Not possible to vote for just one

Posted by: GrennBeck at December 14, 2007 5:20 PM

Let's just induct Jimmy Carter and John Esposito into the Dhimmi Hall of Shame, and save ourselves the trouble of voting for them every year.

Posted by: 3812Michelle at December 14, 2007 5:34 PM

3812Michelle

Correct! Dhimmi Hall of Fame!

Jimmy Carter (DHOF '07)
John Eposito (DHOF '07)

Posted by: greatcometof1577 at December 14, 2007 5:36 PM

A vote for Condi should be considered a vote for the dhimmi-in-chief: George W. Bush.

As much as Condi's actions deserve to be decried, could any of them have taken place without the assent of her boss?

Posted by: PMK at December 14, 2007 6:19 PM

American Dhimmi of the Year 2007?

Charles Johnson!

Posted by: november1981 at December 14, 2007 6:21 PM

PMK: agreed. My take is that Bush lacks intellectual curiosity because a simple guy, Condi lacks intellectual curiosity because she feels she already know enough.

Posted by: npabga at December 14, 2007 6:23 PM

Jimmy Carter is bad, but he's no longer in power. Condoleeza Rice is much worse. She should lead in the poll.

Posted by: wrathofasma at December 14, 2007 6:36 PM

Geez, carter wins every year. He's such a putz.

Posted by: mrockroll1969 at December 14, 2007 6:53 PM

I voted for Esposito. How can such an intelligent person be such a cabbagehead concerning Islam? (NO offense against cabbage the vegetable - love it, esp. with corned beef!)

Posted by: darcy at December 14, 2007 7:02 PM

I couldn't see voting for Carter again (having voted for him last year), so I went with Rice--and in extention G W Bush. The whole Bush administration's idiotic efforts to "broker peace" between Israel and the "Palestinians" makes me want to vomit. Rice wouldn't have said or done what she did during this fiasco had there not been explicit support from the White House.

That said, it's looking like it'll be Carter (once again) in a landslide.

Posted by: yohannbiimu at December 14, 2007 7:11 PM

President Bush continuing to refer to Islam as the "religion of peace" takes the cake.

Posted by: darcy at December 14, 2007 7:19 PM

Robert,
I am curious to know why D'Souza is in this group? I don't know that much about him, although I'm a few chapters into his book "What's so Great about Christianity." If you could provide me with a couple links, I would appreciate it.
Also, what about a group category? We could have the code pink's, The View girls, the Cindy Sheehans ect,ect..., or we could just cover them all under one tent and call them the Democrats. :) LOL

Posted by: abinitioadinfinitum at December 14, 2007 7:25 PM

Although Jimmy is certainly a perennially worthy yutz, this year I had to go with Pelosi.

She's where she is due to feminism, but then she turns her back on it just to score a hit against Bush. (When she rushed off to Syria with a headscarf on just to kiss butt with the Thugs That Be)

Posted by: freedomschool at December 14, 2007 7:37 PM

abinitioadinfinitum

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/014860.php

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/015481.php

Posted by: greatcometof1577 at December 14, 2007 7:41 PM

Tie-----
Rice/Pelosi
Both sides of the spectrum with major tunnel vision!!!

Posted by: OLD SARGE at December 14, 2007 8:04 PM

I voted for D'Souza, however, Bush (at least Condi did) should have appeared even if it angered some conservatives. Lets look at what he has done this year:

(1) Supports and independent Kosovo

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/016848.php

(2) Gave tax payer money to Saudi Arabia even after a democrat congress tried to stop him (now that is a world turned upside down)

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/018197.php

(3) Bush urges rejection of Armenia Genocide

http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/018424.php

(4) Of course everybody knows how he is putting pressure on Israel to give up land for the "highway to hell".

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/018940.php

There are many more..

I fear those who vote for Carter are voting with their hearts. Carter has one foot in the grave and does not matter...Bush does. I would say Bush has done far more harm to America by his actions this year then anything Mr. Peanut has done this year.

It is an example of how far even conservatives have to go to understand Jihad. They are further down the road then liberals....but that is not saying much. When when conservatives live up to their potential, and stop behaving like the liberals they make fun of all the time.

Posted by: greatcometof1577 at December 14, 2007 8:08 PM

Condi gets my vote.

I mean, the woman isn't going to be around forever. She's about a hundred forty-three years old. She was there, in the antebellum South when she was just a little slave child, and she was there to lead the Civil Rights Movement.

The parallels she draws between the downtrodden Palistinians and their horrendous treatment by the Israelis are keen, clever, and on target.

Even if they do call her a "Black Snake", it's just their frustration talking. Condi doesn't hold a grudge.

Excuse me now. I've made myself sick.

Posted by: Abscedere at December 14, 2007 9:03 PM

november1981 writes:
"American Dhimmi of the Year 2007?

Charles Johnson!"

Whatever your thoughts on the blogosphere dispute
involving LGF, nominating Charles as a Dhimmi
tells me that you don't know what that word means,
and that your ability to discriminate and use words
precisely is rather lacking.

Being a Republican, I hate to do this, but I have
to vote for President Bush. The buck stops there,
right? No more excuses, the guy is a clown. The
Democrat may have been worse (who can know for
sure?) but that doesn't change the fact that he
has kissed mohammadan ($audi) ass for too long.

Posted by: root_cause at December 14, 2007 9:33 PM

Jimmy Carter is bad, but he's no longer in power. Condoleeza Rice is much worse. She should lead in the poll.

Posted by: wrathofasma at December 14, 2007 6:36 PM

Agreed, 100%.

Posted by: awake at December 14, 2007 9:45 PM

I agree with giving Jimmy Carter the life-time Dhimmi award, or else he'll win every year.

I also wouldn't mind seeing Charles Johnson nominated.

Posted by: GuitarBob at December 14, 2007 10:06 PM

Condi takes the cake this year.

Carter is like Susan Lucci for an Emmy---he's been and he'll be in the running every year till he dies--hi is Dhimmi Carter. I absolutely agree with GuitarBob--Carter deserves a lifetime Dhimmi-tude tribute award.

Posted by: BB at December 14, 2007 10:13 PM

Thanks for the links, I had no idea he was so ignorant about islam. He doesn't come off as unintelligent in the few interviews I've seen of him, so I would have to guess he is one who refuses to acknowledge the threat of islam like so many on the left. I personally can not fathom how people ignore something so obvious as the threat of islam. Especially in this day and age. Mr. Robert Spencer, please keep informing people, I am one who was awakened by your book The Politically Incorrect Guide to islam, a year or two ago. Since then I have learned much but still seek your wisdom. Thanks again.

Posted by: abinitioadinfinitum at December 14, 2007 10:15 PM

Now that I've read fully the links you provided for me, all I can say is Wow. I'm glad I learned his mind set on such an important issue as islam, before I continue his book.

Posted by: abinitioadinfinitum at December 14, 2007 10:41 PM

Posted by: greatcometof1577 at December 14, 2007 8:08 PM

Bush isn't a Dhimmi. He is an outright traitor.

Posted by: awake at December 14, 2007 11:07 PM

Posted by: greatcometof1577 at December 14, 2007 8:08 PM

Bush isn't a Dhimmi. He is an outright traitor.

Posted by: awake at December 14, 2007 11:08 PM

Way too many votes for "old news" anti-Semite Carter, letting Condi and her big, uniformed mouth, along with Bush and the current administration off the hook, essentially.

Posted by: awake at December 14, 2007 11:24 PM

Awake,

Dhimmi Carter is a true blue dhimmi but in '07, Condhimmi has earned it.

Posted by: Elric66 at December 14, 2007 11:31 PM

Elric,

Your "preaching to the choir" here, my friend.

Regards.

Posted by: awake at December 14, 2007 11:33 PM

Awake,

Plus it would be nice to email her to notify her on her award. :-)

Hope you are doing well.

Posted by: Elric66 at December 14, 2007 11:37 PM

Plus it would be nice to email her to notify her on her award. :-)

Hope you are doing well.

Posted by: Elric66 at December 14, 2007 11:37 PM

Yes that would be nice and I am sure that you will if she wins this "prestigious" award.

I am doing well. Thanks for the well-wishes and I extend them in kind in the form of a preliminary Merry Christmas to you and yours.

Posted by: awake at December 14, 2007 11:41 PM

Ohh believe me, I will email it to her if she wins. :-)

Merry Christmas to and your family as well.

Posted by: Elric66 at December 14, 2007 11:49 PM

greatcometof1577:
I'm one of those that nominated Condi. By nominating her Bush is nominated by proxy. But her statements of late in comparing the so-called palestinians to African-Americans of the Jim Crow and Civil Rights days is a major reason she is nominated by name rather than Bush. It seems he gave her the keys and went to bed. A vote for Condi is also a vote for Bush.

Posted by: Kevin at December 15, 2007 2:35 AM

Kevin, I think there are simply too many dyed-in-the-wool Republican party folks here to vote for one of their own. Speaking as a Republican, the Bush administration disgusts me, with his open-borders, give away our sovereignty to illegals attitude.

He's also dropped the ball with regard the so-called "war on terror," with his incredibly ignorant comments about the "religion of peace" and "mission accomplished." Personally, I am appalled by this man and the people within his administration, and there should be enough people around here to realize that a vote here for Rice isn't a vote against Republican ideals or what they stand for, because the Bush administration has failed to live up to their standards.

This should be Rice in a landslide, but rather it has turned into a referendum against the Democratic party, which so far has garnered 65% of the vote. Pity.

Posted by: yohannbiimu at December 15, 2007 7:00 AM

yohannbiimu,

I couldnt have said it better. This is for the year 2007 and Condhimmi beats out Dhimmi Carter in that regard.

Posted by: Elric66 at December 15, 2007 8:00 AM

yohannbiimu,

I agree 100%, and the fact that he's a republican makes it worst. I expect his sort of craven dhimmitude from the democrats but a republican should know better.

The republicans are suppose to be the ones to take a hardline approach toward terrorism, and since Bush is the leader of the republican party his weak approach is now considered the hardline "cowboy" approach.

Bush has effectively lowered the bar in dealing with the Jihadi threat, and the repercussions of that will be felt long after he has left the whitehouse.

Posted by: GuitarBob at December 15, 2007 9:43 AM

Carter shouldn't even be in this competition. He sets the standard. He is 'hors categorie'. He scores 10 on the Scale of Carter.
Given the numbers as they currently stand, Rice should be declared winner, with a dhimmi strength of 6.3 on the Scale of Carter.

Posted by: Kim Hartveld at December 15, 2007 10:56 AM

I am definitely a Reaganite Republican. But I call a spade a spade. Whether Bush sold us out because of Saudi money, or because of the leftist lean of the State Department I don't know. But fact is he sold us out. I had high hopes he would take the fight to the enemy, but alas he did not. I realize that not all muslims are looking to strap on a boom-boom vest, but that is in spite of islam, not because of islam. Actions speak louder than words. What irritates me most is that our government cannot seem to realize that if it were true and most muslims do not approve of the violence then this would not be a problem facing the world today for the most violent and supremist aspects of the koran would be tossed, or the whole koran tossed. But our government, as well as other western governments, think that words and polly-annish thoughts trump action. Nothing trumps action. I thought Bush recognized this, sadly he has proven me wrong. So to all my fellow Republicans, wake up. Write off Bush to history, time to find someone who will recognize the threat and face it head on. Condi/Bush deserve the American Dhimmi dishonor. Carter is old news, we know his position, have known it for decades. Condi/Bush deserve it because they have betrayed the nation with their 180. They should have known better.

Posted by: Kevin at December 15, 2007 11:45 AM

First... Carter deserves the “Life Time Dhimmi Award”

Second… Rice IS campaigning for the current Dhimmi Award '07, even digging up old Nazi and Protocols of Zion myths for it.

Next on Bush... when he announced the "Religion of Peace" tm, I have one question... who made him Theocrat in Chief?

Posted by: senor doeboy at December 15, 2007 11:53 AM

I voted for anti-semite Condi.

Posted by: Crusader at December 15, 2007 4:13 PM

C'mon Condi!! She has gained a percentage point on Dhimmi Carter. She absolutely deserves it this year.

Just google: Condoleeza Rice + Jihad Watch + 2007, and it becomes unavoidably apparent.

Posted by: awake at December 15, 2007 5:20 PM

Only occasionally do I not agree with you, Robert. I'm sure there is a way to allow readers to submit their own pick. I don't agree with having to select from a pre-approved group, like in an Iranian election.
This group as some obvious potential winners, but I think others are missing, such as Bush, Gore and the Clintons. D'Souza made up for his lack of concern about jihad with his book "What's so Great About Christianity", which is excellent, and after all, he is an author, not someone making powerful decisions or even accepting money from the miserable yet powerful Saudis, like Esposito does.

Posted by: Max Publius at December 15, 2007 7:44 PM

A vote for Condi should be considered a vote for the dhimmi-in-chief: George W. Bush.

As much as Condi's actions deserve to be decried, could any of them have taken place without the assent of her boss?

Posted by: PMK at December 14, 2007 6:19 PM

Bush has sold out America like noone else. Heck, his father sold out to wahhabbies long before dubya. TO my amazement, his son, who was funded by wahhabbi petro-dollars, who "befreinded" Bandar. I mean.. all the voter had to do was to look at the Bush track record. But Americans don't take their political system seriously and end up being sold out. So yes, Bush, without doubt is the Dhimmmi award winner, hands down.

Posted by: Alert at December 16, 2007 12:39 AM

Max Publius:

I'm sure there is a way to allow readers to submit their own pick.

You may not be aware that the six nominees are the names mentioned most often in the nominations thread. All are chosen by readers.

Cordially
Robert Spencer

Posted by: jihadwatch at December 16, 2007 6:24 AM

My vote is on Condoleezza as well. And it's not just about providing guns to the Palestinians and putting even more pressure on Israel (as if they didn't have enough pressure from Hamas & Hezbollah!).

What makes the scales tip irrecoverably are her efforts in the Balkans, where she struggles hard to create a mafia-run statelet, not even taking the obvoius opportunity to defeat Wahhabi Islam in the area (I think she's oblivious about 9/11 or something).

And her efforts to push Turkey into the European Union, where the large non-European country doesn't belong, is unwelcome, and - based on the opinion of the Turks themselves - doesn't even want to go.

An opportunist of the highest class, ever unwilling to take a risk, ever ready to be deceived, she's my choice.

As for Carter, while he's being jack-ass stupid on Israel (again), she can't beat Mrs. Rice, not by a long shot. He's simply not active enough. Further, he should have been awarded his Lifetime Dhimmi Award right back in 1980 for his contribution to the Islamic revolution in Iran and the founding of Taleban, as well as his hypocrisy of boycotting the Olympics over the 'unprovoked' Soviet intervention in Afghanistan. He's a deserving recipient, but an old horse.

Posted by: Henrik at December 16, 2007 11:18 AM

Oops, I happened to call Carter 'she'. That's undeserved, of course.

Condoleezza looks a lot better than him anyway :)

Posted by: Henrik at December 16, 2007 11:20 AM

President Bush continuing to refer to Islam as the "religion of peace" takes the cake.

Posted by: darcy at December 14, 2007 7:19 PM

That is just the begining. By now, keen observers must have seen right through Bush's hypocritic "War on Terror". The "terror" starts with Quran, with no end in sight. To make matters worse, Bush's allies are a part of the same ummah of muslim "brothers and sisters", the same madrassas and same petro-dollars that fuel and execute JIHAD relentlessly. Why did Bush layvthis self-defeating, war on terror in which his "allies" are a the enemy? Then, why does Bush fund JIHAD with arms (to enemies, aka "allies in war on terror")? If there is a "war on terror" declared by Bush himself, why does he invite the enemy from the open back-door/southern-border? Then, why does he prosecute patrol-agents who guard the back-door Bush deliberately left open for the enemy to walk in? Why does Bush provide financial-ais to one of the countries, which were the chief architects of 9/11? Why does Bush increase the same student's visas the enemy, which is Bush's "ally in war against terror" cast by the same enemy, used to invade and attack Amerrica?

And there are many more questions like the Subai deal etc which support Bush's nomination for American Dhimmi of the Year 2007 award.

That said, to pick from the above list, it definitely has to be Bush's sellout-sister, Condi.

Posted by: Alert at December 16, 2007 1:38 PM

President Bush has had little support from the Republican Party. What can you expect to have happen. The President went gang busters after Islam in the beginning. He has gone soft on it sense the Demoncrats and the MSM have gnawed on his leg non stop, starting before the 04 election.

It appears to me the Republicans in his party had themselves Neutered.

How in the World could you expect the President to "Stand Tall" when his own Party is as likely to shoot him in the Head as would the opposition?

If you want to give an Award. it should go to Congress. Their Poll ratings are even lower than the Presidents. Given the competition, that is quite the accomplishment.

Posted by: flowerknife_us at December 16, 2007 9:04 PM

Charles Johnson should have been on the list. Maybe next year.

Posted by: Charles Bogle at December 16, 2007 11:26 PM

How in the World could you expect the President to "Stand Tall" when his own Party is as likely to shoot him in the Head as would the opposition?

Posted by: flowerknife_us at December 16, 2007 9:04 PM

You are right. How can one expect the president/commander-in-chief/leader of the free world to "Stand Tall" with Bin-Laden financed petro-dollars in one pocket ( http://www.oilempire.us/bushbinladen.html ) and questionable votes in the other ( http://www.oilempire.us/bushbinladen.html )? And as for the phony and self-defeating "war on terror": http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/363
Poor president Bush!

Posted by: Alert at December 17, 2007 9:05 AM

Can we give Carter a "lifetime achievement" award and free up this annual award for other people? Condi really does deserve it (Bolton has made some recent public comments on this topic).

Posted by: JSobieski at December 17, 2007 10:37 AM

While jimmah, with his moral inversions and jew-hatred, is certainly deserving of this award, I think condi, who her saudi masters affectionally refer to in arabic as 'slave', has gone above and beyond this year. At one time I was actually foolish enough to believe she would clean up the state dept cesspool. Instead, she became mired herself, and now has become lap-dog on point for her saudi masters. She's even hectoring the Ethiopians, for godsakes. She and her fellow lap-dog dubya are working hard every day to ensure that America remains a harmless enemy to those who do ill to us, and a treacherous friend to those who dare take our side.

Posted by: Infidel33 at December 17, 2007 10:48 AM

John Eposito (DHOF '07)

I consider him a moslem.

Posted by: interestinconundrum at December 17, 2007 1:55 PM

Why did Bush layvthis self-defeating, war on terror in which his "allies" are a the enemy? Then, why does Bush fund JIHAD with arms (to enemies, aka "allies in war on terror")? If there is a "war on terror" declared by Bush himself, why does he invite the enemy from the open back-door/southern-border? Then, why does he prosecute patrol-agents who guard the back-door Bush deliberately left open for the enemy to walk in? Why does Bush provide financial-ais to one of the countries, which were the chief architects of 9/11? Why does Bush increase the same student's visas the enemy, which is Bush's "ally in war against terror" cast by the same enemy, used to invade and attack America?

This is what I've been saying for 2 years. The old shell game maybe?

Posted by: interestinconundrum at December 17, 2007 2:14 PM

http://www.thatpoliticalblog.com/serendipity/uploads/images/bush_base.gif

Posted by: interestinconundrum at December 17, 2007 2:35 PM

This is what I've been saying for 2 years. The old shell game maybe?

Posted by: interestinconundrum at December 17, 2007 2:14 PM

Ah.. finally, someone who can see the timid, corrupt and spoilt sell-out that Bush family is. Am surprised Americans feel surprised at Bush sell out to wahhabbies, mexicans and whoever wirh a peso or a petro-dollar. On Farenheit 9/11, not that it is the greatest decumentarty but has some truth and facts, Bush humself declared brazenly.. that votes and money are important. Now square that against his actions.. they are consistently in favor of votes and money. and not America or Americans. Am surprised Americans still can't see the traitor they have in white house, even when America is in.. to borrow Tom Tancredo's term: mortal danger. Can you believe US president smoking cigar with wannahhis .. the same who bombed WTC and killed 3000 Americans? If that is not a traitor, who is? And Americans think I am a deomcrat. lol.
Anyway, nice to meet someone who sees Bush BS thru. Also, those who can see Bush BS can also see Tom Tancredo's integrity and patriotism, which should be a refreeshing change after decades of Clintons and Bushs: http://www.teamtancredo.typepad.com

Posted by: Alert at December 17, 2007 5:19 PM