She says... "I am not a dangerous individual," said Ms. Al-Homsi, who said she is an accountant who has dual Syrian-U.S. citizenship.

Taqiyya (LYING) at its best - she truly does not consider herself a dangerous individual cause killing infidels is not dangerous - its her life calling. She would only be dangerous if she turned her sniper's rifle on other muslims.

Posted by: religion of(blown to)pieces at April 6, 2007 10:22 AM

One of the women, Kimberly "Asma" Al-Homsi, 42, of Arlington, who is on probation for a 2005 Garland road rage incident involving a fake grenade, is said to have long-range assault rifle and explosives training, according to a Dallas police intelligence bulletin issued March 5.

"I'm a trained sniper and proud of it," Ms. Al-Homsi said in an interview Thursday after first refusing to comment on whether she has any terrorism ties. She then said no.

Islamophobes! Release these poor victims of discrimination immediately!

Call cair, shapiro and her gang of 20 legislators, and sue everybody that felt threatened by these filthy murderer wannabees, uh, err, uh, ... victims.

Posted by: witness at April 6, 2007 10:24 AM

"We were watching the airplanes," Ms. Al-Homsi said. "That's not a crime, unless you're Muslim."

Oh, you bet your burka it is! At least if I had my way.

Posted by: Pelayo at April 6, 2007 10:25 AM

"I'm not a dangerous individual," said the spider to the fly.

Posted by: Pelayo at April 6, 2007 10:27 AM

Apparently these 'women' wanted to be noticed. Looks like more of the same we are getting from our muslim fiends. trying to use the old "we are being discriminated against" card and get a $ettlement from the government for infringing upon their rights. what a joke on the rest of us.

Posted by: TheOmegaMan at April 6, 2007 10:27 AM

"our muslim fiends."

I meant "our muslim friends", or did I?

Posted by: TheOmegaMan at April 6, 2007 10:29 AM

Who doesn't throw fake grenades during their road rage episodes? only a crime if you are muslim.

Posted by: TheOmegaMan at April 6, 2007 10:30 AM

I guess as long as the Muslo-gals didn't have their shoulder-fired SAM with them all is well.

In the future, Mohammedans scoping out airports will be considered natural if this kind of lunacy isn't controlled now.

Posted by: profitsbeard at April 6, 2007 10:31 AM

Gosh, I wonder what they could be up to. What's a bit more worrying is what their male counterparts were up to at the same time. Muslims will use the obvious appearance of their women as a cover and a shield for their own jihad activities.

The oddly dressed muslim females attract attention while the less obvious male muslims conduct operations. It's just another aspect of the misogynistic culture of islam. Women are merely tools of jiahd to be disposed of as the males see fit.

Real peaceful, yeah?

Posted by: mike trivisonno at April 6, 2007 10:38 AM

The Vietcong, while posing as laundrymen,gardeners,garbagemen,or simply merchants would be caught "pacing" (counting steps and identifying best targets)inside or near the Americans. Usually, within a short period of time, mortars would be coming in with great accuracy....killing many.....

....The American military has experience with "pacers". They are easily spotted...picture someone carefully placing one foot in front of the other , walking in seemingly unorthodox directions, maybe making notes on paper, or behaving strangly when approached...

.....in many instances, after a late night firefight, these "pacers" would be found dead (shot by Americans), the "pacer" would have be carrying grenades, satchel charges, and an AK47...

....someone would comment...."Hey, isn't that Ming?...someone would reply "Yep, I guess we will have to find someone else to burn the ****....

Muslims are no different than the VIETCONG....

Posted by: exsgtbrown at April 6, 2007 10:39 AM

Odd. Syria (like all countries in the Middle East, including Israel) require military service when you become an adult. If you happen to get chosen for it, you could even get special training (like sharpshooting and sniping). There are plenty of Americans (and non-Muslims for that matter) who have military sniper training and like to look at planes. (Back in my home town, my buddies and I would head over to the far end of the airport runway and watch them take off...it's a small town). If a Muslim does it, then it must be a crime, and those glorious non-Muslims couldn't have been responsible for anything...right? Remember this one: "Israeli sniper shoots girl, age 3, several times" (Ha'aretz 23 May 2004)--you probably don't. Maybe she was a radical terrorist trying to kill all Jews by playing outside her home over half a mile away from the border with Israel???

Just doing some thinking...

(PS. Road rage is not a good thing, whether its a Muslim or your grandmother, but it could be like this: "Road rage may have caused father's death in Dallas" (CBS 11 News 27 March 2007)

Posted by: An American at April 6, 2007 10:41 AM

Friend of Naseem?

Posted by: Elric66 at April 6, 2007 10:44 AM

You really can't make this kind of thing up! Unbelievable!

Posted by: nyone at April 6, 2007 10:47 AM

@American-Muhammadan

The Israelis are just taking a page out of the Paleostinians terrorist play book.

Don't bring your bullshit about the many terrorist acts of Israel here on this board.

You and your muhammadans are the world's leading terrorists. After all, your prophet, the fiend muhammad (may he rot in hell forever) said: "I have been made victorious through terror. And you muhammadans are commanded to follow his example.

BTW, The Israelis have Yahweh on their side. The muhammadans have the pagan moon god allah.

Now who do you think is really going to win?

Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at April 6, 2007 10:48 AM

Perhaps she was reflecting on her inner struggle?

Posted by: sounder at April 6, 2007 10:52 AM

Funny, Eric66. Yep, a bit of a "Naseems echo" there.

Anyway, the whole thing sounds so....diversionary. And, yes, Flying Imams-like. After all, women dressed in Islamic garb, especially with camouflage pants underneath, watching with binoculars at an airfield is CERTAIN to draw attention.

They can't be that stupid...can they?

Posted by: Vee at April 6, 2007 10:55 AM

These two women have way too much time on their hands.. why arent they pregnant and barefoot in the kitchen.. where is nasseems when you need him/her?

Posted by: ZenaWarriorPrincess at April 6, 2007 10:56 AM

Remember this American-Muhammadan:

It is the muhammadans who sacrifice their children to the pagan moon good allah, just as their ancestors sacrificed their children to Molech. Same animals, different era.

Who knows what nefarious motive was behind the muhammadans letting that little innocent girl play outside while a terrorist action was being prepared and executed.

If the muhammadans could get even the tiniest amount of PR from an innocent casualty, even a child, why, they wouldn't hesitate for a New York second.

The greatest terrorists the world has ever seen are the muhammadans. It's not even politically correct anymore to compare muhammadans with Nazis since that shows disrespect to the latter.

Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at April 6, 2007 10:57 AM

"Sure. It's all about discrimination, racism, and Islamophobia. Just like 9/11".-Robert

They use American pluralism (a pluralism Muslims do not practice in any Muslim country and which they do not want practiced here)to shame us. Their belief-system is a rationalization for domination, deception, exploitation and even the extermination of unbelievers. However, the days of the effectiveness of this deception (using our pluralism to shame us) are coming to an end.

Posted by: Frank at April 6, 2007 10:58 AM

Anyway, the whole thing sounds so....diversionary. And, yes, Flying Imams-like. After all, women dressed in Islamic garb, especially with camouflage pants underneath, watching with binoculars at an airfield is CERTAIN to draw attention.

They can't be that stupid...can they?

Posted by: Vee at April 6, 2007 10:55 AM

More like testing our resolve and our responses.

Posted by: Elric66 at April 6, 2007 10:58 AM

The Muslims are testing the waters...no more, no less...

Posted by: exsgtbrown at April 6, 2007 11:04 AM

"We were watching the airplanes," Ms. Al-Homsi said. "That's not a crime, unless you're Muslim."

--

Well, Ms. Al-Homsi, you're onto the right track. If I have my way it will be a crime eventually to watch an airplane if you're a Muslim -- because you did it in the United States.

There's the door. ==========> [|

Please don't let it hit you on the way out.

Outlaw Islam in the U.S.A.

Amend the First Amendment.

Posted by: Foehammer at April 6, 2007 11:07 AM

This kind of thing will lead to anarchy when people in western countries are fed up with thier PC governments and start taking matters in thier own hands. Most people I talk to think Islam is incompatable with Democracy in fact believe it should be outlawed in the west. Like the toosie roll center commercial how many licks will it take to get to the chewy center? How many attacks untill people start taking the law into their own hands? One, two, three ....... will it happen in France, Brittain, or America first?

Posted by: Ameriki at April 6, 2007 11:08 AM

France. Believe it or not.

Posted by: Foehammer at April 6, 2007 11:17 AM

I should clarify: The U.S. will be the first to outlaw Islam. France will be the first civil war.

Posted by: Foehammer at April 6, 2007 11:19 AM

I have never and don't know anyone that has gone to an airport just to watch planes, especially in camo. Their cries of racism are a joke. Too bad we can't shoot every Muslim to rid our country of these scum. My blood boils when I just see one on the street.

Posted by: MagnaCharles at April 6, 2007 11:38 AM

Let us hope that ordinary citizens and police officers continue to challenge this type of behavior.

Posted by: MP at April 6, 2007 11:38 AM

The women refused to let police search the car...
Officers should impound the car and wait until they have a search warrant. Any judge who refuses to issue a warrant under these circumstances needs to be educated.

Posted by: MP at April 6, 2007 11:41 AM

Foe that is exactly what I was thinking the first real volly will be in France. History what a compass! The more things change the more they stay the same. This whole thing is sort of a misnomer though the first salvo was fired by the Serbians. Most were shocked that this sort of thing could happen in Europe at the time, but as the rest of Europe starts to feel the effects of Islamic culture upon thier societes you may see that there are still some Huns in Germany etc.

Posted by: Ameriki at April 6, 2007 11:42 AM

I should clarify: The U.S. will be the first to outlaw Islam. France will be the first civil war.

Posted by: Foehammer at April 6, 2007 11:19 AM

You really think the US will outlaw Islam? With these politicians in power? I doubt it but hope you are correct. I agree with you on France. They will have a civil war, whether they want one or not. But the UK is catching up.

Posted by: Elric66 at April 6, 2007 11:51 AM

An American,

My mom likes to watch planes take off and land at her local airport. However, she doesn't have binoculars and doesn't pace around. I would believe the police officer who nabbed these two women. I don't see why he would be lying about what these women were doing. Stop using the discrimination tactic, okay?

I bet you're a Muslim. You're one of those Internet jihadis and you're tactics are similar to the tactics described on a jihadi website translated by MEMRI.

Posted by: wrathofasma at April 6, 2007 11:52 AM

People of low self esteem which is the majority of Muslims crave attention. She tried to empower herself by her statements to draw fear out from others.

The red car means things. The camo means things. The equipment they had means things. The direction paced and faced all means things as much as the target means things to the trained profiler.

This creature whom CAIR represents is a middle age coward who couldn't be a woman in Syria and was too scared to take on the IDF, so she comes to America and sells her soul among the sheep and now wants to punish America for it.

The police could have found a reason to search the car as they do thousands of times daily. This is poor protection from the locals and worse that she is not deported by the Feds.

Posted by: Lame Cherry at April 6, 2007 11:54 AM

wrathofasma-

What is going to undo Islam will be the growing consciousness of the deceptive nature of so many of its adherents. No direct Honest Abes or "Plain speaking" Harry Truman types with this crowd. If there are such types, they aren't "true Muslims". Deception, deception, deception...

Posted by: Frank at April 6, 2007 12:30 PM

"Amend the First Amendment."

..enforce the second...

Posted by: exsgtbrown at April 6, 2007 12:32 PM

What an amazing coincidence. An imam makes an anti-christian/anti-jewish prayer to open proceedings in the Texas legislature and an islamofascist is emboldened enough to do a dry run on a Dallas field and airport. Please remember to thank your closest dhimmi.

Foe, France has been in an undeclared civil war ever since the riots a few years ago. They are just trying to figure out who to surrender to.

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Posted by: Paratisi at April 6, 2007 12:40 PM

"Foe, France has been in an undeclared civil war ever since the riots a few years ago. They are just trying to figure out who to surrender to."

...THERE are neighborhoods in France where the police do not even enter....

Posted by: exsgtbrown at April 6, 2007 12:51 PM

"I am not a dangerous individual," said Ms. Al-Homsi, who said she is an accountant who has dual Syrian-U.S. citizenship.

dual citizenship.. singular loyalty.. to the umma. moslems merely *use* the citizenships they wrangle out of our leftygoodticians to gettheir hands on operating expenses and to build their fiendish forts in our cities.

Posted by: Allahfanculo at April 6, 2007 1:20 PM

I think it is obvious the little girl was shot by islamists who then arranged a scene that would appear to implicate the Israeli’s, islamist theatre of the grotesque. It’s been going on for decades but we were too stupid to recognize it. That may be changing however.

Posted by: tgusa at April 6, 2007 1:27 PM

am not a dangerous individual," said Ms. Al-Homsi, who said she is an accountant who has dual Syrian-U.S. citizenship.

l did not think it was possible to hold dual citizenship with the US?

Posted by: ZenaWarriorPrincess at April 6, 2007 1:30 PM

"I am not a dangerous individual," said Ms. Al-Homsi

...but if you SAY that I am you will pay. Sudden Jihad Syndrome could come over me faster than you can say allahu ackbar! Or at least AS fast.

Oh and by the way, people don't kill, guns do.

...and if Southwest Airlines doesn't stop discriminating against Muslims by denying us advance seating you will all feel Allahs wrath!

-XRDC

Posted by: XRDC at April 6, 2007 1:33 PM

"An American" above cites the allegation of an "Israeli sniper shoots girl age 3". When one searches for the story supposedly from the Israeli daily, Ha'aretz, one finds the story cited on a highly tendentious site "From Occupied Palestine".

http://www.fromoccupiedpalestine.org/taxonomy/term/96?page=4

When one searches for the story on the actual Ha'aretz website, one cannot find the story.

Found 0 results for search "Israeli sniper shoots girl"

The phrase enclosed by quotation marks is, according to the the "From Occupied Palestine" website, verbatim from the Ha'aretz story, and so it should come up on a search -- but it doesn't.

Secondly, even the story as reported at the "From Occupied Palestine" website assumes in its headline that it is an Israeli sniper, but nowhere in the story is this proven. Another discrepancy is the charge in its headline that the girl was shot "several times", but in the story itself it says "She died from a bullet wound to the neck..." clearly implying one bullet, most likely accidental.

Posted by: remote_control at April 6, 2007 1:40 PM

Many people go to the end of airports to watch planes take off and land. Anyone interested in aviation but not working in it might do so. Airshow types. It was my father's hobby in the summer.

BUT- pacing the grounds over and over, claiming to be looking for a museum? One look would tell them they were not at the correct place. No need to walk around multiple times. Especially a trained sniper.

Posted by: Borg at April 6, 2007 1:43 PM

MagnaCharles said

Too bad we can't shoot every Muslim to rid our country of these scum. My blood boils when I just see one on the street.

Instead of wanting to commit mass-murder, I'd prefer to keep those who want to kill us as far away from us as possible. They can live long and, as much as possible in Islam, happy lives, as long as they don't end ours.

I have to wonder if this comment was left by a provocateur.

Posted by: special_guest at April 6, 2007 1:47 PM

"She died from a bullet wound to the neck..." clearly implying one bullet, most likely accidental."

....since no record exists on an "Israeli sniper" being caught or killed...the bullet could well have come from a crazed Muslim trying to shoot the zionist pig...or from a stray bullet from a particularily joyous Muslim celebration (you know, the kind where they all fire guns into the aiR)...

....for the record, Jewish snipers are very selective on their targets...which do not include little girls..

....THE Muslims have been know to bring dead bodies to a scene , place them about, call in the photographers and scream about the zionest killers who just killed these people...only later to be discovered , the bodies were of those executed by the Muslims....

....Muslims practice deceit all the time..

Posted by: exsgtbrown at April 6, 2007 1:47 PM

This might have been another “incident” to prove “Muslim profiling”. If they didn’t want to get noticed they would not have taken so long nor dressed to get noticed. I smell set up here.

Posted by: Ronin at April 6, 2007 1:53 PM

There's two rational possibilities: they were trying to gain information in helping with a future attack, or trying to make the infidels unwilling to investigate suspicious behaviour (like the flying imams).

Either is unacceptable. This female accountant is just as much danger as the guys in Lodi, or any of the other jihadis. There is no way to reliably distinguish the Muslims who will decide not to follow all of the precepts of the Qur'an for their entire lives (the so-called "moderates"), and those who will at some point decide that their true allegiance is to Allah, and that they're eternal afterlife is more important than the ephemeral life here on earth, and go jihadi. The Qur'an and the Constitution are in direct conflict, one or the other has to go. We will have to decide which.

Posted by: special_guest at April 6, 2007 1:53 PM

There is certain "behavior" that will be forever considered suspicious at American airports...and these Borg-o-slam babies-for-jihad makers should realize this...duh. They can thank their Murder Cult slave beating husband Imams & Clerics for that.

But wait a sec, didn't Allah only give them half a wits compared to men according to Mad-haumma?

"Isn't the witness of a woman equal to half that of a man?" [The women said], "yes," [He said], "This is because of the deficiency of the woman's mind."
Vol. 3:826

Posted by: SoteriA at April 6, 2007 1:59 PM

We need to adopt a law enforcement policy whereby we classify all persons behaving suspiciously into two categories:

Stage One:

1) people who look like Muslims

2) people who don't look like Muslims.

This would be the very first stage of attention from law enforcement personnel (LEP).

The second stage, deriving from #1 of the first stage, would be:

Stage Two:

1) people (who looked like Muslims) who upon closer inspection are in fact Muslims

2) people (who looked like Muslims) who upon closer inspection are not in fact Muslims.

At Stage One,

a) LEP would be permitted to use visual criteria, including ethnic appearance, clothing, activity, etc., upon which to base the assumption that the persons engaged in suspicious activity might be Muslims.

b) Upon this assumption, in turn, LEP would be permitted to follow the Muslim(s) in question under surveillance and/or to stop them and question them, run background checks on them, and search them and their belongings and surroundings.

c) Further, the #1 category of suspiciously behaving persons (who look like Muslims) should be accorded more attention and the LEP should be accorded more license to stop, question and search them than they do the #2 category.

At Stage Two, the determination that the suspiciously behaving persons are in fact Muslims would simply undergird the LEP's measures of question, searching, and depending on further suspicious information ascertained, to detain said Muslims. Conversely, determination that the suspiciously behaving persons are in fact not Muslims would be a signal to the LEP to minimize time and attention on this category of suspiciously behaving person (since, of course, LEP do not have infinite time and money to attend to everything suspicious).

Of course, a protocol as adumbrated above would be impossible to concretize (let alone even seriously entertain) in our current PC climate.

Posted by: remote_control at April 6, 2007 2:01 PM

42 and 50? I guess they can't produce babies anymore and have to find something useful to do for their Muslim masters. What good are a couple of women past 40 years anyway? I wonder if they are barren.

Posted by: A_Plague_on_Both_Houses at April 6, 2007 2:23 PM

This must be brought to the forefront before it reaches critical mass. Think Chocolate Jesus. Think of a similar statue of Mohammed crafted of pig lard ... annonymous of course and placed in pubic as "art". We are talking a large statue say 300lbs of pig fat. Make sure it gets publicity youtube etc or local news. It could become a national movement and underground society of statue builders. Sounds fun.

Posted by: Ameriki at April 6, 2007 3:26 PM

"If a Muslim does it, then it must be a crime, and those glorious non-Muslims couldn't have been responsible for anything...right?"

......several terrorist cells have been interrupted by raids by security people...guess what was found in their apartments and houses....

Photos of bridges,tall buildings, landmarks, subway stations, bus terminals, airport facilities, shipping docks, large malls, and of all things...school buses....

....now if a terrorist were to attack, what would he need most of all.......need a clue?....try information....such as photos..directions....time schedules of departures and arrivals...when do the most people congregate....and where are the school buses.....

I have no objection to stopping anyone acting oddly or taking pictures.....

....babes in burkas, wearing combat clothes, hanging around an airport taking pictures would certainly cause me to send out the guards...and armed guards at that...

Posted by: exsgtbrown at April 6, 2007 3:32 PM

"If a Muslim does it, then it must be a crime, and those glorious non-Muslims couldn't have been responsible for anything...right?"

That is right. Go_back_to_the_Arabian_desert. You hate the kufr, you constantly bellyache about how you are treated (we are treated the same as you are). Haul arse.

Posted by: interestinconundrum at April 6, 2007 5:11 PM

"but the women refused to let police search their car"

This is all the evidence one needs to know that officials are issuing "hands off" orders regarding Muslims. Most police I am familiar with (especially in New Orleans metro area) would have suspects brushed aside and bound prior to searching a vehicle with whatever "probable cause" they can think of.

Posted by: We need G.C. Scott at April 6, 2007 5:18 PM

There are plenty of Americans (and non-Muslims for that matter) who have military sniper training and like to look at planes.

Lots of Americans have been in hand-to-hand combat and have fought building-by-building too; but don't nuture fantasies about using these wonderful skills on the streets back home either.

Unlike islamics, most Americans with these skill sets would like to forget, and generally don't boast of such things.

(Back in my home town, my buddies and I would head over to the far end of the airport runway and watch them take off...it's a small town).

Lots of people own airplanes, but don't employ people to fly them into buildings, unlike islamics who have a tendancy to do this sort of thing when given the opportunity.

If a Muslim does it, then it must be a crime, and those glorious non-Muslims couldn't have been responsible for anything...right?

If a muslim does it, it may not be a crime but it will be an act of war; real soon.

Remember this one: "Israeli sniper shoots girl, age 3, several times" (Ha'aretz 23 May 2004)--you probably don't.

I remember that fake sniper story of the muslim boy supposedly shot by the Israeli soldiers, and was filmed by a French journalist -- which turned out to be a big lie.

I also recall the famous morter round supposedly fired by the Serbs in Bosnia that killed people in a market -- turned out to be a booby-trap bomb that was set by the KLA (islamics) long before the market opened. The KLA called the media to tell them that "something big" was going to happen that morning, and right on cue -- CNN and the BBC had their cameras perfectly positioned to film the ensuing carnage.

Maybe she was a radical terrorist trying to kill all Jews by playing outside her home over half a mile away

Could be. After all, islamic children's programs in israel, do encourage little toddlers to be suicide murderers and islamic "mothers" are so proud when their little monsters strap on the suicide belts.

So "american," how about a little cyber-jihad. Isn't that what you are all about?

You WON'T kill all of us, islamics, but you will no doubt give it your "best shot." But two can play the game -- don't forget that.

Posted by: witness at April 6, 2007 5:35 PM

Dallas officers stopped the car nearby, but the women refused to let police search their car, according to a police report.

People don't often realize how rare it is in history that people can effectively say "no" to a police search. Western society is a miracle!

But women like these will try to create a society where one can never say "no" to police...at least if the police are Muslims enforcing Sharia.

Looks like some police were on the ball this time.

Posted by: traeh at April 6, 2007 5:42 PM

"I have to wonder if this comment was left by a provocateur".
Posted by: special_guest at April 6, 2007 01:47 PM

You are absolutely right. I don't like you, but that does not prevent me from seeing that your are often insightful. I really don't like you. In fact, I think of you as "Special-Gust". I don't forgive people who have ever insulted me. I still remember your bullshit post attacking me for speaking "for you" (about 1 year ago). I don't speak for anyone but myself, "Special Gust".

But I still think you are right on this and a lot of other things.

Posted by: Frank at April 6, 2007 6:41 PM

Witch hunting

Posted by: Abdullah at April 6, 2007 7:55 PM

As for Muslim ties to terrorism? They are found in the Kuran.

As for lies to the "unbelievers"? They are also to be found fn the Kuran; they are known as "taqiyya."

Lies to ourselves? Thye are known as "Political "correctness" and are endorsed by mosques everywhere as they paralyze the unbelievers from self-defense.

So this Muslim woman claims she is not a 'dangerous individual'? Well, not if one excludes religious violence executed for al-lah under the guise of jihad against the "unbelievers" as being a danger. (Which is how Muslims see themselves).

From any other persepctive these people pose real danger to the safety of untold numbers of people...

Posted by: pythagoras at April 6, 2007 8:38 PM

Witch hunting
Posted by: Abdullah at April 6, 2007 07:55 PM

Is that what you call what you do?

Posted by: Frank at April 6, 2007 8:45 PM

From above :
I am not a dangerous individual," said Ms. Al-Homsi, who said she is an accountant who has dual Syrian-U.S. citizenship.

Hey lady, i'm not a dangerous individual either if you leave me alone!!!!

Posted by: OLD SARGE at April 6, 2007 9:19 PM

Witch hunt huh?

New story on WFAA tv tonight. Seems our little 'witch' knows a bomber of 2 embasys in East Africa, and was also a secretary to Osama Bin Laden.

"At the same time, one of them admits being friends with a convicted terrorist."

http://www.wfaa.com/sharedcontent/dws/wfaa/latestnews/stories/wfaa070406_lj_lovefieldwomen.3c305bef.html

They also have the story they ran last night at wfaa.com along with the above update from tonights 6pm news.

Applesauce.

Posted by: JarvisW at April 6, 2007 10:20 PM

Thats meant to say the guy she knows was OBL's secretary, not Asma herself.

Posted by: JarvisW at April 6, 2007 10:21 PM

"I'm a trained sniper and proud of it,"

"I am not a dangerous individual,"

-from the article

The dual meaning of many of the Qur'anic passages, once proper taqiyya is interwoven in to them, regularly produces logical contradictions such as those listed above. A trained sniper is most definately, a dangerous individual, unless of course, the training is mere bravado, with no substance behind it.

The degree of involvement of these women, with their connection to terrorist activities, is speculative, currently. As a few posters stated above, their intentional probing, in the same vein of the "flying imams", is obvious and noted.

Their willful obstinance to any interrogation belies a very basic principle...They are Islamists. Islam is still Islam. Taqiyya is still taqiyya. They should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. There should be no capitulation, no preferential treatment, at least not in the face of the threat of litigation of any sort. This is a necessary defense against one of the many fronts in the war against Islam.

Posted by: awake at April 6, 2007 11:31 PM

Frank, what the **** are you talking about? I never intended to hurt your feelings, whatever it was about. A year ago? With an insane job and two toddlers and 4 hours sleep per night, I don't remember what I said yesterday. I don't care if you don't like me. As long as we're both working against the jihad, you're alright by me.

Posted by: special_guest at April 6, 2007 11:43 PM

Ab(sur)dull(ard)-

That should be:

Witches hunting.

Posted by: profitsbeard at April 7, 2007 12:58 AM

Witch hunting
Posted by: Abdullah at April 6, 2007 07:55 PM

Now you’re starting to get it. That is exactly what is being done, although in a more literal way than you think.

Throughout history men were also accused of witchcraft. You now need to ask yourself, "Do I weigh as much as a duck?"

Posted by: Scotty at April 7, 2007 3:45 AM

I always thought you wore the camo on the OUTSIDE and what you were trying to hide on the inside. Wonder what the panties (if any) looked like??

Well, just proves again, they aint too bright, are they?

Posted by: guide inside at April 7, 2007 5:08 AM

At best this was another "Flying Imams" we are really victims BS and at worst, well we all know what it was at worst. Are our laws really this unbelievable or are our law enforcement officers this scared to act after seeing the treatment of Border Patrol agents Ramos and Campean and Hernandez. Two individuals on the hood of a car survelling an airport with front missing license plates with a suspicious license dressed in camoflaouge underneath burkas and they refused to let the police search their car. Isn't there something in the law about reasonable suspicion? This also once again proves what one of our most dangerous and idiotic laws that we have is, Dual Citizenship. If they have dual citizenship with US-Syria this is beyond suicidal. Syria has mandatory military service for it's Citizens. In the US Citizens not only can vote but can also run for public office, all except one, so far anyway. The scenarios from this one are endless.
All dual citizenship must be eliminated and a muslim exclusion act must become a reality.

Posted by: firster555 at April 7, 2007 8:26 AM

i want to know what these pious muslim women were doing outside their homes without the mandatory male relative escort?

sounds like 30 lashes each is in order!

Posted by: theygottago at April 7, 2007 8:54 AM

At least the folks at Love Field now know that the airfiled is a potential target. It should be incumbant on the police to follow up on the address of this woman since it was incorrect on her license. A little surveillence wouldn't hurt either. Just another example of the bold provocation being more explicit and in our face by these Jihadist Muslims. This is only the beginning, but at least some of us are paying attention. WAKE UP! It continues.........

Posted by: IMA Believer at April 7, 2007 1:17 PM

Why do I smell "DRY RUNS" for something later?

Oh, sorry...never mind, I'm just JOHN DOE.

;-)

Posted by: jcom972 at April 8, 2007 3:13 PM

Abdullah:

Not quite. This is a terrorist 'hunt'. Muslims don't practice withcraft.

Posted by: pythagoras at April 9, 2007 1:33 PM

"Witch hunting

Posted by: Abdullah"

...THese witches have ties to known terrorists....

Posted by: exsgtbrown at April 9, 2007 1:34 PM

I'd like to start off by saying that i know these women personally, through both a professional and friendly tie.

Maybe it's just poor judgement on my part, but i never get any kind of bad vibe off Asma and Aisha. I see them and talk with them almost daily through my work, and was there when they were interviewed for the local news this past Friday, a day or so after the first article concerning this incident was published. When the paper first printed it, Aisha was suspended from her job. Two days later, she was fired. She has not done anything wrong.

I understand that it is not the smartest idea for them to do this, and i admit that they (especially Asma) get somewhat of a kick out of messing with the officials who trail them day and night. It would be wise for them to quit, but even still...

I wasn't going to write anything here until i read some of the comments. Yes, Islam-fueled terrorism is a real threat to this country. But our money and man-power resources should be spent on the real terrorists.

The grenade incident happened like this: Asma was driving on the highway and a recently returned soldier saw a Muslim and was trying to run her off the road. He was driving a large truck; she, a beat up, old sedan. She was about to be run into a divider, so she reached under the passenger seat, pulled out a fake grenade, and showed it to him. The man got an award from the city. Asma got jail time. And yes, i know that he was just doing what he was trained to do. I'm saying that it's unfair, what happened to Asma.

By the way, when they took down Aisha's information for the citation... they took her name and address down wrong. Who's the dingbat now?

As for the camo pants... So what? Our teenagers wear them all the time.

Yes, we need to protect our country and our people. I agree with that wholeheartedly- NEVER another 9-11. But we can't lose sight of our morals, ethics, or simply ignore the rights set down in the constitution in the search for terrorists.

Posted by: Elphabai at April 9, 2007 8:57 PM