| FrontPageMag.com | By Robert Spencer | By Hugh Fitzgerald | Books | Dhimmi Watch | Islam 101 | Qur'an Blog | Raymond Ibrahim | Robert Spencer |  |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
"We are working for a Caliphate from Morocco to Indonesia and from Khazakhstan to Saudi Arabia." Hmmm. On my map Denmark doesn't fall between Morocco and Indonesia or between Kazakhstan and Saudi Arabia. Unless you go the other way, I suppose.
"Islamic group incites war on West," from The Copenhagen Post (thanks to all who sent this in):
Controversial Islamic organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir celebrated its annual congress in Copenhagen on Sunday with words of anger against Jews and the West, reported daily free newspaper Nyhedsavisen.Nearly 600 Muslims attended the meeting at KB Hallen in the city’s enclave of Frederiksberg, where religious leaders spoke of the rise of an new Islamic Caliphate and the fall of Western powers.
‘The Caliphate can arrive in an hour, two months or two years from now,’ said Fadi Abdullatif, Hizb ut-Tahrir’s president, who owns a previous conviction for publicly urging his members to kill Jews. ‘We are working for a Caliphate from Morocco to Indonesia and from Khazakhstan to Saudi Arabia.’
The union of nations under a common Islamic law could be created by force if necessary, according to another of Hizb ut Tahrir’s leaders, Atta bin Khalil. Khalil also told those in attendance to ‘continue their state of war against the Jewish nation’.
A third speaker at the congress, Emir Shamil, said that ‘heads may roll’ in the recreation of the Caliphate.
Posted by Robert at August 29, 2007 8:07 AM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
Good thing Islam is a "religion of peace"
Posted by: KAOSKTRL![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.jihadwatch.org/nav-commenters.gif)
at August 29, 2007 8:19 AM
Robert said:
"Hmmm. On my map Denmark doesn't fall between Morocco and Indonesia or between Kazakhstan and Saudi Arabia. Unless you go the other way, I suppose."
Hmmm, my map, either...
Heh, but we're just silly infidels with silly infidel maps. Islamists' maps probably have the entire world as one big 'country', all the same color and with a huge crescent moon super-imposed over the whole thing.
*snort*
Posted by: JenBee at August 29, 2007 8:20 AM
"Nearly 600 Muslims attended the meeting"
...I would like to think the security forces were taking photographs, recording vehicle registrations, collecting information and recording the speeches....all of which may be useful in the near future "when heads may be rolling".
at August 29, 2007 8:34 AM
Remember when conspiracy to murder charges could be brought against anyone who fit the statutory requirements?
Posted by: Beagle at August 29, 2007 8:39 AM
Will it be a Sunni Caliphte or a Shia Caliphate?
Or will they share power democratically?
Anyone?
Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at August 29, 2007 9:01 AM
ATM jihad
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22328389-662,00.html
Posted by: savitch at August 29, 2007 9:03 AM
Heads may roll
because
The blood always flows where the muhammadan goes.
Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at August 29, 2007 9:05 AM
Now folks! we have to keep in mind that these Muslims are only par-taking in their traditional religious practices and as good multiculturalists we certainly would not want to disturb them.
And of course in America we recognize separation of church and state as well as freedom of speech. You wouldn't want us to get the impression that Islam has a political component, would you?
You wouldn't want us to somehow get the impression that they are acting like traitors, or committing sedition, or if you live in America they are in violation of the Smith Act?
Nah --just good old religious practices that have nothing to do with standing governments.
Say! I've got a real good buy on a bridge that goes from Manhatten to Queens in New York--any one interested??
Posted by: Mackie at August 29, 2007 9:06 AM
"Remember when conspiracy to murder charges could be brought against anyone who fit the statutory requirements?"
Yeah, Beagle. Unfortunately, "heads will roll" is such a common saying, no one would take it literally, except for us crackpots and Islamophobes. Oh, and the Mohammedans, of course.
OT: Can someone tell me the address to use to send an article? You'd think I'd remember it, but...
Thanks!
Posted by: Abscedere at August 29, 2007 9:10 AM
Remember folks, they are doing what their rules book, the Koran tells them to do.
Posted by: bigcatgirl13106 at August 29, 2007 9:22 AM
Robert,
Your point is central.
What are these lowlifes doing in Denmark ?
What are they doing in Britain (as the Brits vote with their feet and come here).
Worse, what are they doing here ?
If there is not a presidential candidate that addresses immigration, it is we who can be screwed.
Posted by: dgene at August 29, 2007 9:28 AM
Gets on my t*ts when these hate mongers spout this crap. If it were me spouting off about how all Muslims should be killed as enemies of the west and how we were going to make democracies of all islamic states removing Sharia law and demolishing all the mosques (which i believe would be a good start) I would be arrested and charged!! yet these f****rs don't even get a hand slapped, in fact they get support from our spineless politicians who don't want to be seen as "racist" or an "islamaphobe", who don't want to put their "careers" on the line!!
Grow a spine, arrest them, deport them and make it plain and simple that this is not going to happen!! Go to the mosques they attend and raze them to the ground as centres of hate!!
Posted by: Demvaril at August 29, 2007 9:34 AM
...and THIS is the group that's actually allowed to spew its vile venom--in BRITAIN!!! How is it that a group considered too radical for most MUSLIM countries is given free rein in a WESTERN one? Can someone explain that one to me?
I'm going to London for a year in three weeks...I shudder to think of the crap I shall see there.
Posted by: GetBornAgain at August 29, 2007 9:56 AM
Will it be a Sunni Caliphte or a Shia Caliphate?
Posted by: Ynkedoodl2
Either way, it won't be sunny, and it will be shitty.
at August 29, 2007 9:59 AM
When I hear muslim proclamations that the time of "the return of the caliphate" is nigh upon us, I think of the many times in the past that Christians made the same claims of Christ's return. Just a curiosity.
Posted by: tsarbomba29 at August 29, 2007 10:38 AM
"Emir Shamil, said that ‘heads may roll’ in the recreation of the Caliphate."
-- from the article above
The phrase was being used not figuratively as we, non-Muslims, do, but rather, as came naturally to this Muslim speaker, in its literal sense.
The word "recreation," on the other hand, can and should be read in two ways, both of them apposite: the "re-creation" of the Caliphate and the "recreation" (instead, say, of dodgeball in the schoolyard) of the Caliphate. Fun with Abu Dick and Umma Jane.
Posted by: Hugh at August 29, 2007 10:44 AM
When I hear muslim proclamations that the time of "the return of the caliphate" is nigh upon us, I think of the many times in the past that Christians made the same claims of Christ's return. Just a curiosity.
Posted by: tsarbomba29
Doing some thinking tsarbomba29, are you?
Tell you what. You go live in the Caliphate!
Me, I'll be first in line to kiss Christ's feet!
Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at August 29, 2007 10:51 AM
Oh, relax, people. Does anyone here really think these people can actually bring about the caliphate? Let these sexually repressed, 7th-century towelies rant and rave. They don't have much else going for them.
Posted by: GetBornAgain at August 29, 2007 11:10 AM
"religious leaders spoke of the rise of an new Islamic Caliphate and the fall of Western powers"....from headline.
Even if this "new Islamic Caliphate" were to be implemented it will not succeed, because it's a governmental system built on hate, lies, confusion and false ideals -- just to name a few -- so it's doomed for failure from the get-go.
Islam be gone!!
at August 29, 2007 12:36 PM
GBA writes:
"Oh, relax, people. Does anyone here really think these people can actually bring about the caliphate?"
By all means, let us relax. just like the frog, as it relaxes in a pot of lukewarm water that is slowly brought to a boil.
GBA in 1935. Oh, relax, people. Let Hitler have the Rhineland. The Germans are a defeated people. Their economy is in the toilet. They have no navy. Their army, such as it is, rides on horseback. Hitler is an obvious nutjob. Does anyone here really think that Germany can threaten the Allies again? Go back to sleep.
Posted by: sheik yer booty at August 29, 2007 12:53 PM
GBA in 1993:
Oh relax, people. Does anyone really think these misfits can bring down the twin towers of the World Trade Center? They tried and failed. The perpetrators were arrested within days. Nothing bad will happen. Everyone just go to work.
Posted by: PMK at August 29, 2007 1:05 PM
Even if this "new Islamic Caliphate" were to be implemented it will not succeed, because it's a governmental system built on hate, lies, confusion and false ideals -- just to name a few -- so it's doomed for failure from the get-go.
But if we let it come about, a lot of us infidels will die waiting for it to fail.
at August 29, 2007 1:21 PM
I'm sure that the "heads will roll" bit is just a metaphor. What is it in the original classical arabic? Also, we should keep in mind that rolling heads gather no moss.
Posted by: MP at August 29, 2007 2:11 PM
"HEADS MAY ROLL"--- Yeah, they love that, this insane satanic desire to separate someones head from their body.
Heads may roll in re-creation or recreation; no difference to them. "Of the Caliphate" = call-your-own-fate, jee-hate-ie!
Posted by: guide inside at August 29, 2007 2:35 PM
Posted by: GetBornAgain
Oh relax, people
The controversial Islamic organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir just a few weeks ago of the filled a stadium with 80000 members in Indonesia's capital to call for a united Muslim state
The Islamic nation has entered through al-Qa`ida's war with America a new period that is different from all the other periods experienced by Muslims against their enemies. This period is based on economic war due to the peculiar nature of the adversary in this ferocious battle. Usually, wars are based on military strength and victory belongs to those who are militarily superior on the battlefield...But our war with America is fundamentally different, for the first priority is defeating it economically. For that, anything that negatively affects its economy is considered for us a step in the right direction on the path to victory. Military defeats do not greatly effect how we measure total victory, but these defeats indirectly affect the economy which can be demonstrated by the breaching of the confidence of capitalists and investors in this nation's ability to safeguard their various trade and dealings.
In light of this matter, the difficulty and ease of the task becomes apparent. In addition, it becomes apparent why additional al-Qa`ida strikes inside the United States have been delayed. When thinking about military strikes, it is not difficult to carry out an attack that would kill a good number of American civilians, but in my opinion this is a waste of resources without much benefit. However when directing these resources against economic targets, it is more effective and can get us many steps closer toward victory. An attack that kills a large number of Americans can not achieve a tenth of this effectiveness. This reveals the importance of the blessed September 11th attacks, which is not that it killed a large number of infidels, but what is more important, the economic effect that this strike achieved...I will not be exaggerating if I say that striking the Pentagon was purely symbolic and had no noticeable effect on the course of the battle. It is symbolic for it shows the Americans that their foremost military facility can be destroyed by handful of individuals, which is a blow to their morale and a point of pride for the Islamic peoples who have been drowning in defeat for many years.
Any operation targeting an area of infrastructure in a new country that does not have a history of countering these operations is considered as bleeding (exhausting) to the greater enemy America and the targeted nation itself. It is so because these nations will be required to protect all similar potential targets which results in economic exhaustion (bleeding)... For example, if a hotel that caters to western tourists in Indonesia is targeted, the enemy will be required to protect all hotels that cater to western tourists in all countries which may become a target of similar attacks. You can say the same thing about living residences, economic establishments, embassies, etc
http://www.think-israel.org/salama.alqaidaderailseconomy.html
at August 29, 2007 3:09 PM
Sounds more like they plan a lot more than just a straight line caliphate...must include eurabia, too.
Just another hitler-wannabe stating true intent...glad they come out and show who (what what) they are, plan to do...let them keep talking, as it will only keep arousing the real rage-that of Europeans sick & tired of their BS, and know if they don't stop these maniacs, the Europeans will be dead...or enslaved.
Posted by: jcom972 at August 29, 2007 3:12 PM
Is Washington's renewed jingoism impeding Iran's ability to nuke Israel motivated by yesterday's warning from (or G-d's prayer-response to) Israel's Parliamentarian, Dr. Aryeh Eldad, during his exclusive interview with DemoCast.TV?
Watch him urge Washington not to squander actual Iran-deterence too long as to enable Iran to nuke Israel. Israel fears this US strategy might be planned to give the poll-sensitive, Republican party political justification for a retaliatory Pentagon attack on Iran.
Dr. Eldad cautioned that if America doesn't pre-empt Iran from producing nukes that will endanger the entire world, it might force Israel to take unilateral, pre-emptive military action.
"There's no chance in the world that Israel will be willing to live under nuclear Iranian threat!" he states. Just don't think you can blame Israel for the aftermath.
Watch 3-minute video interview for yourself by freely-subscribing to Democracy Broadcasting's News Magazine postings.
Posted by: DemoCast at August 29, 2007 3:26 PM
"What are these lowlifes doing in Denmark ?"
dgene, I honestly don't know. Part of the answer will have to be because of my former gullibility. I voted for a socialist party, I demonised critics of islam. Why are they being allowed to stay here, in what should be a post-gullible world? Well, for all you hear about Danes possessing a take-no-prisoners attitude with respect to islam and showing the world what antidhimmitude is, this is a wildly exaggerrated claim. The sad fact of the matter is that up to 83% of voters - a large proportion of those not voting the Danish People's Party - only care about preserving their share of what the welfare state can offer. The future? Pah. The fear of being seen to "demonise" and being bigoted trumps any demands that action be taken. Same as everywhere else.
Posted by: anti-uffe at August 29, 2007 4:05 PM
"What are these lowlifes doing in Denmanrk?"
Simple, same as all the other civilized nations they're in...infitration, infestation, insurrection, and eventual takeover of each country from within, since they know they can never defeat us from without.
Posted by: jcom972 at August 29, 2007 4:28 PM
I wonder why these Jerk-offs held their conference in a Western city, instead of an Arab one. Maybe because there are no liquor, no dancing girls, no laughing, no nothing in any arab country. There are no freedoms anywhere except in Western countries.
Come to where I live and see whose head rolls, asshole!
at August 29, 2007 9:23 PM
Robert said:
"Hmmm. On my map Denmark doesn't fall between Morocco and Indonesia or between Kazakhstan and Saudi Arabia. Unless you go the other way, I suppose."
It's all part of Assah's flat earth policy s nazeem keeps telling us..
at August 30, 2007 1:05 AM
"I wonder why these Jerk-offs held their conference in a Western city, instead of an Arab one"
Posted by: Hebrew Handyman
....first, they would be at risk from a Muslim terrorist attack, and secondly there would be no Non MUslims around to irritate....
Ban Muslim Immigration.
at August 30, 2007 7:32 AM
But the worshippers of the profit Muhammad are commanded to wage war on all of mankind until all the world will profess that there is no Al-Ilha but Muhammads Al-Ilha, or they will be enslaved to pay the jiziyah and in the end they will be killed anyhow...
Posted by: sheik yer'mami at August 30, 2007 8:06 AM
Hey Denmark, get smart and kick out those muslims who are declaring war or anything against the west. Same for U.S. They have unbelievable nerve to speak against a western country while they are in it! So give them the door quickly.
Posted by: goodolddays at August 30, 2007 9:48 PM
Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)