Pretty sad that 3 of the 5 are Brits

Posted by: Elric66 at December 14, 2007 5:33 PM

Hugo Chavez doesn't belong on this list. He does what he does not because he wants to or thinks he has to pander to Muslims - it's more that he wants to be the world champion US basher, and there's nobody he finds better suited to that than countries like Iran. Also, being part of OPEC, playing footsie w/ them in keeping oil prices up hasn't hurt Venezuela, although his f&*$ed up attempt to make Venezuela a socialist country has.

Also, Freddy who?

Posted by: Infidel Pride at December 14, 2007 5:59 PM

I agree IP, Hugo doesn't belong there. He is using Muslims to further his cause, not out of submission like Olmert.

Posted by: Elric66 at December 14, 2007 6:39 PM

Also, Freddy who?

Posted by: Infidel Pride at December 14, 2007 5:59 PM

Thielemans. The mayor of Brussels who stopped the anti-Islam protesters in Brussels. The idiot. The dhimmi idiot. He's got my vote.

Posted by: darcy at December 14, 2007 6:42 PM

Hey - shouldn't Karen Armstrong and Yvonne Ridley be on this list? Wow - the stupidest females I can think of.

Posted by: darcy at December 14, 2007 7:09 PM

Oh, what about Tiny Muskins (spelling) - that imbecile priest who said we should all just start calling God "allah" since the Muslims were going to take over anyway?

My God, that is a dhimmi.

Posted by: darcy at December 14, 2007 7:12 PM

Darcy,

In my opinion it must be Olmert. Any leader hell bent on destroying his country to please Muslim deserves the award.

Posted by: Elric66 at December 14, 2007 7:15 PM

I'm with Elric66. Olmert has no excuse. His actions seem suicidal. Suicide is only attractive to anti-happiness, anti-life mentalities. (like the Islamoloopies)

Posted by: freedomschool at December 14, 2007 7:31 PM

Olmert and Livingston are neck-and-neck. Really, they're essentially the SAME PERSON.

Posted by: yohannbiimu at December 14, 2007 7:36 PM

Darcy,

In my opinion it must be Olmert. Any leader hell bent on destroying his country to please Muslim deserves the award.

Posted by: Elric66 at December 14, 2007 7:15 PM

You know, Elric, there's so many dhimmis to choose from - and isn't that a shame? Without doubt, the most intelligent, perspicacious, people on the planet are Jihad Watchers'.

Merry Christmas, Elric --darcy

Posted by: darcy at December 14, 2007 7:38 PM

Darcy,

The world will wake up, I just dont know if it will be too late. The longer we wait, the bloodier it will get.

On a good note, Merry Christmas to you and all at JW.

Posted by: Elric66 at December 14, 2007 7:55 PM

Where's Bush? Where are all the congressmen who voted 'yes' to honoring Ramadan, and 'no' to Christmas? Where's Keith Ellison?

Oh, well. I guess the potential for a very long list is staggering. Olmert, it is.

Posted by: Abscedere at December 14, 2007 8:46 PM

Here's John Smeaton! Scottish baggage handler who tackled Al-Qaida: 'Glasgow disnae accept this! We'll jist set aboot ye!'

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=cCqprbH7mrg

Posted by: devorgilla at December 14, 2007 9:05 PM

In my opinion it must be Olmert. Any leader hell bent on destroying his country to please Muslim deserves the award.

Posted by: Elric66 at December 14, 2007 7:15 PM

Agreed, 100%.

Posted by: awake at December 14, 2007 9:43 PM

"I agree IP, Hugo doesn't belong there. He is using Muslims to further his cause, not out of submission like Olmert".
Posted by: Elric66

Olmert is one of two on that list, that includes membership in a invite only club. The other is getting high votes as well. Both are in high position in their respective government.

Its the same as Hugo, they are using their position and power to move along the group's agenda.

Posted by: Islofob IS-1 at December 14, 2007 10:25 PM

Correction, one is on the American Dhimmi list, not both here, just the one.

Posted by: Islofob IS-1 at December 14, 2007 10:29 PM

Olmert should win this award in a landslide-he's a head of state who's committing treason. He is the Manchurian, er, Koranic Candidate come to life.
The others are worthy but not as destructive. Maybe Olmert needs an award of his own-Quisling of the Year?

Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS at December 14, 2007 10:53 PM

Update:

Olmert and Livingstone are in a dead heat.

C'mon guys! Either the UK's or Israel's ultimate destruction is depending on you two.

Olmert is a no-brainer, in my opinion.

Posted by: awake at December 14, 2007 11:51 PM

At the rate the dhimmis are lining up, gonna have to set up regional awards next year, i.e. Dhimmi UK, Dhimmi Netherlands, etc. Livingstone has done his best to kiss islamic arse, but Olmert is out and out selling his country out to the murderous bastards.

Posted by: Kevin at December 15, 2007 2:29 AM

Livingstone. Living in London, I can say he has not made a bad mayor, but his opinions and attitudes are loathsome. Olmert may think - he is not very intelligent - that he is doing what he is doing in his people's long-term interests, but Livingstone is simply and plainly a Jew-hater who wants to see Israel destroyed. He is also wholly closed to argument where Islam is concerned - since of course any criticism of the Religion of Peace (Six Feet Under) must be the work of the hated Joooooooz. And he has repeatedly made a public ass of himself in his pursuit of Chavez - who had forgotten who he was - and in his support of dishonest black "activist" Lee Jasper, who is turning out to be as corrupt as Enron. Livingstone needs to hear from his city the words that Chamberlain heard long ago as France was going under: "You have been here too long for any good you may have done, and there is no health in you. Depart, I say, and let us be done with you. In the name of God, go!"

Posted by: Paolo at December 15, 2007 8:29 AM

Olmert should win this one hands down. I mean, selling out an entire country, how much more dhimmi can you get?
Oh wait, there's some folks trying to sell out an entire continent. Why didn't the collective leadership of Eurabia make the cut?

Posted by: Kim Hartveld at December 15, 2007 11:04 AM

Why isn't David Milliband (UK, Foreign secretary) here. He aims to bring the Middle-East and North African nations into the European Union, supports Kosovo independence, hates Israel and is the most dangerous dhimmi Europe as ever seen.

Posted by: Stefcho at December 15, 2007 12:42 PM

I'm suprised Prince Charles didn't make the list. Now there's a Bozo for ya.

Posted by: rational at December 16, 2007 9:06 AM

I've got to say Ehud Olmert.

I think a few people balk at naming him, because he is certainly not the most evil figure on the list. But that is not, pe se, what a dhimmi is--a dhimmi may indeed be a nice person--think of Gillian Gibbons--but through appeasement, apologia, wiilful blindness and general groveling can be very dangerous.

Olmert may well--without ever meaning to--sell out the entire state of Israel. His foreign affairs Minister, sweet Tzipi Livni, is possibly even more appeasing and clueless than he is.

Posted by: gravenimage at December 16, 2007 12:51 PM

Hamas will make sure that whatever Olmert says will never come true. He may never want to start WWIV of his own accord, who would? So he is free to offer anything and everything.

Of all th assets Israel has possessed over the years, Olmert has offered the least and has given little more than lip service to it.

The Palestinians are going to wet their pants at some point in the near future and Olmert will be in a position to make them Change. Forever.

For the first time in Israels History, Hamas are about 1-2 good Rocket attacks from having aid in all forms cut off, by Olmerts' Government.

I Vote to have his name removed.

Posted by: flowerknife_us at December 16, 2007 9:23 PM

It must be Olmert all the way. Unlike the others, he is actually selling out his entire country out to to the Muslims.

Gordon Brown is just Tony Blair lite and while Chavez is hell-bent on destroying Venezuela, it is due to his outdated Marxist ideology and not due to a desire that South America be swamped by the Islamic tide. Thielemans and Livingstone are just local politicians and Rowan Williams presides over an already dying church.

Olmert, on the other hand, is a threat to the continued existence of both Jews and Christians in the Middle East. If he is not replaced quickly, not only Israel but all the non-Muslims who are still in the region will be lost forever to the Islamic tide.

Posted by: Provoslavni at December 16, 2007 9:33 PM

I voted for thielemans, a rancid pustule of a man, who has done everything in his power to silence those who would dare try to save the half of Belgium that is still salvageable. But others here have convinced me that olmert is more deserving. I wish I could switch my vote.

Posted by: Infidel33 at December 17, 2007 3:41 PM