Muslims may deny that Muslims kill, But I don't....

Posted by: exsgtbrown at June 5, 2007 8:34 AM

A mixture of taqiyya and genuine cognitive dissonance. At least some of those questioned would take pride in Muslim responsibility for the very terrorism that they deny Muslim responsibility for.

Posted by: Dane at June 5, 2007 8:48 AM

Robert : great post great comment.

Read my hand gesture Ibrahim !!!!! (the middle finger five times)

Posted by: dgene at June 5, 2007 9:04 AM

911 conspiracy theorists who believe the US gov was responsible, cant answer one simple question. Why would any muslim's anywhere, kill themselves for George Bush? If muslims were uninvolved in 7/7, which is obviously erronious, who did it?
These people live in a state of denial. It's part of the psychosis forced on them by Allah.

Posted by: duh_swami at June 5, 2007 9:11 AM

One has to be careful when stating a ‘fact’ (a truth known by actual experience or observation; something known to be true)
For instance we could say that the sun rises every morning in the East and that’s a fact!, but we would be totally wrong. The sun does not ‘rise’, it’s the revolution of the earth that makes it look as if the sun is rising, when in fact the sun does not move at all.

We can say however that Thailand, Somalia, Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan, Israel, Jammu and Kashmir, Indonesia, the Philippines, Fort Dix, JFK Airport among other places all suffer from one particular malaise, Islam. That’s a fact.
It would also be fair to say that Islam just cannot stay at peace. That’s a fact.
The followers of Islam have been brainwashed and conditioned since birth in to the practices of Islam. That’s a fact. (With the exception of those who convert voluntarily but as PT Barnum said “There’s one born every minute”, another fact).
Wherever Muslims settle, the laws of the land have to be altered to accommodate them. That’s a fact.
Muslims are selective in what they find objectionable. That’s a fact.
They will vent for all they’re worth about cartoons and wail about fears of backlash when some errant Muslim has committed a terrorist action. That’s a fact.
They will rage when someone insults Islam, i.e. the Pope and have no problem in committing acts of murder upon those accused of verbally attacking the cult. That’s a fact.
They will not however march in their thousands, ranting and raving about their Islamic murdering brothers who are running riot in all of the places named above whilst bringing embarrassment and shame upon the religion of peace. That’s a fact.
This dereliction of human decency to highlight their rejection of the continual Jihad here and overseas should result in embarrassment, but it doesn’t. That’s a fact.
Their refusal to show any mass rejection of acts of terror and brutality shames the religion of peace. That’s a fact.
These points, and many more yet to be raised, will in the fullness of time bring those not involved with Islam and just waking up to the reality of it, to the realisation that Islam is not the peaceful entity it claims to be. That’s a fact and it, like Islamic acts of terror and brutality, is happening every day as thousands become aware of the threat these people are to the harmony and stability of the world.
Muslims will claim that these comments here are full of ‘hate’ but the reality is these comments and observations are based on fact and the fact is this, Islam is a hateful, spiteful, violent ideology which, when numbers allow causes destabilisation and unrest wherever it sets its foot.
And it’s always someone else’s fault. That’s a fact.

Posted by: Jihadtobejoking at June 5, 2007 9:29 AM

As my dad use to say; "the truth hurts." Who would these 60% of U.K. muslims say caused 7/7? Maybe disgruntled fairies? Maybe disgruntled Christian fairies? I would be interested in a comment from someone from C.A.I.R. I'm sure they could explain.

Posted by: mustang65 at June 5, 2007 9:37 AM

(UK) Survey: 'government hasn't told truth about 7/7' - survey of 500 British Muslims - 25% of Muslims polled think authorities staged bombings, 60% believe govt not told truth on 7/7 bombings
http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/society/religion/survey+government+hasnt+told+truth+about+77/545847
http://www.channel4.com/news/media/images/articles/2007/06/04_muslims_survey.doc
Related video:
http://www.channel4.com/player/v2/player.jsp?showId=6836
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZV0a8Zz6EO4

Posted by: jeffreyimm at June 5, 2007 9:43 AM

I'm surprised at the fuss surrounding this. You point a camera at Muslims and ask them about 7/7. You conduct a survey about Mulims and ask about 7/7.

What possible outcome other than seethe-o-matics, Taqiyya, obfuscation and denial was there ever going to be?

Far more telling (and far more interesting and impactful television and survey results) would have been to to put the same questions to us long-suffering natives.

Now that would have been worth watching on YouTube.

Posted by: Un:dhimmi at June 5, 2007 9:56 AM

I vote for "some other motive."

Posted by: Foehammer at June 5, 2007 10:12 AM

I know that what astounds us is how easily Muslims lie.

And not little white lies. Mohammedan Whoppers.

They know very well who's responsible for 7/7 and every other atrocity. "Taqiyya" runs in their blood, now, it's not just mental. Biological.

Posted by: darcy at June 5, 2007 10:15 AM

So what if they deny it. There are (probably over) 60% of muslims that are misleading us in order to advance islam.

Posted by: R_not at June 5, 2007 10:38 AM

This is your brain> 0

This is your brain on Islam> .

Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at June 5, 2007 10:57 AM

Oh, they believe it - don't you believe it. It is just a method or ploy to keep liberal Westerners questioning the truth and thereby obscuring or putting doubt to the truth. It is a consciense act by many taking the poll to answer not as they really know in order to project this obfuscation and keep the rising force of anti-islamism at bay.

Posted by: macdaddy at June 5, 2007 11:13 AM

Precisely, it's a propaganda tactic designed to elevate Islam and discourage westerners.

The surprise (for me, anyway) are the numbers of non-Muslims (the dhimmis) who also buy into the lies and stupidity. The National Post published an article (by Janice Tibbetts, Sept. 11, 2006), titled: "One in five Canadians believes in conspiracy theories" [about 9/11]. So, the terrorist attacks of 9/11 "were orchestrated by a 'group of highly influential Americans and others' rather than supporters of Osama bin Laden." There are even higher numbers of Canadians (more than half) who blame the U.S. for the 9/11 attacks. I believe this is evidence of some bizarre form of western cultural suicide...the exculpation of all wrong when committed by Muslims, and the denigration/dismissal of all things considered "western" (particularly, logic, reasoning, science, truth, honesty, objectivity, meritocracy, etc.) (unfortunately, the disease is not just present in the UK but is running rampant throughout the western world).

Posted by: J.S. at June 5, 2007 11:29 AM

Also ever notice the following? (I remarked on this years ago).

There are two ways on can go "wrong" in one's thinking. One way is to be overly gullible, believe everything that's told to you and uncritically accept it. The other error is to become so overly skeptical so as to believe nothing (all things are "suspect").

Notice the irony with Islam -- here you've got the Burak Believers (a fanciful critter with a woman's face and peacock tail who lands somewhere in a dream, carrying "the prophet", and "Bingo!" you get a rock with a foot in-print, and sudden claims about owning Jerusalem). On the other hand, these same Burak Believers allege that members of their own cult do not commit terrorist atrocities...that's all done by "non-Muslims." So when faced with actual evidence (the attackers self-made suicide video tape), well, that's all a hoax. But a dream-vision of flying critters -- now that's REAL!! ja.

Similarly, the ability to distinguish truth from lies also appears to be impaired. The people who run about and claim: "Bush LIED!!" clearly have no clue about what a lie IS, nor can they be relied upon to know the difference between when someone tells them the truth and when someone is lying to them...they have lost the capacity to distinguish the difference (just as their Muslim brethren can't distinguish real, factual evidence from fictitious make believe).

Posted by: J.S. at June 5, 2007 11:40 AM

Oh, and that's why the Burak Believers are so dangerous if they ever attain positions of power -- whether at universities, in government offices, in the media, in our courts...etc. etc. The possibilities for damage are endless.

Posted by: J.S. at June 5, 2007 11:43 AM

Again, what is it about the Islamic narrative that produces such profound denial and lack of self criticism within Muslims. We all deny our own sinfulness, however Muslims seem among the worst.

I suspect it is the doctrine of the infallibility of the Koran combined with Muslim supremacist teachings in the Koran. Muslims are told by heaven (so they think) that they are the most righteous and deserving people on earth by the Koran, so they must be, even in the face of widespread demonic brutality by masses of their fellow Umma.

Posted by: James Martel at June 5, 2007 11:52 AM

Yeah, James Martel, Muhammed told 'em that they were the "superior peoples" and that the Koran is the literal word of Allah.

And so they behave accordingly: arrogant, snotty, flippant, grandiose, insolent, pompous, self-aggrandizing, self-important, contemptuous, rude...how'm I doing with the word list? Also, and hugely, ENTITLEMENT. They act like no one has the right to dislike them! Oh, and God Forbid we should have access to the emotion of hate! Hello! Don't tell us how to feel, ya barbarians!

I would say that being a Muslim is synonymous with megalomania - a mental disorder marked by feelings of personal omnipotence and grandeur.

I mean, is it them, or what?

Posted by: darcy at June 5, 2007 12:47 PM

They know very well who's responsible for 7/7 and every other atrocity. "Taqiyya" runs in their blood, now, it's not just mental. Biological.

Posted by: darcy

I seem to remember a load of them dancing in the streets of Gaza. Bunch of backwards liars.

Posted by: The Goobs at June 5, 2007 1:03 PM

And let's not forget "infantile narcissism"...along with psychopathic personality disorders...and pathological lying. (bottom line: do whatever is expedient for the benefit of Islam).

Posted by: J.S. at June 5, 2007 1:04 PM

No doubt it was the Zionists, or maybe George Bush, or maybe the Thais ...

Posted by: joeblough at June 5, 2007 1:25 PM

LMAO @ these conspiracy kooks.
Not like this is a shock to us, since one part of that conspiracy machine,
"calypso" louis "I'm dyin' of @$$-cancer" farrakhan claimed that such events, notably, Hurricane Katrina, was a honkey conspiracy.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=19498

Ya just can't make this stuff up.
Schizophrenia, anyone?
LMAO

Posted by: jcom972 at June 5, 2007 1:34 PM

Let's face it these guys no full well, but they keep playing the lying game to keep stupid westerners perpetually confused.

There's a new doc out there that claims Al Qaeda doesn't exist, and that George Bush only plays stupid, and is actually very smart.

This is what happens when you have to lie, the lies keep perpetuating themselves as holes in the argument keep being exposed.

As Robert and other posters here continually point out this is part of the deception practice. It doesn't matter how insane it is to say these guys didn't do it, reality has proven there are millions of fools out there willing to listen.

Posted by: The fanatic at June 5, 2007 1:55 PM

Folks,

Let me introduce myself: my real name is Ruslan Tokhchukov. If you google it, you'll get an idea about my views. Yes, I am a Muslim, but I am aqutely aware that the Muslims pose a grave danger to the humanity. I still differentiate between Islam the religion and Islamism the hate ideology as articulated by its theorists al-Bannah, Qutb and Maududi, but the distinction becomes increasingly irrelevant because the rapidly growing majority of Muslims are Islamists to one degree or another. What is important is that the continued immigration of Muslims to the US threatens the very survival of this nation and must be stopped completely. I am a Muslim, and I say: do not let any more Muslims in, not one, from anywhere. Not from Egypt, not from Gaza, not from Lebanon, not from Pakistan, not from Londonistan, not from Canadistan. They create a "sea" in this country for its deadly enemies to swim in, and this sea is growing at an alarming rate. This demographic war is every bit as dangerous as the jihad, and is aiding it. Eurabia might be beyond salvation, but the US and Israel must shut their doors to any Muslims. And I don't want you to restrain yourselves in your Islam-bashing out of politness to me. Screw the Muslim religion and Muslims all you want, and no need to apologize to me. I should be apologizing to you for the evil Muslim do every day throughout the world. Are the posts most of you write offensive to my Muslim religion? Yes, very offensive. I want more of it! It is just normal human reaction to what Muslims do. I identify a lot with the German author Hans Habe ("And a thousand shall fall") who fought his fellow Germans and passionatelly called on the US to join Britain in its fight against Hitler. The US did not listen and got attacked, from both oceans. German-bashing did not bother him, he wanted more of it, because he knew that his people were in an iron grip of evil and pose intolerable threat to humanity, so he sided with humanity. What disgusted him was subservient pro-German "they made trains run on time" chat aboard a train between 2 Frenchmen as he fled Nazi-occupied France. Similarly, Muslim-bashing does not bother me, dhimmitude does. You cannot abuse Islam any more than Islamists do, anyway. This religion is so polluted, the best relogion for Muslims right now is no religion at all, just like a food poisonong victim needs to purge all food.

Posted by: Enragedsince1999 at June 5, 2007 2:01 PM

Yes, about the lies -- I recall (many years ago now) how a "news" CBC radio program called: "As it Happens" (i don't know if this program still exists or not), anyway, the CBC folk of this program ran a segment about "Jemaah Islamiyah" in the Phillipines...and the CBC volkish kinder, of course, interviewed a "professor" at some ding-dong "university" -- and the "professor" claimed that Jemaah Islamiyah did not exist -- it was just made-up fare to keep GWB happy. Where the CBC / BBC, etc., find or dredge-up these "profs" is beyond me. (although I do recall reading a criminology text in which the "criminologist" also argued that the Mafia was a hoax -- yeah, The Mob did not exist.) I don't know, maybe this is what happens when you're left too long in isolation or in contact with dust-laden texts...(?)

Posted by: J.S. at June 5, 2007 2:18 PM

JS, those profs aren't hard to find, since 80% of academia hosts them (see David Horowitzs site http://www.frontpagemag.com ) willingly, like such notables as ward churchill the fake indian.

Posted by: jcom972 at June 5, 2007 2:47 PM

Folks,

Here's something you can do to actually make a difference: I e-mailed Rudy Giuliani and suggested he pick hero Steven Emerson as his running mate. The 2 of them will make a perfect 9/11 ticket! Emerson will be a takiya-proof vice-president. But my e-mail was probably lost among millions of others. Can you do me a favor and e-mail Rudy at info@JoinRudy2008.com to call his attention to my e-mail? Just 1 line in the "Subject" field: "Rudy, please consider Ruslan Tokhchukov's advice Re: Emerson" would be great help. I will also try to join a web chat with Rudy's advisor Brent Seaborn tomorrow at 10 am Eastern at JoinRudy2008.com. You might want to join also.

Ruslan Tokhchukov,

Posted by: Enragedsince1999 at June 5, 2007 3:00 PM

Ruslan

Welcome aboard the lifeboat..here take my seat..I'll just sit on the deck and I don't mind the sloshing water. I'll share my rations with you also..take this cracker and a slice of Spam..uh no..I'm sorry, I'll eat the Spam..have some peanut butter. Keep talking were listening...

Posted by: pismopal at June 5, 2007 3:53 PM

So, Russ, do you think of yourself as an apostate? or what, exactly? a secularist? a Muslim in name only? can you still think of yourself as a "religious" (but not of the terrorist variety) Muslim? or more of a Muslim by virtue of culture? (I think I can guess how the jihadis would label you).

Posted by: J.S. at June 5, 2007 5:12 PM

Thanks, Ruslan, for your posts. As you suggested, I googled you ... reading over the links, I have to say that you are one brave man. Spencer could probably use someone like you on his board. Kudos to you!

Posted by: yadayada at June 5, 2007 5:26 PM

A brave man, maybe, but a muslim just the same. The first part was intended to soften us up for the second part. A logical ploy, but still a ploy.
I read the first article on Google, 'Our Place in the World: Roadmap leads to darkness.' 2003.
Interesting...poster's should read that and make up their own minds about Ruslan...there's other stuff there also...

Posted by: duh_swami at June 5, 2007 5:45 PM

duh_swami

I was thinking along the same lines as you. I think Ruslan is staying "Muslim" because it is more effective to protest against the Islamists when one is Muslim. You eliminate that crap about: "you don't understand...you're not Muslim."

On the other hand, it's not (as we all know) just Jihadism that is the problem.

IT'S THE RELIGION STUPID!!!

Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at June 5, 2007 5:57 PM

Ruslan has been active like this for a number of year's. It's probably full time and he probably makes his living from it....I did not read all the links on google, but I wonder why he is still alive.
Do other muslims take him seriously? Does he get death threats? Any attempts? Does he live in a secure, undisclosed location? Does he go to mosque?
Does he still believe that Allah is God?
I dont know, and I dont think I will try to hard to figure it out...

Posted by: duh_swami at June 5, 2007 6:09 PM

Personally, if most Muslims thought like Ruslan, I wouldn't have a problem with Islam-the-religion at all. I was admiring the fact that he says what he says without hiding behind pseudonyms (although maybe "Ruslan" is his pseudonym? :-). And he dares to state his place of residence in his articles and even has pics published of him making a stand for his views outside the Seattle Jewish Federation after the shooting. That's frankly more than I'd ever reveal about myself and my views on the Internet. And I know it's riskier for him as a Muslim to do so than it'd be for me, which is why I tip my hat to him. Hopefully, Ruslan could reveal more what ummah-life has been like for him doing what he does.

Posted by: yadayada at June 5, 2007 6:40 PM

It's a fun tactic of the sub-rosa war that is going on between Islam and the rest of the world.

Anything that undermines an enemy is useful to the spread of the 'faith'.

Even known malicious absurdities.

As long as they feed a need.

Resentful anger against any success, for one.

And an inferiority complex, disguised as "honor", also.

They, know who did it.

They're probably all at least third cousins to every one of the 19 terrorists.
There are no family secrets, at that level.

They're screwing with us, psy ops-wise.

We need to answer them back with our doubts:

"So, Mohammad never really reached "Jerusalem" on the 'Night Journey'... he only went to the "farthest mosque" in his vision, which would make it one, just north of Medina, historically... since there were no mosques in Jerusalem at that time for him to visit...right?"

Posted by: profitsbeard at June 5, 2007 7:21 PM

Ruslan,
Welcome.

Regarding Steve Emerson, I'd vote for him any day of the week but Rudy Giuliani - NOT IN A MILLION YEARS. The man did a wonderful job keeping the city together after 9/11 but that's it.

He's like most of the frontrunners on both sides - not to be trusted.

Posted by: PMK at June 5, 2007 8:00 PM

Profitsbeard...

I actually don't think truth/falsity matters one whit with the Islamic mind-set. So, even if one were to state that Mr Mo was documented (say one discovers reams and reams of evidence -- spoor droppings or something) that he was a itinerant fruit peddler/picker from Jordan, and all the glorifying war-bandit tales were just that -- tales -- (ditto for claimed "night journey" on the back of a jack-ass, just another magic carpet ride) -- it doesn't matter to them...they'll still be stuck in awe-struck moon battery...forever gazing heaven's-ward...and praying to their satanic "deity" called Allah and dutifully enacting their pagan rituals...(including, of course, child sacrifice -- that's when they're not molesting them or beating them up or selling them off).

Posted by: J.S. at June 5, 2007 8:17 PM

I suspect that what distinguishes the East from the West is this relationship between the "real world" (the constraints one finds -- thus, you can't sprout wings and fly off) versus the fantasy world (where wishes -- dreams -- fantasy -- illusions become "real" by merely speaking or thinking). Gabriel Josipovici in "The Book of God" discusses the differing approaches to the "miraculous". For example, there are the Apocryphal Gospels -- here you have the stories which follow a fairy-tale, magical narrative (J.C. makes birds out of river mud, claps his hands, and the birds come to life; J.C. becomes annoyed with another child and kills the child; J.C. causes a palm tree to bow down to the ground, so his parents can retrieve the fruit, and so on.). These fantastic stories were discarded by earlier redactors of the Christian texts. But, Islam adopts these stories as authentic narratives -- yeah, they're all "true." And, in reading what Muslims have to say about these stories, it has led me to conclude that there is an opposite response. A westerner when hearing a fairy-tale (say, something similar to what one reads about King Arthur and talking horses and magical swords and talking frogs), will invariably discount the story and its authenticity, claiming it as childish nonsense, without veracity...but, with Islam, the more outlandish, the more bizarro, the greater the degree of awe, wonder and reverence for the story (and when we Westerners laugh -- this is akin to being "blasphemous.") So when someone alleges that the Kabba stone emits cosmic rays of a miraculous quality -- it's to be wondered at and believed...ditto for an Imam who claims to have spotted "the prophet's" footsteps on the moon -- or the "science" of establishing kinship through suckling, or the wondrous qualities of the prophet's urine...etc., etc.

Posted by: J.S. at June 5, 2007 9:27 PM

"D'oh!"

Posted by: HOV Dummy at June 5, 2007 10:08 PM

60% did not do it, they were not there! It was the other 40%!

Posted by: MZ at June 5, 2007 11:28 PM

Robert Spencer wrote:

Or maybe the denial stems from some other motive. Hmmm.

Different Muslims no doubt have different motives for the denial:

1. Protecting one's "honor" since one is coming from a shame-based, outward-directed culture, and cares most of all about what others think;

2. More inward-motivated embarrassment;

3. Desire to avoid having to offer some account of why Islam supposedly doesn't really permit such things; desire to avoid having to explain that it does permit such things;

4. Desire to strongly distinguish oneself as a Muslim from those who did the terror deed;

4. Sympathy with Jihad and the spread of Islamic law;

5. Actual belief that Muslims didn't do it, and that the CIA, Mossad, McGilla Gorilla, etc., etc., did it.

6. Desire to blame the victim Jihad is attacking: the Jews did it, the Americans did it, etc.

Posted by: traeh at June 6, 2007 4:01 AM

Folks,

Thank you for your responses. I stopped going to mosque because I got suspicious about the dubious "charities" long before most of the rest of the nation began catching on as to their true nature. I am not observant. I don't think God even listens to Muslim prayers any more because of all the evil being done in the name of Islam. I still harbor some faint hope that the Muslim religion could be saved, but it is a fading hope. Anyway, religion is not my main concern. I will not even get into any theological disputes here about how much jihad is rooted in the Qur'an, etc. I want only deal with the practical reality of the threat the Muslims pose to the humanity, just as Hans Habe was totally devoted to protecting humanity from his people, without getting into an analysys of how Teutonic mentality might had played a role in the emergence of Nazism, etc.
P.M.K. : the thing is, Rudy is not the same as the rest of the candidates. The rest are indeed the tiresome, usual types who only talk the talk to get elected, without any intention of walking the walk. Rudy alone stands out. The greatest things he did were not in the aftermath of 9/11, but before. If you do research, he inherited the New York City from his predecessor in horrendous shape, with out-of-control crime, one of homicide capitals of the world, broke and deep in debt. And he completely turned the huge metropolis around, cutting crime more than in half, cleaning it up, turning in a thriving city and a magnet for tourists! If he had done it with the NYC, imagine what he can do with the United States! Rudy is our first great opportunity since 31 years ago when the Democrat primary voters committed a horrible blunder by rejecting great Henry "Scoop" Jackson and picking Carter instead. We have never recovered from it. We haven't had a man in the White House since. Rudy is a man! When he spotted Arafat at a concert at Lincoln Center in October of 1996, he told him to get the f... out. Here's a politician who does not show a slightest symptom of Dhimmitude in dealing with Arab terrorists. How many can be found arownd nowadays?

Posted by: Enragedsince1999 at June 6, 2007 2:16 PM

Another thing: when a Saudi prince al-Waleed bin-Talal handed Rudy a $10 million check along with some pro-terrorist propaganda, Rudy shoved the check and propaganda right back in his face. Here's a candidate untainted with Saudi money! How valuable is that? He will not have hand-holding walks with a Saudi Sheikh fresh from hosting a telethone for the families of suicide bombers screaming: "I will hate America until this life ends! I will hate America even if stone liquifies! My hatred of America, if part of it deposited in Universe, it will collapse!". I am telling you, folks, we have a real thing in Rudy. It sickens me to think that the American people will miss this great opportunity that came our way for the first time in 31 years by not electing him. It would be as big a disaster as rejecting Henry Jackson in 1976. Rudy has just hired the former FBI Director Louis Freeh as his National Securiry adviser, which speaks to Rudy's sound sense. In his book "My FBI", Freeh writes that in Nov. 1998, he presented to the Clinton administation an open-and-shut case proving that the Khobar bombing that killed 19 American GI's was personally ordered by the 2 top leaders of Iran, president Rafsanjani and "Supreme Leader" Ali Khamanei. Clinton covered it up and went to war on ... Serbia! How do we end up with such people in the White House?! We desperately, desperately, desperately need Rudy to rescue us from them! The FBI also proved bin-Laden's responsibility for the USS Cole bombing, but Clinton, at the end of his presidency, abdicated his responsibility and refused to deal with it, kicking the can down the street to Bush, and Bush refused to pick it up. And by failing to go after bin-Laden for the Cole, the 2 cowards failed to prevent 9/11. Read the July 10 & 17, 2006 issue of The New Yorker: 9/11 was easily preventable, and the FBI hero John O'Neil was doing one heck of a job working on it, but his every effort was sabotaged by our Criminal Imbecile Agency! We have this totally rotten, soft upper layer of elites above us: government, media, "intellectual", "academic" on top of our country. What we need to do is to get a large, flat shovel and neatly slice that layer off, dump it into heavy-duty double garbage bags and take them to a toxic waste dump, then power-wash after it and put something solid in its place. The only one solid in this entire field of candidates is Rudy. He, a career Fed himself, the FBI's Louis Freeh, and then add Steven Emerson to them! What a team the 3 of them will make! Folks, if we put Rudy in the White House, we'll do our country and ourselves the greatest service in our lives.

Posted by: Enragedsince1999 at June 6, 2007 3:15 PM