| FrontPageMag.com | By Robert Spencer | By Hugh Fitzgerald | Books | Dhimmi Watch | Islam 101 | Qur'an Blog | Raymond Ibrahim | Robert Spencer |  |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
When Annie Jacobsen first wrote about Flight 327 in 2004, she was ridiculed as hysterical and smeared as racist. But now a new DHS report, released through a Washington Times FOIA request, appears to have vindicated her view that the flight was a probe or dry run by jihadists.
"More details on Flight 327 released," by Audrey Hudson in the Washington Times, with thanks to all who sent this in:
The inspector general for Homeland Security late Friday released new details of what federal air marshals say was a terrorist dry run aboard Northwest Airlines Flight 327 from Detroit to Los Angeles on June 29, 2004.Several portions of the report remain redacted. The release stems from a Freedom of Information request by The Washington Times in April 2006. The Times first reported on July 22 that this and other probes and dry runs were occurring on commercial flights since the September 11 terrorist attacks.
Look for the full report in Wednesday's edition of The Times.
Excerpts fom 51-page inspector general report:
On the flight, 13 Middle Eastern men behaved in a suspicious manner that aroused the attention and concern of the flight attendants, passengers, air marshals and pilots.
Briefly, the following events occurred. Thirteen Middle Eastern men were traveling together as a musical group, 12 carrying Syrian passports and one, a lawful permanent resident of the United States of Lebanese descent, purchased one-way tickets from Detroit to Los Angeles. Six of the men arrived at the gate together after boarding began, then split up and acted as if they were not acquainted. According to air marshals, the men also appeared sweaty and nervous. An air marshal assigned to Flight 327 observed their behavior and characterized it as "unusual," but made no further reports at the time.
During the flight, the men again acted suspiciously. Several of the men changed seats, congregated in the aisles, and arose when the fasten seat belt sign was turned on; one passenger moved quickly up the aisle toward the cockpit and, at the last moment, entered the first class lavatory. The passenger remained in the lavatory for about 20 minutes. Several of the men spent excessive time in the lavatories. Another man carried a large McDonald's restaurant bag into a lavatory and made a thumbs-up signal to another man upon returning to his seat.
Flight attendants notified the air marshals on board of the suspicious activities.
In response, an air marshal directed a flight attendant to instruct the cockpit to radio ahead for law-enforcement officials to meet the flight upon arrival. After arriving, Flight 327 was met by federal and local law enforcement officials, who gathered all 13 suspicious passengers, interviewing two of them. An air marshal photocopied the passengers' passports and visas. The names of the suspicious passengers were run through FBI databases, indicating the musical group's promoter had been involved in a similar incident in January 2004. No other derogatory information was received, and all 13 of the men were released.
Posted by Robert at May 28, 2007 12:06 AM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
|
The whole purpose of terrorism is to cause fear in the general public.
Even if these men were just playing a prank on the passengers (or "Mau-Mauing" in Tom Wolfe's phrase), they caused fear in the other passengers.
Therefore, they were deliberately practicing terrorism.
If we were serious about this war, they shouldn't have been let go.
Posted by: rickl![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.jihadwatch.org/nav-commenters.gif)
at May 28, 2007 12:45 AM
Gee, I wonder if "kiera" and "reza" will say
sorry. Somehow I doubt it.
They want their own banking, and their own prayer rooms, etc. Let them have their
own planes.
at May 28, 2007 12:49 AM
The FBI should have checked what music was in their cases.
I would have been suspicious of "The Gotterdammerung" was a selection.
Or "Jihad" (by the Prevaricators).
I hope the intelligence services have continued to follow up on these guys. Who they contacted after this kind of "dry run" is likely to be revealing.
Posted by: profitsbeard at May 28, 2007 1:18 AM
I wonder if they're still flying around America, testing the water and deliberately terrorizing airline passengers and flight crews. The notorious November imams blatantly encouraged adverse reactions so they could file a frivolous lawsuit, which I hope and pray backfires in their filthy faces.
Air travel has devolved to an almost intolerable level since 9/11, with new restrictions, inconveniences, and regulations added to the long list continuously. I was two minutes late for the 30 minute check-in deadline last week and it cost me $25 to take a later flight and seven wasted hours in the Memphis and Atlanta airports. I could have carried my bag on but all of my cosmetics would have gone in the trash, as well as some very expensive perfume and champagne. I just couldn't stand there and watch the TSA staff gleefully toss an unopened bottle of Dom Perignon, still in the box, in the garbage.
All I could think about as I made the decision to check my bag and wait it out was the fact that muslims are responsible for turning air travel into a nightmare. It used to be so pleasant and uneventful and now you never know what to expect. Muslims---what are they good for?
Posted by: Susanp at May 28, 2007 1:22 AM
I have a strange feeling that this was the last dry run and it was successful. Except for the fact that they were detected by excessive movement and abnormal behaviour, they achieved what they wanted to from this dry run. I expect a real McCoy. I want to be wrong.
Posted by: arjun.sevak at May 28, 2007 1:31 AM
root_cause said
They want their own banking, and their own prayer rooms, etc. Let them have their own planes.
Of course, they do.
And since all religions are the same, I'm sure someone can think of examples of when Christian/Jewish/Hindu/Buddhist pilots started chanting to their god of choice and pointed the plane's nose at the ground. Happens all the time.
Posted by: special_guest at May 28, 2007 2:03 AM
You may view a copy of the OIG report here:
https://www.theaviationnation.com/documents/OIG_Report_Flight_327.pdf
Posted by: FederalAirMarshal at May 28, 2007 2:10 AM
Wonder if that musician knows how to play Mozart's requiem Mass?
Posted by: Timur at May 28, 2007 2:32 AM
HMMM...Champagne and perfume...HMMM...
I would think it is a natural course of events that jihadidts would try dry runs. 13 jihadists playing games is prety expensive, but , I guess with all those MI bucks, money is no object...
Posted by: duh_swami at May 28, 2007 2:52 AM
Ping
at May 28, 2007 3:03 AM
"The FAM supervisor and the FBI agent examined the visas, not noticing they had expired June 10, 2004."
And these guys carry guns...and are charged with protecting US...
Posted by: Arm A. Geddon at May 28, 2007 3:04 AM
I think maybe it's not only "dry runs" but simple harassment, a kind of muscle flexing and showing off, a form of psychological intimidation that keeps them in the news and in the consciousness of young Muslims they want to entrap.
at May 28, 2007 3:04 AM
51 pages...
Number of times "muslim" appears: 0
Number of times "islam" appears: 0
at May 28, 2007 3:20 AM
It shouldn't be surprising that Muslims would be involved in intimidation tactics since Islam is a power ideology. We Infidels should do two things: Try to live life as unintimidated as we can, and reduce Muslim immmigration to the West.
Posted by: jewdog at May 28, 2007 3:46 AM
It shouldn't be surprising that Muslims would be involved in intimidation tactics since Islam is a power ideology. We Infidels should do two things: Try to live life as unintimidated as we can, and reduce Muslim immigration to the West.
Posted by: jewdog at May 28, 2007 3:47 AM
"51 pages...
Number of times "muslim" appears: 0
Number of times "islam" appears: 0"
Posted by: Arm A. Geddon
Why are you surprised? The Homeland Security Chief has already said that they aren't to link Islam to terrorism for P(roven)C(rap) reasons. And the borders are to remain unsecure for economic ones only the gurus in Washington DC seem to benefit from.
Posted by: senor doeboy at May 28, 2007 3:57 AM
Airlines need a passenger Civil Rights Act that allows the passenger a right to delay a plane for any reason at any time prior to take off, if the passenger simply wants off the plane for any reason. This way nobody feelings have to be hurt when you simply do not want to travel with jihadi (the religious one) whom you fear is a gaszi (an infidel slayer).
Posted by: David England at May 28, 2007 6:16 AM
"An air marshal assigned to Flight 327 observed their behavior and characterized it as "unusual," but made no further reports at the time."
-- from the article above
"Unusual"? Without more? What might explain such a mild description, and what explains having the thirteen let go? Fear of how it would look? Fear of CAIR and the people who support CAIR? Was that ever a consideration? And in matters of potential mass death, should that ever be given the slightest consideration -- or is not the fear, at every step, of now offending Muslims (false offending, pretend victimhood, manufactured indignation) itself one of the most useful weapons of violent (and all the other kinds) of Jihad?
Posted by: Hugh at May 28, 2007 6:29 AM
this is for sure a "dry run", but what answers did they come up with? did they think they could do these antics without being detected, or where they mearly doing what the infamous immans wanted to achieve, lawsuits?
what would you do if you happen to sit next to one of them would you openly question their actions, insult mohummad,islam just to get a rise from them?
l would think to insult them with a rather funny question, ie since you regard mohummad the perfect man, does that mean you get to rape little nine years old girls?
at May 28, 2007 6:30 AM
Can't you Americans see that these idiots were teasing you, as a writer above notes they were causing terror in you with their implied reactions. If it had been me on the plane I would have walked over to them and laughed at the cliche they were showing themselves to be, maybe even thrown in an Allahu Akbar just to put the wind up their tails.
AND if some guy goes into the bathroom with a FULL McDonalds bag and comes out with an EMPTY one I could not resist drawing attention to his disgusting eating habits.
If some guy is acting like a potential terrorist on a plane, how about just laughing at him first. I think that is what we would do in Australia.
Posted by: payingattention at May 28, 2007 6:44 AM
...said payingattention, just before he was blown up.
Posted by: Mike_W at May 28, 2007 6:49 AM
This was not terrorism. This was a bunch of Muslims teasing and psyching out Americans who mostly cowered in fear. These Muslim boyz were having some fun at our expense.
Was not a terrorist dry run. Just Muslim intimidation on board a flight which is reason enough to throw them in jail and try them. But that didn't happen due to the political correctness of the Gov't slugs in charge of airport security
Posted by: dennisw at May 28, 2007 7:06 AM
test
Posted by: jihadwatch at May 28, 2007 8:14 AM
i think at seeing the thumbs up stage i wouldve launched some type of counter attack. i'm not sitting by and taking this crap, they act suspiciously i act aggressively.
Posted by: leonthepigfarmer at May 28, 2007 8:20 AM
" If it had been me on the plane I would have walked over to them and laughed at the cliche they were showing themselves to be, maybe even thrown in an Allahu Akbar just to put the wind up their tails. "
me too, i'm generally not afraid to stir crap up with folk i know to be weak. why didnt the otehr passengers start something? 'cos the mussies knew that the passengers were scared. i'd show the "thumbs up" f****r scared once i had kicked the s**t out of him in front of his mates,
Posted by: leonthepigfarmer at May 28, 2007 8:23 AM
'Can't you Americans see that these idiots were teasing you'
Above were the last unrecorded words of an Islamist sympathizer aboard the United Airlines Flight 175. Subsequently, concerned passengers more fortunate than their predecessors have been labelled racist paranoid Islamophobes for being unable to distinguish between an act of terrorism and some jovial horseplay performed by a handful of USA haters going about their everyday business.
Posted by: western infidel at May 28, 2007 8:43 AM
i'd show the "thumbs up" f****r scared once i had kicked the s**t out of him in front of his mates,
the jet that landed in the field in Pa, l think thats what happened to them,the islamists got beat up, also knowing the reactions of people towards muslim terrorists, passengers will not put up with this BS and will take down those islamists. it will never be the same after 9-11, islamists know that to.
Posted by: ZenaWarriorPrincess at May 28, 2007 8:59 AM
One problem airline staff always come across: the whole world arrives at the airport and brings their problems with them.
This article definitely builds a case for profiling the behaviours of potential plane travellers. It must be done in such a way as to not be a burden to the average traveller, i.e. allow everyone, but ban on the first hint of recalcitrant behaviour.
Muslims (especially those eager to imitate their "prophet") are, unfortunately, gaining a worse and worse track record in this regard.
Posted by: jamesforsyth.net at May 28, 2007 9:02 AM
the jet that landed in the field in Pa, l am very sorry to make this error, it was "the jet that crashed in the field in PA". again traveling by air will never be the same, and l hope we make it most uneasy for islmaists, they know we are watching and will not take their crap anymore.
Posted by: ZenaWarriorPrincess at May 28, 2007 9:11 AM
I sure hope if I'm unfortunate enough to board a jihadi flight that I'll be sitting next to leonthepigfarmer and not that thumb sucking payingattention.
The only thing it seems he/she is paying attention to is fairy land.
Pull your head out of the sand and have a look around.
I know a lot of Aussies and thank god they are not as naive as you.
at May 28, 2007 9:16 AM
It was a "dry run".
Why?
To see how much they can and can't get away with. It has two purposes...
(1) Everytime a dry run happens and nothing is found they can claim victemhood and discrimination. CAIR and can get up and scream etc. It weakens the defenses like any good diversion. Enough "false alarms" makes people lax.
(2) It gives other jihadist examples of what is a no-no and what you can get away with. It allows them to make better plans for the real thing. The two groups don't even have to know each other. All the jihadist have to do is read the report.
The most important part of the test was the time. How long did it take the authorities to one be warned of what was going on and two how long before action was taken. Time is critical in these kind of attacks.
at May 28, 2007 9:30 AM
Arm A. Geddon
"51 pages...
Number of times "muslim" appears: 0
Number of times "islam" appears: 0"
This is an order from King Georgie himself. The FBI is now a PC certified operation.
at May 28, 2007 9:36 AM
greatcomet, from experience, I can tell you the fbi is dangerously pc and that some of the best intelligence on the street is ignored due to this mindset and arrogance.
The security of our nation is in our own hands.
Posted by: the poetess at May 28, 2007 9:53 AM
So what happened to the old days when someone
at an airport would make a wise crack like "HI, JACK!" and get arrested?
Have our expectations changed or are they simply being marginalized?
Posted by: witness at May 28, 2007 9:55 AM
The attempt to intimidate Annie Jacobsen, even the attempt to use the law to silence those who report facts, critically analyse Islam, is not new. This has occurred before in America. One such conflict lasted over a decade prior to the Civil War. It was the "speech code" issue of its time.
The "Slaveocracy" of the Old South (as J.Q. Adams angrily call it) attempted to make illegal all speech critical of slavery in congress, in the South and even in the North (they tried to shut down Garrison's Liberator magazine). Old former President J.Q. Adams fought like a tiger to get rid of the "gag rules" in congress as he warned that the issue of free speech was at stake, that the issue was one with issue of the bondage of the Americans held by the slave holders.
The attempt to silence Adams and others did much to make the Abolition Movement into a mighty force. Ordinary folks saw clearly that the "Slaveocracy" was a threat to all free people. The Muslims who attempt to harass and intimidate, to silence those who critically analyse Islam, to silence people who report facts on provocative Muslim behavior, are a similar threat to freedom.
Posted by: Frank at May 28, 2007 10:13 AM
So what happened to the old days when someone
at an airport would make a wise crack like "HI, JACK!" and get arrested?
Have our expectations changed or are they simply being marginalized?
Posted by: witness
-------------------------------------------------
Wanna bet if a Caucasian , non Arab/M.E looking person uttered the word "Hijack" under their breath or acted as suspiciously and someone heard it i bet they'de be tackled and taken off the plane and arrested instantaniously.
That would be a safemove for the authorities cause then no Muslims could be outraged and the authorities wouldn't have to be in fear of being not PC and face the reprisals.
They are making next to impossible for honest people to report or stand up against threats or suspicions. we are being conditioned in our culture to not stand up for ourselves or what is right anymore.
at May 28, 2007 10:33 AM
The attempt by some Muslims to criminalize speech that is critical of Islam, the attempt to silence ordinary citizens who report provocative Muslim behavior on aircraft and other places, are "gag rules". This attempt to silence people will back-fire. The first amendment right to the free and open exchange of ideas and opinions based on reason is in danger from Muslims who want to impose "gag rules". Ordinary people see that.
Posted by: Frank at May 28, 2007 10:34 AM
If (I pray it never happens again) the jihadists ever try to hijack a plane, I hope there are enough people, men and women who will rise up and take the plane back. There is after all, a 200 to 4 or 5 majority. Some will die in the fight to kill those bastards, but all will die if they are allowed to hijack the plane.
Use carry-on baggage as shields and rush them...overwhelming numbers will work.
H*ll, Homeland Security should be holding seminars for the flying public on how to defend an airliner, instead they are telling us not to worry.
Posted by: interestinconundrum at May 28, 2007 10:54 AM
Muslims fly aircraft into buildings. The victims families are paid off. New departments with unelected officals running them are created. The gubment bends over backwards in search of sensitivity for the perpetrators ideology. The airports are turned into prisons, prisons where some of the more violent inmates are pulling the strings. Take a good look people, this is what totalitarianism looks like. Right now it is at the airport but when a bus or train is blown up get ready to lose more of your rights. The gubment does not care about you, your rights, the Constitution or the Bill of rights. These agencies are more dangerous than the terrorists. They pave the way for the islamists to do what ever they feel like doing. Free speech, not for long, the islamists and their demoncrat allies combined with unelected agency officials/employees have begun their assault on all of us and ee are allowing it. If you fly I will say, you probably would have got on a cattle car in Germany during the early forties, anyone who participates in this hoax will not have their freedom of anything in the future. You sacrificed freedom for security and guess what now you have neither, so the old saying is true. I amazes me that with all that has gone on some people still think that the gubment cares about protecting you. The gubment is in bed with the islamists, it is as obvious as the nose on your face. I have no use for any of them, I won’t even give them the time of day. I am watching and waiting, for a state, any state to fight back independently against the islamogubment. I will gladly move there, im a good citizen, I buy things, hire people, contribute to my community and obey the laws. I will take all of this to the state that finally stands up to this islamogubment and says enough, states rights mean something and we have an obligation to look after our citizens! You can get rid of Bush but that won’t solve the problem. The unelected and unfireable anti Americans will still be there in these depts, destroying our country as they collect a salary from taxpayers. Its mean, I’m cruel, but I hope every last one of them ends up in the hands of the islamists, it would be the best thing that ever happened to us. Let them deal with those among us who want to lie down with them, that way we end up with zero blood on our hands yet we reap the benefits of a major housecleaning. Americans, take back your country, it starts with loudly refusing to give up your rights, it continues with where you work and for whom, it goes on with where and what you buy. If you give it up these rats will take it from you and then crap in your face later, isnt that obvious now? All I can say is, what a freaking disgrace!
Posted by: tgusa at May 28, 2007 11:38 AM
So will Snopes now stop saying that Annie Jacobsen was delusional and stop putting this down as an urban legend or whatever they call things they've shown to be false? I'm beginning to suspect that Snopes is not politically neutral.
Posted by: Lydia at May 28, 2007 11:51 AM
I am unable to open FederalAirMarshall's link to the entire document. Does anyone know, is there any more information on this quote:
the musical group's promoter had been involved in a similar incident in January 2004
Any details, anyone?
Posted by: special_guest at May 28, 2007 2:19 PM
special_guest said
Any details, anyone?
D'oh! That line in the report was a reference to this story. D'oh! The same story that Lydia just referred to.
Posted by: special_guest at May 28, 2007 2:39 PM
We will never know if this was a dry run. What we do know is that Muslims are teasing us and the seciurity apparatus.
They are playing mind games, instilling a "fear" of terrorism. That is how mohammed played it - "I have been made victorious through terror". Terrorism's first goal is to instll that fear, which then paralyses the victim society.
This startegy was tried out by a couple of students(muslims it hardly needs mentioning), who boarded a flight from Manchester to Spain, and then returned on the same day. Their stated reason was tourism. They behaved in such a manner that other apssengers simply insisted that they be taken off the flight or they werent going to fly. Period. This served notice on the airline staff and security alike. Any person behaving in suspicious a manner, would be intercepted, for fear that passengers would delay the flight.
I really feel that people behaving in a manner to cause alarm and distress to other passengers on a flight, should be treated in the same way a person who shouts "FIRE" in a crowded hall.
Posted by: DP111 at May 28, 2007 4:28 PM
Do not count on your fearless federal governmental law enforcement and intelligence ostriches (with heads in sand) to do anything to protect us unless it is too obvious to ignore, like Ft. Dix, and be prepared to defend your homes, families, possessions and rights as Americans.
Posted by: HOV Dummy at May 28, 2007 4:46 PM
I would think, if our air marshals and FBI etc were on the ball this would be as much a dry run for them also and help them plan strategy. But don't hold your breath.
Posted by: poetcomic1 at May 28, 2007 4:48 PM
"i think at seeing the thumbs up stage i wouldve launched some type of counter attack. i'm not sitting by and taking this crap, they act suspiciously i act aggressively.
Posted by: leonthepigfarmer"
...or at least, grab you shirt coller as if you were talking into a microphone and say, "we have a 44 situation..six suspicious players, please advise "Q", Plan 6 being activitated, alert response team notified...."
..sit back and keep staring at the individuals...there will be armed air marshals on the flight as there are on all flights these days,...
Posted by: exsgtbrown at May 29, 2007 7:10 AM
All I can say is, fools like these guys better live it up in these days where air marshals are in charge of keeping an eye on us poor kuffir. When feds are benched for doing a piss poor job of keeping peace and maintaining order, there will be replacements. How do you think these replacements will respond to jackasses in turbans giving each other a thumbs up after a restroom trip?
Posted by: Sam at May 29, 2007 7:15 AM
So hopefully today's report will give some credence to what Ms Jacobsen wrote...
It is time we stopped messing around. How many innocent civilians of all races and creeds have been killed by the insane fanatics who use Islam as their excuse? Think of the children on the 9/11 planes, think what they felt as they were flown into buildings and killed. Think of the children in Baghdad schools blown up by Sunni/Shiite fanatics....
This is not a game people, this is DEADLY serious. It's time we started seriously profiling...
Yes, I know that won't catch all the suicidal nuts but it will stop many of them.
Profiling isn't wrong, it's common sense. If you have a problem with it - turn your anger to the person who caused the profiling, not the security official just doing his/her job to keep you safe.
Look at the following:
Politically Correct, To A Fault
To ensure we Americans never offend anyone – particularly fanatics intent on killing us – airport screeners are not allowed to profile people.
They will, however, continue to perform random searches of 80-year-old women, little kids, airline pilots with proper identification, Secret Service agents who are members of the President’s security detail, and 85-year old Congressmen with metal hips (these all have taken place- with the Congressman undergoing a strip search!) Let’s pause a moment and take the following test which entails a history of contemporary terrorism (we Americans have such short memory spans) in chronological order:
In 1970: American University of Beirut President, Malcolm Kerr, was murdered in Beirut, Lebanon by:
A. Huey, Dewie and Louie
B. Heckle and Jeckle
C. Sylvester and Tweetie or
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages 17 and 40.
In September 1970, TWA Flight #741 and Pan Am Flight #93 were hijacked by:
A. The Marx Bros.
B. The Smothers Bros.
C. The Franciscan Brothers or
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40 (in the case of the so-called Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) who then flew the planes to Amman, Jordan).
In 1972, 11 Israeli athletes were killed in the Munich Olympics by:
A. Grandma Moses
B. The night cleaning crew at Rockefeller Center
C. Invaders from Mars or
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40.
In March 1973, U.S. Ambassador Cleo Noel & DCM George Moose were murdered in Khartoum Sudan by:
A. Tom & Jerry
B. Ben & Jerry
C. Dean & Jerry
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
In June 1976 U.S. Ambassador, Francis Meloy and Two other Americans were killed in Lebanon by:
A. The Lennon Sisters
B. The Pointer Sisters
C. The Sisters of Mercy
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
In 1979, The U.S. Embassy in Iran was taken over and embassy officials held hostage for 14 months by:
A. Norwegians from the Lichen Herbarium of the University of Oslo;
B. Elvis;
C. A tour bus filled with 80-year-old women; or
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
In April 1983, U.S. Embassy in Beirut was attacked with 49 killed and 120 wounded by:
A. The Three Stooges
B. The Three Musketeers
C. The Three Blind Mice or
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
In October 1983, the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up killing 241 U.S. Marines and injuring hundreds of others by:
A. A Pizza delivery boy;
B. Crazed Feminists complaining that having to throw a grenade is the beyond its burst radius in basic training was an unfair and sexist job requirement;
C. Geraldo Rivera making up for a slow news day; or
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
In June 1984, TWA flight #847 to Athens was hijacked to Beirut and U.S. Navy diver Robert Stethem was brutally murdered by:
A. Alan King;
A. Rodney King;
C. B.B. King; or
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
September 1984, William Buckley, CIA station chief in Beirut, was kidnapped tortured and murdered by:
A. Jerry Lewis
B. Carl Lewis;
C. Shari Lewis; or
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
Also in September 1984, The U.S. embassy annex in East Beirut was bombed and two American’s were killed by:
A. Hugh Grant
B. Cary Grant;
C. Ulysses S. Grant; or
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
In October 1985, the Achille Lauro cruise ship was hijacked and an elderly American man (Leon Klinghoffer) in a wheelchair was ruthlessly murdered by:
A. The Vienna Boys Choir
B. The Harlem Globetrotters
C. The French Foreign Legion; or
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
In September 1986 Pam Am Flight #73 was hijacked in Karachi, Pakistan and 17 people were killed, 150 wounded by:
A. A Polish Polka Band
B. A Spanish flamenco troupe
C. A group of Argentinean gauchos or
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
In February 1988: William Higgins kidnapped in Lebanon and murdered by:
A. Members of the AARP
B. Members of the AAA
C. Members of AA or
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
In December 1988, Pan Am flight 103 was bombed and 270 people killed by:
A. Luca Brazzi, for not being given part in “God Father 2”
B. The Tooth Fairy;
C. Butch and Sundance, who had a few sticks of dynamite left from their train mission; or
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
In 1993, the World Trade Center was bombed, six killed, hundreds injured by:
A. The entire cast of “Cats”;
B. Martha Stewart
C. Cheese-crazed tourists from Wisconsin; or
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
In March 1995, Americans employees of the U.S. consulate in Karachi, Pakistan were killed in response to arrest in the World Trade Center bombing suspect by:
A. Royal Canadian Mounties;
B. Mexican Mariachis
C. Peruvian Indians; or
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
In November 1995, U.S. troops were attacked in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and five Americans were killed by:
A. A Hassidic Rabbi;
B. A Jesuit Priest
C. An Amish Farmer; or
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
In June 1996, U.S. Marine barracks in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia bombed; 19 Americans were killed by:
A. Sigfried and Roy after having been mistaken for Liberace impersonators
B. Shannon Dougherty
C. Anna Nicole Smith; or
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
In 1998, the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by:
A. Mr. Rogers;
B. Hillary, to distract attention from Wild Bill’s women problems;
C. The World Wrestling Foundation to promote its next villain “Mustapha the Merciless”; or
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
On October 12, 2000, the USS Cole was attacked, 17 crew members were killed and 39 others injured by:
A. The little old lady from Pasadena;
B. A coalminer's daughter;
C. The Swiss Guard
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
09/11/01, four airlines were hijacked and destroyed by:
A. Bugs Bunny, Wil E. Coyote, Daffy Duck, and Elmer Fudd.
B. The U.S. Supreme Court,
C. Barney; or
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
And since then, let's see...
Four Indonesian Christian SCHOOLGIRLS beheaded...Children blown up in a Baghdad schoolyard...Young Iraquis playing soccer machine-gunned to death...A Balinese bar full of tourists blown to bits...Lthe list goes on, and on...
and on...
07/07/2006, Bombs go off in London subway trains and a bus killing 58 civilians. These were placed by:
A. Hillary Clinton
B. Sanjya
C. Paris Hilton
D. Muslim “extremists” mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
Oh, these "brave" jihadis killing children ... what heroes - what cowardly pond-scum.
Hmmm. Nope, ain’t no patterns here. Why would we ever even think about profiling and possibly offending the sensibilities of “innocent” citizens?
at May 30, 2007 2:07 PM
Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)