I just learned today, idling through a dictionary, that Charles Aznavour, whom I had always known was of Armenian descent, bears a last name that, in Turkish, means "a person from the Caucasus" with a strong hint of Georgia.

Connoisseurs of the Caucasus will be thinking of the centuries of Muslim raids to capture Georgian and Circassian girls, chosen for their beauty and brought back for use in the harems. ." They will think about the Chechens who have guarded the Hashemites in Jordan, in the same way that Saddam Hussein could only trust non-Arab, indeed in his case Christian waiters and cooks and tasters, or as Assads, senior and junior, as Alawites must rely on Armenian and other non-Arabs as household guard units. -- just the way non-Arabs (including Armenians). They will think about General Ermolov, and Lermontov's Pechorin in Daghestan, and if they happen to be Russians, they may wonder how the Russians will withstand demographic conquest from within -- and wonder if the KGB graduates, with their diplomas in blood, will look beyond arresting such patriots as Khodorkovsky -- yes, possibly not quite cricket in his behavior, but the most decent among the many greater crooks that Russia has thrown up, beginning in the period of the semibankirshchina -- and whether Russia will dominate the Caucasus, or somehow the Caucasus, and the Muslims in it, now moving to Moscow, may indeed inherit Russia. Something to think about.

Yes, when I read remarks like the blood-curdling ones above, Georgia is on my mind. Not that Georgia. The other one.

Posted by: Hugh at November 4, 2007 6:10 PM

"I announce to all Muslims that I am waging a war against infidels under the banner of "La ilaha illa Allah"."

He's been watching too much Teletubbies.

Posted by: Celsius at November 4, 2007 6:10 PM

"If Allah's Religion could be established on Earth using another method, then our Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, would not have engaged in twenty seven battles."
from the article

What a refreshing, and revealing, admission! The only way to establish Islam is by force. It's too phony and too evil to spread by any peaceful means. If there's any proof that their Allah is not the Creator-God, this is it. Their Allah obviously hates humankind, and instructs his followers to kill humans. If he were really the Creator, why would he have bothered to create mankind in the first place, and then decided to kill them off via Islam? Or maybe he just changed his mind, another of the notorious "abrogations"?

Posted by: ebonystone at November 4, 2007 6:41 PM

"But none of this has anything to do with Islam. Oh, no. If you suggest otherwise, you're a wicked Islamophobe".-Robert

I'm sure that once upon a time, long long ago, there was a Robert who believed good Muslims would confront this. But this is not about truth, this is about power. Chuckle-heads such as Fibrahim Hooper, CAIR-liars, bald faced liars, are propagandists. As Gandhi noted, there are only truth seekers and then there are power seekers. It's one or the other.

Posted by: Frank at November 4, 2007 6:43 PM

The beginning steps in Russian Glass Industry.

They give us a hard time with what is knocking on their door?

Posted by: flowerknife_us at November 4, 2007 6:45 PM

This speech reads like the guy got it out of a formbook.

"I declare jihad on the infidel [insert nationality or ethnic group here] people. We will bring the rule of Allah to the land of [insert name here]. Those who oppose us will [insert action verb here] in blood and suffer [insert noun here] in the fires of Hell."

Posted by: sceptico at November 4, 2007 6:53 PM

More scary take-over threats/promises from The Religion of Pieces. Wake up, world! And somewhere some liberals are sitting back with their feet up going, "This is just a fanatical fringe group, go back to what you were doing, nothing to see here".

I don't know who is scarier--the jihadists who have a long legacy of making good on their threats, or the people who don't believe the jihadists will make good on their threats.

Posted by: Dumpling at November 4, 2007 6:56 PM

" I reject all kafir laws established in the world. I reject all laws and systems established by infidels in the land of Caucasus. I reject all names used by infidels to divide Muslims. I declare ethnic, territorial and colonial zones carrying names of "North-Caucasian republics",

Does this mean they're not going to obey traffic signals and railroad crossing barriers?

Posted by: general pershing at November 4, 2007 7:04 PM

"It's too phony and too evil to spread by any peaceful means."

This is exactly right. For example, I was told by a Catholic aquaintance living in South Korea for some time that the reason the Muslim population in that part of Asia (Korea, Japan, China) is so small is that the people of the Orient just don't quite know what to make of it. They simply don't see a way to incorporate it into their culture and historical legacy. They have no sense of its important or relevance to their lives. Basically, the majority of Orientals have no use for it. Whereas Christianity flourished in Korea, has a large underground community in China, and some significant small pockets in Japan that outlasted two major persecutions and an atomic bomb. All three countries have given Christendom many thousands and thousands of martyrs. I would venture to guess that many, many, many cultures around the world feel as the Orientals do and would have rejected Islam outright had Islam not used the sword and other means of oppression. Islam simply cannot spread by the sheer force of its own testimony. Not like Christianity which has proved over 2,000 years to have its own unique and radiating force with the power to draw all men to itself wherever people are open and receptive to learning about its tenents, philosophies and ideals, and wherever its missionaries present it with love and respect for each person's dignity and freedom. Of course, Islam and Islamic culture has its attractive elements (devotion to family and prayer is something to be admired) but these elements are also found in other religions and philosophies that are more well-rounded and compatible with basic human needs. Basically, Islam has nothing to offer that other religions can't do better...and without all the bloodshed.

Posted by: Dumpling at November 4, 2007 7:14 PM

I reject everything associated with taghut. I reject all kafir laws established in the world. I reject all laws and systems established by infidels in the land of Caucasus
Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war…When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them…If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them. (Sahih Muslim 4294)
and this called itself the religion of peace ya peace only if you join the cult or pay protection

Posted by: mowasaperv at November 4, 2007 7:40 PM

I remember running across Jihad Unspun right after 9/11. What a bunch of nutcases.

I can't stand to read it because of its flagrant lying, all the time. It has no credibility in my estimation. Stuff they say over there is beyond outlandish, it's ... words fail.

Isn't it run out of Texas or something? Who and what the heck is Jihad Unspun? This btw is not a rhetorical question.

Posted by: Goob at November 4, 2007 8:22 PM

Realize, "of course", that Akhmed Zakayev, "Chechen Foreign Minister"..(in exile in UK, wanted for murder in Russia) sacked Umarov (acting "president of Chechnya") immediately upon hearing this.

Initially the Chechen conflict was mostly a nationalist movement seeking independence from Russia for a people who have been brutalized for centuries since the time of Ivan Grozny. Let us not forget the genocide visited upon these people by Stalin as they were exiled to Siberia and other parts of the Soviet Union.

The Chechen conflict has been progressively Islamized over the course of the second Chechen war. The radicals have money and spirited fighters and have overwhelmed the traditionalists who have more modest goals than world conquest in the name of islam. Zakayev does not want Chechnya to declare war on the whole world. The old guard is not so inclined.

What has happened is that these "moderates" are in exile, while the extremists are in the field carrying on the fight. The movement has been splintered by the very effective campaign carried out by Putin. The Chechen war is over except for some small incidents of violence. But you won't read that at jihadunspun...te he.

However, let us review the record. Here is a list of "The Presidents of Chechnya"

Dzokar Dudayev ... dead, killed by Russian missle.
Zelimkhan Yanderbaiev ... dead, killed in Qatar by Russian agents, They blew up his car as he was leaving Friday prayers! (good job Ruskies!)
Aslan Mashkadov ... dead, killed in a sneaky underhanded trap set by Ruskies
Abdul Kalim Sadulayev..killed by Ruskies after only a few months in office, less than three as I recall.

Which brings us to the current "President" Mr. Umarov.

This is only part of the story. The field commanders have been eliminated as well. Most importantly they got Shamil Basayev, author of Beslan and many many other atrocities. Seemed like an inside job at the time, but who knows. Emir Khattab, a Jordanian jihadist was poisoned at his own camp! An inside job for sure. So the Chechen jihadists are in fact infiltrated. Again, good job Ruskies!

And just to close the circle a bit, Mr. Zakayev says that this declaration is the work of such infiltrators who have influenced Umarov to issue this bellicose statement which is detrimental to the cause in the extreme. (Infiltrators named by Zakayev... Mrs. Dudayev, Djokars widow, Movladi Udugov, Propaganda Minister (I mean Information Minister) of Chechnya. and Udugov's brother)

And so the "Chechen High Command" is splintered and fighting amongst themselves. Again. The second Chechen war is over. Good job Ruskies!

Whatever we may think of Mr. Putin, he's has made good on his pledge to the Russian people to beat the Chechen Rebels.

nabi ZK

...OK that was a bit convoluted but gives some background on the current situation in the Caucasus...

Posted by: zonie kafir at November 4, 2007 8:24 PM

It becomes clearer each day that submitting to the tenets of Islam is a mental disorder.

With time, even political correctness will not prevent it from being listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).

Posted by: Wimbledon Womble at November 4, 2007 8:56 PM

The Afghan and Iraq theater conflicts can only accurately be described: US v Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. The fact that the Bush loonatocracy has allied with both terror states has signalled US moral decrepitude. President Stupid has no problem criticizing Russia and straightjacketing Israel, but he allows Saudis and Pakis to finance the murder of Americans.

You hear about the new prosperity in Waziri and Pashto centers of Pakistan. Where did they get that wealth? North West Frontier Province gets 9.8% of foreign aid, under the Pigistan constitutional-fiscal transfer formula. NWFP is controlled by the Jamaat-i-Islami led MMA. The JI invited Osama bin Laden to attend their national convention in 1998. Those animals have been delivered over $2 billiion in US tax payer subsidies since 2001. Those animals held a minute's silence in their provincial assembly to commemorate the terrorist, after US authorities executed same for the murder of 2 CIA employees. Those animals have set up - FOR THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY - heroin factories in Afghanistan. Pashto-Waziri animals use opium/heroin profits, with Bush aid, to subsidize the Murder of Americans. Why? When stupidity prospers, nobody of influence has the intelligence to call it stupidity.

Posted by: supercargo at November 4, 2007 8:57 PM

Islam is a religion of hate and anger. It lacks any sense of compassion and humanizing element. In fact, compassion and human feelings toward non-Muslims is more or less haram in Islam. Hate. Hate. Hate. It is getting old.

Posted by: Wimbledon Womble at November 4, 2007 9:17 PM

@ topic header...

HMMMMmmmmmmm...US UK & Israel are legit targets?
No primary mention of the russians they're at war with, save that of en passant casuality as am unmistakably secondary issue to the US UK & Israel (as if the issue vs. russia may as well be less than significant).
uh-HUH.

Interesting coincidence...most interesting.

Posted by: jcom972 at November 4, 2007 9:29 PM

Spenc-Fitz need to be aware of the following, and to pass it on. At long last they need to drop their Bush-Hughes-Esposito-Armstrong training in Abrahamism (insipid myth that Muslims respect Jews and Christians as brothers in a common faith)
and take their counter jihad away from the collegiate sand box.

From Ecce Libano website, we find that written Arabic has NO spoken component, and barely one half of designated "arabs" have proficiency in it. Even Edward Said had to learn Egyptian when he moved to Cairo with his parents. We should not be working at democraticization of those savages; we should work for de-recognition of their "arab" identity. The American University of Beirut MADE Modern Standard Arabic. AUB is to Arabism as Stellenbosh U was to South African Apartheid and is Islamic University (Medina) to Wahabism and Qom Seminary to Khomenism and al-Azhar to Ikhwanism (al-Bannism).

-----------------------------------
...Calling everything Arabic (from Swahili to Maltese)has become the rule, even though it is laughably inaccurate from a sociolinguistic premise (for more on this see Franck Salameh's Middlebury's Arabic Morass in the Middle East Quarterly Vol. 13, n 3, summer 2006, and Privileging the Vernacular, Middle East Quarterly Vol. 14, n. 2, Spring 2007.)

One of the bizarre symptoms of the systematic denigration of Middle Eastern demotics and the "scholarly" contempt with which they (and their exponents) are treated can be seen in some of the flimsy responses to Salameh's essay; wobbly defenses of a rotten academic status quo, which, anyway, he was able to demolish most exquisitely.

Like Hebrew, Arabic is a member of the semitic branch of the afro-asiatic family of languages. But unlike Hebrew, which is a unified standard spoken language, Arabic is divided into thrity-five varieties, thirty four of which are spoken "mother tongues", and one of which, the Modern Standard variety privileged by and taught at elite universities throughout the world, is not a spoken mother tongue. Let me repeat this for you, Kheir, in case you didn't hear it the first time, the Modern Standard variety of Arabic IS NOT A SPOKEN MOTHER TONGUE.

The formal classification of MSA in Raymond Gordon's Ethnologue: Languages of the World is as follows:

[among Arabs] Modern Standard Arabic has 246,000,000 SECOND-LANGUAGE SPEAKERS (my emphasis). [IT IS] NOT A FIRST LANGUAGE (my emphasis again). [MSA is] used for education, official purposes, written materials, and formal speeches [all of which come not spontaneously, not as "mother-tongues do, but out of prepared materials, LNH]. [...MSA] is used for religion and ceremonial purposes, having archaic vocabulary. MSA is a modernized variety of Classical Arabic. In most Arab countries only the well educated have adequate proficiency in Standard Arabic, while over 100,500,000 do not (my emphasis).

(I wonder, Kheir, how can Arabic be a "mother language" if it is not spoken and if over 150 million "Arabs" do not have adequate proficiency in it, let alone proficiency tout court?)

While it would be simpler (and ideologically comforting to you Kheir) to designate the non-MSA thirty-four "other" species of language as "Arabic dialects" (which, ordinarily, if they were indeed dialects, would be functionally intelligible to each other's speakers), this is unfortunately not the case. While some so-called "Arabic dialects" are, like dyads, more similar than others (especially if they are in close geographic proximity to each other, e.g. Syrian and Jordanian and Lebanese etc...), the thrity-four living varieties are often distinguished easily because many are not functionally mutually-intelligible.

Consider the opinion of none other than the great Arabist apologist, Edward Said, on the issue: "I grew up in a family whose spoken language was an amalgam of what was common in Palestine, Lebanon and Syria." He learned to speak Egyptian in Cairo, and also studied MSA as a subject... Said continues that "if I were to try to understand an Algerian I would get nowhere, so different and varied are the colloquials once one gets away form the shores of the Eastern Mediterranean. The same would be true with an Iraqi, Moroccan or deep Gulf Dialect."

In a now famous quip popularized in the January 17th, 2002 edition of The Christian Science Monitor, Harvard linguist Wheeler Thackston maintained that MSA remains the domain of newspapers not conversations; Arabs themselves speak a multiplicity of languages "which are downgraded to dialects, [but which] resemble [MSA] as much as Latin resembles English."

Arabic might be your mother tongue, Kheir, given how opinionated and ideologically tainted you are, but, Arabic is not the mother language of the Lebanese. LEBANESE is! Beautiful, lyrical, syncretistic, contaminated, colorful LEBANESE.

How about we began fostering and celebrating some balance of perspective, Kheir, instead of clinging to the same old blinkered partisanships of the past?

Posted by: supercargo at November 4, 2007 9:33 PM

"There is no power and no power acquiring except through Allah"....FALSE!

Why Allah cannot be the God of the Bible:
http://www.truthwatch.info/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=83

Posted by: champ at November 4, 2007 9:46 PM

This all has a familiar ring to it.......

**Date Line Sudan, Late 19th Century.

Muhammad Ahmad ibn as Sayyid Abd Allah, the self-proclaimed Mahdi, Under his religious authority has reunited the clans of the Baggara and their subject Fur tribesmen and united into an aggressive alliance dedicated to establishing an "Islamic" Republic as the first step in the global "Islamic" state.**

Islam is the only religion that has global domination as a tenet of it's faith, so long as it has adherents, the dream of the Caliphate will continue to haunt the civilized world.

This theme has and will be repeated until there is Dar al-Islam or Dar al-Kufr, in the end there can be only one.

Posted by: Damn Yankee Infidel at November 4, 2007 9:49 PM

Reading this I have little sympathy for the Chechens.

Posted by: Jerry M at November 4, 2007 9:55 PM

Expect an Islamic Emirate Of Dearborn, Michigan someday.

For all practical purposes there's already Emirates in no-go sections of Paris, Copenhagen, and dozens of other cities in Europe. They just don't call them Emirates yet.

Posted by: rational at November 4, 2007 9:58 PM

"we should work for de-recognition of their "arab" identity."
- from a posting by "supercargo" above

You may have missed the dozens of postings about this subject, including those on Islam as a vehicle for Arab supremacism, and the many on the phoniness of the "Arab-American" construct, used now by Muslim Arabs to exploit the good reputation, and image, of descendants of Arabic-using Christians, chiefly Maronites and Greek Orthodox, but also including Copts and Assyrians, who non-Arab but Arabic-speaking, for the purposes of groups now completely under the control of Arab Muslims or islamochristians such as at least one of the Zogby boys, and Mary Rose Oakar, and others of that uncomprehending-of their-own-history ilk. Salameh's doctoral thesis, to which you refer, has been mentioned several times at this cite. "Ecce Libano" can be found linked to on the left.

Posted by: Hugh at November 4, 2007 9:58 PM

Robert:

A question with an intro:

The intro--
I'll not say Islam is this or is that nor that it espouses this or that. I'm not a Muslim [B"H!].

Yet those who believe that Islam is a justification of murder, terror and war will continue to do so just as long as they can get away with it. When a truly moderate for of Islam becomes the only form of Islam which allows one to operate within any given society, then and only then will such a form appear. Sadly, I think they'll have to create one because as much as I'd like to believe there's a really peaceful form of Islam currently, I see no basis on which to found such a belief.

In essence, Islam is used today as an excuse to be a bully on the global playground. Whether or not this is the "true" form of Islam-- as many would like to deny-- is nonetheless beside the point; toleration of the "bully" behavior has gone too far. The only way to get a bully to stop, as any kid will tell you, is to thoroughly kick his a--. The bully analogy has its limitations but works to the extent that it indicates that [the violent form of] Islam must be defeated if the world is to live in a semblence of peace and normalcy.

Question--

How does one defeat an ideology?

One can say [violent] Islam is like Naziism and the combination of a massive military defeat [since the ideology does entail a superiority complex] and exposure of the real extent of the horrors it has engendered will likely defeat it, but how does one wage the war? and against precisely whom? with what victory condition?

Posted by: MosheC at November 4, 2007 10:01 PM

General Pershing:
Does this mean they're not going to obey traffic signals and railroad crossing barriers?

Some actually don't. Too bad the report isn't in English, it is just hilarious. One of local Wahhabists in Bosnia (the bearded one, Jusuf Barcic) decided he didn't need a license to drive. He drove his green Mazda into the lighting pole you can see in the end of the report. He died of injuries. The reporter mentions Barcic admitted openly he didn't respect man-made laws. You can hear him during the report arguing that you should drive through yellow light, not to slow down the traffic. LOL.
Posted by: SerbInfidel at November 4, 2007 10:31 PM

This on the same week that Pakistan is being undermined. This should let us know two things -
1) Diversity includes irrational violent behavior. Culturism is better than multiculturalism's wide open acceptance.

2) We cannot take our sustainability for granted. If we do not protect ourselves, other cultures are waiting in the wings to take over.

Posted by: jkp at November 4, 2007 11:03 PM

Islam is the only religion that has global domination as a tenet of it's faith, so long as it has adherents, the dream of the Caliphate will continue to haunt the civilized world.

This theme has and will be repeated until there is Dar al-Islam or Dar al-Kufr, in the end there can be only one.

Posted by: Damn Yankee Infidel at November 4, 2007 9:49 PM

Islam does aspire to global domination but it hasn't succeeded in almost 1400 years and it obviously never will. Islam will never be embraced on its own merits because it has none, which is why it only expands because of the obscene muslim birthrate. There are relatively few sincere, voluntary converts to islam. Islam's glory days of conquering armies and forcible conversions are over. Eventually they will realize the futility of this asinine endeavor, perhaps after they are forcibly subdued and/or islam is outlawed in certain areas of the world. I am convinced that self-preservation will eventually captivate the West, even among the left-wing apologists and useful idiots. Can you imagine a far left secular humanist living under sharia? I can't.

It could be really nasty if the elitist, multiculturalist social engineers are allowed to control immigration policies and muslims continue flooding the West. I believe that regardless of where and how the confrontations and conflicts begin, and they are inevitable, muslims will suffer far more than we will. I hate to say it, but they've got it coming.

Posted by: Susanp at November 4, 2007 11:06 PM

All power to Allah! To kill, kill, kill!! This is the true face of Jihad.

Allah? Mohammed? Nothing to do with God. It's all about POWER.

Islam a 'religion of peace'? Put that in your hooka and reform it. Good luck.

Posted by: Battle_of_Tours at November 4, 2007 11:10 PM

" I reject all kafir laws established in the world. I reject all laws and systems established by infidels in the land of Caucasus. I reject all names used by infidels to divide Muslims. I declare ethnic, territorial and colonial zones carrying names of "North-Caucasian republics",

Does this mean they're not going to obey traffic signals and railroad crossing barriers?

Exactly -- actually they plan to institute new, Islamic traffic laws. Interpret old camel right-of way rulings to apply to modern vehicular traffic.

Apparently they'll be changing which side of the road everyone drives on. But to make it a smoother transition, rather than going "cold turkey" and switching everyone at once, the plan is to do it by class of vehicle.

At first, all emergency vehicles, large trucks and buses will switch to driving on the other side of the road. A year later all small passenger cars (those remaining, that is) will follow suit.

Posted by: Archimedes2 at November 4, 2007 11:19 PM

"The fear of allah"

The Bible says--We have not been given the SPIRIT of fear but power, love, and a sound mind.

That "spirit" neither has love or power and continually proves it does not have any soundness of mind. In other words; its crazy and all who follow it are crazy.

Crazy is as crazy does, and Islam is most crazy.

Posted by: guide inside at November 4, 2007 11:29 PM

Unfortunately, in an ironic twist of our ever increasing need for political correctness and all that cr^p, our current society seems to extend Muslims the right to denigrate and wage war on us outright. Additionally, we should just suck it up and smile, right??? 'Cause otherwise, we'll be stuck with the Islamophobic "racist" (neither of which makes much sense semantically) label. We don't have to search very far from US land for the kind of BS we see by the Chechens. I have come across (purely by accident) a "lovely" blog from a lovely "American" lady living in Florida, who, while enjoying all the rights afforded to her in the US, exhibits the very character of which Mr. Spencer writes throughout jihadwatch.

A little excerpt from the blog of "A Muslim Wife"

http://muslim-wife.blogspot.com/2007/10/whats-so-good-about-fasting.html

What's So Good About Fasting?
Bismillahir Rahmanir Raheem

Kaffir: Oooh, you're fasting?
Me: yup
Kaffir: No food?! No Drink?!
Me: nope
Kaffir: Not even water? Oh my gosh...I'm so sorry!
Me: Uh....I'm not.

---- And when a reader questions why a Floridian would call her fellow neighbors "kaffir", we get this lovely exchange:

At Friday, October 05, 2007 6:48:00 PM, Anonymous said…

You live in Florida in the United States and you use the word "kaffir" to refer to the people who live next door to you? I'm not trying to be rude but I'm just curious as to why you would do that...

At Monday, October 08, 2007 5:28:00 PM, abdullah said…

The kaffir (kuffur) are the enemies of islam. They are less than human unless they revert to the one true way. It is acceptable to be rude to them - regardless of where you live, for they are less than us.

At Monday, October 08, 2007 6:50:00 PM, Muslim Wife said…

Anonymous: Did I do something wrong by calling a kaffir a kaffir? Anyways, Abdullah explained it well,masha'Allah, but I'll put it to ya like this...if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck....

----And there are many more vile little notes on the site (if anyone is interested, check out her December 6, 2006 entry in which she lists under "things she wants to do in her life", as #1. "raise mujahideen" )

LOVELY STUFF!

Posted by: ReligionOfHate at November 4, 2007 11:31 PM

Like I've often observed, it's interesting how Western governments that sympathize with Jihadi campaigns like the Chechens, the Albanians, the Bosnians, et al get no thanks from them, or even a diversion from the Jihads against Moscow or Belgrade.

Dripping with irony

Posted by: Infidel Pride at November 5, 2007 2:21 AM

Browsing "A Muslim Wife" is indeed most edifying. One wonders why she didn't just kill her relative's dog herself and save her relative, whose face has, from an defensible inference in a later post, "now turned black from an absence of Allah[.]"

Not being Muslim or Arabic-speaking myself, I have no idea whether she is referring to her relative as being an actual black person ("abeed" -- from what I have been given to understand, a word meaning both "black" and "slave" in Arabic, though not in the "slave of Allah" sense but rather the more temporal one) or is simply being metaphorical.

Posted by: Marwan'sDaughter at November 5, 2007 3:09 AM

"Today, as throughout history, our condition can only be changed with a weapon in hand."

.....torture, extortion, intimidation, fear are just as much a weapon as the gun or sword for Muslims, they use them all...in 1400 years this has not changed....Muslims have never tried peace or co-operation or plurality in their societies where they rule...

...it is important...Ban Muslim Immigration....

Posted by: exsgtbrown at November 5, 2007 5:12 AM

Am sure Vanessa Redgrave's Pet Chechen-Mr Zakayev-is absolutely sincere when condemning statements of his over zealous Muslim Bros. Who in their right mind would live in the violent Hell of Chechyna when they are a citizen of Multicultural
Londonistan? Feted by the loony left & provided with every comfort by New Labour in generous Welfare Benefits. Bet Zakayev prostrates himself
praying to Allah that he never sets foot upon the
land of his Birth again let alone going on Jihad...
Guess this makes him a Kafir too - not only dodging Russian attacks, he is now the target of every Jihadist in Britain. Like the Mafia,really-once you have joined Islam, Death is the only way you will be allowed to leave.

Posted by: Morgane at November 5, 2007 5:55 AM

...if it ain't Muslim, it is a target...

Posted by: exsgtbrown at November 5, 2007 6:12 AM

If Allah's Religion could be established on Earth using another method, then our Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, would not have engaged in twenty seven battles.

In other words, Islam can only be stablished by violent means. How will moderate Muslims answer him?

How diferent this is from the True Creator, the Lord Jesus, Who said "Whoever is willing, let him come and drink freely from the water of life".

How diferent this is from the Lord Jesus Who said "For the Son of Man came to seek and to save that which was lost"

The superiority of the Judeo-Christian worldview is once again manifest.

Posted by: Crusader at November 5, 2007 6:13 AM

"and they are inevitable, muslims will suffer far more than we will. I hate to say it, but they've got it coming."

I hate to say it, but I hope and pray you are right. Unfortunately, the Mohammedans don't have a history of being receptive to love and respect. It is not in their code. Therefore, we cannot "kill them with kindness". The only thing they respond to is violence. It is the only language they know and I'm sorry to say, that's the language the west is going to have to speak if we want to defend our freedoms and way of life and the future of our children.

Posted by: Dumpling at November 5, 2007 6:25 AM

These wonderful peaceful people beheaded 5 friends and colleagues of mine in the late nineties their crime? They were in the country installing a communications network for the Chechen people. As far as I am concerned Chechens are the scum of the earth.

Posted by: Realist at November 5, 2007 6:26 AM

...Guess this makes him a Kafir too - not only dodging Russian attacks, he is now the target of every Jihadist in Britain. ...

nabi ZK finds this quite interesting. But of course this is the expected response for one, such as Mr. Zakayev, who has broken ranks.

...if it ain't Muslim, it is a target...

In this war, everyone and everything is a target. Mr Zakayev is very mohametan in my book. I mean, he participated in the jihad. He even had a torture chamber in the basement of his home for kafur captives. He is wanted for murder! How much more mohametan can you get? But he is also a target according to Morgane. And I believe what Morgane said.

...These wonderful peaceful people beheaded 5 friends and colleagues of mine in the late nineties...

The Chechens are proud of their violent ways. They are mountain people, hillbillies. Traditionally, no Chechen woman would consider marriage to a man who could not demonstrate that he had killed a Russian. Nice, huh? These are not wonderful peaceful people. Chechnya is a nation of competing mafia clans. Putin started to win when he decided to exploit this fact instead of using direct military force in the conflict. Two snaps up for the Kayderov and Yamadayev clans, and congrats to Mr. Putin, capo de tuti capi.

Mr. Arbi Barayev, the monsterous criminal boss who killed your friends at the request of OBL, and in exchange for $, has also been killed by the Ruskies. Again, good job Ruskies!

It was his nephew, Mosvar Barayev, who staged the attack on the Nord Ost performance at the Dubrovka Theater in Moscow. Such a nice mohametan family the Barayev's. Don't you think?

I nabi ZK, do not wish to be too much of a Russophile here. Clearly we have some issues to work out with them. But Putin has fought an effective war against these turds. There is much to be learned here.

(Nabi ZK apologizes for the use of the word "turds" in this forum. Just seemed to fit. For those who might be offended please substitute "pukes". Thank you.)

nabi ZK

...trust the nabi not the wahabi....ZK out...

Posted by: zonie kafir at November 5, 2007 8:45 AM

Zonie kafir,

Kudos for your excellent posts. In the last 20 years, Russia has suffered more terrorist attacks than any other country. However Putin has brought the situation under control as much as any world leader. Thank God for Spetznaz!

Posted by: Provoslavni at November 5, 2007 11:38 AM

"I remember running across Jihad Unspun right after 9/11."

Waitaminute... This means they've been in operation for a full 6 years, or more?

What we're watching here is a live component of the terrorist network, including recruiting new Jihad warriors.

Ain't our government going to, like, shut it down?

If we need legal tools to do so, we'd better create them.

For the record, this site is run off a server in Vancouver, Canada. Netcraft is your one-stop solution to figuring that out.

It's doable to shut this down. It's even easy. What the hell is stopping us???

Posted by: Henrik at November 5, 2007 3:41 PM

I just saw some of this ---my faith is restored!!!

Winds Of Jihad
Nick Griffin & The Islamization Of Europe

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8336123906443296275

THANK YOU NICK GRIFFIN !!!!!

Posted by: ElizaDoolittle at November 5, 2007 4:03 PM

Here is another dawa site.
http://www.beconvinced.com/en/main.php

Lots of info in links

Posted by: interestinconundrum at November 5, 2007 4:40 PM

Regardless, anyone like those whose messiah is prophesied to emerge from the depths of the earth...I mean *ahem* a well, is of no God of Abraham.
Then again, that's not news...
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/9/24/152943.shtml

Posted by: jcom972 at November 6, 2007 3:44 AM