| FrontPageMag.com | By Robert Spencer | By Hugh Fitzgerald | Books | Dhimmi Watch | Islam 101 | Qur'an Blog | Raymond Ibrahim | Robert Spencer |  |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Intifada: the Palestinian "resistance," targeting innocent civilians and celebrating that targeting. Deborah Almontaser was disingenuous in explaining the meaning of the word, and defended it, and was rightly excoriated for doing so. But now Muslim groups are claiming that in getting heat for defending jihad terrorism she was a victim of -- you guessed it -- "racism" and "bigotry."
As if it is "racist" to stand up for human decency and the civilization that is menaced by the Islamic jihadists.
From Newsday (thanks to James):
NEW YORK - Supporters of an Arabic-themed academy are calling for the reinstatement of the public school's founding principal, who resigned amid a frenzy of negative publicity after she defended the word "intifada" on T-shirts.About 200 people demonstrated in support of the Khalil Gibran International Academy on Monday night, gathering in front of the city's Department of Education.
They carried signs that read "NYC needs multi-cultural education" and "The Torah and the Koran both teach peace." Many were Muslims themselves, while others were Jewish.
They shared outrage over the political flaying that led Deborah Almontaser, the founding principal, to resign earlier this month.
"I thought this was not just an attack on her as an Arab, as a Muslim, but this was an attack on our community as a whole," said Sara Said Alkhulaidi, originally from Yemen, but now living in Brooklyn.
Almonteser had defended the use of the word "intifada," an Arabic term commonly used to refer to the Palestinian uprising against Israel, by Arab Women Active in Art and Media on T-shirts. The term, literally translated, meant "shaking off," Almonteser said, while asserting that she didn't think violence was suggested by the T-shirts.
But that response only helped to infuriate critics of the school.
They kept the volume of their rhetoric high on Monday, with critics warning students could be "indoctrinated" with radical Islamic beliefs.
State Assemblyman Dov Hikind said the school's children could be "indoctrinated" and warned in a statement that "establishment of an Arab school is a misguided and dangerous idea."
"It will not, as suggested, be a hope for peace; it is a blueprint for anti-Israel and anti-U.S. extremism," he said, adding that the school has been endorsed by "radical" groups.
Supporters called such statements "racist."
"Unless we all send a clear message that racist comments associating Arabic language and culture with terrorism will not be tolerated, we will continue to hear them again and again," the Arab American Anti-Discrimination Committee and other community groups said in a statement in support of the academy.
Sure. And as long as we tolerate the smearing of opposition to jihad mass murder and Islamic supremacism as "racism," we are going to see the race card again and again.
Posted by Robert at August 21, 2007 1:27 PM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
Okay, let's concede it's wrong to associate "Arabs" with "terrorism".
Let's associate "islamic arabs" with "terrorism and violence" as I for one don't see the Christian Arabs engaging or threatening violence or terrorism.
Posted by: eve_anne_gelical![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.jihadwatch.org/nav-commenters.gif)
at August 21, 2007 1:42 PM
geez, I 'hope' that NYC stands up for what is right. (I can see Saudi money starting to flow... and then you can bet that 'right' will become whatever NYC wants it to be)
Although all of this should be expected if one reads the koran/hadiths/surrahs because it says they can do it to us, but we (infidels) can not do anything to them because they are muslim. They expect us to concede and apologize but they are taught they are not required to do such things. (I just read it in one of the cspipublishing.com books that I ordered)
Posted by: R_not at August 21, 2007 1:54 PM
Memo to INS:
Sara Said Alkhulaidi from Brooklyn
Memo to the Arab American Anti-Discrimination Committee :
"Unless we all send a clear message that ISLAMIC TERRORISM will not be tolerated, we will continue to hear CRITICAL COMMENTS associating Arabic language and culture with terrorism again and again,"
There, that's better.
Memo to the NYC DoE:
Shut that facility down. Protests and demands starting before the first day of school?
at August 21, 2007 2:06 PM
"I thought this was not just an attack on her as an Arab, as a Muslim, but this was an attack on our community as a whole," said Sara Said Alkhulaidi, originally from Yemen, but now living in Brooklyn."
....i guess the entire neighborhood supports the "intifada" , ...it goes to show you do not want these people in your neighborhood...ban Muslim immigration now....
at August 21, 2007 2:12 PM
The term "multi-cultural education" implies that this is a good thing. Were is the virtue in murder, oppression and intolerance for anything non-muslim? By playing the race card they are shifting the argument away from their weakness (lack of virtue). They don't want to assimilate into our society. The are really supporting what they call us. A racist agenda were they can indoctrinate and create anti-social groups like we see in England today. Breading grounds for advancing the Islamic agenda.
Eze 13:10
It is definitely because they have misled My people by saying, 'Peace!' when there is no peace. And when anyone builds a wall, behold, they plaster it over with whitewash;
تتعاون الرابطه 13:10
ومن المؤكد انها قد ضللت شعبي قائلا : 'سلام! وعندما لا يوجد سلام. وعندما يقدم احد على تبني الجدار ، ها هو انهم الجص انتهى تبييض ؛
at August 21, 2007 2:15 PM
Ah yes the typical cry of the guilty. It's all because of racism and bigotry, right. That pathetic lame excuse is getting old and tired. Try something new like yes, I was lying.
Posted by: rgr50279 at August 21, 2007 2:39 PM
"The Torah and the Koran both teach peace." Many were Muslims themselves, while others were Jewish." I am continually amazed at how many Jews are appeasers of islam. But, besides that fact, the first line I cut/pasted is a bold face lie.
Posted by: R_not at August 21, 2007 2:49 PM
no temples, no churches, no synagogues, ... in saudia ARABIA?; no non-slaves-to-allah in mekka ... ? no Jews in saudia ARABia--- racist? biggoted? supremacist? yes?
Posted by: TINBH at August 21, 2007 2:53 PM
To be fair, the Torah does not teach peace neither. However, most Jews today ignore the Torah. If only Muslims would also ignore the Qur'an!
Posted by: Aveyard at August 21, 2007 2:54 PM
To be fair, the Torah does not teach peace neither. However, most Jews today ignore the Torah. If only Muslims would also ignore the Qur'an!
Posted by: Aveyard at August 21, 2007 2:55 PM
To be fair, the Torah does not teach peace neither. However, most Jews today ignore the Torah. If only Muslims would also ignore the Qur'an!
Posted by: Aveyard at August 21, 2007 2:56 PM
To be fair, the Torah does not teach peace neither. However, most Jews today ignore the Torah. If only Muslims would also ignore the Qur'an!
Posted by: Aveyard at August 21, 2007 2:56 PM
....supporters of Christian schools in Muslim countries get assassinated...
Posted by: exsgtbrown at August 21, 2007 2:57 PM
no temples, no churches, no synagogues, ... in saudia ARABIA?; no non-slaves-to-allah in mekka ... ? no Jews in saudia ARABia--- racist? biggoted? supremacist? yes?
Posted by: TINBH at August 21, 2007 2:58 PM
No 'Islamophobia'? Maybe the word doesn't exist in Arabic, but neither does 'racism' or 'bigotry'.
Posted by: Infidel Pride at August 21, 2007 3:13 PM
"The Torah and the Koran both teach peace." Yes, nice, friendly peace.
2:10 Disbelievers are diseased.
2:99 Disbelievers are evil people.
2:104 For disbelievers is a painful doom.
2:171 Disbelievers are deaf, dumb, and blind.
3:28 Let not the believers take disbelievers for their friends in preference of believers.
3:73 Don't believe anyone who is not a Muslim.
3:48 Don't be friends with non-Muslims. They all hate you and want to ruin you.
4:89 Have no unbelieving friends. Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them.
4:63 Oppose those who refuse to follow Muhammad.
4:101 The disbelievers are an open enemy to you.
4:144 Do not choose disbelievers as friends.
5:51 Don't take Jews or Christians for friends. If you do, then Allah will consider you to be one of them.
5:51 Jews and Christians are losers.
5:60 Allah turned unbelievers into apes and swine.
5:59 Jews and Christians are evil people.
5:57 Don't choose Jews, Christians, or disbelievers as guardians.
6:106 Stay away from disbelievers.
8:55 The worst beasts in Allah's sight are the disbelievers.
9:5 Slay the disbelievers wherever you find them.
9:28 Disbelievers are unclean.
9:30 Christians and Jews are perverts. Allah himself fights against them.
at August 21, 2007 3:45 PM
The Yemenite Islamic community of New York are the greatest aggregation of blood-sucking leeches and ignorant barbarians to ever grace the NY Metropolitan area. Their level of anti-semitism, paranoia, arrogance and sheer hatred for this their 'adopted' country surpasses even our 'fine Pakistani citizens'.
Their 'imams' are the most IGNORANT evil f-cks you can imagine. Just think of Saudi Wahabi theologians but without the sophistication (ha ha)
Posted by: poetcomic1 at August 21, 2007 3:46 PM
the ol race card is used again by these arab supremacists, who really only regard true muslims as arabs, and by their actions of bowing towards mecca. how lame can they get! anyone with brain cells that actually work will not stay in this death cult! just say no to islam!
Posted by: ZenaWarriorPrincess at August 21, 2007 3:50 PM
If this be racism, then make the most of it!
-Patricia Henry, pseudononymously
at August 21, 2007 4:36 PM
They carried signs that read "NYC needs multi-cultural education" and "The Torah and the Koran both teach peace." Many were Muslims themselves, while others were Jewish.
They shared outrage over the political flaying that led Deborah Almontaser, the founding principal, to resign earlier this month.
The others were Jewish?
No, they were liberals who happened to be Jews.
In any case, they will prevail in reinstating the terrorist I believe, because NYC politicians don't have the stomach to stand up against them especially when they invoke the magic words "racism" and "biogotry" especially in the same sentence.
Here's hoping that I am wrong.
Posted by: witness at August 21, 2007 4:53 PM
At least one half of the parties hereto are self deluded fools.
Referring not to the muslim side.
You got to wonder why such a great people could lose 1/3 of their population in Europe this last century: was it partially a blindness to their own safety ?
at August 21, 2007 5:22 PM
But now Muslim groups are claiming that in getting heat for defending jihad terrorism she was a victim of -- you guessed it -- "racism" and "bigotry."
It's Hitler and Goebbels tactics re persecution of "German minorities" in the Sudetenland. The issue is not the issue-not then, not now.
at August 21, 2007 5:25 PM
This islamist madrassa should have never been discussed, much less advanced to the stage of hiring teachers and administrators. If the muslims want their own Arabic hate school, let them build it and fund it with Saudi money, not taxpayers' money. Better yet, if they want to live in an Arabic-speaking environment, they should return to their native countries. We do not need multiculturalism; we have our own culture and we plan to keep it. If they don't like it, LET THEM GET THE HELL OUT OF AMERICA!
The audacity of muslims gets more appalling every day. I'm so sick of their threats and complaints, as if they are doing us a favor by immigrating to our country only to exploit us every way they can. WHY ARE THEY HERE?!! Who needs or wants them? All muslims do is bitch and moan about imaginary "racism", "islamophobia", "bigotry" while they disparage America and Americans. Why do these disgusting savages voluntarily come to America and encourage their extended families to join them if they are abused and dissatisfied? I guess somebody told them they could just plant themselves and their umpteen jihadist brats on American soil and it would belong to them. I despise these people and everything they stand for! They do not belong in America and they do not deserve to be here. If we continue to allow our enemies to migrate to this country, we will pay dearly for our deliberate insanity.
Posted by: Susanp at August 21, 2007 5:41 PM
"durka! durka! How dare you infidels interrupt the terror programming of our spawn!"
Yep, makes sense to me.
(/sarc)
at August 21, 2007 5:54 PM
Why is there even a taxpayer funded school of this nature??
I want a Public, White Northern European Christian based Cultural School myself. What do you say NYC?
NYC needs a Multi-Cultural Education like it needs another 9/11. Brainwashing is not what the Public is paying for. Give the Children an Education rather than some grand exercise in Social Engineering. We need REAL Engineers comming out of our Schools.
Communists, Socialists, Progressives and Muslims all share a common Denomanator-Conformity. See how easy Math can be and the Importance of understanding how to apply it.
Now, could those who bandi about the term Rasists pleas give us the Satistical Breakdown by Race, Gender, Religon, Color... Showing exactly who and to what % of each classification holds these Raceists views? Or, is the total greater than the sum of its parts by some expodential factor? Would their Students see the Error or even know the difference?
Posted by: flowerknife_us at August 21, 2007 5:57 PM
Re: Supporters called such statements "racist."
As Hitler and Goebbels noted, such tactics have to be a constant. The charges of "racism" are Sudetenland style "spiritual terror" meant to silence and intimidate opposition. Goebbels said it was crucial to position one's group and oneself as a "victim" in these matters.
Hitler (from Mein Kampf) on the methods he learned in Vienna on how to silence critics: "I understood the infamous spiritual terror which this movement exerts, particularly on the bourgeoisie, which is neither morally nor mentally equal to such attacks; at a given sign it unleashes a veritable barrage of lies and slanders against whatever adversary seems most dangerous, until the nerves of the attacked persons break down and, just to have peace again, they (the PC in media and govt) sacrifice the hated individual(s).
However, the fools obtain no peace.
The game begins again and is repeated over and over until fear of the mad dog results in suggestive (PC) paralysis.........Conversely, they praise every (PC) weakling on the opposing side (who appease them), sometimes cautiously, sometimes loudly, depending on the real or supposed quality of his intelligence".
In regard to the "spiritual terror" tactics of Hitler (noted above), William Shirer (page 23, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich) said: "No more precise analysis of Nazi tactics, as Hitler was eventually to develop them, was ever written".
Hitler (and Goebbels) asserted it was very important to claim the status of "victim" while accusing the critics/opposition of the very tactics being used to silence them, the "barrage of lies and slander" being used against them. Hitler and Goebbels both noted the stupidity of "the masses" in the matter and counted on the (PC) fanaticism of supporters of "spiritual terror". Hitler said, "...in the ranks of their supporters the victory achieved (the silencing, the intimidation of critics) seems a triumph of justice of their own cause, the defeated adversary in most cases despairs of the success of any further resistance".
The tactics used by many on the left (and groups like CAIR) are right from Mein Kampf and Goebbels. It is no wonder Mein Kampf is as popular as the Quran in the Mideast.
Posted by: Frank at August 21, 2007 5:59 PM
As Goebbels noted, it is not the truth or the intellectual content of the propaganda that matters, what matters is "that it is effective". The charges of "racism" work-just as they did with Chamberlain in the Sudetenland. Were the charges true in the Sudetenland? Of course not. But it worked. And Goebbels said the charges must be repeated constantly. It's name calling and slander, slogans, lies, "spiritual" and Cartoon Rage "physical terror". It's Fibrahim Hooper style lies (knowingly charging Robert with a comment he deleted).
Does the truth matter with Fibrahim Hooper and others like him? No.
Posted by: Frank at August 21, 2007 6:16 PM
If I calm down an American of Hispanic decent (2 generation from Mexico), and explain to him that ruthlessly assaulting any Mohammedan he sees because he loathes them and what they stand for and how they treat his people here in the streets of Dallas. Who is the racist? The Hispanic? The Caucasian? Or the Mohammedan?
Posted by: senor doeboy at August 21, 2007 6:23 PM
Muslims constantly harp on how they are not viewed as a part of American culture and loyal Americans. But, here, we have a glaring example of how being equal is not good enough; they want separate schools, their own language, their own culture, their own teachers, their own special curriculum, special ties to their own religion, special relationships with mentors from their own community, etc., etc.
The case for educating/cultivating fluent speakers/students in the Arabic language has been made several times, as if, we don't have any other way to educate enough Arabic language specialists from the general education pool. I'm not convinced this is so.
I'd like to know the full roster of dhimmis in support of this school, including any NY State Legislators, U.S. Senators, U.S. Representatives.
Because, empowering this community at taxpayers' expense is an outrageous example of dhimmitude. And, we are soon going to see just exactly how much respect these people have for mainstream Americans when they gather for their march in NYC on September 9th.
Posted by: BurkasforHitlery at August 21, 2007 6:31 PM
If I calm down an American of Hispanic decent (2 generation from Mexico), and explain not to him ruthlessly assaulting any Mohammedan he sees because he loathes them and what they stand for and how they treat his people here in the streets of Dallas. Who is the racist? The Hispanic? The Caucasian? Or the Mohammedan?
Major typos.. sorry all.. sliced open hand at work tendons gone for now.... I can't type or edit well.
Posted by: senor doeboy at August 21, 2007 6:34 PM
If I calm down an American of Hispanic decent (2 generation from Mexico), and explain not to him ruthlessly assaulting any Mohammedan he sees because he loathes them and what they stand for and how they treat his people here in the streets of Dallas. Who is the racist? The Hispanic? The Caucasian? Or the Mohammedan?
Major typos.. sorry all.. sliced open hand at work tendons gone for now.... I can't type or edit well.
Posted by: senor doeboy at August 21, 2007 6:34 PM
If I calm down an American of Hispanic decent (2 generation from Mexico), and explain not to ruthlessly assaulting any Mohammedan he sees because he loathes them and what they stand for and how they treat his people here in the streets of Dallas. Who is the racist? The Hispanic? The Caucasian? Or the Mohammedan?
Major typos.. sorry all.. sliced open hand at work tendons gone for now.... I can't type or edit well.
Posted by: senor doeboy at August 21, 2007 6:35 PM
"The Torah and the Koran both teach peace"....from headline.
Have they read the Koran? Obviously not.
Posted by: champ at August 21, 2007 6:46 PM
"The Torah and the Koran both teach peace"....from headline.
Have they read the Koran? Obviously not.
champ-
Actually they have been conned by the hustlers. The Quran is set up longest to shortest verses, but what matters is the chronological order in the Quran. The earlier "peaceful verses" have been abrogated (like wine is OK, but later alcohol is banned). They don't realize that the final orders re Unbelievers are that they are to be subdued, converted, reduced to Dhimmi status or killed as per the later chronological orders. ("War is deception" as per Muhammad.)
They are conned. They read and think they see peaceful verses, but Muslims know the "peaceful verses" verses have been abrogated.
Posted by: Frank at August 21, 2007 6:57 PM
Let's associate "islamic arabs" with "terrorism and violence" as I for one don't see the Christian Arabs engaging or threatening violence or terrorism.
Two words: George Habash.
Posted by: Seamus at August 21, 2007 7:06 PM
Champ-
It's like the Prohibition of alcohol amendment in the US Constitution. It's the reverse in the Quran re booze. In any case, the "peaceful verses" in the Quran have been amended.
Posted by: Frank at August 21, 2007 7:09 PM
" In fairness the Torah doesn't teach peace either."
posted above
.........................
And well it shouldn't, as the Jewish people have known no peace since hell was a campfire. Speaking for myself, I actually don't care what someone's holy book has to say...examine the behavior of the adherants for the truth of the issue. Look at the behavior of the Jewish people over the ages and do the same with the mo's and the picture is very clear.
at August 21, 2007 7:20 PM
Translating all of these placards:
America Must Surrender to the Imperialism of Islam.
Their push for "multiculturalism" is telling.
Would you want "multi" drivers of your car?
(Then what real good is "multi" culturalism?)
Isn't our existing culture already working well enough to become the main force for expanding knowledge and liberty in the world?
"Multiculturalism" is simply "divide and conquer" is its p.c. formulation.
It's true believers' aim is to eradicate the last, best hope for human development in Earth.
And bring on chaos.
Out of resentment.
No thanks, cranks.
at August 21, 2007 7:24 PM
Years ago, when I was reading the Koran and trying to figure things out, which I still am, I picked up the phone book and looked under A for Arab, and called the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee and got one Mohammed Mehdi. Since deceased, Mehdi, an Iraqi, declaimed on the phone about how "no Jew from Brooklyn has a right to live in Palestine" etc. Resisting the urge to hangup, I eventually got to know Mehdi.
He was in favor of the destruction of Israel, backed terrorism, and on a radio talk show defended the expulsion of the Jews from Islamic lands after the 1948 Arab defeat because the Jews "had made themselves an enemy". He maintained that the Arabs would have backed Israel had the Zionists asked their permission first before establishing a state. His peace program was to facilitate the emigration of Jews from Israel. He was a friend of Saddam Hussein's and knew Qaddafi. He had a lot of cash to throw around and was a good host. I was his pen pal for a while but eventually our differences were too great.
It's been many years and I have no idea what ever happened to the Committee, but I doubt they've changed. Instead, the world has changed, to the point where the idea of disapproving of people with such violent, supramacist views is considered racist by many alleged progressives, and to the point where an Arabic school with a like-minded principal could show up in Brooklyn.
at August 21, 2007 7:27 PM
Frank -- that's right, so maybe they believe their own lies; and like you said, Muslims know that the old 'peaceful' verses have been replaced by the newest revelations of violence, so perhaps they're trying to con us.
Posted by: champ at August 21, 2007 7:53 PM
"'I thought this was not just an attack on her as an Arab, as a Muslim, but this was an attack on our community as a whole,' said Sara Said Alkhulaidi, originally from Yemen, but now living in Brooklyn."
-- from the article above
How did it happen? Who decided that one "Sara Said Alkhuliadi," whose views we can guess, who is "originally from Yemen," is now "living in Brooklyn"? How did it happen that this government, which has as its first duty the protection of the citizens of this country, and of the legal and political institutions -- beginning with the Constitution and above all, its recognition and protection of the rights of the individual against the collective (i.e., the state), simply allowed in without thoroughly investigating what animates the sara-said-alkhulaidis of this world? They have failed us. And if they haven't cut off such immigration, they are now failing and endangering us.
Who in Congress will make this an issue?
Posted by: Hugh at August 21, 2007 7:55 PM
When I hear Sara Said Alkhuliadi, I need to take two Alkhu-Selzers.
Posted by: jewdog at August 21, 2007 9:12 PM
Who in Congress will make this an issue?
Posted by: Hugh at August 21, 2007 7:55 PM
Hugh, if there any congressman/woman who will make this an issue, it will be Tom Tancredo. His record speaks for himself: http://www.congress.org/congressorg/bio/?id=685
Posted by: Alert at August 21, 2007 9:15 PM
Glenn Beck just reported that 3 separate Freedom of Information Act attempts by an anti-madrassa group to get curriculum info, names of textbooks, and publishers have all been ignored in NY. Very illuminating.
Why a totally Arabic school in the U.S.? My parents came from European stock and we went to the Germanic Garten and Francais Societe on our own time and dollar. Why can't these people learn their kulture from their home and religion and just go to an American school?
How can a city full of 9/11 survivors, victims' families, holocaust survivors and anyone with sense tolerate this?
Posted by: CapitalistGig at August 21, 2007 10:17 PM
"They carried signs that read "NYC needs multi-cultural education" and "The Torah and the Koran both teach peace." Many were Muslims themselves, while others were Jewish"
So, by citing the Torah and koran, the proponents of this "school" are demanding religious instruction in the guise of multi-cultural education? Will they have rabbis, priests, and ministers on staff to present some of the other faiths that make it "multi" cultural? Guess not. It's not surprising the ACLU is silent as these folks telegraph their intentions to impose their cultist beliefs on the American taxpayers' dime, but I'd like to know how the elected leaders -- who are sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution -- could ever justify their support of this violation of our 1st Amendment. They pander to their fear of reprisal or loss of incumbency or who-knows-what chickens##t excuse, while American ideals and rights are consistently eroded by people not worthy of the sacrifices and vision excercised by our forefathers.
Before these morons impose further multi-cultural education on us and our children, how about they take a lesson in American ideals and society's need for common, shared values and rights? Wait, maybe I spoke impetuously. I'll take multi-cultural studies, as long as they include comparative studies of the US Constitution and the koran, so each new American generation learns how islam is so obviously inimical to our individual and national well-being.
Posted by: Gondemar at August 21, 2007 11:14 PM
CapitalistGig:
The fact that the curriculim is being kept private is at the core of the critics complaints and this should absolutely not be tolerated.
We need to watch carefully who the dhimmis,and appeasers are who are allowing this to stand, that goes for Mayor Bloomberg as well. I'd like to hear Hillary Clintons take on this as well, and any other politician that over sees this area of New York.
at August 21, 2007 11:58 PM
pez,
All those verses you listed...I hate it when muslims say that they are taken out of context. What context could they possibly be in to make them sound better? lol
Posted by: mrockroll1969 at August 22, 2007 12:09 AM
They know all about multi-culture education, this is the door they are working from now. Screaming racism! In NY of all places. Mo money mo money! Sounds like they are getting desperate. Funds running short? Just hitting us up any way they can. It worked for other american groups that cry racism, they thought they would try it. It all sickens me! They all are crying for money again! Why? America has so much to offer, that is what they are doing here isn't it, to be free from their culture? If not it is time to GO HOME! Like Bush said, better to fight them abroad then here!
Posted by: MZ at August 22, 2007 2:30 AM
Christiane Amanwhore’SHit Piece on the Jews
http://sheikyermami.com/2007/08/22/christiane-amanwhoreshit-piece-on-the-jews/
Posted by: sheik yer'mami at August 22, 2007 2:56 AM
"The term, [intifada] literally translated, meant "shaking off," Almonteser said, while asserting that she didn't think violence was suggested by the T-shirts."
What an absolute crock. Intifada means the bloody murder of innocent Jews. She's lying through her teeth and she knows it.
at August 22, 2007 3:23 AM
....so, the Muslims object to having a Jewish principal....just what is it that goes on in the school that Muslims do not want the Jews to find out....
Ban Muslim immigration.
at August 22, 2007 5:52 AM
Hello all - destroy pigslam yadda yadda yadda
I had a thought about the islamofacist march on September 9th, a protest that any sane person would deem absurd and ridiculous considering the proximity to ground zero.
Let's have a free baseball bat giveaway like they do at games. Let's have truck loads of baseball bats "coincidentally" delivered around the corner from this "protest".
Islamofacists will scream "bigotry" and "racism" and we could reply quite honestly that they are wrong, we hate them and everything they stand for equally. Or we could just say they are right and then practice swinging the bats.
If say 20,000 baseball bats were to "fall off a truck" around the corner, I wonder how many calls for "death to America" would be heard.
Maybe this is wishful thinking. The other option would be to hold a "gun cleaning" presentation hosted by the NRA. How man guns are there in New York City again ???? hmmmmm
Ban everything islam period.
Don't start trouble and there won't be trouble. I really wouldn't recommend pissing off New Yorkers anymore than they already are.
at August 22, 2007 6:29 AM
This is what I find funny, even though it's not:
How can states continually violate the 2nd Amendment, like New Jersey, and virtually outlaw guns of any kind,
YET
Violations of Freedom of Religion (say...Islam?) can't? Why not? It happens to Christians, Hindus, et al...why not Islam?
Because the Leftists won't have it...the answer can't be any simpler. They won't support logic but will defend a "race" (pah!) underdog.
:P to them, I say!
Posted by: Miss_Anthrope at August 22, 2007 1:37 PM
Jesus would disagree that the Torah does not teach peace. To cite but one example, in St. Matthew 22:37-40, Jesus quoted the Torah, saying, "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets."
The two passages that Jesus cites are Deuteronomy 6:4 and Leviticus 19:18, the latter of which Rabbi Hillel said comprehended “The entire Torah, the rest a mere commentary,” [Bavli Shabbat 31a].
Plus, the injunctions against crimes against humanity in the Ten Commandments are diametrically opposed to the Koran's entire tone and content.
People should always ask themselves, whenever they are about to comment on the Bible, "Do I really have a clue about what I am about to say?"
at August 22, 2007 4:46 PM
Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)