Two days ago I sent a message to YouTube asking that very question. I have yet to receive any form of reply.

Posted by: J.S. at June 14, 2007 11:33 AM

I am sure the controllers of Youtube will be delighted to know that their service is being used as the modern-day equivalent of a Nazi propaganda machine.

But, hey!, at least these putative Jew-killers are honest about their bigotry.

Posted by: A Nonny Nonny at June 14, 2007 11:34 AM

OT: And will we keep separation of Church and State intact in our public schools? Or will this type of story become my monthly regular:

Institutional Jihad in America: San Diego Public School

Posted by: Foehammer at June 14, 2007 11:36 AM

Take a look at this muslim propaganda video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BC0rTlKTNY8

At 01:45 he has two orthodox Christian nuns standing in front of church destroyed by Kosovo muslims in March 2004 pogrom.

Posted by: LazarOfSerbia at June 14, 2007 11:39 AM

Oswald, returning, whispered into the ear of his master, "It is a Jew, who calls himself Isaac of York; is it fit I should marshall him into the hall?"

"Let Gurth do thine office, Oswald," said Wamba with his usual effrontery; "the swineherd will be a fit usher to the Jew."

Not much has changed since Ivanhoe, has it?

Posted by: Miss_Anthrope at June 14, 2007 11:43 AM

How hard is it to threaten Google (owner of YouTube) with a lawsuit? They're a CASH COW!

Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at June 14, 2007 11:47 AM

Youtube also hosts rare gems of truth like this
http://youtube.com/watch?v=TS4v_kj9rw4

Posted by: GreatShaitan at June 14, 2007 11:48 AM

how do we contact you tube about this BS!

Posted by: ZenaWarriorPrincess at June 14, 2007 11:51 AM

The government has a right, and a duty, to monitor the Internet. It has largely failed to do so. Why? And what will the Presidential candidates say about this?

We want to here what they will do to change the unchecked, anything-goes free hands-off attitude that some confuse with "freedom."

"License they mean when they cry liberty." Good then, for John Milton, just as good now. YouTube has issued its own license -- to would-be antisemitic mass-murderers. The issuance of such a license, the failuure to take it back, calls into question all of Youtube, and the corporation, and the stockholders, behind it. They had best get cracking, because the fury that was shown recently over immigration policies being thrust down our throats is the same fury that is building against those, all those in positions of media and political power, who have failed to instruct, failed to protect, failed to do a damn thing, about the Jihad in all of its manifestations, with all of its varied instruments.

Posted by: Hugh at June 14, 2007 12:04 PM

You can flag as "inappropriate" videos -- which, as everyone knows, may or may not get a video yanked.

On the home-page (at the bottom), there are a series of links -- one of which is "Code of Conduct". Click on this which then presents a page titled: "YouTube Community Guidelines"-- notice that in the corner (in red) appears the link "Got Feedback?" Click on this, and a box appears which is entitled: "YouTube Satisfaction Survey." At the bottom of this survey, there is an open comment box. Fill in. (no expletives, please.)

Posted by: J.S. at June 14, 2007 12:14 PM

They are notorious for that. They banned this video of mine here - my crime? Opinion.
I've actually moved my Vlogs to motionbox - it takes youtube 12 hours to load my videos and even then they get slammed with inappropriate content.

Loving America - most inappropriate

More dhimmitube jihad background here

Posted by: Pamela Geller Oshry at June 14, 2007 12:16 PM

Youtube = google who hate jews.

Posted by: KAOSKTRL at June 14, 2007 12:27 PM

You Tube isn't entirely against anti-jihad videos.
Just look at this:

It's a Jihad Christmas, Charlie Brown!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wuPDm5fYFT8

This is great!!!!

Posted by: ThinkForYourself at June 14, 2007 12:58 PM

Pamela, loved your video. You made my day. I'm so happy to relate to women who are not mamby-pamby willy-nilly air heads that would give up this wonderful country and our freedoms in the name of appeasment.

Posted by: mustang65 at June 14, 2007 12:59 PM

Re: YouTube hosts genocidal antisemitic videos

Muslim propaganda has been somewhat effective at painting Arabs and Muslims generally as victims of Imperialism, and You-tube reflects that. But many non-Muslims now see Islam as the engine of Arab Imperialism.

Muslims (particularly Arabs)have been very effective at playing the "lets-shame the other" game on many issues. However, many non-Muslims are now aware that Arab Muslims and Muslims generally have been responsible for much of the African slave trade, as well as the destruction of "indigenous cultures", "indigenous peoples" in India, North Africa, Constantinople, Persia, Kosovo, Darfur, etc.

Though all groups (Western, Chinese, Arab, Aztec, etc.) have been involved in Imperialist-supremacist-oppression, Arab Muslims (as well as Ottoman Muslims and other Muslims) are the least apologetic (among Imperialists generally) for their Imperialist-pig-crimes in history, and usually try to rewrite their Imperialist history with an eye to showing how their oppression was good for their victims, and how they (especially Arabs) were victims of Imperialism.

Jew hating has circulated in much of Europe and the Mideast for a long time. It's always going to be there in one way or other (which is why Israel exists). But Muslims (especially Arabs)are tops in the matter since Jewish people are specifically dehumanized and painted as a debased people in the Quran. For that reason, Islam is probably not "reformable". The mind-set presented in the You-Tube video is not reformable.

Posted by: Frank at June 14, 2007 12:59 PM

Robert, you Jew. Why did you hide the fact that you are a Jew? You Jew you! Only Jews hide their Jewishness, you Jew!

I am deeply shocked that a Jew like Robert would even try to disguise that, while spilling islamophobic words all over the Jew-owned internet. Never minded the Jew-owned USA.

Ahhhh, Jews everywhere!!!!! Oh no! Let me go! Let me go!! Get that white shirt away from me!! HELP! These Jewish paramedics want to kill me!!!

/sedated

Posted by: Crusader at June 14, 2007 1:05 PM

ohhh Sarah Jessica Parker is a Jooo? And Michelle Malkin?! Those eyes never deceived me, I tell you.

Posted by: Crusader at June 14, 2007 1:10 PM

I like Youtube for the rich tapestry of film maker's from mugging teenager's, to serious artist's.
I dont care for Youtube's, and it's parent company 'google's, attitude's that seem to be 'indulging' themselve's in censorship, in favor of political/religious leaning's. If Youtube/google dont get their act's straight, I am going elsewhere, there are lot's of option's on the net...

Posted by: duh_swami at June 14, 2007 1:14 PM

THis lady strangely looks like the bag lady who posed at many of the Lebanon bomb sites wailing for the dead.....

Posted by: exsgtbrown at June 14, 2007 1:29 PM

Anti-semitism has acquired new colors. In the old age, the demons (mis)used Christianity in order to aflict the Chosen Nation. Today they hide their tactic against God's People with taqqiyah-terms like "We are not against the Jews, but only against Zionism".

The hatred the world has against anything remotly associated with God (The True God, not allah) will go on until the Messiah returns.

Posted by: Crusader at June 14, 2007 1:32 PM

I wanna be a Jew too! Presbyterians don't have no fun no how.

Posted by: Jauhara Al-Kafirah at June 14, 2007 1:43 PM

crusader, you are one twisted freak. cool.

Posted by: Miss_Anthrope at June 14, 2007 1:53 PM

Again..it's called political correctness...anti-semitism is politically correct, anti-terrorism is the absolute opposite of political correctness, aka, common sense.

So much for their "free speech" pontifications. lol

Posted by: jcom972 at June 14, 2007 3:02 PM

"...has YouTube become a propaganda arm for genocidal jihadists?"

Yup.

Posted by: Josephine at June 14, 2007 3:37 PM

Remember who runs YouTube - it's the same people who run Google...the same people who are supposed "free speech" activists who sold out to tap into China...the same people who want to know all they can about you so they can run your life for you. Yay for YouTube!!

Posted by: Adam_Schwartz at June 14, 2007 5:05 PM

Robert, to my mind, this is a commendation more than anything. If only any of the world leaders had 10% of your balls (excuse my language), we wouldn't be in this mess. God bless you for speaking out (and Hugh and the rest of the gang).

Don't expect the lefties on YouTube to do anything about this though.

Posted by: SerbInfidel at June 14, 2007 6:16 PM

Think For Yourself-

Nifty little parody link! Thanks!

(Is that animation Australian?)

Posted by: profitsbeard at June 14, 2007 9:08 PM

Outrageous!!! Just as the words of Ahmadinejad are outrageous of his stated desire to "wipe Israel off of the map", so is this photograph. Where's the accountability for this type of hate speech???!!!

And those responsible for allowing this to be posted on U-Tube should also be held accountable. This needs to be removed/banned from the internet -- and now!!!!!!!

Posted by: champ at June 14, 2007 9:13 PM

And if you're an infidel, then you can put your own name alongside "Kill________".

Radical Islam hates us all!! They even hate those that aren't radical!

Posted by: champ at June 14, 2007 9:22 PM

THis lady strangely looks like the bag lady who posed at many of the Lebanon bomb sites wailing for the dead.....

-posted by exsgtbrown

You mean Flat Fatima™?

http://www.thepeoplescube.com/red/viewtopic.php?t=798

Naaa, too young.

Posted by: Mike_W at June 14, 2007 9:24 PM

Here is the exchange I had with YouTube over one of their videos. (Most recent message is on top.)

Hi __,

Thanks for your notification. I have reviewed the content and the appropriate action has been taken.

Regards,

Amy
The YouTube Team

Original Message Follows:
------------------------
From: "___"
Subject: Video complaint - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ul4UecZThH4
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:10:50 -0600

User Name ___

It is amazing how difficult YouTube makes it to contact customer
service/support. What is the purpose of a contact form if all it does is
get
me an email reply that it didn't go through, sends me to the 'Help' page
and
then it's impossible to find an email address or other form?

I had reported someone before, so perhaps this email address will get to a
real person. I am copying/ pasting what I wrote in the original contact
form.

Subject: YouTube Support
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 13:01:48 -0700

This children's program of kids holding pretend guns and blades, some
wearing suicide belts was disturbing. Seeing a little girl with hands
painted red as if dipped in blood was horrific.

It is important that this information gets out to the public. The media
will
not do it.

On the other hand, YouTube sponsoring/supporting this is abhorrent.

Posted by: Mo at June 14, 2007 9:34 PM

"Think For Yourself-

Nifty little parody link! Thanks!

(Is that animation Australian?)"

Cheers, profitsbeard. To be honest I do not know where this video comes from. There was some talk in this thread about YouTube self-censoring the antijihad videos, so I wanted to see if there was in fact any anti-jihad videos on Youtube. I did a simple search for "jihad" and this was one of the videos that came up near the top of the page, and I thought it was worth sharing, because it is such a fun video. It's not exactly "antijihad" per se. But it's not Islamic-friendly either. And it's been posted over a year ago.

No doubt, You tube has been known to cut out the clearly anti-jihad video, and they leave these sorts of videos posted above by Mr. Spencer, and that is just absurd.

Posted by: ThinkForYourself at June 14, 2007 10:10 PM

This women should be EXTREMELY CAREFUL for wearing a head banner which states "KILL JEWS."

Radical Jews won't put up with such blasphemy. They will strap bombs on their children to kill her and her children. They will beat her. Radical Jews will behead her. Radical Jews will make her a slave and force her to pay a tax. Radical Jews will....uh oh wait its not the Jews or the Christians...its the "Religion of Peace", i.e. Muslims.

Nevermind....

Posted by: FLLegal at June 14, 2007 11:43 PM

Most of the people on that video aren't well known, so lumping Robert, Pipes and Malkin with Sarah Jessica Parker and the Seinfelds was rather amusing. After all, there aren't too many who hate the latter, so being associated with them - albeit negatively - isn't going to impact Robert et al.

As for the stupid hate formula, whatever that was - given the number of Muslims there are on the Internet, is it any wonder that the hate Jews sites totally drowns out anti-Muslim or anti-anyone else sites?

Posted by: Infidel Pride at June 15, 2007 2:34 AM

I must be a Jew too, Robert

Posted by: marilyn at June 15, 2007 2:40 AM

One good thing about this video, is that on the page it's on, Robert's "The Truth About Muhammad" speech at the Heritage Foundation comes up on the "Related" column on the right.

So maybe people will watch them and learn something...

I can keep hoping, right?

Posted by: Mo Foe at June 15, 2007 3:16 AM

see my proposal to ban Islam in the US at pedestrianinfidel(dot)blogspot(dot)com/2007/02/proposed- constitutional-amendment.html

here is the entire text

A Proposed Constitutional Amendment
Background and justification to Amendment 28

Whereas Religion is defined as an institution dedicated to improving social conscience and promoting individual and societal spiritual growth in a way that is harmless to others not participating in or practicing the same;

Whereas the United States of America was founded on the ideals of individual rights, including the individual right to practice one’s religion of choice, or no religion, and that there would be no compulsion of religion, nor state sanctioned religion, nor a “religious test” for participation in the body politic;

Whereas Islam includes a complete political and social structure, encompassed by its religious law, Sharia, that supersedes any civil law and that Islam mandates that no secular or democratic institutions are to be superior to Islamic law;

Whereas Islam preaches that it and it alone is the true religion and that Islam will dominate the world and supplant all other religions and democratic institutions;

Whereas Saudi Arabia, the spiritual home of Islam does not permit the practice of any other religion on its soil and even “moderate” Muslims states such as Turkey and Malaysia actively suppress other religions;

Whereas Islam includes as its basic tenet the spread of the faith by any and all means necessary, including violent conquest of non-believers, and demands of its followers that they implement violent jihad (holy war) against those un-willing to convert or submit to Islam, including by deception and subversion of existing institutions;

Whereas on 9/11/2001 19 Muslim hijackers acting in the name of Islam killed 3,000 Americans, and numerous other acts of terrorism have been directed at the American people around the world;

Whereas representatives of Islam around the world including Osama Bin Laden (architect of 9/11), the government of Iran including Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, HAMAS, Hezbollah, and other Islamic groups have declared jihad (war) on America, and regularly declare that America should cease to exist;

Whereas there is no organized Islamic opposition to violent proponents of Islam;

Therefore: Islam is not a religion, but a political ideology more akin to Fascism and totally in opposition to the ideals of freedom as described in the United States Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights.

Be it resolved that the following Amendment to the Constitution be adopted:

Article I

The social/political/ideological system known around the world as Islam is not recognized in the United States as a religion.

The practice of Islam is therefore not protected under the 1st Amendment as to freedom of religion and speech.

Article II

As representatives of Islam around the world have declared war, and committed acts of war, against the United States and its democratic allies around the world, Islam is hereby declared an enemy of the United States and its practice within the United States is now prohibited.

Article III

Immediately upon passage of this Amendment all Mosques, schools and Muslim places of worship and religious training are to be closed, converted to other uses, or destroyed. Proceeds from sales of such properties may be distributed to congregations of said places but full disclosure of all proceeds shall be made to an appropriate agency as determined by Congress. No compensation is to be offered by Federal or State agencies for losses on such properties however Federal funding is to be available for the demolishing of said structures if other disposition cannot be made.

The preaching of Islam in Mosques, Schools, and other venues is prohibited. The subject of Islam may be taught in a post high school academic environment provided that instruction include discussion of Islam’s history of violence, conquest, and its ongoing war on democratic and other non-Islamic values.

The preaching or advocating of Islamic ideals of world domination, destruction of America and democratic institutions, jihad against Judaism, Christianity and other religions, and advocating the implementation of Sharia law shall in all cases be punishable by fines, imprisonment, deportation, and death as prescribed by Congress. Violent expressions of these and other Muslim goals, or the material support of those both in the United States and around the world who seek to advance these Islamic goals shall be punishable by death.

Muslims will be denied the opportunity to immigrate to the United States.

Article IV

Nothing in this amendment shall be construed as authorizing the discrimination against, of violence upon, nor repudiation of the individual rights of those Americans professing to be Muslim. The individual right of conscience is sacrosanct and the practice of Islam within the privacy of home and self is strictly protected to the extent that such individuals do not violate the prohibitions described in Article III.

Posted by: robscottw at June 15, 2007 4:55 PM

Thankyou Robert, for your unselfishness. I enjoyed that! I wish too there was a true interpretation to solve this. I hope my Rev grandpa's book can help. It is strange the only ones who think you are mean are listening to what actually islamist do! Admadmadofjews said what you said he did and I remember that day. The Iyatolya! I will go post somemore things of comments on there for I also heard You Tube becoming a tool for them! It has to be nice for them actually to see you and hear you knowing you are knowledgeable and they will listen if they are smart or have any philosophy.

Posted by: MZ at June 15, 2007 8:30 PM

Robscott,
I vote yay to your amendment! Run for office .We need someone like you to be one of our voices that can be heard. The islamic institution is trying to use intimidation and incesent whining to propagandize. Their most successful tools :
death and deceit. They are as we speak on a nationwide indoctrination surge in all mosques and muslim communities in America. Refer to Nonie Darwish, "Now they call me Infidel". It's an eye opener. Keep up the good work.

Posted by: imamerican at June 15, 2007 10:41 PM

I love your message Robert. I also love this one I discovered written by Reverand Grandpa scholar!
Adam and Eve 1st Humanity=Death no redemption! Abraham, was the ending of all sacrifice. This is where Mohammed steps in and still lives the 1st Humanity=Death, no hope, no redemption, no love! God had a perfect vessel. One to be glad to do the will of His Father! Jesus-2nd Humanity=Life redeemed, love, fellowhip with God and man, to be our own character to choose, so that we can have fellowship with God and Jesus, that being our will, the Will of Jesus!

Posted by: MZ at June 15, 2007 11:58 PM

Rob Scott

I second (or third, or fourth, or whatever) your amendment. In fact, I'd like to see this become a proposition on a state ballot sometime next year. A good place to start might be one of the Bible belt states where it's likely to pass, such as OK, NE, SC, et al, and not in states like CA or MI. Start it in a state where it can pass, and let it. Chances are that a local court may not strike it down, and that it'll have to go all the way to the Supreme Court. Regardless of how it does there, the conversation about whether or not Islam deserves the protections of a religion would have been opened - much to the chagrin of the ummah.

I however would say that using the example of Saudi Arabia is a bad idea, since US policies are - for better or worse - not determined by policies of other countries. Even though other Islamic countries may not officially ban the construction of churches and synagogues, in practice, they make it impossible, therefore maintaining plausible deniability - something that would be impossible to address in your petition.

I'd also include citations of Quranic verses as supporting material for some of the assertions you've made above. Include plenty of them which Muslims will then be at a loss to rebut.

Posted by: Infidel Pride at June 16, 2007 3:08 AM