| FrontPageMag.com | Articles By Robert Spencer | Articles By Hugh Fitzgerald | Books | Islam 101 | Qur'an Blog | Robert Spencer Bio |  |
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Hush up, Alan
Hannity and even Colmes (video at Hot Air) try to pin him down about Iraq and about his attendance at pro-Hizballah rallies, but Colmes makes a key mistake when he asks him if he attended such rallies in Washington, when in fact they were in Dearborn. [CORRECTION: A commenter below says that Colmes mentioned Dearborn; sorry I missed it.]
A few quotes I dashed down:
"You talkin' to me?"
"I am generally against any occupation." Hmm. What occupation might he have in mind? "Any evil party. Any occupier occupying innocent people, an innocent land, and suck the wealth of the nation, whether that it is Middle East or somewhere else, generally."
Is Hizballah a terrorist organization? Simple yes or no question. "Hizballah is a Lebanese organization and I got nothing to do with that." Hannity returned to this one and never got a satisfactory answer.
Note the pattern: CAIR officials have danced around similar questions, as has Cat Stevens. This is becoming a handy guide to pseudo-moderation: if someone suddenly finds straight answers hard to come by when asked if he thinks a particular jihad group is a terrorist group, his moderation may not be all it is cracked up to be.
Meanwhile, neither Hannity nor Colmes asked him if he was referring to Israel as an occupier, which he almost certainly was, or made any reference at all to the call to conversion to Islam and implication that Jews and Christians are among those doomed by God.
And Hot Air also links to a story that mentions how Al-Husainy has in the past conferred with the Bush Pentagon -- a stick Alan Colmes tried to beat Steyn with last night. This was no doubt a result of the fact that Shi'ites were initially enthusiastic supporters of the campaign in Iraq, as Al-Husainy makes clear tonight. They saw that with Saddam out of power and the U.S. instituting "democracy," they had the numbers to seize power. Now that the Americans are waking up to the fact that by aiding the Shi'a they have in effect been abetting the creation of a Shi'ite Arab client state of Iran, the ardor for democracy has cooled among the once enthusiastic Shi'ite Jeffersonians.
UPDATE: Debbie Schlussel has a terrific list of questions Hannity and Colmes could have and should have asked Al-Husainy. If they had, the Imam would almost certainly have been contacted by the American Ballet Theatre.
Posted by Robert at February 8, 2007 10:31 PM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
|
Al-Husainy was spinning, dancing, bobbing and weaving like mad.
It was actually funny, there towards the end, when even Colmes was looking frustrated at not being able to get even one single straight answer out of this guy.
Posted by: JenBee![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.jihadwatch.org/nav-commenters.gif)
at February 8, 2007 11:02 PM
Sometimes I think Chuck Norris has more skill discussing this topic than the regular hosts.
Posted by: Vince at February 8, 2007 11:05 PM
This guy was not even an effective liar, but "Dumb and Dumber" failed to pin him down on anything.
Imagine what Tariq Ramadan could do to H&C.
Posted by: Jan Sobieski at February 8, 2007 11:09 PM
If a list of those "doomed by G-d" were available for his examination, Al-Husainy would be shitting in his pants.
Posted by: pismopal at February 8, 2007 11:09 PM
No doubt my monitor has poor resolution but this is the second pic (or video-catch) in which Colmes appears to be wearing a really ugly, messy black turban!
Posted by: Caroline at February 8, 2007 11:15 PM
Fire them and get intelligent, well-prepared people to engage in what, for intelligent, well-prepared people, is a thankless task and an essentially moronic job. Some will, for these extraordinary times, be willing -- as they would not ordinarily be -- to sacrifice.
Posted by: Hugh at February 8, 2007 11:17 PM
"Now that the Americans are waking up to the fact that by aiding the Shi'a they have in effect been abetting the creation of a Shi'ite Arab client state of Iran, the ardor for democracy has cooled among the once enthusiastic Shi'ite Jeffersonians."
I have to admit I took some mild pleasure in this word play.
Posted by: Malinois at February 8, 2007 11:18 PM
Apparently the questioning emails to Hannity and the execs at Fox lit a bigger fire under the Colmes & Hannity tag team asking why they are plagarists and not bringing on people like Mr. Spencer who actually understands the subject.
Good work to those who emailed Fox.
Posted by: Lame Cherry at February 8, 2007 11:29 PM
Colmes seems to realize the mistake he made in defending this idiot during the past week, and if you look at his facial expressions he seems really embarrassed, perhaps upon the realization that the views that the left categorizes as bigotted and therefore untrue may actually at least sometimes be true. I don't know why this imam agreed to appear, as he did nothing but make a fool of himself. Even Colmes got pissed. If I were a jihadist PR relations advisor I would tell him not to go on, and let people debate about why. But it was a really funny clip.
Posted by: Matityahu613 at February 8, 2007 11:32 PM
You know who he reminded me of? Smoking Joe Frazier ... that's who... all the bobbing and weaving and trying to not get hit by Ali. Only difference is, Frazier, in the middle of all the head weaving and bobbing was throwing solid punches at Ali. The Imam on the other hand was probably KOed within the first 30 seconds of the fight. In that sense, I should probably amend my initial statement. He was more Frank Bruno to Mike Tyson than Frazier to Ali. :-)
Enjoyed this enormously!
Posted by: Rationalist at February 8, 2007 11:41 PM
Robert--
Some other quotes:
He is against oocupation of land "whether it is Muslim or Arab," and he believes all nations want peace "whether it is Lebanese or Muslim."
Exactly.
at February 8, 2007 11:44 PM
Another thing which tends to irritate me is this blythe reference to "People of the Book" that the Muslims use... as if by saying that, they are getting on the right side of all the Christians and the Jews. What about the rest of humanity mate? What about the Hindus and Buddhists and Jains and Sikhs and Bahaiis and Confuscians and Shintos and other religions that I might have missed out? What are your opinions on that? I wish someone would ask the Imam that and then watch him squirm a little more!
at February 8, 2007 11:45 PM
Your are talking to me! Occupation! Man its Occupation! Does anyone have camel?
War, Peace and Occupation...I am for all and against all!
That was painful for me to watch...but funny!
Posted by: greatcometof1577 at February 8, 2007 11:56 PM
There is a radio broadcaster down in OZ where I live who is also Jewish like AC.
Whenever these types of discussions (anything to to with Israel or islam) comes up he tries so hard to be "even-handed" it makes me puke. Actually I no longer listen to him.
Perhaps the two of them confer?
My friend emailed said broadcaster and told him he was the most anti-semitic Jew she had ever heard.
"Err,,,ummm,,,errr I try to be fair", he said!
Sure!
at February 9, 2007 12:05 AM
Sometimes I think Chuck Norris has more skill discussing this topic than the regular hosts.
Posted by: Vince
If Chuck Norris was the host at least he would do some kind of kung-fu trick that might be neat. He would just pull out a board and smash it over his head and say...."Imam can you do that" and then say...."remember me kicking your guys ass in the movie delta force....that motorcycle was...neat"
at February 9, 2007 12:08 AM
"blythe reference"
-- from a posting above
It goes with Gotterdannerung.
Posted by: Hugh at February 9, 2007 12:09 AM
That's what's scary about it Hugh!
But as someone else pointed out, Colmes himself appeared rather exasperated towards the end and I thought I saw some slight hints of fermentation, possibly even an eventual awakening on his part to what this all means!
Posted by: Rationalist
at February 9, 2007 12:16 AM
Al-Husainy simply refused to answer to 'yes or 'no' questions posed by Hannity. Al-Husainy's taqiyya was consistently confusing and quite tedious to say the least. It actually got so bad, that Colmes, contrary to every fiber in his multiculturalistically afflicted mind, actually resorted to agreeing with Hannity and proceeded to pile on Husainy. Embarassing to say the least.
I could only laugh at the whole tragedy. All are to blame, including the producer of that mess. I agree with Hugh that they, "Dumb and Dumber", as "lifted" from me by Jan Sobieski previously in this thread, should be summarily replaced.
Memo to Jan,
If proven wrong, with proof of course, I retract my statement and apologize for "lifting" from you.
Posted by: awake at February 9, 2007 12:22 AM
How many ways can two people screw up an interview? That was God awful.
Thanks Pawn. Thanks Alan. You're fired!
Posted by: Mr.C at February 9, 2007 12:34 AM
"So guide us to the right path. The path of the people you bless, not the path of the people you doom. "
Strange. Every prayer I've heard from christian priests ask something like this:
"So guide them on the RIght Path back to you,God, for their salvation."
But they never talk about doom.
at February 9, 2007 12:39 AM
Exactly allat,
Christian pray to God to save those that need to be saved. Christians also peacefully go out and spread the word. People need to know why we make a big deal about people swearing on the Qu'ran, the current immigration crisis, and this imam who prayed at the DNC. It's not just to smear the Democrats. It's for a legitimate reason.
Posted by: wrathofasma at February 9, 2007 12:44 AM
"What about the Hindus and Buddhists and Jains and Sikhs and Bahaiis and Confuscians and Shintos and other religions that I might have missed out? What are your opinions on that? I wish someone would ask the Imam that and then watch him squirm a little more!"
In other words the Pagans: as well as the American Indians (including Hopis and Mayas).
Moslems have no mercy on Pagans, because of worshipping "multiple gods." From what I read about the history of India, the islamics slaughtered the Hindus by the hundreds of thousands.
at February 9, 2007 12:49 AM
Colmes was embarassed because he knew what the taqiyya damage was doing to the DNC. They are either coconspirators or suckers.
With people highlighting all of the taqiyya, as was mentioned in a previous comment, the DNC looks like a sell out bunch if there ever was one.
Posted by: Mike H. at February 9, 2007 12:52 AM
...but Colmes makes a key mistake when he asks him if he attended such rallies in Washington, when in fact they were in Dearborn.No, Robert, Colmes mentioned both Dearborn and Washington. So even if Washington was wrong, Dearborn was correct.
He is against occupation of land "whether it is Muslim or Arab," and he believes all nations want peace "whether it is Lebanese or Muslim."Tokyobk, I noticed that as well. In fact, this Shi*t* needs to go to taquiyya school - so much for that Sunnite theory that taquiyya is a speciality of Shi*t*.
After seeing his performance, I'd say that he did a better job for our side than even Robert, Debbie or Michele could have done. It was a good idea not to have anyone opposite him, but just let him speak. And at the end, he let the cat out of the bag on who he thought occupiers were.
Posted by: Infidel Pride at February 9, 2007 1:01 AM
My son, who knows very little about islam and issues we discuss here, watched a few minutes of it and burst out laughing.
"The guy cannot answer a single question". He said.
"It would all be too funny if it were not so serious". I replied.
I think more of these sorts of interviews should be on tv. A video-clip or show has got to be worth a million words!
Maybe Robert could submit a list of potential "victims", and possible questions to FoxNews?
(For a fee - of course!)
at February 9, 2007 1:02 AM
"You talkin' to me?"How many al-Capone movies has he been watching? Posted by: Infidel Pride
at February 9, 2007 1:03 AM
In the picture his gesture says---Shhhhhhh, these boobs dont have a clue what Im up to. My rope-a-dope bob and weave has them in a brain freeze like sucking on a popsicle in August.
He's thinking--Wait till I get back to Dearbornistan. This will get me a plane ride with Pelosi and Ellison!
Posted by: guide inside at February 9, 2007 1:03 AM
IMO that pic looks like every reference if seen or read of:
an islamic ruler or caliph thinking about what kind of execution he's going to mete out to the poor transgressor of Sharia - he looks so dumb then say:
"Take him away and remove his head."
Or something like that.
The pig will be sure to take out his anger on one of his women tonight.
at February 9, 2007 1:04 AM
Maybe if H & C had devoted more than 3 minutes to the interview they could have got this person to make a mistake and reveal his intentions. I find it ridiculous that FoxNews will give up on someone if they can last the whole three minutes. I've seen O'Reilly tell the music to stop cause he was going to linger but aren't H & C senior enough for that? If these blokes really wanted to get to the bottom of it rather than just having their "OK We need to interview this guy" box ticked then maybe they would have got somewhere.
Posted by: payingattention at February 9, 2007 1:26 AM
Slightly OT but is pertinent to this discussion:
I found this video on Pamela Oshry's (atlas shrugs) site. The guy in this video attended a presentation about Islam at his local library. He asks the Muslim chaplains about taqiyya, sharia and Muhammed's marriage to Aisha. They too do the dance this Al-Husainy bastard does. Also, this is a good reference, a good how-to video for us if we want to attend an interfaith meeting, a Q and A session at the local library or local university and an open house at the local mosque. Here's the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJweJ02Ar0c
Posted by: wrathofasma at February 9, 2007 1:28 AM
Gramfan:
Who is the broadcaster that you speak of, I would like to find out more about him, please.
Regards
at February 9, 2007 1:29 AM
The "interview"--using that term loosely--was hard to watch. What was the point of using up precious time while Hannity shouted, like an angry parent, the same question over and over?:
"WHO is the oppressor you referred to in your prayer!?"
[imam starts obsequious sniveling and smiling]
"WHO is the oppressor you referred to in your prayer!?"
...etc.
H & C had this guy for THREE MINUTES. Alot could've been gotten out of him in that time, in skilled hands. It would have been lies, but viewers are smart; some would see the Taqiyya for what it is.
How frustrating.
at February 9, 2007 1:42 AM
@ payingattention:
Jon Faine of the A-B-C 774
(in Victoria).
ps. I don't listen to the radio anymore, although the quiz with Delroy gets a bit of time at night due to the spouse.
He had Pilger on yesterday night. I couldn't listen to him for more than a few minutes.
He was singing the praises of Al Jazeera...ICK!!
That was enough.
at February 9, 2007 1:50 AM
Wow what a farce of a video.
COLMES -- if you can't see through the imams obvious lies (its called practicing taqiyaa a doctrine of Islam 'justified lying') please pleeeeeeeeeeease contact me I have a huge tower here in toronto called the CN tower for sale cheap! Yes I actually OWN the most famous building in Canada yes sir! call me Ill give you a goooood price.
you moron.
http://graphics.worldweb.com/PhotoImages/Articles/Canada/CNtower.jpg
at February 9, 2007 2:01 AM
GramFan:
OK I think that chap airs on 702ABC in Sydney. I can download his material so I will pay attention to what has to say. We need Andrew Bolt on radio I reckon.
at February 9, 2007 2:30 AM
wrathofasma: Thanks for that video.. was VERY illuminating.. I like the way the young gentleman made his point.
Posted by: Rationalist at February 9, 2007 2:44 AM
The interview was priceless. Remember, this "leader" was at the DNC leading them in prayer. I think the H&C show tonight shows there is NO WAY the dems knew what he was saying.
They (H&C) have had shows all week long we should welcome, this one was one of the best, and will take all the help on prime time we all get.
at February 9, 2007 3:08 AM
wrath,
Thanks for the link. Plenty of other interesting videos in that area, too.
If anyone would like to understand the looney left's understanding of the DNC Imam's invocation and tonight's H&C dog and pony show, check out the relevant threads at NewsHounds.
Loopey!
Make sure you click on the 'continue reading' line to view the whole lead in to the questions.
Posted by: PRCS at February 9, 2007 3:53 AM
"You talkin' to me?"
How many al-Capone movies has he been watching? Posted by: Infidel Pride
Actually, it's Taxi Driver.
Posted by: Charles Martel at February 9, 2007 3:54 AM
Lying Moslem snake. "War is deceit?*" This guy is waging war. Only one way to stop these guys. And it ain't with debates, or even words . . .
---------------------------
*Deceit is used by the weak. Right now these forked-tongue crawlers are using that. When their numbers grow strong enough, they will come at us with weapons. In the end, only one way to stop them . . .
at February 9, 2007 3:56 AM
Al-Husainy guy is a slime ball. All the Muslim leaders appears to fit into the exact same category. I wondered how you could achieve that unless you follow the same source?
One got to be a degenerate to follow these kind of bunch of degenerates.
at February 9, 2007 4:16 AM
Good , the BBC getting some deserved flack from the Sun newspaper >>>>>
IT sometimes seems the BBC would prefer terrorists to succeed than for an innocent man to be briefly held without charge.
In their politically correct bubble, intelligence is always flawed and anti-terror action is inevitably heavy-handed.
So the release of two suspects held over the alleged plot to behead a British Muslim soldier was a gift from heaven.
For 24 hours, BBC bulletins repeated the ludicrous claim by one of them that, for Muslims, Britain is a police state.
The truth is that these suspects were swept up in a legitimate raid by police who had reasonable grounds for suspicion — and freed after questioning.
That is not the action of a police state. Far from being too harsh, our police may have been too soft.
They should have cracked down sooner on the increasingly assertive minority who pay lip service to liberty but preach murder in the mosque.
Action should have been taken to prevent forced marriages and honour killings which, unforgivably, take place on British soil.
And marches over Danish cartoons by rabble-rousers calling for death to British soldiers should have been broken up on the spot.
It is time the BBC woke up to a dangerous truth.
Britain is at war with radicalised young Muslims who are willing to commit atrocities against a country which has offered them a home.
The BBC should stop sneering.
And give the police all the support they need to stop them.
at February 9, 2007 4:27 AM
Great extract aladdinsane57. Would be better if the Sun wasn't such a crap paper.
I never manage to get past page 3.
But maybe reputable broadsheets in the UK will also pick up the line.
Posted by: payingattention at February 9, 2007 4:49 AM
It was what I expected, a clash between Islam and Christianity, the Jews are only being used as a scape goat in all of this. From 69 up too 77, the Americans were kept in the dark about Islam, and that's only because Islam wants nothing of Christianity within Islam. Islam wants a beacon of darkness protrayed to their constituents, could you imagine what would happen if the two were to assimulate together; God forbid; Peace !
Posted by: Jeff at February 9, 2007 4:49 AM
Jeff:
Islam is inherently against assimilation so what you are talking about is even more kumbaya-like than hoping there won't be rivalries between nations such as the US, Russia, and China.
Islam is like the Borg in Star Trek, it only assimilates or dies.
Posted by: JSobieski at February 9, 2007 5:08 AM
I meant to say assimulates others into itself, but obviously should have gone to sleep before posting.
Posted by: JSobieski at February 9, 2007 5:09 AM
Catmeat sheik Hilali told to piss off with golden Handshake:
http://sheikyermami.com/2007/02/09/catmeat-sheik-hilali-told-to-piss-off-with-golden-handshake/
Posted by: sheik yer'mami at February 9, 2007 5:47 AM
I still maintain that "Is Hizbullah a terrorist organisation?" is not the correct question.
"Is Hizbullah an extremist organisation?" would be a better one to ask, as well as variations thereof.
Perhaps these interviewers could point to Hizbullah's supremacist views, its aggression against its own countrymen and Israel, its bigotry, and then ask him why this creepy little man was seen campaigning on behalf of such an organisation?
Surely an imam who speaks on behalf of 'moderate' Muslims in the US would have no problem disassociating himself from a murderous, brutal and supremacist movement as Hizbullah, which seems hell-bent on dragging Lebanon into civil war?
Posted by: A Nonny Nonny at February 9, 2007 6:23 AM
This iman is trying to fool the non-Muslims when he got caught with his hands in the cookie jar.
Posted by: bigcatgirl13106 at February 9, 2007 6:25 AM
This iman is trying to fool the non-Muslims when he got caught with his hands in the cookie jar.
Posted by: bigcatgirl13106 at February 9, 2007 6:25 AM
Re: "No doubt my monitor has poor resolution but this is the second pic (or video-catch) in which Colmes appears to be wearing a really ugly, messy black turban"!
Caroline-
You are interesting, creative lady. I detect a lot of good things about you.
at February 9, 2007 6:57 AM
Re: CAIR, this deceptive cleric, etc.
I have no patience with phonies. I understand how Mike Savage feels about such crap. Islam, as Fitzgerald has said, is very unpleasant. It's about domination, deception, never the Golden Rule. It stinks from the habit of deception.
Posted by: Frank at February 9, 2007 7:02 AM
From above:
"blythe reference"
-- from a posting above
It goes with Gotterdannerung.
Posted by: Hugh
Hugh,
I can't believe you would miss spell Wagner's epic 'Twig light of the Gods'- Gotterdammerung! Even worse: that no one else seems to have caught this obvious (but innocent) blunder.
at February 9, 2007 8:03 AM
descendantofacrusader (me too, by the way, his name was Guy de Janes)
I noticed the incorrect spelling but it is Hugh so it shows that he is only human, which is comforting.
Posted by: tokyobk at February 9, 2007 8:23 AM
Al-Husainy was no doubt referring to the Arabian occupation of Asia Minor that started about 1400 years ago in the Hejaz and sorta spread by the sword over about 16 "Arab" countries and 6 "non-Arab" countries (Pakistan, Israel, Iran, Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Afghanistan).
Posted by: waterdragon52 at February 9, 2007 8:27 AM
Tokyobk:
Human, indeed – Hugh may have just had a long night but just the same ‘spell-check’ never sleeps and is always on guard.
at February 9, 2007 8:36 AM
Blythe Danner will not be amused. But I was.
Posted by: Hugh at February 9, 2007 8:42 AM
Hugh,
Glad to see you are alive, awake, and paying ever vigilant attention even though Mr. Wagner cannot.
at February 9, 2007 8:47 AM
Who said their is no fun in Islam? Watching this
Imam do the imam shuffle as he artfully dodged questions can bring a smile to any thinking person. Even colmes was showing his impatience with this loon.
This imam summed up correctly the bush Iraq war. These Shiites got the use to do their dirty work in Iraq by getting rid of sad dam so that they could take over and finally establish an Iran type mullachacrosy. And we have to pay for them by our son's blood and billions of dollars. How does it feel to be screwed by Shiite Muslims?
at February 9, 2007 8:50 AM
payingattention
We need 1000 Bolts!! And also Piers Ackerman.
I check their sites every day.
Sheik, meat mufti isn't going anywhere is he??
I think he may stand again in April.
at February 9, 2007 8:52 AM
One of the best interviews yet, revealing Islam for what it is. Lying, Sneaky and Evasive.
Now the world can see how "un-American" Islam is in the USA.
We need more Lying, Sneaky and Evasive Muslims on international TV. Expose them for what they are.
After last nights interview, the bowing in prayer DEMs, must be horribly embarased today!
Posted by: sounder at February 9, 2007 9:01 AM
That an oleaginous creep like Al-Husainy can be a leader of Islam is a clear indication of what the ideology is about. But give him credit, Al-Husainy adds a dash of carnival clown color to offset Tariq Ramadan's gravitas.
Yep, Moslems come in flavors, every one of them poisonously bitter.
Posted by: Alarmed Pig Farmer at February 9, 2007 9:03 AM
"I can't believe you would miss spell Wagner's epic 'Twig light of the Gods'"
-- from a posting above
"Glad to see you are alive, awake, and paying ever vigilant attention even though Mr. Wagner cannot."
-- from same poster, later posting
This Mr. Wagner you speak of in the second posting -- is this the dendrologist-composer who gave us "Twig light of the Gods" or is it some other Mr. Wagner?
at February 9, 2007 9:35 AM
I always hated Alan Colmes. I regard him as a typical pompous, arrogant, liberal jerk who thinks he has all the answers. I wish he would leave the FOX Network and go back to Air America where he belongs. As for Pawn Hannity, he needs to listen to Michael Savage some more because he is the only commentator screaming the truth out there about what Islam really is.
Posted by: A.I. Steamroller at February 9, 2007 9:43 AM
Also Sean Hannity would do well to also pay attention to Glen Beck who is getting it.
Posted by: bigcatgirl13106 at February 9, 2007 10:10 AM
Also Sean Hannity would do well to also pay attention to Glen Beck who is getting it.
Posted by: bigcatgirl13106 at February 9, 2007 10:10 AM
Yeah, Glen Beck is pretty good too.
at February 9, 2007 10:16 AM
You'd think just one of them could simply have asked: Who is doomed by God?
No Christian clergyman could have made a statement like that to a room full of Dems and gotten away with it.
Someone should ask any Democrat that was there, Who do you think he meant? Who is doomed by God?
Posted by: freedomschool at February 9, 2007 10:33 AM
I also wouldn't have minded someone asking him about his views on occupation, specifically the ones he mentioned: Political, ideological and media occupation.
What is ideological occupation? Media occupation?
Posted by: freedomschool at February 9, 2007 10:45 AM
I'm curious about the trick he tried to get away with regarding Hezbollah -- and this is similar to the recent SFSU case...
At SFSU, stomping on a Hamas or Hezbollah flag was considered offensive (stomping on Israeli or American flags is legitimate, of course). Why? Because the name "Allah" is on those flags. Wow -- they get special status because they claim association with Allah.
Here, Al-Husainy doesn't address Hezbollah *the organization*. Instead, he hides behind Hezbollah *the name*. As if he isn't aware that:
- Hezbollah is the name of a political/religious/terrorist agency
- folks can call themselves anything they like.
Apparently, by choosing an unimpeachable name, the organization naturally achieves unimpeachable status!
at February 9, 2007 10:46 AM
Please do not mistake 'entertainment', e.g., on prince waleed's toy "Fox News", for 'information', e.g., this web site and a host of others. Do not expect too much from entertainers.
Posted by: Infidel33 at February 9, 2007 10:54 AM
"he needs to listen to Michael Savage some more because he is the only commentator screaming the truth out there about what Islam really is."
No, Michael Savage is screaming the truth about what the Muslim extremists really are; Savage still thinks there is a majority Islam untainted by extremism.
Posted by: remote_control at February 9, 2007 11:28 AM
Hugh,
My apologies, Mr. GutterdaNNerung, I guess even spell-checkers are not infallible. Either way: I think Herr Wagner might well get have the final chuckle.
at February 9, 2007 11:59 AM
"WHO is the oppressor you referred to in your prayer!?"
[imam starts obsequious sniveling and smiling]
"WHO is the oppressor you referred to in your prayer!?"
It was painful to watch - the imam should have said - and no harm to him - we, here wouldn't have cut off his head.
"The U.S. is!"
Posted by: allat at February 9, 2007 12:08 PM
I meant get [to] have. silly spell-checkurz!
at February 9, 2007 12:12 PM
Hell. He knows no matter what he says, there will be those Americans who will defend him. He's not a Christian, only Christianity threatens the LLL.
Posted by: Carolyn2 at February 9, 2007 1:00 PM
I do not know about him as well as the Americans do but to me it seems like Ali G the guy who plays Borat whenever he was being asked a serious question and relating it to youth culture.
I think that this is like watching the stone throwing Muslims at the police over temple mount then seeing one being arrested and getting scared over the consequences of his action.
I think this guy has no moral structure and is only a crowd pleaser if not a stirrer of some sort.
'Yes I agree with everyone’s opinions' but does he know they against each other? The trouble is he shows signs of actually having his heart in one place and by denying the questions when confronted like 'lie to the enemy' as mentioned in his holy book to does. To me it seems he would leave for the winning team and lack loyalty to everything he is supposed to represent.
Is he a diplomat?
at February 9, 2007 2:03 PM
Hannity just had him on his radio show.
The guy had a total meltdown and refused to answer two simple questions.
1) Is Hezbollah a terrorist organization?
2) Is Ahmadina-whatever anti-semetic?
Tge guy goes on a tirade about how Hannity is "breaking the law"? by asking him a question.
One MUST NOT QUESTION Muslims.
Posted by: St_James at February 9, 2007 4:47 PM
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)