![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
An update on this story. "Mistrial for six in Miami terrorism-conspiracy case," by Jim Loney for Reuters:
MIAMI (Reuters) - A U.S. judge declared mistrials on Thursday for six men accused of plotting to wage war against the United States and blow up Chicago's Sears Tower after a jury acquitted one defendant but could not decide on verdicts for the others.
The decision was a setback for the U.S. government, which had touted the arrests as an important victory in its war against terrorism. Prosecutors may decide to retry the six.
Lyglenson Lemorin, 32, was cleared of charges of conspiring to help foreign terrorist organizations including al Qaeda, and conspiring to blow up buildings and overthrow the U.S. government.
"It has become clear the jury cannot reach a verdict regarding the remaining defendants," said U.S. District Judge Joan Lenard.
The verdict came after the 12-member Miami jury deliberated for part of nine days and twice told the judge they were unable to reach agreement on any of the charges against the men, known as the Liberty City Seven after the poor Miami neighborhood where they met.
The young men had faced up to 70 years in prison if convicted on all four counts, which included allegations they took an oath of allegiance to Osama bin Laden's Islamic militant group and plotted to blow up FBI offices and the 110-story Sears Tower, the tallest U.S. skyscraper.
At the time of the arrests in June 2006, federal agents said the group's plans were "aspirational rather than operational," and posed no real threat because they had neither al Qaeda contacts nor the means of carrying out attacks.
Defense lawyers dismissed the charges as "nonsense" and said the entire plot was orchestrated by paid FBI informants.
The group's reputed ringleader, Narseal Batiste, testified that he went along with the informants, who posed as Middle Eastern contacts, in a bid to con them out of $50,000 to support an inner-city religious group.
Posted by Marisol at December 13, 2007 5:19 PM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
Gee, there seems to be an epidemic of mistrials in cases where jihadis are concerned. Could there be a pattern here?
My favorite line in the article was this: "The group's reputed ringleader, Narseal Batiste, testified that he went along with the informants, who posed as Middle Eastern contacts, in a bid to con them out of $50,000 to support an inner-city religious group."
Yep, many inner city religious groups are funded by people who con others out of money. Sounds very charitable to me.
at December 13, 2007 10:34 PM
I wonder if jury members - not all of them, perhaps, just two or three of the most vulnerable - are being threatened, or blackmailed, or something?
Military tribunal for all Jihad-related cases, is starting to look better and better.
Posted by: dumbledoresarmy
at December 14, 2007 2:13 AM
Typical...
Posted by: Sneakyzionistcrusader
at December 14, 2007 5:32 PM
Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.


(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)