Political correctness will kill us all in the end.

Here is the response I recieve for getting the website www.thereligionofpeace.com removed from the filters.

Hello Richard,

Thank you for your inquiry regarding the site’s categorization.

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com is a controversial site. Many people find it informative and want access to it, while many find it offensive and want to restrict access to it. While we hear from the public at both ends of the spectrum, we do our best to remain objective, and to cover the site in our list according to its content and according to our specific category definitions. Our customers’ filtering needs are then satisfied according to their own local policies and they can override to block or allow access at their discretion.

This site was analyzed and discussed at length by our Web Analyst team. There was an overwhelming agreement about the content of this site, that it meets specific category definitions. The site has a pervasive theme to expose violent acts perpetrated by Muslim extremists and asks that other Muslims should speak out against Muslim extremism. The site does not advocate discrimination, hate, or use of violence against Islam. But the site does use shocking material to convey its message, such as violent and horrific images. The images clearly meet our Violence category definition. The political views expressed within, as public controversy attests to, is in the outer limits and therefore meets our Political Opinion/Extreme category definitions. As with any site, we will modify the category ratings as the content changes. As this site has a fairly high profile, we will likely revisit the site frequently and re-review its status in our list.

Thank you.

SmartFilter Sites

Secure Computing Corporation

sites@smartfilter.com

Posted by: Elric66 at November 15, 2007 7:48 AM

There is probably no way to fully know how much damage this woman has done.

We adopted a child internationally in 1996. I cannot describe to you the layers of background checks we had to go through in order to bring a 4 year old disabled child into the country. Keep in mind we are both US citizens by birth, both well educated, both gainfully employed, and didn't have so much as a speeding ticket in the way of criminal activity.
If this woman had been put through the same level of screening we had to endure she'd have been caught red handed when she first applied for work. Once again, we see the difference in the way the laws are applied to certain groups of people. It must be nice to be a protected species. Our country will continue to be in grave danger as long as we play politically correct games like this.

Posted by: livefreeordie! at November 15, 2007 7:48 AM

I received the same response from Secure Computing as Elric. This was mine to them:

So religionofpeace.com has violent content. Who and what is the cause of the violence? The website is not responsible for the violence. They are merely bringing it to people's attention. Would it be better if people were not informed about what is going on regarding militant islamists attacking other muslims and other innocents?

The news on tv and the paper reports on horrific murders and child abuse every day. Are they not to do so because such acts are violent? If someone cannot handle the truth, then they should stay away from papers, tv, radio and the internet and hide under a rock. Will this make violence disappear?

Knowledge is power. The more people know what goes on in the name of islam by some, the more impetus for change for the better there will by by all. Why would you want to help hinder that process? Ask the victims of violence at the hand of islamist extremists if they want these events to be swept under the rug and their suffering continue.

Posted by: j_not_a at November 15, 2007 8:23 AM

You got to wonder how many other 'moles' are in the CIA (and FBI, and ICE) which we _dont_ know about.

Someone should be fired over this. Not 'laid off' or 'allowed to retire'. F-i-r-e-d. Unfortunately they will probably get a big bonus (like the person who came up with Visa Express) and promotion.

Now I'm going to have to go checkout thereligionofpeace.com....

Posted by: CrazyFool at November 15, 2007 8:27 AM

j_not_a,

I basically told them the same thing. I was surprised they responded so quickly though. Havent heard from the other 2, have you?

Posted by: Elric66 at November 15, 2007 8:33 AM

Anybody know of a single nation that is free of the Islamaniac taint? If there is one I'd like to move there because turbans and burquas will be manadatory in the West within 50 years and I have no desire to wear a turban.

What passes for leadership in the West these days is an absolute disgrace. They are killing us with taxes today and then tomorrow they'll kill us with sharia.

Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS at November 15, 2007 8:36 AM

A former colleague called Prouty “among the best and the brightest” CIA officers in Baghdad. She was so exceptional, agree officials of both agencies, the CIA recruited her from the FBI to work for the agency’s clandestine service at Langley, Va., . . .

Every official who went on record and vouched for this traitor is now suspect. TIME TO CLEAN HOUSE.

Posted by: justamomof4 at November 15, 2007 8:37 AM

Elric, have not heard from the other two sites.

Posted by: j_not_a at November 15, 2007 9:04 AM

"many find it offensive and want to restrict access to it."--Part of the response to Elric66

These people would have shot Paul Revere, for disturbing the peace, by their logic in the matter.

And check out the quote. What's next? Is there going to be a guard at Barnes and Noble, approving my book purchases, as I leave?

Posted by: Abscedere at November 15, 2007 9:10 AM

Paul Sperry has a book titled 'Infiltration, Muslim spies and subversives have penetrated Washington D.C.' it is a must read book it is a wake up call for all Americans

Posted by: Mercury messenger of the Gods at November 15, 2007 9:59 AM

Paul Sperry has a book titled 'Infiltration, Muslim spies and subversives have penetrated Washington D.C.' it is a must read book it is a wake up call for all Americans

Posted by: Mercury messenger of the Gods at November 15, 2007 10:00 AM

OT see accompanying picture of "this week in rage boy's latest antics"

http://www.thestar.com/News/World/article/276671

Posted by: j_not_a at November 15, 2007 10:18 AM

Everyone who had anything to do with hiring this woman needs to be investigated, charges filed if appropriate, and fired. No excuse for this kind of incompetence is good enough...

Posted by: duh_swami at November 15, 2007 10:18 AM

It is long overdue for the FBI, and the CIA to take mandatory courses in understanding the Quran, and the Hadiths that direct Muslims toward Jihad against unbelievers , and that they are directed not to make friends with non believers, or infidels.

They need to understand that most fundamental Muslims put the infidels who are citizens of the Great Satan (the United States)in the camp of the dar-al-harb.

Somebody has to convince them that they should not hire the masters of taquiya to give them classes in Islamic studies.

Posted by: Mackie at November 15, 2007 10:22 AM

This is a big part of the problem, and needs amendment in regard to religions which, like Communism, preach the overthrow of our government and the imposition of a world-wide system:

42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16. Employment by Federal Government

(a) Discriminatory practices prohibited; employees or applicants for employment subject to coverage

All personnel actions affecting employees or applicants for employment (except with regard to aliens employed outside the limits of the United States) in military departments as defined in section 102 of title 5, (and) in executive agencies as defined in section 105 of title 5 (including employees and applicants for employment who are paid from nonappropriated funds)… shall be made free from any discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

(b) Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; enforcement powers;
…

Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission shall have authority to enforce the provisions of subsection (a) of this section through appropriate remedies, including reinstatement or hiring of employees with or without back pay, as will effectuate the policies of this section, and shall issue such rules, regulations, orders and instructions as it deems necessary and appropriate to carry out its responsibilities under this section. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission shall —

(1) be responsible for the annual review and approval of a national and regional equal employment opportunity plan which each department and agency and each appropriate unit referred to in subsection (a) of this section shall submit in order to maintain an affirmative program of equal employment opportunity for all such employees and applicants for employment;

(2) be responsible for the review and evaluation of the operation of all agency equal employment opportunity programs, periodically obtaining and publishing (on at least a semiannual basis) progress reports from each such department, agency, or unit; and

(3) consult with and solicit the recommendations of interested individuals, groups, and organizations relating to equal employment opportunity.

…

(c) Civil action by employee or applicant for employment for redress of grievances …

Posted by: Karl2 at November 15, 2007 10:26 AM

I hope that someone like Paul Sperry does an in-depth report on this woman and her activities. The story is bad enough, but it most certainly is not the full story.

Posted by: maryrose at November 15, 2007 10:34 AM

Read It All.

For once, I can't. It's just too horrible. Can I get my money back, you know, the taxes I've been paying so the government can do its job? If I take my car in for repair and they do nothing but pretend to repair, I can sue and get my money back. Why not here? Between the unending TSA failures, failed prosecutions, and this, not even letting a mole in but giving her the crown jewels to guard!

My guess: Top officials at the FBI and CIA will reap huge rewards and bonuses.

Posted by: Seymour Paine at November 15, 2007 10:35 AM

Employment decisions, at least in national security positions, should be allowed to take into account and exclude employees whose beliefs include a belief that a world-wide imposition of Sharia law should be imposed, etc. Here is how the law was written to keep Communists out of national security positions during the Cold War:

"42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2. Unlawful employment practices

(a) Employer practices

It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer —

(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual,
or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect
to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of
employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion,
sex, or national origin; or

(2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or
applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend
to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or
otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of
such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

…
(d) Training programs

It shall be an unlawful employment practice for any employer,
labor organization, or joint labor-management committee controlling
apprenticeship or other training or retraining, including
on-the-job training programs to discriminate against any individual
because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in
admission to, or employment in, any program established to provide
apprenticeship or other training.

…
(f) Members of Communist Party or Communist-action or
Communist-front organizations

As used in this subchapter, the phrase "unlawful employment
practice" shall not be deemed to include any action or measure
taken by an employer, labor organization, joint labor-management
committee, or employment agency with respect to an individual who
is a member of the Communist Party of the United States or of any
other organization required to register as a Communist-action or
Communist-front organization by final order of the Subversive
Activities Control Board pursuant to the Subversive Activities
Control Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. Sec. 781 et seq.).

(g) National security

Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, it shall
not be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to fail or
refuse to hire and employ any individual for any position, for an
employer to discharge any individual from any position, or for an
employment agency to fail or refuse to refer any individual for
employment in any position, or for a labor organization to fail or
refuse to refer any individual for employment in any position, if —

(1) the occupancy of such position, or access to the premises
in or upon which any part of the duties of such position is
performed or is to be performed, is subject to any requirement
imposed in the interest of the national security of the United
States under any security program in effect pursuant to or
administered under any statute of the United States or any
Executive order of the President; and

(2) such individual has not fulfilled or has ceased to fulfill
that requirement."

Note that the law already includes a national security "out" which could be adopted by Executive Order of the President, if someone occupied that position who did not think we were dealing with a religion of peace. But, it might be worth considering amending the above law to specifically list Islam right next to Communism.

Posted by: Karl2 at November 15, 2007 11:01 AM

Nothing will done to remedy the problem because of political correctness. Rules and restrictions were put in place to (at least attempt to) reduce the number of commies that were hired during the cold war. Others, already in place, were rooted out. Look at the hell that was raised because of those actions!
After the fall of the Soviet empire records were opened up and, sure enough, a lot of the suspected communists were in fact communist agents or communist sympathizers. Learning the truth still hasn't changed the howls of 'moral outrage' from the left, however.

Times have changed for the worst since the cold war ended (or took a break...however you want to view it). Political correctness is even more entrenched among 'the people in charge'. There are plenty of people walking the halls of power who, for whatever personal reasons, would love to see us fall. Look at the things that happen regarding security leaks and it's obvious we've been infiltrated deeply. There is absolutely no telling how many layers deep the incompetence/treachery goes, and I really don't see how we'll 'fix' the problem.
This woman probably wasn't working alone. As many of you have already said, just the fact that she wasn't properly vetted to begin with speaks volumes about the entire screwed-up system. Just how many more Nada Prouty's are there deep in the system undermining our efforts? How much damage are they doing? How much more are they putting us at risk? What did she/they hear and deliberately misinterpret to throw us off track? To what dangers have they exposed us all? There's no telling what Prouty and her allies have done, nor what the ultimte cost will be of her/their actions. All I know is that WE will continue to pay for those costs in lives and treasure- same as we paid her wages.
Sleep well everyone!
Pray, plan, and prepare: Security starts in the home.

Posted by: livefreeordie! at November 15, 2007 11:27 AM

Why isn't the foolish CIA and FBI hiring from reliable minorities like Arab speaking Maronite Christians or Sephardic Jews ?

No intelligence to keep us safe.

Stupid stupid stupid stupid.

Posted by: dgene at November 15, 2007 11:43 AM

"Keystone Kops idiocy of the FBI and CIA in hiring this woman and employing her in sensitive work is a manifestation of both agencies' abysmal failure to address the ideological dimension of this conflict."

What more can we expect of the FBI and CIA? It's the political leadership of this country that sets the tone that these agencies operate under.

If the President and his cabinet, plus the Congressional leadership, won't face up to the reality of the Islamic threat, how can the CIA and FBI be expected too?

If the President of the United States told the Directors of the CIA and FBI to be especially wary of hiring Muslims, and to be suspicious of their loyalities and beliefs, this wouldn't have happened.

So long as Muslims are expected to be viewed no differently than Baptists and Catholics, we can expect more of this kind of crap.

Posted by: rational at November 15, 2007 12:15 PM

When are the FBI and CIA going to hire people that are loyal to us?

Posted by: alaskan1000 at November 15, 2007 12:40 PM

I know from personal experience that the FBI is very eager to hire Middle Eastern/Arabic people. In fact they, the CIA and the other intel agencies fight over this very limited pool of applicants. Most of the male Middle Eatern applicants either fail the pre-employment polygragh and/or the phyiscal fitness test (for special agent applicants). Even sadder is that the FBI thinks Middle Eastern is primarily Muslim and doesn't or hasn't made efforts to recruit non-Muslem Arabs or Persians. There has been some outreach to the Sikh community, but little to none to the Christian Arab communities in this country.

I will say in the FBI's "defense" that this woman must have passed everything to include the polygraph. She is either a very good liar or they asked her non-confrontational questions.

Posted by: HOV Dummy at November 15, 2007 12:56 PM

"I will say in the FBI's "defense" that this woman must have passed everything to include the polygraph. She is either a very good liar or they asked her non-confrontational questions.

Posted by: HOV Dummy"

...during her employment interview, she probably said , "I am a Muslim, hire me or else!" ...."you stupid dhimmis".....

Posted by: exsgtbrown at November 15, 2007 1:07 PM

Another intelligence triumph. I often wonder how much care goes into vetting people once they are on-board. The CIA probably thought, well since the FBI has hired her...
Slightly ot - Ed Norris, upon retiring from the NYPD became Police Commissioner of Baltimore City, then was lured away to be appointed Superintendant of the Maryland State Police, finally ending up pleading guilty to felony charges for crimes committed while in charge of the BPD.

Posted by: MP at November 15, 2007 1:37 PM

The CIA and the FBI may well have had many victories over our enemies as well as defeats in the decades since WWII that we will never hear about, nonetheless, the obvious lack of common sense, the stupidity and lack of basic tradecraft demonstrated by their failures that we do know about are staggering. In the present case it can be objected that hindsight is 20/20 and that, at the time, things that now seem so obvious, were not so obvious or clear but, not checking out a Muslim who wants to work for the FBI and CIA and one with an absolutely marvelous CV at that, six ways from Sunday? How about the rapid promotions and no doubt ever widening and deepening access to classified information given her so soon?

Intelligence work has been likened to a “wilderness of mirrors” but to even notice such mirrors you have to look and from reports so far the FBI and the CIA looked the other way rather than inquire too closely about a recruit who looked so temptingly good; that should have been the first red flag telling them that they should look very closely, indeed, at their “just perfect” new recruit. Where was another James Jesus Angleton when we needed him?

Looking at the publicly available record of performance of the CIA and the FBI over the last few years does not inspire the least bit of confidence in me. Rather, it seems that the these agencies are often ineffective, are inbred and insular with employees giving their primary allegiance to their agency, are riven with institutional infighting and often opposed to the President and his policies, with many of their officials/analysts/agents trying to sabotage those policies however and whenever they can, the public’s safety be damned.

The President gets to nominate a few people at each agency to sit on top of the pyramid and run the agency and to advocate his policies but the vast pyramid of all the agency employees below the apex of the pyramid remains untouched and, as we have seen, often unmoved to carry out the President’s policies and sometimes to deliberately sabotage them. It is also obvious that any changes that need to be made to an agency's institutional culture can be easily blunted or sabotaged given enough bad faith by uncooperative administrators or employees; I know how the game is played. Thus, reforming and weeding out incompetents, wrongheaded policies and procedures and obstructionist partisans at such agencies as the CIA, the FBI and, one might add, the State Department, seem to be almost hopeless tasks.

Posted by: GaryK at November 15, 2007 1:39 PM

As expected, the problem in the UK is probably even worse by several orders of magnitude:
"200,000 licences to work in sensitive security jobs should be reviewed."
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=494120&in_page_id=1770

Posted by: dry_heavz_4_alla at November 15, 2007 2:20 PM

Amazing. They hire someone affiliated with Hezbollah, yet fired my friend who was a Marine, for carrying grenades which are banned in OGA contracts. With this kind of stupidity and incompetence, should we really be surprised Bin Laden hasn't been killed yet?

Posted by: Bonniea at November 15, 2007 2:30 PM

I see two lessons to be learned from this most unfortunate (but wholly predictable) episode.

First, we can see that the government of the United States is guilty of recklessly endangering the lives of the American people and (gross) dereliction of its duty in safeguarding the US public's safety. The evidence against the FBI is especially damning (and this is by no means the first time the FBI has been shown to be utterly incompetent in handling domestic jihad-related public safety issues). I see grounds for a class action lawsuit by the American people who deserve better than THIS.

Secondly, I see fairly strong evidence to show that permitting Muslims to immigrate into the United States (much less take jobs for the American government) is risky in the EXTREME. This can rebound in America's favor in the struggles to curtail illegal immigration into the USA from corrupt third world countries and to have Islam outlawed in America. Americans are only now beginning to ask why does allowing the immigration of and hiring of Muslims in America usually lead to disaster for America? The answer to this question isn't really the most important consideration, preventing any more such catastrophes like the one in the above article about Ms. Prouty and her illicit espionage escapades with the US government is.

I see a possible solution: creation of counter-jihad branches in US law-enforcement, the national Guard, and domestic intelligence agencies devoted entirely to counter-jihad, staffed entirely by people who have been thoroughly educated in the field of violent Islamic holy war (all others need not bother to apply, notably most if not all US Muslims and the likes of such Islam-apologists as Karen Armstrong or John Esposito).

Posted by: pythagoras at November 15, 2007 2:53 PM

This is going to be a short, but very relevant post:
Tom Tancredo : http://www.teamtancredo.typepad.com

Posted by: Alert at November 15, 2007 3:14 PM

Doesn't the FBI and CIA flat out refuse to hire any arabic-speaking Jews -- based on their religion and how it might 'upset' their existing (muslim) translators?

Posted by: CrazyFool at November 15, 2007 3:51 PM

Memo to all readers and lurkers from other non-Muslim-majority countries, such as, for instance, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, European countries, India. Especially if you happen to be a government employee - above all, the police force, defence force, intelligence services, ANY part of the civil service, public utilities, health department, communications, transport, education. Or if you have close friends, fellow-parishioners or relatives who work in those areas.

READ THIS ARTICLE that Robert has posted for us. Print out, or email, multiple copies. Translate it, if you have to, into - for example - Hindi. Make sure that every one of your non-Muslim colleagues and any and every superior who is a non-Muslim, gets a copy. Give it to your head of department. Give it to your principal, give it to your Human Resources person. Give it to your government-employee spouse, friend, relative, fellow-worshipper.

The terrible truth is this: unless proven otherwise, every Muslim within the non-Muslim world must, from a purely practical and prudential point of view, be assumed to be an actual or potential fifth-columnist. And they CANNOT be allowed into any position that they could use to destroy us. Awful, isn't it? But I don't see any way around it.

I suspect that the reason Muslims in general fear non-Muslims, in Muslim countries - why they do not allow dhimmis into positions of authority, etc - is that they fear from non-Muslims what they KNOW they themselves are programmed to do, eager to do, were the positions reversed.

As an Australian, it gives me the shivers to wonder how many Nada Proutys have burrowed their way into OUR public service, OUR intelligence service, police and defence force, Centrelink [welfare agency] and the rest, our hospitals, our universities, our education departments, you name it...and are busy practising malice and fraud of every kind.

Posted by: dumbledoresarmy at November 15, 2007 4:27 PM

And check out the quote. What's next? Is there going to be a guard at Barnes and Noble, approving my book purchases, as I leave?

Posted by: Abscedere

When I went B&N to get Roberts book on Mohammed they had it so well hidden I couldn't find it. I worked in libraries in HS and college and even worked for a large bookstore chain once stocking a new store. Then when I asked for it the sales clerk looked at me as though he would like to put me up against the wall frisk me and take my picture. He frightened me so I decided to buy the book online. As I was leaving the store he was pointing at me while speaking with another clerk.
Spooky.

Posted by: Aunt Bea at November 15, 2007 4:44 PM

And check out the quote. What's next? Is there going to be a guard at Barnes and Noble, approving my book purchases, as I leave?

Posted by: Abscedere

When I went B&N to get Roberts book on Mohammed they had it so well hidden I couldn't find it. I worked in libraries in HS and college and even worked for a large bookstore chain once stocking a new store. Then when I asked for it the sales clerk looked at me as though he would like to put me up against the wall frisk me and take my picture. He frightened me so I decided to buy the book online. As I was leaving the store he was pointing at me while speaking with another clerk.
Spooky.

Posted by: Aunt Bea at November 15, 2007 4:46 PM

A further note.

I find myself wanting to vomit as I encounter example after example of the falsehood that runs right through the lives of so many Muslims like Nada Prouty.

People of the Lie. Cool, barefaced, habitual, breath-taking, mind-boggling falsehood. Deliberate lying and deceit as a way of life - and much of it with the active intent of harming the people who are being lied to. So many Infidels who have had to do with Muslims even in ordinary, daily life, here in the West, have been burnt by Muslim lies.

Unfaithful in little, unfaithful also in much.

She lied to get her citizenship. That lie was, in fact, the tip of an iceberg.

The continual petty lawbreaking, cheating, traffic violations, tax evasion, welfare fraud of so many Muslims in non-Muslim societies - and, at the other end, the wholesale involvement of wealthier Muslims in large-scale organised crime, drug trafficking, pimping, slaving, corrupt business dealings - are all part of the same pattern, the same 'atmospherics' as Hugh calls it.

Time to start chipping away at those 'little' falsehoods, pulling on the loose threads, the odd little things that stick out. Catch a Muslim speeding, cheating on welfare, lying to get citizenship? - don't assume that's the ONLY lie they're telling, or the ONLY law they're breaking. Figuratively speaking, turn them - and their family network, and their mosque - upside down and shake them and see what falls out of their pockets.

Thieves and bandits. Common, ugly, nasty Bedouin Arab banditry absolutised and apotheosised as a way of life, as a Religion (and 'projecting' its own evil outward onto us Infidels ). Mystified, romanticised, veiled and masked with ritual and illusion and rhetoric, like the Omerta, or the codes of the Thuggees and the Triads, or the pirates of legend.

But in the end - lies, all the way down, all the way up, from the implacably hostile foefic rewrites of Torah and Gospels (rewrites which are then touted as the 'pure' 'original' revelations which us nasty Christians and Jews have perverted and wilfully denied!), to the lies and treachery of a Nada Prouty.

Posted by: dumbledoresarmy at November 15, 2007 5:03 PM

She questioned Al-Qaeda detainees and would have come across near bloody perfect...

religionofpeace.com do have some gory pictures and definitely falls into a violent category, I agree with the decision and wouldn't want children to access it...

Posted by: eloivsdiablo at November 15, 2007 5:11 PM

@dumbledoresarmy

It all starts with Mohammad: A liar and the father of lies and a murderer from the beginning.

But they call the fiend a noble prophet! Ha-ha-ha.

He was an unholy, self-fulfilling profiteer.

Islam is all deceit!

Posted by: Ynkedoodl2 at November 15, 2007 5:26 PM

FAO: ISLAMISFORLOSERS

You said: "Anybody know of a single nation that is free of the Islamaniac taint? If there is one I'd like to move there because turbans and burquas will be manadatory in the West within 50 years and I have no desire to wear a turban."

Abu_Lahab says: Turban = Sikh

I don't think our Sharia compliant 'friends' will want you to wear one. Just beat your wife and keep your beard neat, ok?

Posted by: Abu_Lahab at November 15, 2007 5:41 PM

They hire a Hezbollah terrorist AND illegal immigrant, but refuse to even consider hiring an Israeli fluent in Arabic and/or Farsi, and skilled at catching terrorists, because they are terrified that it will "offend" Muslim employees. The Criminal Imbecile Agency is an abomination of this land. Aiding the Global Jihad is the only thing they have been doing for the last 40 years. What is troubling, however, is that the all-pervasive rot of dhimmitude has now began penetrating the heretobefore healthy FBI.

Ruslan Tokhchukov, EnragedSince1999.

Posted by: Enragedsince1999 at November 15, 2007 5:51 PM

From the article:

A former colleague called Prouty “among the best and the brightest” CIA officers in Baghdad.

I don't doubt the accuracy of that statement. This Hizb'Allah double agent probably is the best we can hope for, the best of the lot, the cream of the curdled crop.

Posted by: special_guest at November 15, 2007 6:45 PM

The plea agreement recommends that Prouty face a prison sentence between six and 12 months, and pay a maximum fine of $250,000. The documents also indicate Prouty will be on supervised release for two to three years after serving her sentence. (ABC News)

Wow! Less than a year in jail and allowed to live here (What else is meant by "supervised"?) for several more years (plenty of time to have some citizen children?) after "serving her sentence".

Read it all? Big mistake. The last paragraph showed why our own idiocy will be our downfall. We have to stop blaming PC. The problem is the people we allow to run our government. They see what she did as nothing more than "some inappropriate computer searches".

“This is not John Dillinger or Reilly Ace of Spies,” said the official. “She took an illegal shortcut to the American dream, then she made some inappropriate computer searches. At this point, there is no reason to treat this as a counterintelligence case. There is NO allegation she had ever ties to Hezbollah. You can’t let suspicions get ahead of the facts.”

Posted by: PMK at November 15, 2007 6:46 PM

nothing on TV

Posted by: ploome at November 15, 2007 7:04 PM

If a fraction of what Rowan Scarborough says about the CIA in his book "Sabotage: America's Enemies Within the CIA" is correct, we're screwed until we undo the "cultural revolution" that has taken over the CIA and FBI. The CIA/FBI seeming obsession with sensitivity and diversity is just one symptom of a larger, more dangerous problem: leftist ideologues in our intelligence services and law enforcement.

Separatist movements like Aztlan and Islam have been given cover under the guise of diversity and sensitivity. If the leadership of our law enforcement and intelligence organizations want to run focus groups on sensitivity and inclusion they should go to work as middle school guidance counselors. Otherwise, they should suck it up, because we need people who will get the actual job done.

Posted by: RalphInfidel at November 15, 2007 7:19 PM

Current and former intelligence officials tell NBC News that Nada Nadim Prouty had a much bigger role than officials at the FBI and CIA first acknowledged. In fact, Prouty was assigned to the CIA’s most sensitive post, Baghdad, and participated in the debriefings of high-ranking al-Qaida detainees.

A former colleague called Prouty “among the best and the brightest” CIA officers in Baghdad.

She was so exceptional, agree officials of both agencies, the CIA recruited her from the FBI to work for the agency’s clandestine service at Langley, Va., in June 2003. She then went to Iraq for the agency to work with the U.S. military on the debriefings.

Remember all those murders that took place a few years ago that sure looked like "inside-job?"

Everyone denied it then and claimed such accusations were "nut-case-conspiracy-theories."

Why all the name calling? Perhaps to silence those who were asking all those embarassing questions.

Should we feel sorry for the CIA/FBI for hiring here? After all, real American citizens were too stupid for these jobs and didn't want to work.

Besides, Nada Prouty probably worked cheap.

How many American lives did she cost? Oh that's right, we can't figure that one out because in doesn't show up on the damned balance sheet.

This stink is wafting from the very top all the way down the capitol- hill.

Posted by: witness at November 15, 2007 8:01 PM

witness:
"Should we feel sorry for the CIA/FBI for hiring here? After all, real American citizens were too stupid for these jobs and didn't want to work."

Feel sorry? Nope, it was a conscious decision to weaken the CIA and give it a domestic political interest. Real American citizens were removed from the CIA during this "ethnic cleansing". Luckily, illegal aliens are pouring across the border (estimated up to 4000/day, just in Arizona), ready to take the jobs we "wouldn't do".

Posted by: RalphInfidel at November 15, 2007 8:46 PM

Luckily, illegal aliens are pouring across the border (estimated up to 4000/day, just in Arizona), ready to take the jobs we "wouldn't do".

I wonder if Prouty got in from Arizona?

My feelings go out to the families whose relatives died because these kinds of security breeches -- actually, they were murdered as far as I am concerned because they were wilfully compromised by those who should have protected them.

Posted by: witness at November 15, 2007 8:54 PM

“There is NO allegation she had ever ties to Hezbollah. You can’t let suspicions get ahead of the facts.”
--Senior US Official

Made it through the Democratic debate. One incensed Middle Easterner demanded to know why he was profiled at the airport. And, of course, the pandering began. Absolutely no profiling. Patriot Act bad (or, alternatively, if the Candidate had voted for the Patriot Act: ‘Patriot Act execution bad’). The guy was smiling by the end and ended up expressing thanks.

But the best part was how to fix the entitlement problem. Hillary has the solution:

1. ‘Fiscal Responsibility’; and
2. ‘Set up a commission’

In 1947, 10% of the federal budget was spent on social programs. It’s over 60% today and spiking. Ironically, the Patriot Act isn’t going to win this war. This war will be won when the entitlement system fails. The failure will be sudden and massive, and will have people in the streets.

I don’t know whether or not the link is historically accurate, but it sure seems to be tracking:

http://brickoven.blogspot.com/2007/10/hillary-44.html

Posted by: pez at November 15, 2007 11:24 PM

probably another planted question?
wouldn't surprise me any.
lol

Posted by: jcom972 at November 16, 2007 12:23 AM

The joke in the intelligence world is that when you get a top-secret clearance it's no big deal if you cheat on your spouse. What makes you a risk is if you haven't told your spouse.

Unlike the Valerie thing this will generate NO indepth reporting. Because this would end up at another door than that of the administration.

Don't forget the executive orders that were given by the Clinton administration. Such hiring turncoats or recruiting them was a no-no.

Posted by: Aunt Bea at November 16, 2007 9:23 AM