Muslim "separatists" ? Whatever happened to the word "terrorrists"? Or "murderers" ?

Posted by: Crusader at June 7, 2007 7:42 AM

as bodies of innocent people continue to pile up around the world, the term "Muslim" continues to be involved as being the aggressor.....I suspect Muslims seek to kill all non Muslims, which may include you....

Posted by: exsgtbrown at June 7, 2007 7:59 AM

Crusader, I for one am surprised that they even called them "Muslims."

Yeah, "is claimed in full by both India and Pakistan" but since the whole damn world is claimed by Islam, that shouldn't surprise us, should it?

I am particularly impressed that the article didn't end the way it does with pert-near EVERY news release about yet another (ho-hum) incidence of Muslims murdering Hindus in Kashmir, to wit: Kashmir is a majority Muslim state in India and they want to vote on their status.

They NEVER cite the pertinent facts about Kashmir. That at the time of partition, ALL SIDES (including Pakistan) agreed with, and SIGNED THE TREATY which laid out the future possibilities of Kashmir. At the discretion of the King of Kashmir, it would either remain independent, accede to India, or accede to Pakistan. At the discretion of the King. Not the people. No plebiscite, no popular vote, no international agreement; ONLY: at the discretion of the King. All sides agreed (for one it was but a hudna, or temporary truce, a way to buy time, amass some strength, and then take whatever they can.) ...and what do you know? Within a year Pakistan INVADED Kashmir, DEMANDED all of it, and sent in settlers. The overwhelmed King said that Kashmir would become part of India. And despite the Treaty of Partition, despite the promises of Mohammed Ali Jinna and so many other Muslim "activists", Pakistan claimed Kashmir in it's entirety, continues to claim it in it's entirety, and will never stop claiming it in it's entirety.

And the "liberal media" and the "conservative media" has the audacity to refer to it is "Indian-Occupied."

And the "Kashmiri Separatists" also know that China occupied 10% of Kashmir (also stolen from India) and for some strange reason, they NEVER, EVER sneak into that portion and kill people. I wonder why? Isn't "God" on their side? Of course the answer is obvious: Muslims only fight people that they are sure that they can walk all over... they know that no matter how mnay Hindu Priests, Pilgrims, Soldiers, Women, and Children they MURDER, India would NEVER hit them back really hard, just as the Mob can shoot through a crowd to try and hit a persuant policeman, and the cop can't fire unless he is POSITIVE that he won't hit an innocent bystander. Anyway, the "Muslims Separatist" and "Independence Fighters" know that that if they cowardly sneak into Chinese Occupied Kashmir, and kill a few Chinese people, the NEXT DAY Karachi and Lahore get firebombed. No questions, no bullshit, no excuses. Firebombed.

Unless of course they fall for the lies of the (increasingly Arab-owned) media. Of succumb to "international pressure" to "use restraint" as EVERYONE always does whenever Muslims attack.

AND BY THE WAY: Do not buy ANYTHING from Ethan Allen. It is not owned by descendants of that great American patriot, but rather and filthy-rich Kashmiri Muslim who has devoted his life to making Kashmir a part of Pakistan.

Your liberal friend,

kj

fanorollins@yahoo.com

Posted by: kj at June 7, 2007 8:13 AM

Obviously the Hindu road-workers were listening to Britney Spears. Or something.

Ah, the brave warriors of Islam.

Posted by: A Nonny Nonny at June 7, 2007 8:26 AM

Within a year Pakistan INVADED Kashmir, DEMANDED all of it, and sent in settlers.
posted by kj

How is that NOT a Pakistani "occupation" of Kashmir? What's good for the West Bank should be good for Kashmir.

Instead India and Pakistan are fighting over Kashmir, while Israel is "illegally occupying" the West Bank, formerly a part of JORDAN.

Posted by: PMK at June 7, 2007 11:50 AM

Nope.

They were just stuggling to liberate Kashmir from those Hindu Zionists occupying Iraq.

Posted by: joeblough at June 7, 2007 12:10 PM

AND BY THE WAY: Do not buy ANYTHING from Ethan Allen. It is not owned by descendants of that great American patriot, but rather and filthy-rich Kashmiri Muslim who has devoted his life to making Kashmir a part of Pakistan.

Nice to see you again, and that's perfectly correct. His name is Faroukh Kathwaira, and he lost one of his sons who fought in the Jihad in either Kashmir or Chechnya.

Posted by: Infidel Pride at June 7, 2007 12:50 PM

kj

I think you are absolutely right about the Chinese held parts of Kashmir.

Posted by: joeblough at June 7, 2007 6:09 PM

For those who doubt that the "Ethan Allen" owner is not a "real" Muslim:

"Farooq Kathwari talks about establishing 'a moral precedent' at Ethan Allen, and delivers by promoting modesty, accountability, and humility. At a Christmas dinner he hosted, he read from the Koran about the birth of Jesus."

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_43/b3754076.htm

The "morality" emits a whiff of Islamic morality.

For an exhaustive look at the "Ethan Allen" owner and his orientation, see

http://islamic-danger.blogspot.com/2007/06/do-not-buy-ethan-allen-furniture-do-not.html

Posted by: unicorns62000 at June 7, 2007 8:59 PM