| FrontPageMag.com | By Robert Spencer | By Hugh Fitzgerald | Books | Dhimmi Watch | Robert Spencer | Islam 101 | Qur'an Blog |  |
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Anjem Choudary is the Muslim leader in Britain who told an interviewer forthrightly that no non-Muslims were innocent, simply by virtue of their being non-Muslim.
By Aaron Klein for WorldNetDaily.com (thanks to Doc Washburn):
JERUSALEM – The thwarted car bombings in London last week and the terror attack this weekend against Scotland's busiest airport were "completely justified" and likely the beginning of many more attacks in Britain, a prominent UK Islamist leader connected to terror supporting groups told WND yesterday."There is no doubt whatsoever that there will continue to be attacks against the British government, its interests and the home front as long as we see the continued British and American occupation of Muslim land in Iraq and Afghanistan, support for criminal Israel, and draconian measures taken against Muslims in the UK," said Anjem Choudary, founder and former chief of two Islamic groups disbanded by the British authorities under antiterror legislation.
"A war is being waged against Muslims on every level. There are many in Britain who take their ideology from Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida and are ready to carry out many more attacks," Choudary said.
Choudary said the attempted terror attacks the past few days were "probably carried out by local British Muslims."
Choudary currently presents himself as an Islamic lecturer and a leader of Britain's Shariah Islamic court. He is a founder and former chief of Al Muhajiroun, a British group that sought to impose an Islamic state on the UK and that was allied with the goals of al-Qaida.
Posted by Robert at July 2, 2007 5:26 AM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
The time is ripe for deportation of all islamists.
Posted by: ZenaWarriorPrincess![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.jihadwatch.org/nav-commenters.gif)
at July 2, 2007 7:50 AM
No, they take their ideaology from the koran.
When can we stop muslim immigration?
at July 2, 2007 7:55 AM
Britain's Shariah Islamic court?
Time to close down that court. Past time.
Posted by: Borg at July 2, 2007 7:58 AM
In a well-ordered society, that had not lost its moorings, Choudhry would have been removed in one of three ways. One way would have been to arrest him and charge him with treason, but that would require laws, about the "War on Terror" -- that is, the war of self-defense against the Jihad -- that have not yet passed, and apparently are not contemplated. Another way, more rapid and efficient, would be to remove Choudhry from the country forever. Still a third way, which could be combined with #2, would be to make sure that wherever Choudhry is sent, it is ultimately to a land from whose bourne no traveller returns.
Posted by: Hugh at July 2, 2007 8:12 AM
Anjem Choudary, I am suprised to read these statements because in a sense, those words are "fighten words". Do not be suprised if there will be a HUGH ANGRY BACKLASH by non-Muslims over in the UK soon.
Posted by: bigcatgirl13106 at July 2, 2007 8:31 AM
The opposite of "well ordered" is a place where academics call for a boycott of Israel while giving aid and comfort to the jihadist enemy. Unfortunately, that is the UK. But I think the tide will turn. Its only because of the leftists and anti-semites who populate the media, academia, and other elite institutions such as the Anglican church heirarchy that the UK has turned topsy turvy, but eventually people with common sense will realize they've been duped (as is beginning to happen in France, with Sarkozy), and things will straighten out.
Posted by: usapatriot at July 2, 2007 8:36 AM
Why cannot someone just do what Hollywood does and often? i.e., remove him permanently in an "accident".
After all, he calls it justified war and in wars both sides are supposed to shoot not just one side.
at July 2, 2007 8:40 AM
Shame they can't get him on charges of treason.
Are there any "incitement to violence" laws over in the UK?
>>Do not be suprised if there will be a HUGH ANGRY BACKLASH by non-Muslims over in the UK soon.
Posted by: bigcatgirl13106
I can hardly wait! I hope it happens very soon, if nor sooner.
Posted by: Gramfan at July 2, 2007 9:54 AM
Choudhry is just a pig. We all know this. He even looks a bit like a pig. Apparently the word choudry in arabic means bacon sandwich. :)
Posted by: DaveMate at July 2, 2007 10:38 AM
This HOMICIDAL Mohammedan cultist is pissed of at Britain because of ".......draconian measures taken against Muslims in the UK." What "draconian measures?" Passing out WELFARE CHECKS to any lazy musulman who shows up?? Wassamatter?? Haven't all those British politicians BOOTLICKED you hard enough (yet), pal?
Goddamit, DEPORT these third world dregs NOW before they kill AGAIN!
at July 2, 2007 11:21 AM
"...Anjem Choudary, founder and former chief of two Islamic groups disbanded by the British authorities under antiterror legislation."
Apparently these groups disbanded like dandelion seeds.
OK, Britain. Time to get your garden gloves on.
Posted by: freedomschool at July 2, 2007 11:24 AM
Zena,
How do we distinguish an Islamist from a "peaceful Muslim"?
Posted by: PMK at July 2, 2007 12:31 PM
The time is way past due to turn this around and stop allowing these animals to live within our Countries. As George Bush said "you are either with us or against us", well I do not see the supposed friendly muslims speaking out against these radicals so what does that tell us...they must be with them.
Kick them ALL out of every Country that they do not belong. The ONLY way to beat this disease is to remove ALL potential carriers of this disease and send them back from where they came! If they were born within the Country then boot them even faster because they are the ones that can be the most dangerous. Plus they have no desire to be true citizens. They want the welfare check.
Freedom of speech does not include killing the native non-muslims.
If they want to practice their "religion" if anyone in their right mind would call it that, then let them do it amongst their own within their own countries.
Keep this garbage out of my World!
at July 2, 2007 12:36 PM
Choudary said the attempted terror attacks the past few days were "probably carried out by local British Muslims."
Well, I'll give Choudary this....at least he's not parroting the usual islamologic "truther" BS, pinning the attacks' planning on some frame-the-poor-innocent-Muslim conspiracy by Bush, Blair, Brown, Jews, Israel, the Mossad, or the monolithic West.
Posted by: yadayada at July 2, 2007 2:32 PM
"How do we distinguish an Islamist from a "peaceful Muslim"?
Posted by: PMK [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 2, 2007 12:31 PM"
For starters - his wife wears a burkha. There may be other Islamists who wives don't wear the burkha but I think its safe to say that anyone whose wife DOES wear the burkha is an islmist. It shows someone who already follows the strictest sharia law, which also suggests that he would probably favor the imposition of Sharia law, which probably also indicates that he is aware enough of traditional Islamic jurisprudence to be generally supportive of violent jihad. To be frank, should a "backlash" ever materialize, it should be selectively targeted against these men whose veiled wives are walking advertisements for their beliefs. It's probably the closest thing we can come to "judging a book by its cover" - or in this case, by the book's wife's cover.
Posted by: Caroline at July 2, 2007 3:49 PM
Posted by: PMK at July 2, 2007 12:31 PM
"Zena,
How do we distinguish an Islamist from a "peaceful Muslim"?
There's no way to tell which is which. They change roles in the blink of an eye. Shoot, lose the gun, become an ordinary passer-by. When apprehended they swear they're innocent. When they're PROVED to be guilty, they had no idea the device was lethal ("Achmed gave me a suitcase & said leave it in the subway"). When they're proved to have conspired with others in committing the terrorist act, they "got carried away" by somebody else's rhetoric and certainly didn't mean for anyone to get hurt, no sir, because a devout Muslim heeds Allah's command to do no harm to innocents. Bull and more bull.
When is the the backlash going to finally start?
Posted by: A_Nonny_Mouse at July 2, 2007 3:58 PM
A Nonny Mouse: "There's no way to tell which is which"
I completely disagree and above I indicated one very reliable way to in fact distinguish the Islamist enemy from the potentially moderate Muslim. If there's ever to be a backlash, which may well be inevitable, for God's sake direct it against the actual enemy! It doesn't help at all to imagine that there's no way to tell the difference between an Islamist and a genuine moderate Muslim!
Actually there IS a sound way to tell the difference, as I indicated above. And BTW - it isn't the woman in the burkha herself who should be the target because there's no way of knowing how much choice she actually has in the matter. But her husband?
Unless someone can provide some plausible explanation as to how a Muslim man whose wife wears the burkha/niqab ISN'T a proponent of Sharia law - with all that ultimately implies for infidels - and hence isn't an "Islamist" and hence the enemy - then I think my conclusion about how to practically identify the "Islamist" enemy is fundamentally sound.
Posted by: Caroline at July 2, 2007 8:59 PM
This Choudary bastard needs a bullet in the head. Anybody who incites others to violence must be stopped.
Posted by: Hebrew Handyman at July 2, 2007 9:33 PM
...Ban Muslim Immigration...its time has come...
Posted by: exsgtbrown at July 3, 2007 7:56 AM
There is no such thing as a peaceful or moderate Muslim. The Qu'ran is a book of domination. Islam IS NOT a religion. It is a ideaology that masquerades as a religion. It is perhaps the most ingenious mind control ever devised.
Posted by: PLCinTEXAS at July 3, 2007 8:03 AM
Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.
(Note: Comments on articles are unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Jihad Watch or Robert Spencer. Comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying may be summarily deleted. However, the fact that particular comments remain on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Robert Spencer of the views expressed therein.)