| FrontPageMag.com | By Robert Spencer | By Hugh Fitzgerald | Books | Dhimmi Watch | Robert Spencer | Islam 101 | Qur'an Blog |  |
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
The worst form of terrorism. Worse than flying commericial airliners into high-rise office buildings. Worse than beheading preteen Christian girls on their way to school. Worse than launching attacks from civilian areas in order to use retaliatory actions to score propaganda points. The worst form of terrorism.
And with Ban Ki-Moon vowing to do the OIC's bidding more zealously than ever, watch for the UN to call for muzzling of all "criticism of Islam," i.e., exploration of the elements of Islam that the jihadists are using to encourage violence. And that will allow the jihadists to operate unhindered.
"‘Islamophobia Worst Form of Terrorism,’" by Siraj Wahab for Arab News, with thanks to LGF:
ISLAMABAD, 17 May 2007 — Foreign ministers of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) yesterday expressed grave concern at the rising tide of discrimination and intolerance against Muslims, especially in Europe and North America. “It is something that has assumed xenophobic proportions,” they said in unison.Speaking at a special brainstorming session on the sidelines of the 34th Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers (ICFM), the foreign ministers termed Islamophobia the worst form of terrorism and called for practical steps to counter it.
The ministers described Islamophobia as a deliberate defamation of Islam and discrimination and intolerance against Muslims. “This campaign of calumny against Muslims resulted in the publication of the blasphemous cartoons depicting Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) in a Danish newspaper and the issuance of the inflammatory statement by Pope Benedict XVI,” they said. During a speech in Germany last year, the Pope quoted a 14th Century Christian emperor who said the Prophet had brought the world only “evil and inhuman” things. The Pope’s remarks aroused the anger of the whole Islamic world.
“The increasingly negative political and media discourse targeting Muslims and Islam in the United States and Europe has made things all the more difficult,” the foreign ministers said. “Islamophobia became a source of concern, especially after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, but the phenomenon was already there in Western societies in one form or the other,” they pointed out. “It gained further momentum after the Madrid and London bombings. The killing of Dutch film director Theo van Gogh in 2004 was used in a wicked manner by certain quarters to stir up a frenzy against Muslims,” the ministers pointed out. Van Gogh had made a controversial film about Muslim culture.
The OIC foreign ministers deplored the misrepresentation in the Western media of Islam and Muslims in the context of terrorism. “The linkage of terrorists and extremists with Islam in a generalized manner is unacceptable,” they said. “This is further inciting negative sentiments and hatred in the West against Muslims,” they said. The ministers also pointed out that whenever the issue of Islamophobia was discussed in international forums, the Western bloc, particularly some members of the European Union, tried to avoid discussing the core issue and instead diverted the attention from their region to the situation of non-Muslims and human rights in the OIC member states.
Of course, it is the "terrorists" and "extremists" who keep linking their actions with Islam, not the Westerners who dare to speak openly of the link they make. But the OIC, like so many, would not have you noticing that.
Posted by Robert at May 17, 2007 8:18 AM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
well... all this is your own fault.... u let it happend.
if u give some one a chance to f--- u over for the 1000th time, its not his fault its yours
eu/usa think that they can reason and apeal to the common sence of those people, i dont understand how come u get surprised each time u get f---ed by them.
hope eu/usa will wake up sooner then latter.
Posted by: Bob![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.jihadwatch.org/nav-commenters.gif)
at May 17, 2007 8:46 AM
manic islamophoebia may be a life saving condition....
Posted by: exsgtbrown at May 17, 2007 8:47 AM
The OIC foreign ministers deplored the misrepresentation in the Western media of Islam and Muslims in the context of terrorism. “The linkage of terrorists and extremists with Islam in a generalized manner is unacceptable,”
Screw you buddy. I'll decide what's "unacceptable", which is a nonsense word anyway. Which was originally used by psychiatrists
Posted by: dennisw at May 17, 2007 8:50 AM
This may indeed be the problem that rips the UN apart. I think that most americans don't really care what the UN thinks anyhow.
Islamophoebia is a life saving condition.....yours!
Posted by: credit man at May 17, 2007 8:52 AM
Yet again, the inversion of aggressors and victims. Yet again, the conflation of ideology and adherents (by the way, how can one 'defame' an ideology?). This is pure propaganda, rat-cunningly designed for the receptive ears of dhimmis and jihad-enablers.
The essence of the article is this: after all the thousands of jihadist murders, carried out by Muslims explicitly and deliberately invoking Islam's canonical texts and teachings, explicitly and deliberately aspiring to the example of the founder of that belief system...will *you infidels* please stop linking Islam and terrorism!
Posted by: Dane at May 17, 2007 8:55 AM
This is pure propaganda, rat-cunningly designed for the receptive ears of dhimmis and jihad-enablers.
I call them the wanna-believers. Because they want to believe that Islam is approximately like Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism in its tolerance of others. Nothing could be further from the truth. The truth of eternal Islamic intolerance, aggression, warfare, forced conversions is too much for these mush heads to handle. This would take them out of their comfort zone
at May 17, 2007 9:06 AM
The answer is a whole lot easier: the members of OIC should take a good hard look at themselves using a mirror. They will get an answer why there is Islamaphobia.
Posted by: bigcatgirl13106 at May 17, 2007 9:15 AM
Re: “It is something that has assumed xenophobic proportions,” they said in unison.
Yes it has assumed xenophobic proportions in Saudi Arabia and practically every Muslim country in the Mideast. People have become well aware of what Islam means everywhere-especially in the Mideast. It's the engine of Arab Imperialism, just another one of the many rationalizations for Imperialism in history.
Even "liberals" are getting it re the intolerance of Islam, including the Jew-hating and the general attitude of supremacism that is inherent in the Islamic belief-system. We are not far from the time when people will laugh at the "victim" game played by practitioners of this Intolerant-Supremacist-Arab-Imperialist "religion".
at May 17, 2007 9:19 AM
“It is something that has assumed xenophobic proportions,”
Is there any philosophy that is more xenophobic than Islam?
The September 11 attacks were supposed to make us more accepting of people who want to kill us? The London and Madrid bombings were proof of just how loving Muslims are?
“This campaign of calumny against Muslims resulted in the publication of the blasphemous cartoons depicting Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) in a Danish newspaper and the issuance of the inflammatory statement by Pope Benedict XVI,” they said.
"Blasphemous" says it all. Those cartoons were not blasphemous to anyone else. They were a reaction to the actions of Muslims.
"The killing of Dutch film director Theo van Gogh in 2004 was used in a wicked manner by certain quarters to stir up a frenzy against Muslims"
Why wasn't the killing of Theo van Gogh a WICKED act? They didn't condemn the original act, only the reaction to it.
Here's a bargain for you: I'll lose my Islamophobia when Muslims stop their campaign of world conquest and when Muslims allow Jews to exist in the area where they predated Muhammad (Saudi Arabia) and all his co-religionists (the entire Middle East).
I'll lose my Islamophobia when the former seat of the Byzantine Empire is allowed to build new Christian churches and when it allows non-Muslims to live and worship freely. (that means no jizya)
I'll lose my Islamophobia when Iran stops its campaign of "death to America".
Until then, what goes around comes around.
Posted by: PMK at May 17, 2007 9:37 AM
Islamophobia suggests "irrational fear."
I have no "irrational fear" of islam; what I have is "rational contempt" for the ideology of islam.
Is there a name for something you detest because it is rationally detestable?
That's what I got -- whatever you call it.
Posted by: witness at May 17, 2007 9:38 AM
So calling a terrorist a terrorist is terrorism.
(Is that Orwell I hear laughing... or is that barfing... in the Beyond?)
Posted by: profitsbeard at May 17, 2007 10:00 AM
Notice how the deception and usurpation just never end?
Notice how the muslims usurp Theo Van Gogh's death at the hands of a muslim spreading islam through violent jihad and attempt to twist it into evidence of their own self-created construct they call islamophobia.
Islamic culture is based on deception and usurpation and is spread through violence and is sustained by human sacrifice
Posted by: mike trivisonno at May 17, 2007 10:00 AM
"will *you infidels* please stop linking Islam and terrorism!
Posted by: Dane "
...Will those who study the Qur'an and Islam quit killing the infidels....
Posted by: exsgtbrown at May 17, 2007 10:26 AM
To them islam and muslims are superior to us all. So naturally, opposing the islamist agenda would be the worst kind of terrorism. Do these fools ever think about what they say and how it sounds to us? Yes, but their supremacist arrogance destroys any thoughts that we would consider sane and what we get is nothing that a five year old couldn’t figure out over time. Don’t you see, being concerned that islamists might want to blow you up and take everything you have is not nearly as bad as having it happen to you in reality. Nothing to worry about here except your own racist islamophobic personality so move along infidels, how dare you question the benevolence of the islamists. The ioc is the shark, the iun is the remora. What does a remora do, why it swims along finding sustenance by eating parasites off of the shark, what else?
Posted by: tgusa at May 17, 2007 10:26 AM
That's the humanaphobes calling the kettle black.
Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at May 17, 2007 10:29 AM
When I think of Buddhists I have an image of bald men in saffron robes ringing bells.
When I think of Hindu’s I see an image of Ganesha with four arms and big trunk for a nose.
Unfortunately, when I think of Muslims I have a series of unsettling images ranging from raging crowds baying for blood, children armed to the teeth (baying for blood), explosions, AK47’s, women dressed like Daleks, fatwa’s, genital mutilation, stonings, beheadings, and this is wrapped up in a maniacal rage filled face, teeth bared, eyes staring whist promoting a state of unrelenting and uncontrolled hatred for ME, the infidel. To overcome this terrible state of affairs where I have been affected by an obviously unwarranted hatred for the Religion of Peace I will have to be de-programmed, perhaps the UN will introduce a programme funded by the Saudi’s?
We’ll need a mantra to recite daily to help us on the way to enlightenment and Ban Ki Moon might be the man to come up with one. “Lun, Lun to the leligion of fun!”
at May 17, 2007 10:48 AM
*yawn* This is more of the same, nothing new to see here. Playing the victim card is something Muslims are VERY good at, but unfortunately people like us can see through it. It's just one step in the master plan to either convert us all or kill us.
Posted by: Adam_Schwartz at May 17, 2007 10:49 AM
"The ministers also pointed out that whenever the issue of Islamophobia was discussed in international forums, the Western bloc, particularly some members of the European Union, tried to avoid discussing the core issue and instead diverted the attention from their region to the situation of non-Muslims and human rights in the OIC member states."
Hahaha, that's a good joke.
So killing Infidels is a-okay but drawing funny pictures of Mohammed is TERRORISM!
Life becomes satire.
BTW does anybody know which EU members those ministers are complaining about? I'd love to encourage them.
Posted by: I<3Crusades at May 17, 2007 11:02 AM
If you follow this path to its destination, you see their goal. Very soon, sites like JW/DW will be closed down or banned for the "crime" of Islamophobia. Organizations and people fighting jihad will be criminalized. Robert, Hugh, Srdja Trifkovich, Daniel Pipes, Walid Shoebat, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Nonie Darwish, and others will be put on terrorist watch lists by the Department of Homeland Security or indicted in the Haque as war criminals against Islam. Beware, both the Islamist and the Left share the same goal.
Posted by: Provoslavni at May 17, 2007 11:14 AM
Message to Muhammadan cry-babies
You should have been more careful in what you wished for because it appears you have gotten your wish.
Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at May 17, 2007 11:18 AM
jihadtobejoking
When I think of Jesus, I project the image from the Shroud of Turin on the inside of my eyelids. And there I see the calm, serene face of my Messiah who's love reforms and redeems me daily.
When I think of the fiend muhammad (may he rot in hell forever) I see a sword-wiedling horned demon with blood dripping from claw and blade. "O Lord," I pray, "remove this scourge from the earth. Amen."
at May 17, 2007 11:24 AM
Why would we non-Muslims fear a cult that says:
2:10 Disbelievers are diseased.
2:99 Disbelievers are evil people.
2:104 For disbelievers is a painful doom.
2:171 Disbelievers are deaf, dumb, and blind.
3:28 Let not the believers take disbelievers for their friends in preference of believers.
3:73 Don't believe anyone who is not a Muslim.
3:48 Don't be friends with non-Muslims. They all hate you and want to ruin you.
4:89 Have no unbelieving friends. Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them.
4:63 Oppose those who refuse to follow Muhammad.
4:101The disbelievers are an open enemy to you.
4:144 Do not choose disbelievers as friends.
5:51 Don't take Jews or Christians for friends. If you do, then Allah will consider you to be one of them.
5:51 Jews and Christians are losers.
5:60 Allah turned unbelievers into apes and swine.
5:59 Jews and Christians are evil people.
5:57 Don't choose Jews, Christians, or disbelievers as guardians.
6:106 Stay away from disbelievers.
8:55 The worst beasts in Allah's sight are the disbelievers.
9:5 Slay the disbelievers wherever you find them.
9:28 Disbelievers are unclean.
9:30 Christians and Jews are perverts. Allah himself fights against them.
at May 17, 2007 11:30 AM
This article was so filled with false statements I felt compelled to respond. Here are some of my comments:
I hope I am not the only person from Europe and North America to take exception to your rather shrill article.
Let me state at the outset that "islamophobia" would be defined as an IRRATIONAL fear of Islam. Since 9/11/01 any fear in the West about Islam is adequately supported by almost daily news about killings, terrorist attacks, genocide, and civil war all in the name of Islam. There is nothing IRRATIONAL at all about having concerns about the corrosive effect of Islamic fundamentalism on societies around the world.
1. "The rising tide of discrimination and intolerance against Muslims . . .is something that has assumed xenophobic proportions." Please be reminded that Islam is not associated with any race. Some 80% of Muslims are not Arab. In fact, the largest racial group of Muslims is not Arab but Indonesian.
2. "Islamophobia [is] the worst form of terrorism." A major website called www.TheReligionofPeace.com has documented over 8,300 individual acts of deadly Islamic terrorism around the world since September 11, 2001. Last week alone, there were 66 Islamic attacks which killed 511 people (mostly Muslim) and injured an additional 489. If the carnage from "islamophobia" exceeds those figures, please tell me where I can see the statistics.
3. "Islamophobia [is] deliberate defamation of Islam." While Pope Benedict XVI did, indeed, state that the Prophet had brought the world only "evil and inhuman" things, but there is the counter-argument from a credible representative of Islam of the good things that Muhammad introduced? Bear in mind that subsequent to the Pope's speech, 38 imams from around the world signed an "Open Letter to His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI" which stated that Muhammad "never claimed to be bringing anything fundamentally new." This denial flies in the face of the reliable Bukhari hadith, Vol. 1, Number 429, in which Muhammad claims his unique gifts include pillage and terror. Your own sacred books do more to condemn Islam than any "islamophobic."
4. "[The ministers] deplored the misrepresentation in the Western media of Islam and Muslims in the context of terror." As journalists, you would be very aware of false reporting. When terrorists leave behind letters, dvds, and audio tapes justifying their acts by quoting scriptures from the Qur'an and by shouting "Allahu Akbar," is it misrepresentation to comment on those facts in the news reports?
5. ". . millions of Muslims in the Western countries .. . are further alienated and targeted by hatred and discrimination." Please understand, immigrant Muslims in the United States have above average incomes here, and they are much better off than they were in their countries of origin. Furthermore, it has been well-documented that discrimination against Jews in the U.S. is proportionately much higher than discrimination against Muslims. Most Americans don't have a problem with Muslims (people), but rather Islamic fundamentalism (religion).
6. " . . need to enhance efforts to promote greater understanding and awareness of Islam." Unfortunately, much of the literature produced by KSA on Islam and distributed in the U.S. is filled with hatred. See "Saudi Publications on Hate Ideology Invade American Mosques" at www.freedomhouse.org/religion
So, here is the remedy: Rather than whine about how Islam is misunderstood in Europe and North America, the KSA should stop using its largess to fund intolerant madrassas and mosques, to print hate-filled literature, and to fund terrorist activities. Instead, the money should be spent on secular education, economic development, and promoting equality for all. There was an inscription in the Kabbah before Muhammad founded Islam. It said, “He that soweth good shall reap joy; he that soweth evil shall reap sorrow; can you do evil and be rewarded with good? Nay, as grapes cannot be gathered from thorns.” (Ishaq, p. 86)
I challenge anyone at ArabNews or from the OIC conference to tell me, honestly and with credible documentation, what were the good things that Muhammad introduced?
at May 17, 2007 11:56 AM
I will admit i suffer from
bulletophobia
bombophobia
wmdophobia
assaultophopia
beheadingophobia
...and probably Islamophobia...
...all based on current world events created by Islam...
Posted by: exsgtbrown at May 17, 2007 12:06 PM
"The ministers also pointed out that whenever the issue of Islamophobia was discussed in international forums, the Western bloc, particularly some members of the European Union, tried to avoid discussing the core issue and instead diverted the attention from their region to the situation of non-Muslims and human rights in the OIC member states."
Well at least some Westerners are thinking.
"O Lord," I pray, "remove this scourge from the earth." Amen Ynkedoodl2.
Posted by: ofcourse at May 17, 2007 12:10 PM
Our definition of terrorism:
ter-ror-ism: the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion.
Their definition of terrorism:
ter-ror-ism: the systematic use of events especially as a means of finding us out.
Posted by: Miss_Anthrope at May 17, 2007 12:23 PM
How much more rope do we have to give the fascists before we pull the pin and snap the odontoid process...?
Posted by: eloivsdiablo at May 17, 2007 12:26 PM
Their definition of Islamophobia:
Is-lam-o-pho-bi-a: an exaggerated usually inexplicable and illogical fear of Islam.
Our definition of Islamophobia:
Is-lam-o-pho-bi-a: an exaggerated yet realistic fear of removal of one's head from one's neck especially by the sword.
Posted by: Miss_Anthrope at May 17, 2007 12:27 PM
Lets just make sure I am clear on this concept ok. You are an Islamophobe if you notice and comment upon common sensory input relative to what is being done and said in the name of Islam. In order to not be an Islamophobe you must not hear what Muslims are saying, you must not see what the Qur’an is preaching, you must not speak about Islam. Three monkeys see no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil. Well unfortunately for Islamists the only monkeys are them if they believe this is going to happen.
Posted by: Ameriki at May 17, 2007 1:23 PM
Speaking at a special brainstorming session on the sidelines of the 34th Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers
Brainstorming? Don't you require some brains before you commence that type o activity?
Just asking...:)
Posted by: thomas ato at May 17, 2007 2:12 PM
Speaking at a special brainstorming session on the sidelines of the 34th Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers
Brainstorming? Don't you require some brains before you commence that type o activity?
Just asking...:)
Posted by: thomas ato at May 17, 2007 2:17 PM
So if I say that there is nothing within this universe that requires the existence of Allah for life to evolve and form and therefore declare that there is no such thing as "Allah" - is that Islamophobic?
If this intractable statement terrifies Muslims, I guess this would make me a terrorist of sorts...yet debunking the Allah myth is bloodless.
Imagine:
No Allah, no more belief in Islam.
No Islam, no war, know peace.
at May 17, 2007 2:28 PM
And Islam teaches first degree murder too-- a capital crime under OUR laws.
Get it out of here now!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: pythagoras at May 17, 2007 3:26 PM
Dagnabbit, the OIC and CAIR keep calling it Islamophobia.
Try "IslamoRealism".
I think back to the movie "To Kill A Mockingbird", where a rabid dog comes into town. Everybody goes indoors while Atticus Finch gets his rifle and kills the dog. Those who worship Political Correctness believe you're supposed to ignore that the dog is slavering and snapping; you're supposed to "dialog" with him, pretending that he's rational, there's no danger, and you can forge a win-win compromise. Realism understands that the dog IS dangerous: he may not want to be, he may not have chosen to be, but he IS; and we have to deal with the reality of that.
Posted by: A_Nonny_Mouse at May 17, 2007 4:26 PM
Hamas murdering Fatah. Hezbollah murdering Lebanese. Syrians murdering Lebanese. Turks murdering Kurds. Iranians murdering Iraqi's. al Qaeda murdering everyone.
The OIC needs to address just how many Muslims were murdering Muslims and stop whining about what the secular and Christian west is governing in it's own people where no one is being murdered, deprived of the necessities of life and have freedom to be Muslims.
at May 17, 2007 4:36 PM
I can't remember the Surah and verse number off by heart, but isn't "Islamophobia Worst Form of Terrorism" merely a translation into PC-speak of "Persecution is Worse Than Carnage"? In other words: Muslims are busy identifying themselves as 'the persecuted' ('nobody loves me, everybody hates me') - and in the Koran the proper response to that is to violently eliminate the 'persecutor'...
Posted by: dumbledoresarmy at May 17, 2007 4:41 PM
rising tide of discrimination and intolerance against Muslims, especially in Europe and North America. “It is something that has assumed xenophobic proportions,” they said in unison.
ok lets look at "xenophobic proportions" muslims in North American /Europe..
a, did they lose any body parts, ie heads, limbs, such as the 3 Christian girls in Indoneisia? or in Thailand? etc.
b, did any muslim embassy get put on fire? or any mosques get torched?
the answers are a big NO!
Now lets just compare what has happened to non muslims in muslim countries? yes non muslims have been killed, ie shootings, beheadings, etc.
yes Churchs have been burnt down to the ground, etc.
The Foreign ministers of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) need to be reminded that terroism against non muslims and even muslims at the hands of islamists are real and even deadly.
at May 17, 2007 5:31 PM
LOL..."worst form of terrorism"???
It's his own schizobabble that is the worst form of that mental disorder call malignant narcissistic projection.
Classic taqqiyah at its best!
LOL
at May 17, 2007 6:33 PM
This headline can be divided into two sections: Truth & Lies.
First the Truth: "During a speech in Germany last year, the Pope quoted a 14th Century Christian emperor who said the Prophet had brought the world only “evil and inhuman” things."
Now for the Lies: everything else!
Posted by: champ at May 17, 2007 8:19 PM
Would rather be labelled Islamophobe than DHIMMI...
Well latest dim witted Prez of U.N is called Ban Ki-Moon-with all this 'Mooning' around guess he has something in common with Islamists.
Who cares what useless U.N says anyway-am looking forward to film coming out which details
corruption that high ranking officials as well as
soldiers have indulged in-they'll be too busy diving for cover soon.
at May 17, 2007 9:47 PM
I always love to see how the moslem mind works. They are equating the actual harm done to non-moslems throughout the world by moslems...even in western nations....with the same non-moslems talking about what moslems are doing in the name of islam.
And in their minds, the talking we are doing is WORSE than the actions of the moslems!
All I can say is "never the twain shall meet".
at May 18, 2007 9:03 AM
These people can call us all the nasty PC names they want. We can NOT permit Islam to massacre our people and take over our nation (which is what it is presently setting itself up to do)!!!
I would rather be called "Islamphobic" now than be "Islamic" later on!
I am not personally bothered by being called "Islamophobic" anyway. I acually consider the term "Islamophobia" a compliment (like being called "Islamosavvy"). If it bothers Muslims, great!
Posted by: pythagoras at May 18, 2007 1:46 PM
So the lady accross the street tells me that creepy little invaders have been shitting all over her kitchen lately. She goes on to explain that they vanish the moment the light is switched on, so she decided to sprinkle some insecticide on an old leg of lamb and, without much thought for the consequences, she simply tossed it behind the refrigerator to see what would happen...
So I'm over there borrowing some sugar (along with a few eggs, and a bowl of flour) and I notice this poor helpless brown creature desparately rocking back and forth and spinning around on his back in the middle of the floor. His tiny legs clutched valiantly at the air, as if in a last desparate bid to right himself and scurry to safety under the counter. I stared in sad disbelief as his smoothe hard carapace sparkled mournfully under the fluorescent kitchen lights. And my blood ran cold.
I smiled politely as I left with with my eggs and the bowl of flour (and some butter), but my stomach was already lurching from the sight of that pitiful creature struggling in such brave futility for his life.
I resolved to never speak to, or indeed even look at, that particular "neighbour" ever again (let alone visit or try to borrow anything from her).
It was only much later that I came to realize that I may have witnessed the worst incident of malicious poisoning ever perpetrated by one of gods creatures upon another. The lingering look of misery and betrayal on the face of that helpless little insect may just haunt me forever. In more than two thousand years of human history, surely no other killing has even come close in callous viscious savagery. In time I began to suspect the awful truth that it may in fact have been the most horrific killing ever, ever - and by several orders of magnitude even!
I'm sorry, I guess I'm getting all emotional about it again, so I better go and drown this dreadful feeling in some really excellent Danish beer.
Posted by: lietzout berzerker at May 18, 2007 2:45 PM
Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.
(Note: Comments on articles are unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jihad Watch or Robert Spencer. Comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying may be summarily deleted. However, the fact that particular comments remain on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Robert Spencer of the views expressed therein.)