So many worthy choices. I would have gone with Carter except he's such a wordly guy these days that I felt he'd be better suited for the International division. Plus, he's trying his best to exterminate Israel. Rice and Baker also seem better suited for International Dhimmi for the same reasons. I had to go with Pelosi, the worst of the remaining cretins although they too are worthy of the dishonor-I felt Pelosi goes the extra mile for bringing us the joys of dhimmitude so I felt her efforts should be rewarded.

Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS at December 11, 2006 12:30 PM

My choice would be determined by who has had -- or potentially has -- the most deleterious influence. My trigger finger thus initially twitched toward GW Bush for his two intolerable errors of 1) thinking Muslims desire democracy and 2) his vomitively reiterated mantra "Islam is a religion of peace" coupled with Ramadan celebrations in the White House and the like; but because he has also pursued eminently rational tactics such as trying to treat Muslim prisoners outside of Geneva convention rules, spying on American immigrants and citizens, and monitoring international finances of people without their consent, my finger wavered, and I remembered how influential the disastrously PC Nancy Pelosi will likely become; so:

I vote for:

Nancy Pelosi

Posted by: remote_control at December 11, 2006 12:30 PM

I voted for James Baker cuz he's so amazingly craven, pompous, and dangerous at the same time.

The squalid Jimmy (who's been soiling his underwear all over the map for decades now) is becoming more of a tired joke and less of a virile vigorous Super Dhimmi.

Much more surgical in his operations, James is much more dangerous than Jimmy.

Jimmy, blinded by ignorance and not sated with the creation of the Palestinian Authority and the election of a terrorist government there, now wants to further empower the Palestinans and destroy Israel.

True, that's awesome Dhimmi performance. But James wants to engage the Syrians and Iranians to bring peace to Iraq, and in exchange America will relinquish the Golan Heights.

Now that's suicidally stupid.

Posted by: Alarmed Pig Farmer at December 11, 2006 12:32 PM

Dhimmi Carter deserves a career award and shouldn't be eligible for the annual award.

What makes Baker the winner for 2006 is that, Quisling-like, he is bringing both left and right to accept Carter-like policy.

Posted by: Aaron's Rantblog at December 11, 2006 12:36 PM

No doubt about it it's Jhimmi all the way. And to seal the deal, he's just come out with fresh condemnations of Israel in a brand new book whose title contains both the words "Palestine" and "Apartheid".

Posted by: Jan III Sobieski at December 11, 2006 12:37 PM

Shame on you J. Carter!!!

You should really know what Apartheid is before you throw around such an ugly word.

For shame

Long live Israel!

Posted by: Concerned Canadian at December 11, 2006 12:38 PM

We have some real examples of pure Dhimmitude, where the person really believes it, doesn't just act on it. Carter is perhaps most that way.

However, I voted for Rice because she wants to mindlessly add Turkey to the EU.

Turkey has been the main enemy of Europe for over 500 years. To just give it Europe after all the sacrifice and deaths to stop it is the greatest betrayal.

Posted by: Old Atlantic at December 11, 2006 12:55 PM

And here I thought old Jimmy would never win another election! Good for the old peanut brain.

Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS at December 11, 2006 1:10 PM

This one is the easiest choice. I gave it to Dhimmi Carter for his long career of craven appeasement, incompetent leadership and general boot licking attitude. Pelosi and Baker are also deserving, but they haven't got the resume Carter does.

Posted by: Proud Infidel at December 11, 2006 1:28 PM

I vote for Bush because, as president, he can do the most damage as a dhimmi, and he has done lots by letting in all those saudi exchange students, some of which we know are terrorists in waiting. He has also allowed in and allowed to stay most of the illegals from Mexico. He has also been the highest ranking member of government to declare islam a religion of peace. He is also the up to his ears in saudis and their backroom deals. He has also allowed his administration to become infiltrated with islamic agents from a myriad of islamic organziations.

The others on the list are islamic sympathizers, a different category. A dhimmi is one who caves in to islamic power and demands. The others have not. They promote islam by their own ideology. Bush, is simply a dolt who accepts his islamic oil masters. A true definition of a dhimmi.

Posted by: August22 at December 11, 2006 1:29 PM

Jhimmi Carter deserves much more than 'American Dhimmi of the Year' - he merits a lifetime award
with oak leaf clusters for mendacity and plagiarism. (See the maps he stole from Dennis Ross and used in his new book on Israel)
What a vicious fool...

Posted by: sonnyboy at December 11, 2006 1:31 PM

George Dubya.

Jhimmy Carter and the rest are very worthy choices, but Jhimmi is completely irrelevant and Baker should get the Cy Young. Jhimmi deserves a Lifetimt Achievement Award of Dhimmitude though.

But it is BUSH who is doing all the damage. And let's not forget how close he is with the SOWdis.

Posted by: germaninamerica at December 11, 2006 1:32 PM

1# Nancy Pelosi
2# Jimmy "Dhimmi" Carter
3# Rosie O'Donnell

Posted by: EliasAlucard at December 11, 2006 1:42 PM

I would make the argument that Dean Esmay is far to insignificant an individual to make this list. Unlike the opinions of the others on this list, however misguided they may be, his isn't worth a tinkers dam, and is barely even worthy of ridicule. But I guess the other posters didn't agree.

Posted by: Abu Allah at December 11, 2006 1:50 PM

I voted for Pope Ben, Brigette Gabriel (because I think she is smokin hot to look at), Old Jacques, and Nancy P.....Off the ballot, I would have given mention to Sean Hannity....I am surprised at him....he's as bad as Bush when it comes to the "Islam is a great religion that's been perverted" puke.....He really needs to read the Koran and open his eyes....

Posted by: Oiznop at December 11, 2006 1:52 PM

Dean esmay should not have made the list. Nobody outside these pages has ever heard of him. Only people in the public eye should be on the lists.

Posted by: August22 at December 11, 2006 1:57 PM

Abu Allah and August 22:

I agree re Esmay. He is a pygmy. But again, I went with the most often-nominated people.

Cordially
Robert Spencer

Posted by: jihadwatch at December 11, 2006 1:59 PM

As long as Jimmy is on the list you must vote Jimmy. No matter who or what has happened. He is and will always be the Dhimmi of them all. G.W. should be on the list and is a Dhimmi but no one will ever outshine Mr. Peanut.

In fact the American Dhimmi award should be a Giant Golden Peanut in his honor.

Posted by: greatcometof1577 at December 11, 2006 2:02 PM

'Kind of like Teddy (toad) Kennedy. How long are these "destroyers" going to be around?'~ AIG

Likely until people coming out of the voting booth (just having put them in Again) see Jihadists coming in through the windows.

Posted by: Gary at December 11, 2006 2:13 PM

Had to flip a coin with Bush on one side and Carter on the other. Carter won.

P-l-e-a-s-e retire from public speaking dhim-boy.

Posted by: Sasha at December 11, 2006 2:19 PM

ps
Bush still has a chance to redeem himself. Waiting and watching....

Posted by: Sasha at December 11, 2006 2:19 PM

See the Score!

Jimmy will always win this. Heck he would won this without that stupid book.

Jimmy 62

Others 38

Posted by: greatcometof1577 at December 11, 2006 2:24 PM

Greetings in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, the Lamb of God that takes away the sins of the world.

Whee Hee! All that voting was fun!

Posted by: Stand fast in the liberty at December 11, 2006 2:26 PM

Mr. Spencer should invoke the mercy rule becuase this is getting ugly!

The peanut is unstopable. A true scoring machine!

Posted by: greatcometof1577 at December 11, 2006 2:28 PM

Pelosi's damage will occur NEXT year, when she becomes Speaker.

This year, it has to be James Earl Carter and his new book, the culmination of 26 years as an Ex-President relentlessly demonizing Israel.

Posted by: Cornelius at December 11, 2006 2:51 PM

Jimmy Carter, without any doubt

Posted by: Daffersd at December 11, 2006 3:03 PM

George Bush because he is in the leadership position to alert and positively influence the nation, but has been pulling the wool over our eyes instead.

Posted by: Gabriel_the_American at December 11, 2006 3:18 PM

Jimmy's ahead with a clear majority. Cool! In fact, my top choices for both "top" dhimmi catagories are "winning."

I still have a ways to go with my top anti-dhimmi nominees, though.

Posted by: yohannbiimu at December 11, 2006 3:19 PM

I hope that the total number of votes are posted for this.

Posted by: yohannbiimu at December 11, 2006 3:20 PM

This was hands down the most difficult test I have ever taken in my entire life. Using standard test-taking technique, I was able to cross dubya off the list right away, because he at least made an effort to break free of his dhimmitude... But how on earth does one differentiate between the rest????

Okay, I can narrow it down to Dhimmi Carter, Condi & BaKKKer. I would vote for all 3 if I could, but I will give the nod to Carter because, for him, it certainly is a lifetime achievement!

Posted by: Dum Dhimmi Dum Dum Dum at December 11, 2006 3:32 PM

We should send them all t-shirts with the phrase, "We're not worthy" because no matter how much groveling they do toward Mucca and the religion of piss, they are still infidels until they convert.

Former President Carter doesn't have the sense to understand that appeasement never works with bullys or terrorists.

James Baker is practically a Saudi lobbyist and his Iraq report, no doubt, pleases his masters very much.

Nambla Pelosi serves whichever master can advance her political aspirations and elevate her above the masses. Her chief goal is self-aggrandizement at the expense of the inconsequential, little people whose values and beliefs prevent them from selling out to the puppet masters.

Condoleeza Rice needs to reexamine her dhimmi-placations and self-flagellations. Terrorists (Palestinians included) have nothing in common with the Civil Rights Movement. Rosa Parks never packed dynamite.

With leaders like this, who needs enemies?

Posted by: BurkasforHitlery at December 11, 2006 3:38 PM

Dhimmi Carter

Posted by: VileInfidelNeocon at December 11, 2006 3:40 PM

Wow, Jimmy's lead just keeps growing. I wonder if he can make it to 70% by the time the polls close...

Posted by: yohannbiimu at December 11, 2006 4:07 PM

His lead was 62% when I voted, and now it's 65%.

Posted by: yohannbiimu at December 11, 2006 4:08 PM

No doubt about it it's Jhimmi all the way. And to seal the deal, he's just come out with fresh condemnations of Israel in a brand new book whose title contains both the words "Palestine" and "Apartheid".
Posted by: Jan III Sobieski

LIFETIME "JHIMMI-CUP" ACHIEVEMENT AWARD for the ol' Corn Cracker. He obviously has lost what mental facilities he ever had. And yaser AraFART is his ghostwriter.

Try SOWdi Arabia for an Apartheid State, Jhimmi!!!

I don't care how old you are, I'd love to SLAP you!

Long live "Bad Boy" Israel!! Just kidding about the Bad Boy part.. :-)

Posted by: germaninamerica at December 11, 2006 4:19 PM

My vote goes to GW Bush for being America's worst ever wartime President. First, he told people to go shopping rather than become engaged against the worldwide caliphate scourge. Then he babbled for years that "Islam is the Religion of Peace" despite all evidence to the contrary.

Bush has celebrated Ramadan in the White House, for heaven sake. Imagine if FDR had used the White House to welcome Japanese or Nazi militarists in 1942. Of course, Roosevelt never would have considered being hospitable to enemies during wartime.

All the while Bush has left our borders wide open for terrorists and Mexicans.

Posted by: Dana at December 11, 2006 4:35 PM

I saw the nominations, but how does Carter's book on Palestine trump the Baker commission's recommendation that this Administration play footsie with Iran and Syria? I'm disappointed at the current trends.

Come on, guys, more votes for BaKKKer.

Posted by: Infidel Pride at December 11, 2006 4:45 PM

I know some may have expected me to vote for someone else...but this time, I have to vote for George W Bush, hands down.
Carter?...sourpussed loser who can't let go & was responsible for allowing islamo-fascism to proliferate...most of us laugh at him anyway.

James Baker?...his goal is to remain a relevant good-ole-boy in the american apparatchick of washington beltway politics. No cigar...

Esmay is merely a militant hyperpolitical partisan & qualifies for articles of treason & sedition...well beyond the scope of this poll.
An islami-commie brown shirt punk. Nope...

Nancy Pelosi...she's more involved in her own turf wars and not as pro-maniac as appears (although she is not in americas best interest, but for different reasons). She'll self-implode on her own. Nah...

Condi?...a Foreign Minister by another name, her rhetoric does obfuscate, but if push comes to shove, she's on Israels side, although she's only doing the bidding of her boss...which comes to the brass tacks.

George W Bush...I hate to say it, but his naivete is beyond colossal. He should know better than to try and accommodate some of those lunatics, especially some who have been invited to the White House. Although he maintains his position with iran, his attitude with the rest of them is beyond atrocious.
For the American President to do such things is irresponsible, naive, and downright suicidal, not only for our nation, but for western civilization in general.
His achilles heel isn't kissing up to them...his fatal flaw is POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.
The kicker is...I voted for him both times (not because he was the best, but the lesser of the evils. Had Joe Liebermann ran against him W would have LOST, and W even admits it too).

Hey...the shoe fits. Sorry.

Posted by: jcom972 at December 11, 2006 4:53 PM

Wow, read this attack by Deannio "you're a traitor if you disagree with me!!!111" esmay

they gather together a bunch of ersatz "research" that they intentionally slant in a particular way, then they demand that you "debate" them. When you refuse to play their head games, they then triumphantly announce victory.

Wow, that's pretty much his playbook on the HIV/AIDS link. He cites some discredited researcher (just one mind you) and demands you debate him; when you disprove all his arguments he gets spitting mad.

What a loser the Repo man Esmay is.

Posted by: Scorpius at December 11, 2006 5:05 PM

James "Abu" Bakr made a good last minute push with the Bakr report, but Dhimmi Carter's body of work prevails.

Posted by: Jan Sobieski at December 11, 2006 5:12 PM

Does the Update indicate that someone at JW is campaigning for Esmay? I wonder why, he's such a deserving feller.

He deserves it, but there should be a different category. One especially for the Esmays of the world. Perhaps there could be an award in the category called Shill for Islam.

Posted by: Pelayo at December 11, 2006 5:14 PM

Dean is trying to fire up the faithful rightnow over in his "world" to storm the walls jihadwatch. This pathetic attempt will fail and Robert "The Bruce" Spencer will lay a beat down not seen since the Battle of Bannockburn.

To the walls men and Mr. Spencer if anyone captures Dean can we ransom him or just let him go?

Posted by: greatcometof1577 at December 11, 2006 5:16 PM

greatcometof1577,

As an uneducated, former Repo man I think Deannio is pretty worthless.

Posted by: Scorpius at December 11, 2006 5:39 PM

Gotta be Dubya, based upon the same criteria I used for the Internationale edition of Dhimmi. Recall his failure to detain certain Saudi nationals for questioning following 9/11. Recall his support of the UAE takeover of US portland management. Recall his ill-conceived invasion of Iraq with its shifting objectives: first to find WMDs followed by a Crusade -can I say that word?- to bring democracy to the benighted Iraqi people.

The other candidates are fools. Dubya is a fool and a knave.

Posted by: Chatillon at December 11, 2006 5:53 PM

ps
Bush still has a chance to redeem himself. Waiting and watching....
Posted by: Sasha

Yes, he's on the fast track to redemption. He's got Jhimmi Bakkker in his ear.. islam is a religion of peace.. iftar dinners at the Ramada Inn.. I mean the White House... handholding and buttkissing the sheiks every chance he gets.

Oh yes, he's redeeming himself trather nicely in the eyes of his investors, er i meant his masters.

Sorry, I am very disappointed how few votes this foolish and so very dangerous man is getting. He's like the captain of the Titanic. Iceberg? what iceberg? At least the iceberg hadn't lined the sad captain's pockets.

Bush has clearly done the most damage. all the candidates are obvously in worthy contention. But Carter is merely a foil for the much more insidious minion GW Bush. The worst that Dhimmi Cater can do is build mosks-for-humanity..

Better NOT give him any ideas. He MAY just do it.

How can you NOT vote for Dubya considering his many misdeeds and his position of power. A position he could have used for good but instead he sold what soul he had to the SOWdevils.

Posted by: germaninamerica at December 11, 2006 6:30 PM

What makes Baker the winner for 2006 is that, Quisling-like, he is bringing both left and right to accept Carter-like policy.
Posted by: Aaron's Rantblog

Sorry, Aaron but that isn't due to Baker's skillz but rather to the fact that both left and right have no morals and they bothy are looking for the easy way out - Israel and the American people be damned.

George Dubya for DHIMMI Americano!!!

Posted by: germaninamerica at December 11, 2006 6:33 PM

WOW! Dhimmi Carter's cracked the two-thirds mark with 66% of the vote. Can he make it to 70%?

Posted by: yohannbiimu at December 11, 2006 6:40 PM

Carter's views are more objectionable than Bush's, but given that no-one listens to him, he's more like Esmay in that regard. Vile, but irrelevant.

Bush gets it. (my vote for Dhimmi of the year, that is)

Posted by: special_guest at December 11, 2006 6:41 PM

AIG...

...just keep in mind.
The record in time will show W got there by what he has FAILED to do...the rest got there by deliberate, intentional and malicious means.

Posted by: jcom972 at December 11, 2006 6:53 PM

germaninamerica

I was about to disagree with you but after some thought.....I don't know....

Now I think about it...God they both are really are stupid...

How depressing...

Posted by: greatcometof1577 at December 11, 2006 7:01 PM

Dhimmi Carter.

Posted by: Foehammer at December 11, 2006 7:34 PM

Dhimmi Carter.
Posted by: Foehammer

Just remember this.. lifetime Dhimmi Carter never fooled anyone.. MUCH unlike that slick and PC bumble-Bush.

I don't think even Dhimmi Carter had moslems in the White House to help them in breaking their fasting rituals.

When Carter got elected there was another choice. Each time Bush got in the choice was: Either I vote for Bush or I don't vote at all. I am glad I made the best possible choice.

Posted by: germaninamerica at December 11, 2006 7:49 PM

It's always Jimmah for me on this one.

Posted by: pigtails not veils at December 11, 2006 8:03 PM

Finally, an election Jimmy can win, heh.

Posted by: kevin at December 11, 2006 8:56 PM

I hope that JC proudly shows to accept his award. BTW, is there a cash prize that goes with this? (Kinda like the Nobel Prize?)

Posted by: yohannbiimu at December 11, 2006 9:05 PM

l voted for Carter, he perhaps should be retired and or have his very own catergory. He is the ultimate traitor of the US and free world. l truly dispise this man even more than Chirac, as he was raised in the US and should know better. Carter should know that the US is a great country, the ones wearing the "white hats", but he is most liberal looney around.
Truly this man was the worst president, remember him wearing those warm sweaters, telling people how to stay warm! He was such a downer, and depressing man. With Regan coming right after with his optimitic view of the greatness of the US and its citizens, for what ever mistakes he may have done, he could not of been more opposite of the failed presidency of Carter.

Posted by: ZenaWarriorPrincess at December 11, 2006 10:06 PM

I voted for Dhimmi Carter! No further explaination needed.

Posted by: littlegreenfeetball at December 12, 2006 2:54 AM

Dean Esmay needs to be in a separate category with Cindy Sheehan, and Adam Gadahn as "most feeble, worthless, and/or pitiful, dhimmi making the loudest noise" award.

Posted by: Xero G at December 12, 2006 2:56 AM

I think putting Dean himself on that list is a bit ott. There have been times when one has wondered about him in regards to these things. However it does not warrant him to be in such inaugust company. One does have to wonder why so many people who comment on this site have such a loathing for him when there are far more dhimmi sites about than his.

I voted for Carter as he was the only natural choice.

Posted by: Andrew Ian Dodge at December 12, 2006 5:51 AM

Andrew Ian Dodge:

I noted in the original post that the inclusion of Esmay was ridiculous, but that I followed the number of nominations.

As for the "loathing," if you read the history of our exchanges, some of which are linked in the update above, you will see that Mr. Esmay has engaged in an unprovoked and unremitting campaign of the most vile slander against me personally and flagrant falsehoods about the work I am trying to do. If he expects to win any friends this way, well, perhaps he should try a different tack.

Cordially
Robert Spencer

Posted by: jihadwatch at December 12, 2006 6:38 AM

Well, as an Esmayite, I'll do my best not to slaver. Anyway, Esmayites and Spencerites alike, we all believe primarily in individual freedom. As voluble as they've been (often unnecessarily, on both sides), the differences are mostly in terms of how best to preserve those freedoms.

I don't always agree with Dean, and I think a lot of what Jihad Watch does is useful, as the media is largely too frightened and/or PC to take on Muslim extremists. OTOH, I think some of it is counterproductive or inflammatory, and tends to push moderate Muslims away from the liberal ideals we hope Muslims as a whole will embrace to a greater degree.

"Unlike Mr. Esmay, we believe in free speech"

LOL Come on now, you're starting to sound a bit like DU. I don't think Dean has advocated locking anyone up.

Posted by: TallDave at December 12, 2006 10:56 AM

Mr. TallDave:

I was referring to the fact that Mr. Esmay does not allow comments in support of me and my positions, including those that would correct his numerous and relentless slanders and carpet-chewing, wild-eyed personal attacks, at his website.

Cordially
Robert Spencer

Posted by: jihadwatch at December 12, 2006 11:05 AM

"Unlike Mr. Esmay, we believe in free speech"

LOL Come on now, you're starting to sound a bit like DU.

Or Brian Macker.

Posted by: Veeshir at December 12, 2006 2:38 PM

TallDave: if Esmay is, indeed, censoring "Spencerite" comments on his blog - and he is - then he does, categorically, not believe in free speech. There's no getting around this. Come to the light, brother. ;)

Geoff

Posted by: Geoff at December 13, 2006 1:39 AM

You left out Michael Moore (who calls the insurgents who are murdering our soldiers "Minutemen") and Cindy Sheehan, along with the administration of Georgetown University (now known as Hoyastan or Hoyastine because of its acceptance of money from Al-Waleed bin Talal and hosting the International Solidarity Movement in February).

Jimmy Carter is definitely my choice from the six options, though. A real Kumbaya-singer and loser.

Posted by: Winged Hussar 1683 at December 13, 2006 2:26 AM

Geoff,

Glenn Reynolds does not allow comments on his site at all. Does he not believe in free speech? Meryl Yourish does not allow anti-Israel comments on her site, does she not believe in free speech?

The thing is that you can always write your own views on your own blog. However no one has the 'right' to say whatever they like on someone else's blog. Its just not a free speech issue.

Posted by: Kav at December 13, 2006 6:35 AM