 8:00 PM

It should be made a crime in the US for a Mohammedan to issue a death fatwa on US soil - a capital offense whether the fatwa order is carried out or not.

I am depending on the new Democrat leadership to enact this law.

I'll not be holding my breath.

Posted by: Pelayo at November 29, 2006 8:03 PM

Doesn't look like Azerbaijan is likely to put up with such Iranian interference. OTOH, they are allied w/ Turkey, so who knows?

Posted by: Infidel Pride at November 29, 2006 8:04 PM

It was issued by the conservative Grand Ayatollah Mohammed Fazel Lankarani.

As opposed to the... liberal (?) Grand Ayatollahs?

Posted by: loler at November 29, 2006 8:06 PM

They accuse the Azeri writer of portraying Christianity as superior to Islam and Europe as superior to the Middle East.

well lets see, what are the hordes of middle eastern muslims doing in Europe? are there any groups of a dozen Europeans moving to the arab musilm middle east? what people dont want to stay in any cesspool stan? oh my islam sucks, so move to Europe, Australia, U.S.,Canada. anywhere but a islamatic state.. lets connect the dots...if superiority is where everyone wants to live, does that not point out to non-islamic countries as the place to live! wow.. immans are not the sharpest knives in the mosque.

Posted by: ZenaWarriorPrincess at November 29, 2006 8:14 PM

I wonder, just what does one call Mohammed that could be considered an insult? Liar? Cheat? Murderer? Thief? Rapist? Oath-breaker? Slave-raider? Racist? Child-molester? All of these titles are ones that Mohammed gloried in, and that Moslems glorify him for, so none of them could be considered an insult. To any honorable person, Mohammed is not the object of insults, he IS the insult.

Posted by: ebonystone at November 29, 2006 8:22 PM

loler,

Yeah, I was just thinking that! I guess they have a different interpretation of Conservative over there...

http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com

Posted by: Doctor Bulldog at November 29, 2006 8:23 PM

The Azeris have been persecuted along with other minorities in iran for centuries. The hateful ayatollahs are just that ... hateful. They pretend to be pious. Give their usual lip service and are seated in places of honor at banquet tables. Yet, they treat others with hate, vengence and contempt. There is nothing holy about the ayatollahs of iran.

Posted by: callmeinfidel at November 29, 2006 8:25 PM

jcom972 - Thanks, pal. Now how do I remove the
coffee from screen and keyboard? Fatwad indeed!

Posted by: MP at November 29, 2006 8:26 PM

Hugh,

Azerbaijan certainly has its troglodytes and its president, Ilham Aliev, is reminiscent of a Soviet-style oligarch, but the country is rich with natural resources and seems to possess an aspiration to join the rest of the world.

Recent news seems to suggest that they are serious about resolving the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict too.

One has to wonder how Iran views this latest development.

Ummah News Links

Posted by: ummahnewslinks at November 29, 2006 8:36 PM

As opposed to the... liberal (?) Grand Ayatollahs? Posted by loler

The moderate Grand Ayatollah?

Posted by: Pelayo at November 29, 2006 8:37 PM

I'm surprised that a "death fatwa" wasn't placed on anyone READING these articles.

Posted by: champ at November 29, 2006 8:39 PM

Awe man, I wanted my own fatwad. I feel left out, maybe I can call the ACLU and scream discrimination. Let us keep the fatwahs coming, overload these idiots. Fight Islam like it fights the West, on all fronts. Fatwah this, fatwah that. What a joke! Keep feeding the hole in Irag with dead Muslims. Keep killing them in Afghanistan. Pull back, let them kill themselves, and hit them again in two years!

Posted by: zooboomafoo at November 29, 2006 8:43 PM

I think I've formed a gestalt.

A fatwah is a fatwad issued by a fat-head.

Posted by: USBeast at November 29, 2006 8:47 PM

How come we can not say murder this person, or murder that person? What is a Christian fatwa? Slap his face, turn a cheek? Let's get nasty on these idiots of self grandure. Offend your prophet? What about the shmucks pissing on the ten commandments in LA? Fatwas for those that strike away Christianity, and Judeo Christian concepts. You can kill us, but we have to take it standing up? Go circumscise some women, send them to our country, you can come too, and spread the nonsense that you left your country for!

Posted by: zooboomafoo at November 29, 2006 9:02 PM

It's about time we get a fatwa story-it's been weeks and I was concerned that the peaceful ones were losing their touch.

Now that Lankarani has issued one of those fatwas of death does he get a promotion from ayatollah to imam like Satan Khomeini?

What a bunch of senile old goats.

Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS at November 29, 2006 9:32 PM

I'm surprised that a "death fatwa" wasn't placed on anyone READING these articles.

Posted by: champ at November 29, 2006 08:39 PM

I'm sure one of the "trolls" has gotten around to that already.

Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS at November 29, 2006 9:57 PM

"They allege that he has ridiculed all the sanctities of Islam and done it knowingly, fully aware of the consequences of his action.."

Right. Messing with the Doctrine of Death brings death. He should have known that.

Posted by: rocky at November 29, 2006 10:14 PM

I recall reading a sura in my original Arabic Qur'an that goes something like (correct me if I'm wrong):

"O ye believers, do not feel obliged to believe that the same Allah who has endowed you with sense, reason, and intellect has intended you to use them."

Posted by: Malinois at November 29, 2006 10:17 PM

It's so silly that the "superior religion" of Islam must destroy all who "insult" their "prophet." It's as though the fact that they call for the destruction of all who "insult" their "prophet" is proof of its "superiority."

All it really takes is a little thought and application of logic to see that Islam's inability to stand up to even the slightest scrutiny bares witness to its utter INFERIORITY. Islam is a cult of death and ignorance. It is a blight upon the face of humanity.

Posted by: yohannbiimu at November 29, 2006 10:26 PM

Sounds like a mob contract to me- seems the imams fancy themselves as middle eastern mafioso. Fatwah- They issue these thinking that Christians are weak and will 'turn the other cheek', but may I remind them that old testament siants were anything but weak. God said love your enemies for sure, but He also expects us to take action when we're being threatened to protect both ourselves and our families and country. http://sacredscoop.com

Posted by: CottShop at November 29, 2006 10:26 PM

Interesting how the BBC uses the word "conservative" to describe the Grand Ayatollah...

Wouldn't a more appropriate word be "orthodox"?

Posted by: atheling at November 29, 2006 10:29 PM

okay he is a pedophile a robber and a con man who founded the cult of Islam and made him so rich that he was the modern equivalent of a multibillionaire. As for Iran the religious leaders issuing death threats big deal Iran is a joke a very bad joke mind you but still a joke. The best thing the West could do is drop a couple A-bombs on a religious center and wipe out its idiots who are making the threat

Posted by: islamakapigeaters at November 29, 2006 10:45 PM

atheling- Psychopathic criminal would be more appropriate title

Posted by: CottShop at November 29, 2006 10:51 PM

I hear it's a lovely modern colonial with five spacious bedrooms and three full baths, including a tub with water jets in the huge master bedroom. It's like having your own spa!! You'll appreciate the recently updated kitchen with granite countertops and stainless steel designer appliances. Rear sliding doors open onto a new deck and professional landscaping with charming views of downtown Tehran and its 427 Khomeini billboards. Fabulous upscale neighborhood with top-rated schools, just minutes from Mount Shemshak where the slopes are open all year long!! Hurry, won't last!

Posted by: SalameBoloney at November 29, 2006 10:52 PM

Interesting how the BBC uses the word "conservative" to describe the Grand Ayatollah...

Wouldn't a more appropriate word be "orthodox"?

Posted by: atheling at November 29, 2006 10:29 PM

"Fanatical" seems the best choice.

Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS at November 29, 2006 10:58 PM

Why don't the EU buffoons, those pompous, born-to-rule bureaucrats who wax hysterically about U.S. "human rights" abuses, condemn these death edicts issued by islamic neanderthals? The European and UN demi-god bureaucrats never condemn the death sentences passed down by islamic demons with god complexes, but they tear their hair out over rabid terrorists in Gitmo, not to mention their incessant condemnations of Israel for defending itself.

They cannot even distinguish good from evil, like the ignoramus Jimmy Carter. He can find nothing good to say about Israel, but the ayatollahs can do no wrong. Even Jimmy is a hypocrite. What is it about muslims that elicits the sympathy and support of these people? They are in league with pure evil.

Posted by: Susanp at November 29, 2006 11:25 PM

Yes this Fatwa is truly TOLERANT and PEACEFUL.

i'll never doubt President Tom again.

Posted by: DUGGY at November 29, 2006 11:44 PM

How many of you would agree with me that Ayatollah Lankarani, and anyone else who issues a death fatwa against a person merely because of that person's thoughts, should be assassinated by a Western government?

How I wish I could, within the bounds of my government's laws, issue a clear warning to Lankarani to retract his death fatwa, and then if he refused, assassinate him without breaking my nation's laws.

If we care about freedom of speech and religion, these death fatwa issuers must be warned by our governments, and then if the fatwa is not retracted, our governments must kill or make disappear the fatwa-issuer. We should urge our governments to start carrying out such operations covertly or otherwise. But maybe I'm over-reacting because I love freedom of speech and religion...

Posted by: traeh at November 29, 2006 11:46 PM

Hey Guys,
Listen to this song "Islam Is Not For Me"

http://cyberray-rays.blogspot.com/2006/11/islam-not-for-me.html#links

it is friggin hilarious!!!!

Posted by: Cyberray at November 29, 2006 11:48 PM

Sean Hannity, for what it's worth, several times mentioned on his show earlier tonight an article by Robert Spencer. Hannity also had Steve Emerson on and interviewed one of the passengers who was on the plane with the six imams.

Posted by: traeh at November 29, 2006 11:51 PM

They've got many more islamists there and haveto watch what they say..just ask Theo Van Gogh.
Oh yeah that's right...they murdered him.
Plus, the citizenry isn't anywhere near as well-armed as we Americans are (they don't understand that this is one major reason we have our second amendment...it's not about hunting, it's about tyranny & self-defense) so they have to tread carefully.

Don't worry about Jimmy C...he's as marginalized now as he ever was. He's the reason Iran is like it is now, and senile as hell. Oddly enough, Carter also used the same electronic spying methods in 1978 as Bush does now and that was ok then- what a hypocrite himself.

You are right about these fatwads (yes, I itentionally misspelled it)...it's tantamount to ordering someones murder. If this were the US we should, and could, prosecute under RICO statutes (for the non-US folks, RICO= Racketeering, Influence peddling and Corrupt Organizations Act, passed to nail mobsters years ago, but is also applicable to ANY organization or person who pushes such madness).

Posted by: jcom972 at November 29, 2006 11:52 PM

Well, this has all the usual hidous elements of these fatwas, just like the Rushdi case..

The fatwa threatens a citizen of another sovereign nation. An artist is threatened with death because of his non-violent ideas. It is forbidden to consider any religion or philosophy superior to Islam, or even to critisize Islam's shortcomings. It is forbidden to consider any other place to be superior to Islamic countries in any way.

It is hard to know whether Mr. Tagi is considered an apostate because he is a member of a small minority--Azeri--not considered truly "Islamic" by many Sunnis and Shiites, or if it is because of the critical nature of his writings. In either case, the sentence for this "apostasy" is death.

Why isn't there more righteous anger over these fatwas?

Posted by: gravenimage at November 29, 2006 11:59 PM

"ignoramus Jimmy Carter" - Susanp

Is it so obvious? Mind you what he presided over: the destruction of Lebanon's democracy (and Lebanese Christians) by the Islamists, the destruction of a moderate Iran, and the sell out of the West to Saudi Arabia. How this guy ever became president is beyond me; a nightmare turned reality.

Posted by: ofcourse at November 30, 2006 12:03 AM

Lets talk about fatwas. In a layman's view it means assassination. So lets talk about assassination as a tool of warfare. Our enemy, radical Islam, uses this tool willingly and effectively. Is this a tool of warfare we in the West should consider? There are moral issues for us, the civilized world, in considering such an act. But are there times when a targeted killing would save many lives? Certainly when war has been declared officialy against, for example, Nazi Germany and Imperialist Japan, Hitler and Tojo became legitimate targets. We have issued an order to kill Bin Laden and his lieutenants, but we don't target the leaders of Hamas, Hezbollah, Syria, Iran, Iraqi militias, and others. Why not? Would there be greater peace and fewer Americans killed if we took out certain terrorist leaders? These terrorist leaders, whether heads of state or heads of organizations, have declared war on us. Should we not declare war on them? In a time of "assymetrical warfare" this relationship may be the only symmetrical aspect there is. Its worth some thought and I would add this, when Saddam and his regime were taken down every leader in the middle east sat up and took notice.

Posted by: gordo at November 30, 2006 12:40 AM

"Ummm, they keep misspelling FatWad"

That's because they're ignorant, child molesting, ass licking muslimes.

Posted by: Mikey at November 30, 2006 1:51 AM

Cyberry I think thats a great song! Also if anybody wants to read the full color comic ILLUSTRATING many quranic verses of muhammed (yes the ugly bastard is pictured) just click here:

http://www.faithfreedom.org/comics/comics.htm

he was a sick sick little pedophile.

Posted by: THE ALLIES SHALL WIN at November 30, 2006 4:53 AM

Muslims alledge Islam is a Peaceful and Tolerant Religion.

If you believe that go now to the corner and stand on your head.

If you look at any Muslim ruled country you will find very little evidence of a peaceful and tolerant religion.

In fact, where ever Islam has taken control, the first thing on their agenda is to eliminate all other religions. In places where other religions and cultures once thrived, The Muslims has taken every step to destroy all vestiges of the "conquered people". The Muslims have destroyed the churches, the memorials, the libraries, the schools, the heritages, the hospitals, and all manner of any lifestyle that does not adhere to the tyrannical rule of the Islamic clerics. The Muslims seek out and kill the professors,doctors,teachers,journalists,students,lawyers,businessmen,engineers,pilots,judges,nurses,policemen,military personnel,nuns,priests,and all other manner of people who have shown at one time or another to get an education and have developed some inkling of an ability to think for themselves. Self thought is evil under Islam.

In these muslim countries, the other religions have been virtually erased from history. Islam flows into other countries like the black plague, destroying all who encounter it. And just like the plague, the people who encounter it cannot seem to identify its cause or cure. But in todays world we can identify the cause of all this death and destruction--It is Islam. The world seeks a cure. We know now appeasement does not work, hudna or truces do not work, peace treaties do not work, mutual co-existance has been ruled out by the Muslims, negotiations do not work, embargoes do little,Islam has ruled out tolerances for other religions, tolerance for free speech, education, freedom of thought or the pursuit of happiness and yet the world leaders seem to be very good at sticking their head in the sand, leaving their butts boldly sticking out.

Islam is eliminating all options for the people of the earth. There are only a few options left.

Posted by: exsgtbrown at November 30, 2006 6:49 AM

Since Jimmy Carter keeps coming up. The day he was inaugurated as president it was so cold it snowed all the way to the Bahamas.
We just elected a Democratic majority to Congress. It snowed in Orlando before Thanksgiving.
Portents, signs, omens?

Posted by: auntbea at November 30, 2006 7:01 AM

Sorry, left out the LOL

Posted by: auntbea at November 30, 2006 7:03 AM

DEATH!!!, it is the Islamic answer to everything and anything or anyone that dares to be different or unwilling or independent.

Posted by: exsgtbrown at November 30, 2006 7:35 AM

USBeast, nice gag. I feel like drawing that into a comic strip, it reads like one.

Posted by: savitch at November 30, 2006 7:48 AM

An Azeri Writer has been condemned to death by an Iranian ayatollah, Salman Rushdie-style, for perceived insults to the Prophet Muhammed.

The BBC, in its permissive latitudinarianism, reports the story as matter-of-fact run-of-the-mill news from the Middle East and the fact that Azerbaijan is a place where British Petroleum has a huge stake in oil-investment upstream would never enter into the journalistically-challenged British propaganda network.

Oh, and the Republic of Georgia is where the pipeline from Azerbaijan passes through on its way to the Turkish port of Ceyhan, whence the crude oil is shipped to refineries in the UK. And if Georgia were a person, Vlad the Empoisoner would have already administered Polonium 210, because the Azeri oil competes with Soviet exports to Europe, which the former-Sovs wish to have completely under their control through oil blackmail. Vlad, the Short, almost invaded Georgia last month after it threw out four of his FSB, the successor to the KGB operatives, as they were planning their assassinations of senior Georgian politicians---0ops, maybe got a bit ahead of the curve there! Vlad the Short just signed a big agreement with Iran, concerning the sale of anti-air missiles for an oil and gas agreement.

Every story has its subtext.

Between Vlad's poison-purveyors and Ahmedinejad's nutty basijis, I'd hate to be that poor Azeri journalist.

Posted by: daveinboca at November 30, 2006 8:12 AM

Do you think the poisoned Russian got sick delivering some dirty bomb components to members of the Religion of Peace?

The thought had occured to me.

Posted by: exsgtbrown at November 30, 2006 8:26 AM

"USBeast, nice gag. I feel like drawing that into a comic strip, it reads like one."

Do it and post it, Savitch. Maybe we can be honored by a fatwa.

Posted by: USBeast at November 30, 2006 8:33 AM

I think these fatwas have as much to do with stifling attempts at reform in the clerics' own countries as they do with defending Islam. There has been a student movement within Iran pushing for a secular government for years (the Third Force), and the student age demographic within that country makes up a sizable percentage of the population.

Someone should draft a letter to the people of Iran, in which I'm-A-Dinnerjacket is called out as the megalomaniacal despot he is, and encourage their resistance, as he in effect attempted to do with the American left. Only problem is, it's very doubtful CNN would serve as a media outlet for mere American citizens as they did with for a hostile foreign government. Go figure.

Posted by: Clive at November 30, 2006 8:34 AM

from above:

"There has been a student movement within Iran pushing for a secular government for years (the Third Force)",

There are many student organizations in Iran, the ones not towing the party line are harrassed,beaten,imprisoned,raped,killed and/or otherwise discouraged from actually thinking.

Posted by: exsgtbrown at November 30, 2006 10:20 AM

Hmmmm

If I could somehow get my hands on that house, I could turn it into a brothel with gambling and booze. Then the good devout muslims wouldn't find it necessary to fly all the way to Las Vegas to cavort with prostitutes, drink and gamble AND we wouldn't have the need to profile them on the trip over here. It is a win win for all. Let me see..what to call it?

MooHammy's Harem?
Islamic Dolls?
Allahland?

Gimme some help here....

Posted by: Sixgun at November 30, 2006 11:08 AM

"Interesting how the BBC uses the word "conservative" to describe the Grand Ayatollah...

Wouldn't a more appropriate word be "orthodox"?"

from a post above.

I disagree. "Orthodox" is rooted in the Greek "Ortho" and "doxia" which literally means "right glory" i.e "right worship" with a secondary aspect of right practice as in "observant". As such it is a term that is correctly applied to forms of Christianity and Judaism. In a far looser manner it can be applied to other religions such as Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, and Confucianism without too much objection.

However, Islam by its nature is a political ideology far mor than a religion and to Muslims the role of humans is not to glorify God but to simply submit. As such "Orthodox" would not be appropriate to apply to Muslims.

Posted by: Provoslavni at November 30, 2006 1:13 PM

Azerbaijan means land of the Azeri's, a muslim majority country, in fact it is a muslim country.. and guess who was the CEO of the Azerbaijan Chamber of Commerce until he became Vice President of the U.S... a man named Dick Cheney was summoned to Saudi Arabia by his boss King Abdullah.

"KKKonservative" Americans are being played for fools and taken for a ride by KKKorporate America, but priorites are priorities and the Christian Right KKKonservative Radicals have been jerked around and snookered because of their psychosexual insecurities.. a good example....

Christian Coalition President-Elect Declines Job Over Opposition to Addressing Poverty, Environment
The president-elect of the Christian Coalition of America says he won’t be taking the job because of the group’s opposition to expanding its agenda. The Reverend Joel Hunter says he wanted to address issues including poverty and the environment but was told the Christian Coalition does not want to move beyond opposing abortion and gay marriage.

You see, that's all it takes, in true Muslim fashion, the Christian Right is militated and mobilized over issues of abortion and gay marriage.. nothing else is important.. and I don't get why they are so upset with Muslims since Muslims deal very "effectively" with abortion and gays.

If that's all they care about then Islam is their friend and best ally.. even Ann Coulter, and Bill Oreilly (the old culture warriors) think so.

Posted by: Nariz at November 30, 2006 3:26 PM

Nariz, time to UP the dosage. Your hysterics are coming through again.

Posted by: Gary at November 30, 2006 4:41 PM

LOL
Nariz needs to get his info on America from someone more reliable, not mikie-the-moore-on.

But hey, it's good for a laugh...just don't give him any more kool-aid.

Posted by: jcom972 at November 30, 2006 5:24 PM

Gee Nariz, do you actually read and listen to folks, or do you simply read propaganda that the left feeds you? The last time I checked it was leftists who love to talk about the "Israeli injustices to the 'Palestinians'" and crap like that. Where in any of the leftist media do they even address the Islamic threat, other than where it's something that is solely the fault of US foreign policy?

Let's see, we have Glenn Beck (a conservative) who has a three hour radio program and a one hour television program on CNN Headline News that dedicates a LOT of airtime to the Jihadi threat to the world. Thomas Sowell is always writing about the Jihadi threat, as does Mona Charen. Just because Ann Coulter, David and Rush Limbaugh do not dedicate all of their efforts to combatting the Islamic threat, is there ANY doubt that they know about it, and have spoken out about it?

What about Michelle Malkin, who works directly with Robert Spencer in a number of ways? What about Robert Spencer himself? Do you think that he does not have "conservative" tendencies? And who comes to the rescue of these poor Muslims whenever their their toes get stepped on? Who are afraid to call a spade a spade 100% of the time, because to do so is politically incorrect?

Nariz, your pals on the left are so far on the plantation, doin' the massa's biddin' in regard to the war against Islamo-fascism (that is, doing NOTHING) that there is nothing to say about them. They are literally treasonous in their aiding and abetting of the enemy. You really ought to watch Glenn Beck's program tonight. It's going to be an eye-opener.

Posted by: yohannbiimu at November 30, 2006 5:33 PM

God, I love this website. I will say a prayer every night, that it holds up, and the founders are taken care of.

Posted by: zooboomafoo at November 30, 2006 7:59 PM

"God, I love this website. I will say a prayer every night, that it holds up, and the founders are taken care of."

Ditto, Zoo.

Posted by: USBeast at November 30, 2006 9:02 PM

Australia captures one moment in every year as being of extraordinary significance. On the turning of the eleventh hour of the eleventh day in the eleventh month of each year, the country stops for a minute of silence. This solitary moment remembers those who have fallen in times of war, that we may yet live...

"The Last Post" is the military bugle call of the many in honor of the few.

We might all do well to listen to this tribute to the fallen, as it also holds a promise for the future:
http://www.awm.gov.au/commemoration/last_post.htm

Having only recently passed two 11th days of the year,I say that all Western cultures can share in this moment of tribute. Whether the soldiers be of the Australian AIF in Borneo or the 101st in Normandy, or the Desert Storm forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, let the same words be spoken over them: "Never has so much be owed by so many to so few..." (Winston Churchill). When words are spoken in this manner, they are as jewels in the crown of freedom. So, to my grandfather (Lt/Col in Royal Dutch Marine Corps, who seriously damaged the enemy's plans for Indonesia; and to the thousands of others, of all ranks, who would not bend to the will of evil, I say "Thank You and May God Bless You All. RIP"

I would add to these words: Shame, Chirac. Shame, Blair. You, who lack the intestinal fortitude required of true leadership, must now be labeled in the same category as the 2 greatest appeasers in the past 100 years: Neville Chamberlain and Kofi Annan (Peace Be Upon Them). True history is never soft on the truth. May you and your cronies be held utterly accountable for your dismal cowardice in the face of such pathetic creatures as typify the current Muslim world. Everlasting shame...

And the Fatwa of the Lord God Almighty, Mighty Sovereign over All and King of Israel, King of Kings, who is the Two-Edged Sword, Who came to us to be with us, that we might be with Him, He does NOT forget! And He has had it written, and Sealed as the Final Word of God, this Fatwa, known today as the Book of Revelation.

Oh Muslim! Read it.

Posted by: maranatha50 at December 1, 2006 5:54 AM

Post Script: By all rights, I should be honoring the memory of and acknowledging the many tens of thousands, and even the millions, "who would not bend to the will of evil".

This next call would appear to be above the call and duty of the well-trained soldier in any current Western arm of the military: Whenever any "imam" or "mullah" or "Ayatollah" or other representative of the Islamic pogrom against the West issues a death "fatwah" against a citizen of this planet, the same shall be enacted against that said representative of Islam. Then it can be said, in all fairness, that an eye for an eye has prevailed. (The Qu'ran is absolutely filled with such exhortations, PBUI)

You want to issue death warrants? Against those who speak out against your mind-bendingly barbaric tyranny? Then let the same prevail against you, who are so mightily devoted to the cause of Allah. Let the same apply to those Nasrallah's who think that they can hide from the consequences of those words that they choose to speak in front of their thousands of admiring followers. "Death to America? Death to Israel?" Ummm, you first. Amen.

Posted by: maranatha50 at December 1, 2006 6:35 AM