http://streamingradioguide.com/radio-show.php?show=437

Posted by: Foehammer at December 4, 2006 3:16 PM

Foehammer,

Thanks for the link.

http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com

Posted by: Doctor Bulldog at December 4, 2006 3:19 PM

Work in some financial aspects of jihad.

Thanks.

Posted by: mtriviso at December 4, 2006 3:36 PM

Wow...miracles do happen, Robert. I think I just saw a flying pig.

Posted by: Galloglass Warrior at December 4, 2006 3:41 PM

,,sounds like Ahkmed chikkined out when he realized Robert was in the lineup..

Posted by: Madduck at December 4, 2006 4:21 PM

I signed in here, first time in months, JUST in time to see this and cath you on Hannity (I usually listen, but fell off in the last week so I only started streaming JUST in time to hear you guys).... My goodness that woman has reality issues doesn't she?

Good spot. In case it hasn't been said lately, thanks Rob for all that you do.

Posted by: Twitch at December 4, 2006 4:30 PM

Great job! I agree with you. Those Imams should applogize to the other passengers. I couldn't even imagine how terrifying it must have been for those people. Kudos to the flight staff for taking control of the situation!

Posted by: faubio69 at December 4, 2006 4:32 PM

Sean Dhimmity had a caller just last Friday bring up Robert Spencer's books and the US's mis-understaning of Jihad and before the caller could make a coherent point, Dhimmity grabbed the reins and delivered his "look...there are good muslims...hijacked a peaceful religion" apologist spiel and ended the call.

I dont think Sean has any idea what Jihad is. Sorry I missed this Robert, hope you got some good talking points in.

Posted by: GreatShaitan at December 4, 2006 4:34 PM

Does anybody have a replay? That site is a mess, I can't use it.
TY.

Posted by: loler at December 4, 2006 4:36 PM

Hannity could have at least gotten Robert's name correctly. The show was dominated by a female muslim apologist who danced around the issues like a whirling dervish. She added nothing to the facts that came through in between her used car sales pitch. Richard did add a bombshell toward the end with the question..."why does an immam with 50000 miles a year with this airline suddenly have a problem on that flight?" Why indeed?
Good job Robert , with the little time you were alloted! Every little bit helps.

Posted by: pismopal at December 4, 2006 4:40 PM

loler,

Use this link:
http://streamingradioguide.com/radio-shows-on-air.php

The first hour of the program is playing on KRMG AM (Tulsa) at this time.

I believe you have an hour before Robert is on.

Posted by: PRCS at December 4, 2006 5:11 PM

With Sean Hannity calling his guest speaker "John" Spencer twice I guess that means Sean never read any of Robert's books.

Posted by: Borg at December 4, 2006 5:19 PM

So who's actually hosting today? You got in when Laura Ingraham was pinch hitting for O'Reilly; who's pinch hitting for See-Ann when his program forgot itself and had you on?

Posted by: Infidel Pride at December 4, 2006 5:32 PM

PRCS - Thanks for the link and explanation! I had no idea how this worked.

Posted by: Josephine at December 4, 2006 5:32 PM

Pinch hitters,
I guess none of them have the spine to host Robert, all those inconvenient truths they would be forced to confront. Not to mention the danger they would inherit. No, O’Reilly is Irish but not in the general meaning of the word or culture. John Wayne would have kicked his ***.

Posted by: tgusa at December 4, 2006 6:14 PM

Thanks, I enjoyed being able to listen to that interview!

Posted by: Josephine at December 4, 2006 6:35 PM

See here for an additional Spencer/Lekovic match:

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/014108.php

Posted by: PRCS at December 4, 2006 6:46 PM

tgusa

I disagree. Some of the pinch hitters I've heard are far more aware of the Jihadi threat than their supposedly more illustrious hosts. Some recent examples:

• Roger Hedgecock for Rush Limbaugh;
  
• Michael Smirkanish (sp?) for Bill O'Reilly;
  
• Bob Dornan for Michael Savage;
  

By & large, I think most Right wing radio talk hosts get it - problem is that since the big kahunas Rush & See-Ann don't, that impression has unfortunately been extrapolated to cover the entire genre in general. Undeserved, IMO.

Posted by: Infidel Pride at December 4, 2006 6:51 PM

OT, but important.
The Russian that was poisoned by polonium supposedly converted to islam, was he trying to sell a dirty bomb?
http://www.express.co.uk/news_detail.html?sku=814

Posted by: Carolyn2 at December 4, 2006 8:14 PM

Good job, John!

Posted by: Martin Beauchamp at December 4, 2006 8:30 PM

Besides them, some of the original hosts - Laura Ingraham, Ann Coulter, Michael Medved, Lee Rodgers (my favorite), Brian Sussman have been pretty forthright about Islam (even though some, like Sussman, call it the I-F word, and Medved calls it Islamo-Nazi). Note that I've just listed the hosts I've heard: I don't know whether Cal Thomas has a show, but on FNW, he usually doesn't fail to mention the threat Islam poses.

Posted by: Infidel Pride at December 4, 2006 06:51 PM
***

And don't forget Michael Graham of the infamous CAIR-WMAL/ABC controversy. I enjoyed MG when he was on the radio in DC. He could be over-the-top sometimes, but he was hilarious. (He is a former stand-up comic.)

Posted by: CJ at December 4, 2006 8:41 PM

I heard a bit pf the program while driving. I almost wrecked when Sean called him John Spencer. Later, on another short trip, I heard Sean reject racial profiling with the usual "minority of extremists" addendum. I like Hannity, because although he isn't the sharpest knife in the kitchen, he does defend conservative principles and he ordinarily does so with passion. One can only hope he will now tune into JW/DW and learn a bit regarding the ROP, about which he is entirely ignorant, apparently.

Carolyn: Thanks for the update on Litvinenko. The news just keeps getting weirder and weirder.

Regards,

HAID

Posted by: Haid Dasalami at December 4, 2006 8:55 PM

Make that "a bit OF the program." I ran that through my spell-checker, and it only highlighted "Litvinenko." So much for JW adding a spell-checker--HAID.

Posted by: Haid Dasalami at December 4, 2006 9:00 PM

I was watching Hannity and Colmes tonight and there was a liberal lawyer named Michael Gross and some conservative talking about the six imams. Gross was about as gross a dhimmi as can be, but surprisingly, the conservative informed views that muhammad told his followers to lie in order to defend the faith.

Gross called him paranoid.

I will record it when it comes on again and make a transcript of it.

Posted by: senatortombstone at December 4, 2006 10:41 PM

senatortombstone,

Yeah, Michael Gross is an ACLU lawyer. Glenn Beck has had him on his show a few times. The man just scares the crap out of everyone! No wonder ACLU wins so many cases. Even the Judges probably get intimidated by him.

http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com

Posted by: Doctor Bulldog at December 5, 2006 12:17 AM

Doctor Bulldog,

I watched the re-run of Hannity and Colmes (missed first minute).

Gross is psychotic! Hannity pointed out that the behavior of the imams was suspicious. Gross then commented that he and Hannity were just as suspicious.

I don't know if Gross is just being a troll or if he really believes himself.

But both he and Colmes got pretty indignant when Mark Williams, the conservative guest, commented that muhammad gave muslims permission to lie in defense of islam.

Posted by: senatortombstone at December 5, 2006 12:26 AM

Robert,

My reading diet has brought me to your site. For several years, I have read your views as glanced off other bloggers. I have begun reading your site, and on balance I agree with your views on this world. I do not see your view as bleak. I see it as real.

Cheers,

Posted by: Moze at December 5, 2006 1:15 AM

Robert (John!?) - I too heard it - great points.

We need to educate Hannity, if we can. He has a large audience, although I am not sure how much of a constraint the Saudi prince (who owns a block of Fox) is on what Hannity and others can say without getting canned.

The entire FOX staff seems to be totally PC on any Muslim issue. Between CAIR and the Arab prince they have FOX cowering in the corner, which is right where the Islamists want them.

The first thing Hannity should learn about Islam is who Robert Spencer is and then go from there.

Posted by: Jimmy Bones at December 5, 2006 1:20 AM

Briefly? It was a full half hour, and given that you had 3 other people to share the air with, not surprising that he did let you on. I was also chuckling at Ahmad Yunis not able to make it: this meant the 6 Imams had to be defended by a woman. Oh, the shame of it.

Thankfully, there was no hijacking of a great religion bs from See-Ann, and he might be more open to having you on individually in future. I wouldn't hold my breath, though.

Posted by: Infidel Pride at December 5, 2006 1:32 AM

Robert, heard you as much as possible yesterday, though Sean Hannity did not give you a lot of time. You did what you could best do. I guess people are scared of the true message of the dangers of Islamofacism.

Also despite the PC nonsense over at Fox, at least to the credit of Laura Inghram, she was abale to bring you on a few weeks back when she sub for Bill O'Reilly.

Posted by: bigcatgirl13106 at December 5, 2006 6:10 AM

It's sad. I used to love FhOX news, but when I became aware of real islam, I alo became aware of their dhimmitude.

Sad.

Posted by: senatortombstone at December 5, 2006 6:58 AM

A little off topic, but last sunday I saw Robert on CSpan doing Q/A on Islam. His talk preceeded another (expert) who looked foolish and uneducated on the subject by comparison. I really like the thoughtfull insights into Islamic reformation very intelligent and witty too! Anyways I bought your book and am going to buy it as christmas presents for all my iliberal friends and family. Keep up the great work. We will save our civilization one mind at a time.

Posted by: ethoman at December 5, 2006 10:36 AM

Faux news, The History Channel, Discovery, and even on occasion the Military Channel, just to name a few. They are all PC dhimmiwits or LLLs. That is why when they speak about Air pollution coming from China they refer to it as soot. 50% of the pollutants in the air of LA come across the Pacific and end up on the West coast. Remember when we were the ones responsible for all that pollution? Yeah, they called it SMOG then. It just goes to show that one mans SMOG is another mans SOOT. I watch almost no TV and would throw the thing out except for the occasional Football game or classic movie on TCM. It does not matter what channel you select, you will eventually get the LLL point of view, just listen for awhile and see for yourself. I would like to make a request, if any TV execs are out there, can I when I tune in to a Football game not get a boohoo, poor me, sob story of one sort or another. I came to the channel to see guys get drilled, not for a lesson in some of the worlds sadder moments, save it for a telethon!

Posted by: tgusa at December 5, 2006 10:36 AM

After reading the report here: http://www.investors.com/editorial/editorialcontent.asp?secid=1501&status=article&id=250126364574564&view=1&view=1
this is a no-brainer. Lets see.

At the gate before boarding, they angrily cursed the U.S. Then they bowed to Mecca and prayed "very loud," chanting "Allah, Allah, Allah," according to the gate agent and another witness.

On the plane, they didn't take their assigned seats and instead fanned out to the front, middle and rear of the plane.

Some ran back and forth speaking to each other in Arabic. Adding to suspicions, most of them asked for seat belt extensions even though they didn't need them — or even use them.

I;m surprised the Air Marshall didn't shoot them on the spot.

In the IMAM's version.

They "did nothing unusual" and discounted all of the witnesses.

No further comment is required except why didn't this information make CNN headline news?

Posted by: JamesThailand at December 6, 2006 1:05 AM

I see Infidel Pride has a fondness for "I would make allies with Islam" Ann Coulter.

Then again when your highest priority is the divisive, rip America apart, "culture war" against gays and women (hmmm, the inherent misogyny in homophobia has it's counterpart in Islam) I can understand how radical fascists (they aren't true conservatives) would be temperamentally associative with Islam.. when it comes to family values (patriarchial hegemony) they really aren't that much different in philosophy, sentiment and ideology.

Secular liberals such as myself tend to look at these radical fascists on the right and compare them to the fascists of Islam and say "heads they win, tails I lose". Why should I back homegrown fascists , who are actually working to marginalize and oppress me, against some foreign fascists whose chances of victory are nil at least in my lifetime.

What stake does a liberal have in the battle between two right wing extremist fascists?

Stonings? Capital punishment for apostasy? Hmm, those are actually the agenda, albeit the hidden agenda, of the Dominionist movement..to which even Catholics and Calvinistic sects, foundations, trusts and churches have signed onto, overtly or unwittingly.

Posted by: Nariz at December 6, 2006 1:28 PM