Can I write-in Jimmy Carter?

Posted by: garyford99 at December 11, 2006 12:31 PM

Oops sorry, I saw that Carter is already covered (and indeed in the lead) in the American Dhimmi poll.

Posted by: garyford99 at December 11, 2006 12:33 PM

Another tough one-Chavez almost seems like a Muslim the way he sucks up to them but Chirac has done so much to dhimmify France that it's more of the ummah than not. If nothing else, he's easily the worst French politician since the immortal Pierre Laval.

Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS at December 11, 2006 12:34 PM

I voted Chavez. His marionette performance at the UN was very apt. a stupid ignoramous mocking a stupid ignoramous institution like the UN. that was must see TV for sure!

Posted by: Concerned Canadian at December 11, 2006 12:36 PM

I think Jacques Chirac takes the cake, or the madeleine, as the case may be.

Posted by: remote_control at December 11, 2006 12:38 PM

Chavez, whom I've referred to as a "vassal of the Sultan," gets my vote, but I won't deny Jacques Chirac is very deserving.

Posted by: Jan III Sobieski at December 11, 2006 12:43 PM

Hard to pick just one, but I pick Al-Chirac. His dhimmitude is destroying France. Also has been anti-American and anti-Israel.

Posted by: Sasha at December 11, 2006 12:49 PM

Many excellent choices, including Chirac. Blair last week said that it was a perversion of Islam what bin Laden believes, and all the others.

This is the sort of useful idiot pablum that qualifies for Dhimmitude. Blair's father was a communist and then converted to being a conservative.

This presents an interesting parallel to Bush Sr./Jr.

Posted by: Old Atlantic at December 11, 2006 12:58 PM

Why is Chavez on there? His actions are not stupid for him and are quite consistent with his other efforts. Chavez's anti-Americanism (and therefore his jihadi sympathizing) is a critical component of what keeps him in power. This is in stark contrast to Chirac.

Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at December 11, 2006 1:00 PM

Karen Armstrong needs a Lifetime Achievement award in dhimmitude.

Posted by: 3812Michelle at December 11, 2006 1:10 PM

This is THE toughest of the polls. All of them have earned their Dhimmi stripes over and over. I went with Chirac because he's truly fiddling while Paris burns.

Posted by: Proud Infidel at December 11, 2006 1:23 PM

Got to be Tony BLiar. We know wht Chirac is. Bliar is a stealth Dhimmi of major proportions.

BRING BACK MAGGIE!!!!

Posted by: germaninamerica at December 11, 2006 1:26 PM

I can't believe Prince Charles isn't on this list. The ultimate dhimmi tool. Other than that, I'm on board with all the other no. 1 choices made on the other surveys.

Posted by: No1 Infidel at December 11, 2006 1:30 PM

Easily Hugo Chavez.

Posted by: EliasAlucard at December 11, 2006 1:43 PM

Alas my choice did make the list in this category. Come on Kofi Annan is a Dhimmi if there ever was one but we can't win them all. So I chose Karen Armstrong (she is the most annoying) but any of the others like Jacques Chirac would be good.

Posted by: greatcometof1577 at December 11, 2006 2:15 PM

http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1165506764231&pagename=Zone-English-News/NWELayout

Given the recent action above, I suggest that people voting for Blair reconsider.

If a Republican '08 Presidential Candidate I could trust (anybody except McCain) issued a similar statement, he or she would have my vote.

Posted by: JSobieski at December 11, 2006 2:32 PM

Jacques gets my vote.

The others are lightweights by comparison, mere imposters.

Jacques rolled up his sleeves years ago, and went to the sweaty labor of laying the foundation for the total and final collapse of Western Civiliation, and the freedom it spawned.

EAD.

Posted by: Alarmed Pig Farmer at December 11, 2006 2:47 PM

Considering that French policemen are ordered to run away rather than confront criminals, I would consider Jacques Chirac and France effectively subdued and dhimmitized.

Posted by: twoCents at December 11, 2006 2:56 PM

Why is Koran Armstrong on the list?

She is a 'revert'- a traitor to her nation, an agent of desinformation and above all else a shill for Islam.

Give her the 'Azzzzhole of the year award'- but as a Muhammedan she is not a Dhimmi, but a slave of Allah....

Posted by: sheik yer'mami at December 11, 2006 2:59 PM

Chavez has my vote.

Posted by: Daffersd at December 11, 2006 3:05 PM

All of the above surely, but if I must pick one it will be Chirac who sits twiddling his thumbs while his country burns.

Posted by: km at December 11, 2006 3:06 PM

As the guy who first nominated Jacques Chirac, I am PROUD to see that MY BOY is leading in the polls. It's too bad that he isn't winning as roundly as Jimmy Carter is on the American Dhimmi Award portion of it. Chirac is the personification of dhimmitude, IMPO. Nobody else in the world can touch him.

Posted by: yohannbiimu at December 11, 2006 3:25 PM

I agree with the guy who suggested that Prince Chuck should be up there. He makes Tony Blair look like Rambo in comparison.

Posted by: yohannbiimu at December 11, 2006 3:29 PM

but didnt CHIRAC stand up to little girls and their head scarves? Thats pretty "macho" for a frenchmen isnt it??

Posted by: deanayer at December 11, 2006 3:37 PM

http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1165506764231&pagename=Zone-English-News/NWELayout

Given the recent action above, I suggest that people voting for Blair reconsider.

If a Republican '08 Presidential Candidate I could trust (anybody except McCain) issued a similar statement, he or she would have my vote.
Posted by: JSobieski

I'm not convinced. He's said a lot of other stuff in direct contradiction of the above. And his actions speak louder than his words. He's always visiting some mosk or other. And look what Britain has turned into in the few short years of Bliar's rule!

Posted by: germaninamerica at December 11, 2006 3:54 PM

Tony Blair, hands down. He has the brains and speaking ability to be the Churchill of the 21st century -- but not the spine, alas.

Absolutely the biggest disappointment in western leadership, period.

Posted by: Dana at December 11, 2006 4:19 PM

Has to be Chavez. He's even using the language of jihad.

Posted by: Cornelius at December 11, 2006 4:21 PM

GIA I AG-ree.

""Our tolerance is part of what makes Britain Britain. So conform to it; or don't come here," Blair"

If he stopped immigration and deported those who don't coform to it, that would be anti-Dhimmi.

It would be better to stop immigration and say nothing.

Posted by: Old Atlantic at December 11, 2006 4:28 PM

Actually I wanted to select Katie Koran of our NBC news network, but since she's not on it...
Hmmm, Karen Armstrong is close, but she's just a dhimmi-WIT...

I vote ole' "blaque jacques(off)" chirac...not only does he have his head so far up their anal cavities he can't see the light for all the deep s(fecal matter)t but has been #1 in backdoor oil deals with the islamists since the 90s in blatant violation of the UN resolutions dealing with Iraq & the oil-for-food scandal...and got a free pass at that, too. (and that's not even counting the domestic islamist uprisings in his own country-my hats off to the people there for standing up to those islamofascist maniacs).

With "friends" like "blaque jacques", we in the US don't need enemies.

:-)

Posted by: jcom972 at December 11, 2006 4:38 PM

Again, what did Chirac, Blair, Zapatero or Armstrong do this year? Also, doesn't Armstrong qualify more in the US Dhimmi category?

Posted by: Infidel Pride at December 11, 2006 4:47 PM

For my criteria, I look to Dante and his Circles of Hell, the lowest being reserved for the treacherous, the level above going to fraud artists of various kinds and the level above that going to perpetrators of violence either through direct physical violence or violence in spirit. Even with this helpful guideline, it is so hard to judge between these worthy candidates.

Nevertheless, it would seem that Jacques Chirac is well-positioned to lead the pack to the bottom of the Pit. His continued support of policy putting Western culture at risk cannot be viewed as anything but treasonous to the ideals of Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite. These sentiments are for all or they are for none. They are needed in the Moslem world more than anywhere else, yet Chirac leads France's advance to the rear in this campaign. Shame on him.

Posted by: Chatillon at December 11, 2006 5:18 PM

Why can I only vote for the six most-often-nominated people? That's an uncharacteristic limitation on the expression of my opinion. Jihadwatch had not looked like the sort of place where bureaucrats could take control..

I wanted to vote for President Emile Lahoud, a Maronite Christian serving in Lebanon's highest institutional post (which has to be filled, constitutionally, by a Christian) but whose dhimmitude has made him the Uncle Tom watchdog of the Muslim takeover of his country.

Posted by: martyrmaker at December 11, 2006 5:39 PM

Karen Armstrong has to be a muslim no matter what she says.

Posted by: KAOSKTRL at December 11, 2006 6:27 PM

why is jack chirac even considered to be a dhimmi when he is trying to prevent Turkey from joining the EU? jack chriac has also critsised Turkey on its human rights unlike other countrys

Posted by: Greek Gurl at December 11, 2006 6:35 PM

I'm rather disappointed that Chirac is only polling 31% of the vote. In my eyes he's the biggest dhimmi breathing. I can't imagine a head of state being as big a p*ssy as he is when it comes to the threat his country faces. I also can't imagine a head of state screwing up as badly in attending to the wrong "enemies" (the USA and Israel) as this guy has.

He's got to get at least one-third of the vote.

Posted by: yohannbiimu at December 11, 2006 6:37 PM

All of those are very tempting choices guys, but Senior Zapatero easily got my vote because he is as bad as Chirac, and may be in for another term, while Chirac will be replaced by Segoleyne Royale or Nicholas Sarkozy so is no longer of any consequence.

Posted by: NicephorusPhocas at December 11, 2006 7:32 PM

Kofi Annan.

Posted by: Foehammer at December 11, 2006 7:36 PM

Karen Armstrong.

I almost voted for Chirac- the leader of France does have great influence for good or bad. But Armstrong apologizes for Islam in the soft, syrupy style that so many digest. Her books are front & center in bookstores and libraries...

Hence, my vote.

Posted by: Foreign at December 11, 2006 7:42 PM

I was looking for Kofi Annan but he didn't make it on the list. I had a hard time with this one and couldn't choose between Chirac and Chavez. Can I vote twice? :) I went with Chavez.

Posted by: pigtails not veils at December 11, 2006 7:58 PM

I vote for Prime Minister Surayud Chulanont of Thailand, a muslim who who overthrew the democratically elected goverment of Buddhist Thailand and immediately offered Muslim Thais of the south Sharia law and autonomy resulting in the present mass murder and ethnic cleansing of Thai and Chinese in order to establish this autonomous Islamic region that threatens the stability of the entire region.

Posted by: laosuwan at December 11, 2006 8:43 PM

This category is very difficult, since all the nominees are so good. I chose Zapatero (the contrast with Aznar couldn't be more stark), but Chirac, currently leading, is deserving too.

Posted by: tvdog at December 11, 2006 8:49 PM

I vote for Manmohan singh who proclaimed that muslims deserve first preference in India

Posted by: Shyamsunder at December 11, 2006 9:40 PM

laosuwan said:

"I vote for Prime Minister Surayud Chulanont of Thailand, a muslim..."

That in itself disqualifies him, because he is a Muslim. Dhimmis are non-Muslims who postrate themselves to Muslims, and go out of their way dignify Islam to the rest of the world. They also go out of their way to attack those who DARE resist Islamic attempts to forcefully cause others to submit to them.

As a Muslim, Surayud Chulanont cannot be a dhimmi. He can offer his foot for dhimmis to kiss--that's a huge difference.

Posted by: yohannbiimu at December 11, 2006 9:43 PM

it just occurs to me that since Prime Minister Surayud Chulanont is a muslim he cannot be a dhimmi, so I withdraw the nomination.

Instead may I propose Tulsathit Taptim editor of the Nation Newspaper in Bangkok, who published this ridiculous editorial encouraging Thais to look to Aceh Indonesia as an example of how to obtain peace with separatists and is typical of their peace at any price dhimmi approach to islam...

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2005/07/19/opinion/index.php?news=opinion_18070241.html

EDITORIAL: Lessons of peace in Indonesia
Published on July 19, 2005

Thailand would do well to learn from the accord struck between the Susilo government and the Free Aceh Movement.

A long-awaited peace agreement between the government of Indonesia and rebels in Aceh province was finally concluded over the weekend with both sides saying that they would sign the agreement next month. Both parties emerged from the meeting triumphant because both understood the importance of compromise. Credit must be given to all parties. First of all, it should go to Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, who changed his position on whether the Indonesian political system would allow the establishment of a local political party. By diverting from a long-held position in order to compromise, he was able to make substantial progress in the talks, as this was the final obstacle standing in the way of the two parties inking this historic accord. Susilo is a confident leader compared to his predecessors and his success is tied to the fact that he has taken an entirely different approach to the peace talks than any of them.

Representatives from the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) were confident that they could do business with the Indonesian government and this confidence was certainly a major factor in the meeting’s ultimate success.

Leaders of GAM also showed that the movement has grown more pragmatic and resilient over the years since its formation in 1976.

While the details of the agreement have yet to be released, it is clear that Indonesia has agreed to allow GAM to set up a political party and take part in Indonesia’s democratic process. Such a move would provide the rebels with a certain degree of autonomy and latitude.

If this agreement proves successful upon implementation, it can be used as a model to serve for other restless outlying regions of Indonesia such as West Papua.

In 2003, GAM and the Indonesian government agreed to a cease-fire, but the peace deal collapsed due to growing suspicions on both sides. The tsunami on December 26, 2004, which tore through the region and hit Indonesia and Thailand particularly hard, also served to weaken GAM. Many of its members, including those in hiding and collaborators, were killed in the tsunami and their bases in the troubled province wiped out.

Rehabilitation and recovery efforts in Aceh have been painfully slow and the human toll wrought on the area incredible. However, if there is to be one positive coming out of this catastrophe, it is that it drove GAM and the government of Indonesia to the table to end a 30-year conflict that has cost more than 15,000 lives.

Of course, the accord reached between GAM and the Indonesian government in Helsinki may just be an isolated agreement, as the peace talks in Sri Lanka, where government forces are battling Tamil guerrillas in areas affected by the tsunami, has yet to produce the same results. That situation may change in coming weeks. Hopes are high, however, that representatives on both sides will put their differences behind them and negotiate a cease-fire in order to get on with the massive humanitarian aid effort needed, which so far has been hampered by the fighting.

Thailand can learn some valuable lessons from the experience of our Indonesian neighbours. For years Indonesia was in a state of denial regarding issues of internal strife. Then Jakarta chose to enter into negotiations which resulted in the independence of East Timor in 2000.

Conflict in Thailand’s southern region has been going on for at least four centuries and the daily reports of violence serve to remind us all that without proper dialogue and a workable framework for conflict resolution the conflict in the South will continue indefinitely. Increasingly sophisticated militants are becoming more likely to go for broke in their attacks, making the threat one that holds the promise of intensifying, rather than fading.

As the conflict in the South wears on, the underlying cause behind all of the violence remains the same – locals there are tired of injustice and their lack of participation in the political process and in the daily goings on in the troubled South.

Posted by: laosuwan at December 11, 2006 9:44 PM

well its three for three, l totally dispeise Chirac, he is yesterday's hasebin, belongs in a museum of tired old traitors. please let someone with old real French warrior bloodline arise from the ashes.

Posted by: ZenaWarriorPrincess at December 11, 2006 10:00 PM

Read THIS if you don't think it's Tony BLiar! I am stunned he's only got a measly 6%. We've got much work to do my fellow 6%!

Blair: 'Muslim may be PM'
Tony Blair, ballyhood "rejection of multiculturalism" notwithstanding, demonstrates that he still doesn't have a clue about political Islam. An interview by Anila Baig in The Sun (thanks to all who sent this in):

A MUSLIM could one day be Prime Minister, Tony Blair said last night.
Speaking exclusively to The Sun, the PM said: “They said there would never be a woman Prime Minister, but there was. It would depend on how good they were.

“The people would judge who was best for the job.”

The Premier also said he would not mind if any of his children wanted to marry a Muslim, saying: "I would respect it, if that was their decision and they were in love and happy."

Posted by: germaninamerica at December 11, 2006 11:07 PM

Read THIS if you don't think it's Tony BLiar! I am stunned he's only got a measly 6%. We've got much work to do my fellow 6%!

The Premier also said he would not mind if any of his children wanted to marry a Muslim, saying: "I would respect it, if that was their decision and they were in love and happy."

Posted by: germaninamerica

Yes, I'm surprised he didn't get more votes. This was a very tough one. I just kept seeing that ugly Chavez with his display at the U.N. and I couldn't help it.
You are right about Bliar though.

Posted by: pigtails not veils at December 11, 2006 11:28 PM

I'm very sad to see Tony Blair's named here. He is still our best and probably only European ally. He also paid a heavy price for his support to the US in the war in Iraq. That's too bad. I would have thought that someone like Jimmy Carter and definitely Bill Clinton deserved to be on this list. Al Qaeda thrived under Mr Clinton's watch and 9/11 was being plotted at the same time he was apologizing to the entire world for America's "crimes". He is the dhimmi incarnate. Also, what about the Spanish people who buckled at the first terrorist attack or the Dutch Prime Minister (forgot her name) who stripped Ayaan Hirsi Ali of her Dutch citizenship. How about the NY Times editor? Can you be more dhimmi than that? Mr Blair's name does not belong on this list. I respectfully disagree. I can name 20 other names that deserve this title far more than him.

Posted by: Mishka at December 12, 2006 12:05 AM

I'm very sad to see Tony Blair's named here. He is still our best and probably only European ally. He also paid a heavy price for his support to the US in the war in Iraq. That's too bad. I would have thought that someone like Jimmy Carter and definitely Bill Clinton deserved to be on this list.
Mishka

That's why I didn't pick Blair because he has still been a strong ally to us in this war.
Not to worry about Jimmah Carter though, he made another list.
Cheers

Posted by: pigtails not veils at December 12, 2006 1:01 AM

Is it too late to nominate Kofi Annan? Being a follower of the true religion, I guess he is disqualified by the definition of dhimmitude, but still...

Posted by: Vagn Henning at December 12, 2006 5:50 AM

I vote for the spanish PM José Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, aka Mr. Bean. You can't tell if he's evil or only stupid, but his way of dealing with terrorist in general is suicidal.
He started the "Alliance of Civilizations" ("Alliance of the Incivilizated") that counts with Iran and Turkey as main supporters, and belongs to an anti-christian party that prefers the increasing of privileges por islamist people in Spain at the same time that the ones for christian people decrease very fast.

One vote more for the "Bobo Solemne" (the "Solemn Asshole").

Posted by: Mister X at December 12, 2006 2:46 PM

Just tried out something very funny. Made a little trip through the communities with a head scarve. I dare say I never found so much respect for my little person in my whole life if not to say: Cowardiceness and arsecreeping. Instead of the usual hatred I saw fear in their eyes. I vote for "Europa" as the international dhim until I hear or see a single person breaking out.

Posted by: avraaam at December 12, 2006 4:14 PM

P.S.: If I continue this fashion maybe I can marry one of Blair`s children or those of another rich idiot who thus hopes to save his precious little life?

Posted by: avraaam at December 12, 2006 4:18 PM

7% for Tony Blair??? Is that all? I'm disgusted! Forget Chirac - he's French; he can't help surrendering.

Blair, on the other hand, is dhimmi by choice. Ignore the blowhard rhetoric and the ridiculous cowboy walk - they're a legacy of too many weekends at the Bush ranch.

This is the guy who, after 7/7 - the worst terrorist atrocity in British history - told us that "the rules had changed". For a start, preachers of hate would be kicked out of the country. SEVENTEEN months later, and the number of hate preachers that have been kicked out is precisely ZERO (Don't count Omar Bakri - he scurried away of his own accord, the snivelling lard-arsed coward).

Blair weighed up the potential benefits of taking action - fewer "community leaders" to stoke up tensions, fewer organised hate rallies, greater national security.

Then he considered the potential costs - Muslim protests, charges of "Islamophobia", a backlash from Muslims voters at election time (85% of Pakistani and Bangladeshi Muslims in UK who do vote, vote Labour). And he bottled it. He put votes before security; his career before our safety.

He also introduced the cringeing Religious Hatred Law after Muslim requests for one AND backed down on outlawing forced marriages. And then he boasted that Britain may one day have a Muslim PM! What more does he have to do to earn your contempt?

Posted by: Matamoros at December 12, 2006 7:37 PM

"Forget Chirac - he's French; he can't help surrendering." ROTFL!

French terror alert levels:
(1) Run ("Sauve qui peut!")
(2) Hide
(3) Surrender ("Je me rends!")
(4) Collaborate
(5) Convert to Islam and bow to Mecca

I nominate Kofi Annan as either a dhimmi or a willful collaborator. Willful collaborator sounds far more likely.

Posted by: Winged Hussar 1683 at December 13, 2006 2:31 AM

"7% for Tony Blair??? Is that all? I'm disgusted! Forget Chirac - he's French; he can't help surrendering."

Hmmmm...interesting presupposition. So, you say that surrendering is the knee-jerk reaction particular to French people, when hostile foreigners appear in their front yard? Hmmmm...I know that's what they did in 1940, but they actually DID send hundreds, and hundreds, and hundreds, and hundreds, and hundreds, and hundreds, and hundreds, and hundreds, and hundreds, and hundreds, and hundreds, and hundreds, and hundreds, and hundreds, and hundreds, and hundreds, and hundreds of thousands of their countrymen to their deaths on the Western Front back in 1914-18.

The French didn't ALWAYS react so cowardly to adversity. I also recall a time when the French conquered most of Europe...

Posted by: yohannbiimu at December 13, 2006 6:20 PM