....more Muslims killing Muslims.....

....a Muslims worst enemy is another Muslim....

Posted by: exsgtbrown at April 12, 2007 7:51 AM

Well he surely was an apostate ruling by other than what Allah has decreed and being a friend and protector of the KFR .

Posted by: KAOSKTRL at April 12, 2007 8:15 AM

We are approaching another Grim Milestone.

Posted by: Jimmy the Dhimmi at April 12, 2007 8:50 AM

There are two kinds of Islamic reformers in the world; dead ones, and those that exist in our creative imaginations.

Posted by: witness at April 12, 2007 8:52 AM

Can we please pay our warmest tribute to this Muslim man

Posted by: Abdullah at April 12, 2007 10:14 AM

"But the Muslims like you continue to kill off the Muslims like him. So the war goes on."

......exactly.......

Posted by: exsgtbrown at April 12, 2007 11:10 AM

Hey! I am still waiting for all those 'moderates' to do something about their radicals. One lone voice here and there just doesn't get it done. We are told about all these 'moderates' that don't agree with the radicals and when something like this happens to 'one of them' where is their outrage, their rioting, their... hmmm, if I said "killing of their own like they do to others when they say something against islam" then that would be saying that they are just like the radicals - OH they ARE just like the radicals!!! In fact, they are one and the same.

Posted by: R_not at April 12, 2007 12:04 PM

Hey Abdullah warm tributes to people goes both ways. I just read your snide comments about American soldiers slurring the term Americans who are dying for Muslim safety.

This Muslim was murdered by Muslims as the majority of Muslims are. You cheer when it is done in mass and yet you equate this person needs warm tribute.

Islam has warped your mind and the things you write should literally shock you, but they don't just like these murderers of this attorney.

Posted by: Lame Cherry at April 12, 2007 12:30 PM

Given that Bangladesh has the more Islamic of their coalitions in the government, I'll say that Hyder Hossein had balls.

Posted by: Infidel Pride at April 12, 2007 12:58 PM

I'll say that Hyder Hossein had balls.

Posted by: Infidel Pride "

......no doubt!!.....It will take many more Muslims who will fight for peace and justice....unfortunately, the most violent of Muslims are against those who have a sense of peace and justice.....

....they are caught between the proverbial rock and a hard place and deserve better.....

Posted by: exsgtbrown at April 12, 2007 3:21 PM

"....they are caught between the proverbial rock and a hard place and deserve better....."

....they ,,,, being the Muslims who strive for peace and justice....

Posted by: exsgtbrown at April 12, 2007 3:22 PM

Wow...at least here in the US, we just fire them.

Posted by: jcom972 at April 12, 2007 3:47 PM

If there are Muslims who want to steer Islam away from violence, this is what happens to them, unfortunately. Reformation of a religion is always difficult, but when the core religious documents demand violence from its followers to stop any possible reformation, the task becomes (nearly?) impossible. It's sad, but this is their battle to fight, within Islam. It's not up to the infidels to choose the future course of Islam. Our goal should only be to protect ourselves from Islam as it exists today (and as it has for the past 1300+ years): full of violence and evil (according to our morals).

Remember, this Muslim man was walking out of a mosque when he was shot by Muslims, for the crime of trying to curb Islamic violence. Forget the taqqiyya, Muslims don't have any restrictions on who they will kill, Muslims kill Muslims all the time. Islam is the opposite of the Religion of Peace. If Islam were to somehow enslave the world, and everyone everywhere were forced to "revert" to Islam, Islamic violence would not end, it would just be getting started.

Posted by: special_guest at April 12, 2007 4:28 PM

OT, but Bangladesh-related. Thanks to Islam-Watch for posting this, which describes Muslim extremists' systematic rape of non-Muslim and Ahmadi minorities:

http://www.hrtribune.com/report/Thesis_Jenny3.pdf
Rape as Genocide Under International Criminal Law: The Case of Bangladesh.
Thesis by Jenny Lundström. Lund University. Global Human Rights Defence (GHRD).

“In Bangladesh, gang rape has become a major tool of political terror, forcing minorities to flee and has proven more effective than murder. The victims have all been belonging to ethnic/religious minorities.* Neither little girls nor pregnant women and the elderly are spared. The perpetrators are men belonging to various branches of Muslim extremist political parties, including direct branches of the ruling BNP (e.g., various student wings of BNP like JCD and Jubo Dal. In many cases the rapists are closely related to BNP leaders.” Page 31.

*Hindus, Buddhists, Christians, Ahmadis, etc.
BNP=Bangladesh Nationalist Party

Page 34. “The rapes taking place in Bangladesh are often associated with brutal violence (e.g., beatings, cuttings, and the forceful insertion of objects into the vagina) and a great majority of are gang rapes that takes place in front of the victim’s husband, children, or parents. The investigative material from human rights organizations like GHRD provides countless examples of how victims have suffered physically and mentally as a result of rape. A victim as young as four years old was gang-raped in Jhenida and the rape was initiated by a local leader of Jatiyatabadi Chhatra Dal, (JCD) a student wing of the BNP. In order for the perpetrators to enable the act they had to first cut her vagina open with a knife.”

Page 38. “…the rapes in Bangladesh are taking place in a generally discriminatory structure and are supplemented by additional systematic attacks (killings, arson, destruction of cultural and religious places and other violence).”

Posted by: Khaybar Oasis at April 12, 2007 5:53 PM

Somewhat off-topic: perhaps we should change our terminology? See the Small Wars Journal blog

http://smallwarsjournal.com/blog/2007/04/war-on-terrorism-aqstyle-terro/

which says maybe we should try NOT calling them jihadis (self-glorifying description)and instead call them irhabis (terrorists) and the mufsiduun (evildoers); don't talk about the 72 virgins but about going to Hell (as murders and apostates)...

In other words call a spade a spade; they're not holy, they're not warriors, they're not doing good for the world, for Muslims, or for Islam. Call them on it.

Posted by: A_Nonny_Mouse at April 12, 2007 7:51 PM

In other words call a spade a spade; they're not holy, they're not warriors, they're not doing good for the world, for Muslims, or for Islam. Call them on it.

(from Nonny Mouse:

Disagree. Get into the enemy's psychology and then satirize it. Show how stupid their thinking is by using their own limp egotistic projections.
Their depravity should be shown in its own light on a stage, in art form. We saw how Mohammed reacted when poet's satirized him in verse. He sought to kill them. He saw how dangerous it was to his perversity projected to a religion.

Posted by: Briars at April 12, 2007 8:58 PM

Muslims shooting Muslims.

And?

Posted by: profitsbeard at April 13, 2007 1:30 AM

special_guest-

Thanks for that reminder that Islam is not ours to change but only to defend against. All future convulsions of this extremely insular and strange sect will be strictly internal and if any reformation should develop it will be from within. Such a strategy would help get our men and women out of Iraq and better positioned to lead the fight elsewhere.

I would only add that it is just possible that our discussions have some slight effect on those Muslims who bother to look over the fence now and then. They seem shy about holding up the mirror to see their own behavior. I can understand why.

Posted by: lycaste at April 13, 2007 1:58 AM