Clearly she is not the author of this letter or any other,whose contents become more and more rediculous as time goes by.How much longer will they allow this to continue before iran is punished and humiliated for its crimes?

Posted by: 72_goats at March 30, 2007 4:19 PM

This is what happens when you have low self esteem Muslims seeking attention in screwing up a situation they planned.

What makes more effect? A lone video played and people wanting more or a continuous volume of media cluttering up the media?

The first obviously as it draws public attention.

All the Iranians are doing now is making people yawn at the "message" and is creating an anger in England and a distaste in other nations.
See for psychological effects torturers will make captives "sing" to lower the other sides moral, but that works only in select usage.

The Muslims have once again screwed up as they always do. I hope that this British public anger gets Tony Blair onto his manhood and takes Thatcher action.
The Russian and Chicoms will not do anything as Iran is not worth going to war over against NATO. Blair needs to whack these terrorists with American and British firepower for the good of the world.

Posted by: Lame Cherry at March 30, 2007 4:20 PM

Hmm, looks like 'president' Ahmadi Najis needs to invest in a better Farsi to English translating program for his IBM 486 (or Apple IIE or Commodore 64 maybe?)

Posted by: Abu Allah at March 30, 2007 4:35 PM

This is a bit off topic, but perhaps not. If you accept that this letter has been dictated to Ms. Turney, you might notice the frequent mention of Iraq, as well as the request/demand that the U.S. and other forces leave Iraq.

The last time I checked, the Iraqi government requested that the U.S. and coalition forces remain in their country to provide stability. In fact, if I recall correctly, the government of Iraq became quite agitated when we indicated we were leaving sooner, rather than later. I, of course, realize the inherent problems of this attitude, but that's not where I'm going with this line of reasoning.

Who has the most to gain from an unstable Iraq? Iran. Who has lots of natural resources in the form of oil? Iraq. Not Iran. Who needs the cash to fund a nuclear program? Iran. Not Iraq.

Perhaps this letter requesting the U.S. and coalition forces to leave Iraq so the citizens of that country can begin "rebuilding their lives" is, in fact, a request for the West to leave so that Iran can continue their own "occupation" of Iraq.

Iran is not looking out for their Shiite brothers. They are looking out for themselves.

Posted by: s at March 30, 2007 4:41 PM

This reminds of the fake letter by Hugh.

No, not that letter...

The letter that Hugh Newton and wife supposedly wrote to Jimmy, their son, after the extra-terrestrials abducted them in the movie "Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius. It read something like, "Gone fishing. Take care. See you in a couple of days."

I don't believe it anymore than Jimmy believed it.

Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at March 30, 2007 4:43 PM

Sounds like Iran has a Minister of Propaganda just like Nazi Germany. Remember Goebbels?

Posted by: The Resistance at March 30, 2007 4:45 PM

"Vous m'ecrivez, mon ange, des lettres de quatre pages plus vite que je ne puis les lire."

I think Pushkin would have been amused.

Posted by: Hugh at March 30, 2007 4:48 PM

Whereas we hear and see on the news the way prisoners were treated in Abo-Ghrayb (sic) and other Iraqi jails by British and American personnel, I have received total respect and faced no harm.

These Moslems really do know how to treat a woman. I never woulda guessed it.

Posted by: Alarmed Pig Farmer at March 30, 2007 4:52 PM

"utterly transparent to the rest of the world".

Exactly right, we all know what they are doing. As for the Brits that have been taken hostage, NO ONE has the right to question their bravery or courage, EVER! Far too many are sitting home and not willing to lift their finger in the defence of their country, where as thees folks proved their courage when they stepped aboard that small boat to do their jobs. So it can never matter what they say, or what they do now, there dedication and courage is not up for debate, they have proven that already.

When my sons when to Iraq and Africa this year I told them, "if you are taken, tell them everything they ask, there is no dishonor in that, we are not dealing with sane people, it is as if you have been taken prisoner by an insane asylum. Just get home, that's all that matters". Hell, if it was me they had captured I could fart the La Marseillaise if they wanted me to.

Posted by: QuadoLama at March 30, 2007 4:55 PM

Rouget de Lisle, on the other hand...

Posted by: Hugh at March 30, 2007 5:01 PM

QuadoLama-

I agree. Since deceit in the muslim mindset is perfectly okay for the Infidel, I have no compunction about lying to muslims.

I'll kiss the earth and bless muhammad to save my head. The moment they turn their back, I'll knife their sorry asses. muslims get no respect. I have to respect someone to tell the truth.

Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at March 30, 2007 5:01 PM

Hugh,

I should have said "No, not that Hugh" but I'm sure you caught my drift.

Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at March 30, 2007 5:04 PM

This is just another ploy of the iranians. If any of Westerners have any backbone, you would not invest in companies who deal with iran. Make changes in your retirement portfolios. Hit the Iranians where it really hurts.... their pockets.

Posted by: callmeinfidel at March 30, 2007 5:05 PM

"Sounds like Iran has a Minister of Propaganda just like Nazi Germany. Remember Goebbels?"

Hey, anyone seen "Baghdad Bob" lately?? I hear he's been looking for a gig for the past few years...

Posted by: EricInTexas at March 30, 2007 5:06 PM

To British People

The Iranian people are really nice and friendly. They have good food and gave me a dog to pet. Beedies are much better than Infidel cigarettes.

In order to improve relations between our two Countries, there are many things Blair and Bush can do. First, no more pictures of the great Iranian leader in elevator shoes. That must never again happen! Also no more pictures of the great Iranian leader in the same room as the dog-leader of Syria, unless the Iranian leader is on stage.

The Iranian people are also very compassionate and friendly. The great Iranian leader washes frequently and there is no truth to the rumor that he has underarm odor. No truth at all! Lying pigs and dogs.

I have faced no harm and have received great respect. Talk again soon.

Faye Turney 31/03/07

Sarcasm off. Thoughts with the captives.

Posted by: pez at March 30, 2007 5:13 PM

"I'm sure you caught my drift."

I catch all kinds of drifts. Drifts and drafts, dribs and drabs, grib grab grob grub.

Posted by: Hugh at March 30, 2007 5:16 PM

To People of British
I am writing to you , sacrificed due to the intervening policies of the Bush and Blair governments.
We were arested after entering the holy and sovereign Iranian waters, air, land and their pure islamic shia spiritual space by the noble, heroic and brave Iranian forces. For this, I am deeply sorry. This has caused even more distrust for the people of Iran and the whole area in the British.
The Iranian people have treated me exceptionally well and have proved themselves beyond any doubt to be caring, compassionate, hospitable and friendly also superior to any westerner in every way. For this I am thankful and considering on converting to shia islam and serving in the revolutionary guards of the ayatollah until the coming of the blessed twelfth hidden imam Mahdi.

I believe that for our countries to move forward we need to withdrawing imediatelly all our occupational forces from Iraq and leave the people of Iraq to start re-building their lives under the caring guidance of the superior Iranian people and their aytollahs. As we hear and see on the news the way prisoners were treated in Abo-Ghrayb (and this should be on news everyday forever) by British and American agressor, I have received total, ultimate,all-encompassing and universal respect and faced no harm, hunger, cold, heat, starvation or any other physical or psychological discomfort.

It is now our time to ask our government to make a change to its oppressive, tyranic, monstrous infidel behaviour towards other people.

Finally, my name is not in any case, shape or form Cyrah Derakhshan, I am not a translator from the english in the Holy Revolutionary Islamic Guards of Iran, and I did not write this false letter pretending to be,

Faye Turney, 27/03/07

Posted by: Excommie at March 30, 2007 5:32 PM

Did Hugh just called Ynkedoodle a grub?

But back on topic, is not capturing foreign troops in open seas an act of war? Are the British tired of defending their own?

Why has this not been a trigger for escalation of hostilities? Even USA appears quiet on it.

Posted by: payingattention at March 30, 2007 5:38 PM

So Iran is behaving like a Bond villain rather than a grown-up, sophisticated member of the so-called 'global community'.

A 'normal' country would put these servicemen on trial.

The soldiers' captors are skilled in this sort of thing, it seems, because they know that words 'Iraq', 'Bush and Blair', 'Guantanamo' and the like will strike a chord with the anti-war constituency in the West.

I wonder if she will be 'invited' to join Islam?

The British government could make a tit-for-tat response. Storm an Iranian embassy, take 15 Iranian staff into custody and parade them in front of the camera.

Then force the Iranian ambassador to don a Mohammad tee-shirt and apologise on camera for the behaviour of Islam, Iran or whatever.

If our government did that, the Muslim Council of Britain and the Stop the War Coalition would be outraged.

Posted by: A Nonny Nonny at March 30, 2007 5:40 PM

Did Hugh just called Ynkedoodle a grub?

Grub:

1. the thick-bodied, sluggish larva of several insects, as of a scarab beetle.
2. a dull, plodding person; drudge.
3. an unkempt person.

If he did, he's only 1/3 right.

Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at March 30, 2007 5:44 PM

and where is the muslim council of great britain? normally the british press are falling all over themselves to get their reaction/response when muslims spread their religion of peace (via the sword) against their english hosts in london.

Posted by: leonthepigfarmer at March 30, 2007 5:53 PM

I would have bid 2/3

Posted by: payingattention at March 30, 2007 5:54 PM

The real lunacy is in the accuasation of a fifteen person "invasion".Yes thats right Britains plan was to invade the putrid Iranians with FIFTEEN soldiers.

Reality escapes these people.

One can sit here and read these"letters of confessions" and see the cigarette smoking ,sweating nazis or vietnamese intimidating a confession for propaganda.

Even more fanatacal is the thought that these fools think we will believe anything that comes from Iran peroid.

notice the calls for execution.How about those chants.meanwhile the loser iranians we hold captive TRUE INVADERS AND SPIES AND TERRORISTS sit in a comfortable cell somewhere getting three hots and a cot.All to thier religious beliefs.

Are these British sailors allowed to pray to thier God if they have one? Are they allowed to eat THIER chosen foods? One could imagine by the female wearing the towel on her head all is doubtfull.More like continual harrasment to pray to allah and all his crap.More like made to eat muslim crap food.

I am willing to bet all i own they are forced before if and when they are released to convert to devilism.In fact i ahve no doubt.

All these worthless people need carpet bombed.If anyone has muslim family in this area i am sorry for you but so many have suffered over so few and it goes beyond lunacy.This goes on and on in any scenario you can think up.This includes King Fraud,his ass needs jacked up too.confiscate all he and his "princes' and the other low lifes own here in the U.S. and tell them never again can they own another thing in the free world till attitudes change DRASTCLY,in a HUGE and DRASTIC WAY.

I swear with my hand to God if any government gives in to these people in any of these hell holes i will ... i make a pledge lets just leave it at that.

If there are no men out there with the sack or backbone then step down and run out of the way.let real men come to the door of the house of islam.You can bet where there is smoke ther is fire,also where ther are flies there is rot!

JIHAD THAT JIHAD ALREADY.

Posted by: Dar al-harb at March 30, 2007 5:55 PM

"did Hugh just call..."
-- from a posting above

Of course not
.
Drifts led to drafts, coming through a window or vasisdas of mental opportunity (and I'm a card-carrying member of the Plunkett Party, when I sees my opportunities, I takes 'em), and the drifts and the drafts led to the dribs and the drabs, and then for some reason I found myself at the funeral of Marshal Zhukov, and the horse-drawn hearse -- or was it Suvorov, or Kutuzov, or possibly some other heavy-lidded general in his coffin -- and the horsebeats of the horses drawing the caisson, or the Russian equivalent, made the sound, as Mayakovsky famously heard it, of "grib grab grob grub."

Please don't read anything else into it.

Posted by: Hugh at March 30, 2007 5:59 PM

No Hugh didn't call anyone a 'grub' he caught your "did you get that?",while you missed his "did you get that?"

Posted by: Dar al-harb at March 30, 2007 6:02 PM

Here's my working theory...the Iranians employed Nasseem to do the letter for Faye. Certain phrases have a ring to them, not unlike the rantings that Naseem sends to JW. I will know for sure when Faye apologizes for being "uncovered meats." This is OT, but I just read that Rep. Keith X. Ellison will be accompanying Speaker Pelosi on a fact finding trip to Syria. Will he save the day and negotiate for the 15 British soldiers release from Assad's headquarters, a sort of Muslim-to-Muslim gesture that might help the process along with electing yet more "invaluable" Muslims to Congress.

Posted by: maryrose at March 30, 2007 6:06 PM

OK well I have never been to any funerals of people with Russian sounding names, horse drawn or not. But very interesting, Hugh.

As far as house of war's remark goes, made no sense at all.

Posted by: payingattention at March 30, 2007 6:10 PM

Clearly the Iranians do not know the British. All they are doing by going on like this is to make the British people more determined to win in the end. I know all Australians are right in there with the British and will be there to the end when they win one way or another.

Posted by: cobber at March 30, 2007 6:13 PM

l guess we should bow down to the iranian mullahs and leave iraq and afganistan, and leave the ME all together, and then israel will have to defend herself. what else did the iranians want.. oh well this will make also the left demicrats happy..btw pelosi is going to syria to meet with the head honcho Assad next week. maybe she can be kidnapped by the iranians, and can you quess what her letter will say?

Posted by: ZenaWarriorPrincess at March 30, 2007 6:14 PM

There is no reciprocity from our Mohammedan enemies. The argument that we must treat them kindly when captured so that they will treat our people according the the rules of warfare do not hold water.

When Mohammedans sign treaties, they have their fingers crossed, so to speak. They are consummate liars, they learned that from the Perfect Liar himself.

My father volunteered to guard some German prisoners while he was stationed at Brownwood, Texas. He was really not happy that the prisoners were treated better than he was. No, he was never a prisoner, it was just that prisoners had a better life comapared to an ordinary US Army PFC.

These bed-wetting, snot-nosed liberals who complain about our treatment of Mohammedan prisoners make me want to throw up.

Posted by: Pelayo at March 30, 2007 7:08 PM

heard it, of "grib grab grob grub."
Hugh that sounds like a marching song by the Hobbits, maybe this person read "Lord of the Rings".

Posted by: ZenaWarriorPrincess at March 30, 2007 7:18 PM

BBC Radio Four's the “Now” show goes out at 6.30pm every Friday and takes a satirical look at the week's news.

This week one of the stars of the show did a little routine. After covering himself by saying he was sorry for the sailors held by the Iranians he joked that there really wasn't much difference between what the Iranians were doing what the US was doing at Gitmo. I think he also said the Iranians were treating their captives a lot better then the US.

I was so angry I switched off and if I could remember his name I’d tell him he was a dumb b*****d.
Can someone tell me so we can nominate him for Dhimmi of the year?

Posted by: Fred at March 30, 2007 7:41 PM

Dear Jihad Watchers,
I so happy to be here in safe house with Hugh and Robert. They persuade me very much about how bad it be to try and subjugate Infidels, who are nice persons.
Now, if only that stupid Borat Ahmedinejad would donate some of his oil billions to Jihad Watch website, then I could go back to my family in Dogpatch, Iran. Instead, that idiot will want me to become martyr to dumb cause.
Taqqiyah-ly yours,
Abdul Abulbull Amir

Posted by: jewdog at March 30, 2007 7:41 PM

I saw the movie, saw the book cover too and measured the width of the book.

Then I moved on..

Posted by: payingattention at March 30, 2007 8:02 PM

Which dimocrat will show up in iran first, jesse jackson,al sharpton,al franken,brad pitt or that idiot from pennsylvania, maybe bono who knows , and if they do go i wonder if the iranians would like to keep them awhile, probably not for they are worth more to their cause here in the states!!!!

Posted by: OLD SARGE at March 30, 2007 8:14 PM

INSANITY! is the only word to describe the state of this world. Up is down and Wrong is right. One can no longer even see Pure Evil and Hypocricy and actually get away with calling it out. The Islamist conditioning and Dhimmitude training we are getting is terrifying. We can no longer say anything whatsoever about Islam , ( even if they drag people off the streets into a Mosque and Murder them )lest be branded " Intolerant " or " Racist " . We truly live in mad times.

Posted by: MoBlows at March 30, 2007 8:47 PM

OLD SARGE posted: Which dimocrat will show up in iran first, jesse jackson,al sharpton,al franken,brad pitt or that idiot from pennsylvania, maybe bono who knows

Is there a book on it, and what odds are they giving? I tip Jesse Jackson or Jimmy Carter as the odds on favourites.

Posted by: DP111 at March 30, 2007 8:47 PM

Re: Iran issues another letter purportedly from female sailor

I wonder about these "men" (such as the 5' 3'' Psychotic in Iran) who are so concerned about scarfing and parading this woman for their political and belief-system reasons. The more I know about Islam, the more it repels me. Every civilization, to some degree or other, must control the sexual instinct because of its power to create chaos. But Islam is in overdrive on this matter. It's sick. It's not about controlling the sexual instinct. This belief system is misogynist.

Posted by: Frank at March 30, 2007 8:58 PM

jewdog-

You are a piece of work. God bless you for that.

Posted by: Frank at March 30, 2007 9:26 PM

Thx, Frank. It's tough being a Jewdog among Christocats.

Posted by: jewdog at March 30, 2007 9:32 PM

JD-

Thank God for laughter. LOL.

Posted by: Frank at March 30, 2007 9:36 PM

Hell, if it was me they had captured I could fart the La Marseillaise if they wanted me to.

Posted by: QuadoLama

They do that five times a day in their mosks.

Posted by: Allahfanculo at March 30, 2007 9:46 PM

To British People
I am writing to you as a British service person who has been sent to Iraq, sacrificed due to the intervening policies of the Bush and Blair governments.

First of all.. even I know that you should write To *the* Brisitsh people. Ergo it's a fake or if she wrote it she wants to make it look like a fake.

I tend to think the iranians dictated this letter for her.

Why else would "she" write: "the intervening policies of the Bush and Blair governments"?

And why would she mention Bush *ahead* of the head of State of her own country?

This fake letter reveals the true intent of those who dictated it to her. They seek to split apart the "coalition".

The hostage taking is directed at the United States more than Britain. They were concerned the Americans might actually come out and *kick Butt* if they took Amricans hostage.

This is NOT a dig against Britain. It's my assessment of their thinking. With the worst PM Britain has had in my lifetime at least it is beginning to look as if their gambit is paying off.

Posted by: Allahfanculo at March 30, 2007 9:55 PM

Iranian Hostage Form Letter # 53:

Dear People of -[Fill in Name of Country];

I am/ we are being treated -

[multiple choice, check one:]

A)[__] splendidly [for Hindu captives]; B)[__] charmingly [for French hostages]; C) [__} okay [for American dogs]; D) [__] with the utmost respect and dignity [for British prisoners].

My/our captors are-

[pick and reassemble any number of adjectives]:

wise, thoughtful, decent, kind, courteous, friendly and assiduous.

I am /we are sorry that I/we-

[select appropriate crime]

A) insulted the memory of the prophet;
B) invaded the sovereign territory / coastal waters of Iran;
C) spied on the peaceful nuclear facilities of the people of this Islamic republic;
D) was/were smuggling heroin / guns / alcohol / pornographic DVD's into Qom.

I/we will never do this again and wish to thank the wonderful people of Iran for-

A) not executing me, but only sentencing me life in prison;
B) giving me a free holy Koran and some sheeps' eyeballs;
C) trading me for the kidnapped, completely innocent members of the Iranian military / diplomatic corps who wandered by mistake into Iraq;
D) hanging me tomorrow at noon.

Posted by: profitsbeard at March 30, 2007 10:03 PM

This is important (ar least to me).

A 'hostage' is an innocent person held for the purpose of extortion. To extort money or favor(s).

An armed, uniformed person is sanctioned by his government to carry out the lawful duties his governmenr has tasked him.

A Flagged (uniformed) Person captured by a declared enemy is a Prisoner of War and PoWs are granted an extraordinary status and protection under the Geneva Conventions.

A Flagged person captured by a non-declared "Enemy State" is neither 'hostage' nor "PoW" but exists in a limbo of international law that nevertheless amounts to an Act of War perpetrated against the Flag of the Offended Nation.

If said "Offended Nation" is a signatory to a Mutual Protection Treaty then all signatory Nations are obligated to perform whatever actions necessary to prevail in any and all measures intended to effect an end to said "Offending Nation's"" action(s).

The "Signatory Nations' Action(s)" may include Diplomatic, Economic, and/or Military Sanctions against said "Offending Nation."

_____________________________

O.K.--However logical, I made the above up; what can I say? I love lawspeak.

Speaking of which--When did the lawyers gain control of the warfighting? It's SUPPOSED to be messy.

"War is Hell". That's why we try to avoid it. But war IS upon us.

_________________________________

[Channeling the Great Carnak (all respect to Carson)]]

The dems win in '08 and maybe '12 while the world spins into chaos. A US leader rises (finally), but only because the recognition of the threat to all of our societies is made real.

Then we do what shoud have been done 10, 20, 40 years ago.

And it's very messy, indeed.

Posted by: turn at March 30, 2007 10:30 PM

My sentiments exactly, MoBlows!

Posted by: fedupinamerica at March 30, 2007 10:52 PM

"service person"
-- from the letter signed by Faye Turney

That's the one part of the letter that one can be sure the Iranians did not dictate. It is pure Thoroughly Modern Millie, in her silliest guise.

Not even "servicewoman"? Or worse, "servicewomyn"? She went all the way, with "service person"?

What about the other ones, the "service persons" who "just happen to be male"? Just a whole bunch of "service persons" in uniform, offering civilians a plausible greeting: "Hi, I'm Jennie or Jack, it hardly matters which, and I'll be your service person for the next few years."

Posted by: Hugh at March 31, 2007 12:20 AM

"Which dimocrat will show up in iran first, jesse jackson,al sharpton,al franken,brad pitt or that idiot from pennsylvania, maybe bono who knows .."

OLD SARGE;

Now your gettin personal, perhaps. Why not single out the idiot from PA? I may, again may, be one of them.

Posted by: Islofob IS-1 at March 31, 2007 12:47 AM

Chycks. The irony.

Posted by: pez at March 31, 2007 1:30 AM

This letter is obviously fake. The phrasing reeks of a non-native English speaker.

I have some hope for Britain's weak response. I hope that the weak response is not indicative of abject weakness, but indicative that something big is going on. Let me outline my theory for you.

First, some background. So far, Britain's response has been piss-weak. It's like they barely even care. The US has stated that they won't trade 5 republican guards for the 15 British troops, end of story, no more negotiations (and rightly so). Both nations are acting like they aren't really bothered by the kidnapping of these troops, or are too busy to pay any attention to it. "Why don't they seem to care?", one may ask.

I guess that the reason that they don't seem to care is probably because they're about to destroy the Iranian military and nuclear programme, and aren't willing to be distracted by this. America has recently shifted another carrier group near Iran. It's my belief that America has no intention of allowing Iran to get the bomb. It can be guaranteed that there will be no warning of an attack on Iran - doing so would allow Iran to prepare, and potentially keep some of its nuclear programme.

America's mobile infantry may be bogged down in Iraq, but their navy, air force, and tanks aren't affected by Iraq's insurgency. America is probably now as ready to destroy Iran's military as they ever could be; Iraq war, or no Iraq war, makes little difference.

Hence, I conclude that the destruction of Iran's military and nuclear programme is imminent. A good thing it will be, too. I imagine it will be a two week affair, with most of the important stuff destroyed in the first 12 hours (SAMs, nuclear facilities, power stations, fuel depots, air-force, navy, etc...), with the rest of the time spent mopping up (blowing up tanks, barracks, etc...).

Posted by: Mr Mason at March 31, 2007 2:08 AM

It is definetly not written by this woman for two reasons... She says in this letter that she has been sacrificed due to the intervening policies of the Bush and Blair governments.
Well obviously the Iranians dont know that unlike Iranians, our people are not forced to go into the armed forces... and two she says that,,,Whereas we hear and see on the news the way prisoners were treated in Abo-Ghrayb (sic) and other Iraqi jails by British and American personnel, I have received total respect and faced no harm. Yep, by the look of fear on her face it sure looks like she is happy eh...
We know that this poor woman like other woman in Iraq/Iran are more likely to be raped, tortured and possibly killed as have many others before her...we see the evidence of their hatred for us everywhere, they slaughter our men at the drop of a hat...

Posted by: Gaye at March 31, 2007 3:59 AM

Yes, I now believe it is time to get out of Iraq, so as they can continue to kill themselves at the fast rate that they were before. They hate us being there so lets leave... but I feel that we should fall back and into Israel, this way we can help Israel keep an eye on Iran, as once they have built their nuclear they can reach Britian and other countries with the long range missiles etc...we must help protect Israel... they also have every right to exist, and be there... they could wipe out the whole lot of the Muslims in the area but they dont so who is the most human...

Posted by: Gaye at March 31, 2007 4:12 AM

Someone spotted what I thought! Yes why do these Iranian nut-jobs look so very reminiscent of the classic drawings of Neanderthals? You know, the ones with skulking shuffling gait and knuckles dangling round their knees. Protruding brows and big flat noses? Recognise this image? Does look a lot like the tosser at the top of the page doesn't it!!
posted above

I am waiting for CAIR to go after CEICO for their cave-man commercials. Personally they look like this guy and definitely act like him.

Posted by: auntbea at March 31, 2007 12:59 PM