| FrontPageMag.com | By Robert Spencer | By Hugh Fitzgerald | Books | Dhimmi Watch | Islam 101 | Qur'an Blog | Raymond Ibrahim | Robert Spencer |  |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
1938 Alert: "'Devastating response' if Iran nukes attacked: Terrorists say Tehran providing instructions in case U.S., Israel strike atomic facilities," by Aaron Klein for WorldNetDaily.com, with thanks to Sr. Soph:
JERUSALEM – Iran is anticipating a U.S. or Israeli military strike on its nuclear facilities and has been providing Palestinian terrorists and other regional allies with contingency plans for attacks against the Jewish state and American regional interests in the event of war, according to Palestinian terrorist leaders.A senior leader of the Islamic Jihad terror group, which Israel says is backed by Iran, told WND Tehran is expecting to be attacked, but he didn't provide a time frame in which Iran anticipates a strike.
He claimed during any attack his organization has been directed by Iran to "wreak havoc" on Israel with suicide bombings, rocket attacks and "special surprises." He said rocket attacks would be launched from both the Gaza Strip and from the West Bank, which borders Jerusalem.
He threatened his terror group will target American interests in the Middle East whether any purported strike against Tehran is carried out by Israel or the U.S.
"The Zionists and the Americans are coordinated 100 percent. It doesn't matter who attacks Iran, we are planning to hit them both," said the Islamic Jihad leader, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he said the topic was "very sensitive."
He said overall Islamic Jihad leader Ramadan Shallah has been coordinating war plans with Iran, Syria and the Iranian-backed Hezbollah Lebanese militia. Shallah resides in Damascus and travels frequently to Tehran.
Shallah, you may recall, is confessed Islamic Jihad leader Sami Al-Arian's friend and former colleague at the University of South Florida.
Posted by Robert at February 27, 2007 6:33 AM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
|
"Iran is anticipating a U.S. or Israeli military strike on its nuclear facilities "
....more like provoking......
![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.jihadwatch.org/nav-commenters.gif)
at February 27, 2007 6:50 AM
"He claimed during any attack his organization has been directed by Iran to "wreak havoc" on Israel with suicide bombings, rocket attacks and "special surprises." He said rocket attacks would be launched from both the Gaza Strip and from the West Bank, which borders Jerusalem"
....AS if this is not currently happening in Israel....
at February 27, 2007 6:52 AM
It is very interesting to note that a person like Ramadan Sallah was in a Florida university and had US visa.
On the other hand ,one of my friend from India,a non muslim (in other words someone who has no religious enemity against USA), a person with computer engineering background and experience in developing useful software packages was denied a US visa authorities and no reason was provided.
I guess my friend would have nee only useful in growth of economy and would have lead a peaceful life and contributed to the IT industry.Which probbaly does not count much???????(sarcastic nod)
But from what I read above , I guess the contribution from my friend would have been USELESS compared to great contribution Ramadan Sallah is giving to the country or gave in the past when he was in USA.( Sarcasm intended).
Indeeed Ramadan Sallah deserved the visa a lot more(A big sarcastic nod). Apparently to get a US visa I guess just bieng Muslim is enough,wether you hate USA or not is irrelevant???
Leaving aside sarcasm and to be brutally truthful,when it comes to immigration
1)All immigration must be banned.
2)Especially Muslim immigration.
3)Even the other people that is non-muslims should be asked to stay in touch with the local police station where they immigrate once a week.
What I mean to say is ,that they should drop in to the local police station, say for just 1 minute to say "I am around and I am upto no mischief"
Any immigrant who has no evil intentions or schemes of harming USA, would not mind spending a minute of his week to ensure safety for himself and safety for USA by this simple formula.
The only people likely to oppose this type of law will be people who have something to hide/ bad intentions or are illegal immigrants.
Besides it will also create one extra job at every police station througout the country for our citizens, The appointed person to co-ordinate at each police station can be designated as Immigrants Customer Relations Officer.
Any opinions????
at February 27, 2007 7:39 AM
...old Sami Al-Arian in the news again?....
I remember him ...affiliated the the charities such as the Islamic Association of Palistine (which supplied monies to Hamas), something called the Occupied Land Fund ( a well know terrorist funding agency), something called the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Developement (which sent millions of dollars worth of material and logistical support tho Hamas)...
...some of Samis buddies include MOusa Mohammed Abu Marzook, Shukri Abu Baker, Ghassan Elashi, Haitham Makhawri, Mohammed El-Mezain, Akram Mishal, Mufid Abdulqader, AbdulrahamOdeh,
...Some of these individuals are affiliated with something known as CAIR....and we know a little about CAIR...
....When you find a Muslim financing terrorist operations, chances are his BUDDIES are doing the same....
...Ban Muslim Immigration now...
Posted by: exsgtbrown at February 27, 2007 7:51 AM
I'm sorry, all of this is impossible. The Iranians are Shiite and the Palestinians are Sunni. Everybody knows that there cannot be any cooperation between Shiite and Sunni in matters of terrorism.
(/sarcasm)
Posted by: PapaBear at February 27, 2007 7:58 AM
Published: 02/26/07, 7:33 PM
Washington's Make-Believe Policy on Iran
by Elan Journo
"US policy on Iran is a pathetic sham."
"In fact, this policy is a pathetic sham. It is a cover-up for Washington's abdication of the responsibility to protect American lives."
.
.
.
"To extend its financial 'pressure' overseas, Washington hopes to persuade foreign governments, international banks and companies not to lend Iran money or sell it technology or nuclear expertise. This entails groveling before the likes of France and Germany, keen appeasers of Iran, and Russia, which gutted the already toothless United Nations sanctions against Iran."
.
.
.
"This plan is not some mistaken or naive attempt to deal with Iran. It is an evasion of Iran's nature and goals - an evasion of the need to eliminate the Iranian menace."
.
.
.
"Iran's nuclear quest (like its funding of insurgents who slaughter our troops in Iraq) is just the latest in a series of hostilities stretching back to the 1979 invasion of our embassy. To protect American lives, we must recognize Iran as an enemy stained with US blood and assert ourselves militarily to make it non-threatening. This does not mean an Iraq-like crusade to bring them elections; it means protecting US lives by destroying Iran's militant regime. But that is precisely what our leaders refuse to do."
.
.
.
"Washington has resigned itself to the emergence of a nuclear Iran (and an endless insurgency in Iraq), because our leaders do not believe we have the moral right to stop it. To do that would be self-assertive: it would mean putting America's interests first. Today's prevailing ethical standard condemns such action as selfish and, therefore, immoral. Washington's moral premise rules out as illegitimate the dedicated pursuit of American self-defense. But wishing to evade the self-destructive implications of their moral principle, our leaders concoct a plan that creates the illusion of their commitment to our defense."
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/6946
at February 27, 2007 10:42 PM
Geddon - thanks for that Journo article.
he is depressingly correct. Bush seems more interested in placating Pelosi, et al, than in defending the country. And having a State Department that is cluelessly in bed with the enemy does not help.
at February 28, 2007 12:42 AM
"In fact, this policy is a pathetic sham. It is a cover-up for Washington's abdication of the responsibility to protect American lives."
Isn't this usually called "malfeasance"? Soon enough it must be labeled "treason".
Posted by: Zenster at February 28, 2007 4:01 PM
Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)