This is not news. Jihad in India has been ongoing for the last 1200 years. India like Spain, is unfinished Jihad business.

Posted by: DP111 at April 14, 2007 7:47 AM

dont the people of India want to join their coussin in the cesspoolstan? l mean who needs to prosper and have freedoms. join the mindless robots of islam.

Posted by: ZenaWarriorPrincess at April 14, 2007 9:56 AM

Dear Zena,

Believe me none of us want to join these bastards. However, we have paid a heavy price for our freedom and they are not our cousins. Their faith and customs are nothing like us Hindus, they are a demon that came from the bowles of the middle east.

"Pakistan started the moment the first non-Muslim was converted to Islam in India long before the Muslims established their rule. As soon as a Hindu embraced Islam, he was an outcaste, not only religiously, but also socially, culturally, and economically. As for Muslims, it was a duty imposed on him by Islam not to merge his identity and individuality in any alien society . Throughout the ages, Hindus remained Hindus and Muslims remained Muslims, and they had not merged their identities; that was the basis for Pakistan." Source: Mohammed Ali Jinnah, Address to University Students, Impact International, Islamic Journal, Aligarh Muslim University, March 1944.

The people of India are Hindus, while the Pakistanis, Afghanis are Muslim. They are cousins to the Arabs now, not us.

I guess you were just kidding, but to even think of being associated to them sends shivers down my spine.

Okay gotta run.

Cheers,

Jai Mahakali,
Ayo Gorkhali!!!

Posted by: Gorkhali at April 14, 2007 11:34 AM

Ah so the leaks were correct last week that a new bin Laden message was coming down the pike. Not though the standard fair of the tall one.

It might be interesting to see if the CD's are Chicom manufacture. So as not to help the terrorists, this is a CD which will reveal a great many things.

Posted by: Lame Cherry at April 14, 2007 12:22 PM

Don't worry about it to much.
Political correctness has yet to infect the Indian Army.

This is an amusing link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_xQBm-7sVg

Although the link is quite funny.
Do not underestimate India or the Indian people.

We have suffered these animals since about the 8th century and we have a totally different attitude towards them.

Massacre and violence, intimidation and expulsion is the best response to them.
The are the Dhimmis in India, they know what happens if they raise their heads in jihad.

Posted by: apostate_islam at April 14, 2007 12:32 PM

Oh great. Not only does Bihar have Naxalites (Commies) but they have their fair share of jihadis. I wonder if the Commies are allied with the jihadis, just as they seem to be in the rest of the world, even here in the US.

Posted by: wrathofasma at April 14, 2007 1:13 PM

I would think osama would realize he's wasting his time.

There are more mOslems in India than in Pakistan.

They are outnumbered by non-islamic Indians 10 to 1.

They have fought for over a millenia, and the price for an all-out offensive in India has already been shown to be more than the indian mOslems are willing to bear (forget the geneva convention if that happens)...
...and I haven't even mentioned a group with even more vociferous hatred of mOslems than hindus do, and are demonstrated some of the most ruthlessly effective fighters on earth: SIKHS.

This invocation by osama has to be little more than frantic desperation.

Posted by: jcom972 at April 14, 2007 8:10 PM

To all Hindus who celebrate New Years today, wish you all a very happy New Year. Here in the US, we celebrate it by filing our taxes, and it's surprising the number of non-Hindus who join in such festivities (okay, I'm being facetious).

Gorkhali, that's how I read Zena - she was being facetious.

Posted by: Infidel Pride at April 14, 2007 11:48 PM

Second thoughts - all Indian Muslims should go to Pakistan and join Osama's Jihad. Including the ones sneaking in from Bangladesh.

Posted by: Infidel Pride at April 15, 2007 2:49 AM

@ jcom972:

You are mistaken my friend about the Sikhs. There are two camps of Sikhs these days, the ones who identify themselves with the Hindus (these are the ones who follow the original path) and a new group which identifies itself with Islam (began during the late 1970s and picked up in 1984).

Even among Sikh nobility (Patiala Faridkot Nabha and Jind) they identify themselves with the greatest of India's warriors the Rajputs. Sikh martial tradition borrowed a lot from the Rajputs including the Khanda symbol, Saffron cloth, the carrying of the dagger and the most obvious, the adoption of the name Singh.

There are some Sikhs who have begun to keep muslim names to identify more with Muslims and are antiHindu (ie Tiger Jeet Singh the famous wrestler has named his son Ali). Many Sikhs believe that Sikhism is a mix of Hinduism and Islam because many of Kabir's writings are in the Guru Granth Sahib, however they forget that Kabir was an Apostate.

The battles that were fought between Hindus and Muslims were mainly between the Rajputs and Muslims, there were other groups, but the stiffest resistance was given by the Rajputs especially the Rajputs of Mewar who never got conquered. Even when the Sikhs became militarised in 1699 by the last of their Gurus, Guru Gobind Rai, he chose to instill the martial traditions of the Rajputs into the Sikhs as he has written in his autobiography Bachitra Natak, and his adoption with the name Singh (he could have chosen Khan, but he didn't). The Sikhs performed miserably and it wasn't until Guru Gobind Singh (formerly Rai) took the aid of a Rajput named Laxman Singh (ascetic name Madho Das) to come lead the Sikhs against Islam. Laxman Singh came to be know as Banda Bir Bairagi (the Brave Man who was an Asetic). He got Rajputs from the Shivalik hills to join the Sikhs and thus began the victories agianst Islam in Punjab and the establishment of the first Sikh kingdom, all done by a Hindu Rajput. The takht Akalis (blue turbanned Sikhs, today's Akhalistanis) betryed him because they became jealous with his success and they betrayed him to the Muslims. The Muslims captured him with his 200 Rajput soldiers and all chose death instead of conversion, and what a gruesome death it was.

I have to disagree with you further because I come from a Rajput family and I have Sikh cousins, but I see more hatred for Islam among Rajputs (traditionally raised) than I do among the Sikhs of the West. The Sikhs have even begun to change their history to make it seem that the Hindus were the cause of their misery. They have even claimed that Sikh revolutionaries during the time of the British had muslim names ie Udham Singh aka Ram Mohammad Singh Azad, this too at a time when identifying with muslims was very looked down upon.

Shivaji and his Maratthas, the Ranas of Nepal and their Gurkhas, the Rajputs of Mewar, the Chauhans of Chamba, Chatrasal and his Rajputs of Bundlekhand, the warriors of Assam, the Gonds, the Bhils, the Dogra Rajputs, the Hindu Jats...the list goes on and each of these fighters strikes more terror into the heart of Muslims than the Sikhs do especially since the Akhalistan movement came into being because muslims see Sikhs as people they can use against their own cousins (Sikh and Hindus being cousins, at least they were at one time).

Thus there are now two camps in the Sikhs, the brave ones who are loyal to their Hindu brethren and the others who now claim to be closer to the Muslims, Muslims that were responsible for more Sikh deaths.

Making a claim as you did no doubt shows respect to the Sikhs, but be careful at how far the claim goes, even Musharaff said a while back, there are two reasons why Pakistan will never win against India: the Rajputs and the Gurkhas.

Cheers,

Ayo Gorkhali.

Posted by: Gorkhali at April 15, 2007 4:28 AM

"It is yet to be known how the Al-Qaeda propaganda material made its way to Bihar."

...with a government escort, no doubt....

Posted by: exsgtbrown at April 16, 2007 3:22 PM