Feel the love of Islam!

Posted by: darcy at February 18, 2008 9:27 AM

Nice permanent bruise on the guy's head. He must surely be very devout.

Posted by: ImNoDhimmi at February 18, 2008 9:37 AM

You know, that "bruise" probably is from all that daily head-banging! I bet you it is! Wow! That is sad! LOL, the chuckle of the day!

And they want us to have "respect" for this idiocy!

Posted by: darcy at February 18, 2008 9:44 AM

Adorable!

Hope their poison has an antidote.

I don't think the antidote is Western understanding.

Posted by: Abu_Lahab at February 18, 2008 9:46 AM

This brings to mind a public service ad that was aired in the US, I think in the 1970's. The video was a slideshow with children of different races and nationalities, IIRC. The background song was, "You have to be taught to hate and fear, you have to be carefully taught."

The point of the ad was that children learn prejudice from their parents. I don't think they meant formal instruction and recitation, as in the above story.

Some US public schools have banned Mark Twain's _Huckleberry_Finn_ because it contains the "N" word. This is in spite of the fact that Twain was an ardent abolitionist and close friend of Harriet Beecher Stowe, author of _Uncle_Tom's_Cabin_.
--
Connecticut Yankee

Posted by: CTYankee at February 18, 2008 9:49 AM

No antidote will help this child unless it is administered before about the age of ten. By then, he will have been thoroughly schooled and educated in his own superiority, even if he can't read or write. He will carry that education with him throughout his life. All the rest of us can do is hope that it is very, very short.

Posted by: PMK at February 18, 2008 9:50 AM

I bet the bruise is from playing "William Tell" at one of those jihadist paintball meets.

(Overture not included.)

Posted by: MarisolJW at February 18, 2008 10:03 AM

The bruise is actually more of a callus, and is indeed a sign of piety. There'a word for it, but I can't remember what it is.
Anyway, the practice of knocking their heads on the floor does a lot to explain Moslem mental instability. They're literally beating their brains out. Probably especially damaging the frontal lobes of the cerebrum, where the higher mental powers, like conscience, are supposed to reside. It would be interesting to get an MRI scan of this guy's brain, and compare it to a normal person's.
Just aa industrial workers must wear helmets and safety glasses at work, and as people must wear seat belts in autos, Moslems ought to be required to wear forehead-cushions when at prayer.

Posted by: ebonystone at February 18, 2008 10:11 AM

I bet the bruise is from playing "William Tell" at one of those jihadist paintball meets.
by Marisol

But paintball isn't allowed in Islam. What kind of example is this father setting for his son? Bad father!!!

Posted by: PMK at February 18, 2008 10:15 AM

Dad is just another "misunderstander" of Islam.

Posted by: tanstaafl at February 18, 2008 10:21 AM

I don't think the antidote is Western understanding.

Posted by: Abu_Lahab at February 18, 2008 9:46 AM

Not a chance.

Posted by: darcy at February 18, 2008 10:21 AM

RELIGION OF PEACE, HUMANITIES CURRICULUM (Junior Level) Islamia School London.
As approved by the Department for Education.

"Who do you kill?" asked the teacher.

"America kill," said the boy.

"Who else you kill?" said .

"Bush I kill," said the boy.

"And who else?" demanded the Imam.

"Blair kill, both people kill."

"Who else you kill?" asked the grand mufti.

"Saddam, Saddam," said the boy.

Then they began chanting at each other.

"Kuffar [non-believers]" the boy said: "Kill."

"Mushrik [polytheists]" and the boy said: "Kill."

Then they continued with: "Hindu?... Kill... Sheedi [blacks]?... Kill... Pathan [thieves]?...Kill...Sharab [alcohol]?...Kill...And who do you love?...Sheikh Osama bin Laden, I love."

You've all got the bruise thing wrong, thats a scar from his lobotomy

Posted by: ericthekuffar at February 18, 2008 10:22 AM

You've all got the bruise thing wrong, thats a scar from his lobotomy

Posted by: ericthekuffar at February 18, 2008 10:22 AM

infideleric - unfortunately, Islamists don't rquire a lobotomy in order to behave as though they have in fact had one. The Qur'an has made them nuts, no surgery necessary.

Posted by: darcy at February 18, 2008 10:28 AM

I'm currently reading "Why We Want To Kill You" by former PLO terrorist Walid Shoebat. While I certainly don't need to be convinced of the seriousness of the threat from Islamists, it is a sobering read that is worth anyones time.

The book is about how Shoebat was taught to hate, how terrorists get support from their families and community, how terrorism is not caused by poverty. Mr. Shoebat spends a lot of ink on how jihadists (including children) are recruited and rewarded, on the meaning of jihad, on what goes on in the mind of a jihadist, and he takes on some common myths about terrorism. Shoebat, of course tells why he is no longer a terrorist. He ends with a chapter on how to deal with the Islamists.

The entire book is filled with quotes from the Quran and supporting texts, from Islamist literature, and from various media. He names names and points blame where due.

I am also reading "American Crescent: A Muslim Cleric on the power of his faith, the struggle against predjudice, and the future of Islam in America" by Imam Hassan Qazwini (religious leader of the Islamic Center of America in Dearborn, Michigan). It is most illuminating to read the two texts side-by-side. Qazwini also has a "mythbusting" chapter that takes on 20 "myths" about Islam including whether it is a peaceful religion, the wearing of the hijab, issues of women and Islam, whether the Prophet marrried a nine year old girl (not consummated he says), and others. What he leaves out is more telling than what is included.

Most illuminating.

Posted by: cumulusnine at February 18, 2008 10:31 AM

Several posters have commented above on the prayer-bruise in the middle of the forehead (which, for pious Muslims, replaces the pineal gland that the Cartesian French may flaunt). The name for this sign of zealotry is "zebibah."

Infidel officers, attempting to deal with Muslim rioters, might give the order "Don't fire until you see their zebibahs."

Of course, the notion that only those with tell-tale zebibahs need worry us, is comforting, butbecause it offers false comfort, is itself a source of worry. It is not only those who flaunt that bathetic bruise of piety who are deeply committed to the duty of Jihad, but hundreds of millions of Muslims who take that duty seriously, but need have no zebibah as an outward sign of an inward determination.

The word "zebibah," incidentally, in Arabic means "raisin," which thus returns us by a commodious vicus back to Luxenberg's "Syro-Aramaische Lesen" ("a Syriac reading") of the Qur'an, and those famous "raisins" that he suggests were promised to Muslims in Paradise, rather than the traditional (never questioned by those who could not conceive of a Syriac, that is Aramaic, Ur-text or substratum, to the Qur'an) dark-eyed houris and pearly boys.

"Zebibahstan" is the name I give to that virtual land, across all frontiers, that consists of the fanatically and obviously pious. The most famous zebibah is that of Ayman Al-Zawahiri. Neither Bin Laden, however, nor the late Imad Mughniyeh, appeared to possess the zebibah. It is now quite the fashion in Egypt, where the turn to ever-more fanatical Islam reflects despair at the despotism and economic paralaysis, and the problem that cannot, by those same Muslims turning their mountain of misery into the molehill of the zebibah, ever be recognized: that the very political and economic failures of their societies, the ones that cause them to turn more and more to the sole solace of Islam, are in fact the result of Islam itself.

For the politicaldespotism so widespread in Muslim lands reflects the Muslim view of the universe, wherein political legitimacy is located not in the expressed will of the people, but in the will expressed by Allah, and if the ruler can continue to be seen as a Believer (and what rulers, Mubarak, the Al-Saud, any of them, would not be able to buy off or threaten local clerics to give them their imprimatur, signifying that they are "good Muslims"). Furthermore, the habit of submission -- the key to Islam -- including mental submission, is a habit easily transferred from submission to the will of Allah to submission to the will of the Ruler. Islam is a collectivist faith, and the rights of the individual must always yield to the greater good of the Ummah, and that is, to the greater good of Islam. That is why Muslims who question the faith are not allowed outwardly to jettison it -- it would damage the "image" and therefore the power, the attractiveness, of Islam. In the same way, challenging a Muslim ruler in the name of some un-Islamic concept -- "democracy" in the Western sensee, not in the "consultative" version that Bernard Lewis likes to insist has always been part of Islam and therefore, he claims, demonstrates that "democracy" is not foreign to it -- is impermissible, unless it can be demonstrated that such a ruler is not, in truth, a good Muslim. Mere corruption is not sufficient.

And if Islam encourages submission to the ruler, even the despotic ruler, it also helps to explain economic stasis. Some Muslim states are very rich, but only because of an accident of geology. Some are poor but manage to get along because they receive Infidel infusions of aid -- a disguised Jizyah. A few Muslim countries rely on harnessing the industriousness and entrepreneurial falir of their non-Muslim populations -- such as Malaysia with its Chinese and Hindus. And one, Turkey, has an economy that manages to function, but Turkey is also the only Muslim country to have been subject, for 80 years, to the systemtic constraints put on Islam that helped create a secularized class that, in large part, created whatever economic well-being Turkey enjoys. Though much is now made of "Islamic success stories" in Turkey - factories in Konya owned by Erdogan supporters, for example -- almost all of the economic activity that matters is conducted by the secular class. Inshallah-fatalism is not conducive to economic activity.

But those turning to more and even more Islam, signified by the zebibah, out of political and economic despair, are turning to the mantra "Islam is the solution," for no one inside Islam, and what is still worse, no one outside of Islam, has noted (as has been done here for more than four years), that the failures, political, economic, social, intellectual, and moral, of Islamic societies are the result of Islam itself.

That is an understanding that Infidels must first grasp, and then show that they grasp it, and unhesitatingly discuss this understanding. In time, Muslims will have to recognize, and take into account, this Infidel view of things, and can no longer blaming the Infidels for everything. And the keenest minds in the world of Islam will, openly if obliquely, manage in time to acknowledge the accuracy of that observation.

Posted by: Hugh at February 18, 2008 10:36 AM

I have no reason to not believe this is not normal and consistent with a believers obligation as a parent.

Posted by: GrennBeck at February 18, 2008 10:37 AM

Most illuminating.

Posted by: cumulusnine at February 18, 2008 10:31 AM

cumulus, I can understand why you're reading the Shoebat book, and in fact I'm going to get it. But, why are you wasting your time on the imam's sugarcoating of lies? Furthermore, I wouldn't put one penny in that imam's pocket.

Posted by: darcy at February 18, 2008 10:40 AM

Im pretty certain hell get stoned or at least blanket partied by his islamist prision pals for apostacy. Just take a look at that whackin great tilak mark. What a doofuss

Posted by: OLDEngland at February 18, 2008 10:52 AM

Darcy,
I appreciate your sentiments. I got both books at the public library, so I didn't add anything to the coffers of the authors (authors don't make much anyway, but that's another story).

I am a firm believer that one should "know thy enemy." Reading the "imam's sugarcoating of lies" helps me to better prepare for debate and argumentation when these lies are parroted by the uninformed. It makes me think and analyze and ask more questions and seek more answers.

Sometimes I think that I already know all I need to know about Islam and Muslims to take an effective position, and should just stop studying it. But curiosity gets the better of me and here I am once again on JW, or at the library, looking for answers.

I encourage every one to read from all sides on all issues.

Posted by: cumulusnine at February 18, 2008 10:53 AM

Am slightly puzzled regarding the last line regarding "marrying into and giving birth to"... Chapattis???

Posted by: grobari at February 18, 2008 10:56 AM

Sounds like this week's episode of the Assud the Rabbit Show.

Posted by: Shy Guy at February 18, 2008 11:10 AM

Khan is working on his Knighthood.

Posted by: Zeno at February 18, 2008 11:12 AM

jokes aside, what is one supposed to do. this animal is teaching his children to kill and get killed. these children will kill - because they do not know any better.

Posted by: swimmer at February 18, 2008 11:15 AM

The bruise on the man's forehead reminded me of the ashes displayed by Christians on the first day of Lent. It was an indication that we are sinners, not that we are pious. Is this yet another piece of Christianity that Mohammed got wrong or did it already exist within pre-Mohammed Arabia?

Posted by: PMK at February 18, 2008 11:18 AM

Yes, cumulus, I certainly agree about knowing one's enemy. And you can't know the Islamic enemy without reading the Qur'an - which for some reason our "leaders" refuse to do.

I don't feel like I need to read a mendacious "taqiyya" imam, though. I get all I need about the "other side" here on JW and DW. Frankly, I don't think I could stomach reading the imam who claims that the Mo/Aeisha combo was "unconsummated!" Yeah right - the imam is just tired of hearing Mo being called a pedophile. Of cou8rse he is lying - I'm sure Dearborn is "taqiyya town" USA.

Jw and DW are all about knowing one's enemy. The Shoebat book should be required reading in American high schools.

Posted by: darcy at February 18, 2008 11:24 AM

This only goes to show how Islam suppresses the normal instincts of human beigns.

It is unnatural for a parent not to want what's best for their children.

Even parents who do wrong things themselves, want their children to grow up doing the right things.

This man is infected with that peculiar Islamic sickness, whereby Evil is good, and good is evil.

He calls his spiritual darkness light, and he's determined that his innocent children are going to live in the same darkness. Islam killed his natural moral instincts to distinguish between right and wrong, and he'll kill those same instincts in his children.

What a tragedy for these poor kids!!!!

Posted by: rational at February 18, 2008 11:35 AM

One must wonder in how many other Islamic households are similar cathechisms conducted? Exactly how does the Islamic community hold itself apart while residing in "infidel" lands? Exactly how does that community inculcate in its children a ubiquitous pattern of hatred and disdain and contempt for "infidels" no matter what economic stratum they reside in?Exactly how does one explain the fact that many Muslim households breed offspring who appear to be more fervently Muslim and more fervently filled with hatred with each new generation that is spawned?

We are confused by those among them who still maintain the mask of civility to our faces, the ones who smile and assure us that what we see and smell and sense is not real. We cannot comprehend the actions words and sentiments of this father. But we had better do so.

It is not simply in their mosques that the poison of Islam derives its toxicity. It is in the home where "infidels" usually cannot peer, in the dorm rooms where private conversations can be held, it is in the breakroom at your average everyday factory and grocery store when two Muslims meet and can drop the pretenses for a moment and share Islam with another Muslim, unguarded.

This scene is being repeated in countless secret and stolen moments across the world. We have here a mere glimpse of the magnitude of our problem.

Posted by: jsla at February 18, 2008 11:35 AM

CTYankee -

This brings to mind a public service ad that was aired in the US, I think in the 1970's. The video was a slideshow with children of different races and nationalities, IIRC. The background song was, "You have to be taught to hate and fear, you have to be carefully taught."

I also recall the PSA from the 70's, but cannot locate a video online. It was based on a song from the Broadway musical South Pacific
Copyright 1949 (renewed) by Richard Rodgers and Oscar Hammerstein

You've got to be taught to hate and fear. You've got to be taught from year to year. It's got to be drummed in your dear little ear. You've got to be carefully taught.

Imagine the reaction to an updated production of the PSA showing video images from MEMRI archives depicting muhammedan children being taught to hate.

Posted by: miira at February 18, 2008 11:42 AM

"Zebibahstan" is the name I give to that virtual land, across all frontiers, that consists of the fanatically and obviously pious.

One large trans-national tribe of Zebibahstan are the Tablighi Jamaat, floating with their robes and long beards across all borders, for a long time under the radar (and still largely unnoticed by most), claiming to devoutly follow a piety "beyond politics" but by that really meaning a more classical and sinister transcendence of the modern separation of religion and state.

Posted by: cantor at February 18, 2008 11:45 AM

During the next general elections held in Britain, this moron, under the caption of; "This is the future of New Labours tomorrow" should be posted on every bill board throughout the United Kingdom!!.

Posted by: Stopmakingsense at February 18, 2008 12:28 PM

Sorry rational wghat is right and wrong is dependent on your moral scale .
Ishaq:327: "Allah said, 'A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.'"

http://infidelnation.org/DOWNLOADS/Sirat.rar
8:67.
It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
http://www.ummah.com/what-is-islam/quran/noble/nobae008.htm

Posted by: GrennBeck at February 18, 2008 12:37 PM

Hugh's choice of words is once again impeccable, but for once there might be something I might add:

A few Muslim countries rely on harnessing the industriousness and entrepreneurial falir of their non-Muslim populations -- such as Malaysia with its Chinese and Hindus. And one, Turkey, has an economy that manages to function, but Turkey is also the only Muslim country to have been subject, for 80 years, to the systemtic constraints put on Islam that helped create a secularized class that, in large part, created whatever economic well-being Turkey enjoys.

For " Malaysia with its Chinese and Hindus" I would like to add mistreated and suppressed Chinese & Hindus, as well as the Christians who must live in fear.

And Turkey, that 'economic boom', is entirely due to cheap loans, grants and developing aid from the EU, mostly Germany, that will probably never see any returns, just like the US will never see any returns from Egypt, Pakistan, Palistan, Yemen or any of these other hell-holes that have become a bottomless pit for the jiziyah...

Posted by: sheik yer'mami at February 18, 2008 12:40 PM

Don't fail to read the posting above by "jsla" at 11:35.

Posted by: Hugh at February 18, 2008 12:41 PM

Bruise provides good contrast for target acquisition.

Posted by: RalphInfidel at February 18, 2008 12:41 PM

I guess this is the jihadi version of Art Linkletter's "Kids say the darndest things", crossed with "The Texas chainsaw massacre". Very cute.

Posted by: jewdog at February 18, 2008 12:52 PM

A word to Islamofascists -

-Pat Condell's latest video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7iBoq_yC4k&feature=related

Posted by: Mackie at February 18, 2008 12:56 PM

It's nice to be able to put a face on evil - there it is.

Posted by: champ at February 18, 2008 1:02 PM

zebibah," incidentally, in Arabic means "raisin

Well he is doing of good job of raisin his kids.

Posted by: ericthekuffar at February 18, 2008 1:06 PM

"the ones who smile and assure us that what we see and smell and sense is not real." --jsla

I don't believe one word a Mohammedan says. Not one. And they are the party responsible for my intractability in this matter.

Posted by: darcy at February 18, 2008 1:07 PM

jsla:

It is not simply in their mosques that the poison of Islam derives its toxicity. It is in the home where "infidels" usually cannot peer, in the dorm rooms where private conversations can be held, it is in the breakroom at your average everyday factory and grocery store when two Muslims meet and can drop the pretenses for a moment and share Islam with another Muslim, unguarded.

Too true, although since languages such as Urdu and Arabic are pretty much impenetrable to the vast majority of Western infidels, Muslims who speak them can share Islamic moments within earshot of the kuffar.

Occasionally though, they get overheard by someone who understands.

Posted by: watling at February 18, 2008 1:13 PM

"Zebibahstan"! I love it. Hugh, you are a genius.

Wasn't it the Jesuits who said, "Give me a child until he is six years old, and he is mine for life"? This young boy, and millions of others like him, are already lost.

Posted by: ImNoDhimmi at February 18, 2008 1:13 PM

Hugh:

"Several posters have commented above on the prayer-bruise in the middle of the forehead ...The name for this sign of zealotry is zebibah."

That's a pity. I'd convinved myself that it signalled a return to good old-fashioned coppering, and the Jack Regan school of interrogation techniques.

Posted by: Matamoros at February 18, 2008 1:14 PM

How heartwarming to have an insight into a proud father bonding with his children.

Bundles of joy...

He resembles the mental patient in One flew Over The Cuckoos Nest (the actor also starred in Back To The Future) the one that sat up in bed right at the end of the movie screaming and cheering - then laid down again.

I wonder if he will continue his child abuse in prison - poisoning the minds of his children when they come to visit him in prison over the next 14 years.

Posted by: Ken CleanAirSystem at February 18, 2008 1:20 PM

What this father is doing to his children is the worst kind of child abuse. It is widespread in the Muslim world--just look at Saudi textbooks, or the hideous children's show "Tomorrow's Pioneers" from Gaza, with its cute "martyred" animal mascots preaching hatred of Jews and Infidels.

Groban wrote:

Am slightly puzzled regarding the last line regarding "marrying into and giving birth to"... Chapattis???
..............................

Chapattis are a type of Indian and Pakistani flatbread. The life this tender father envisions for his tiny daughter--just three years old--is that she serve jihadis in every way. First, by feeding and sustaining them in some remote mountain cave, then, when she is old enough--at nine or so--by serving their sexual needs, and finally by bearing the next generation of killers.

Hugh wrote:

Several posters have commented above on the prayer-bruise in the middle of the forehead . . . The name for this sign of zealotry is "zebibah."
.................................

Yes. In Bosch Fawstin's upcoming "Pigman" comic, his nemesis "Super Jihad" sports a prominent zebibah. A nice touch.

PMK wrote:

But paintball isn't allowed in Islam. What kind of example is this father setting for his son? Bad father!!!
..................................

Paintball is indeed haram--if you and your pals are just going out to have a bit of rowdy fun. If, however, you are using paintball to prepare for jihad, then it is perfectly OK.

Paintball jihad--here's a link:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26166-2004Feb9.html

Posted by: gravenimage at February 18, 2008 1:40 PM

swimmer said

what is one supposed to do. this animal is teaching his children to kill

Well, for starters, we should not let this parent or child, or all the other similar parents and children, into our country on the false assumption that they are just like us, that they want the same things as we do, that if we just give them enough money and compassion we will win their hearts and minds.

And that's just a start.

From the article:

Then it continued with: "Hindu?... Kill... Sheedi [blacks]?... Kill...

No-one has yet pointed out the obvious, so I will have the honor:

Islam is racist.

And that's almost the least of its problems.

Posted by: special_guest at February 18, 2008 1:44 PM

Would the operator of a zumbooruk (i.e. a Zumboorukchee) necessarily sport a zebibah?

Posted by: special_guest at February 18, 2008 1:50 PM

Darcy,

how dare you call me an infidel you bloody KUFR.

Posted by: ericthekuffar at February 18, 2008 1:59 PM

A very ugly, inhuman man -- the face of true Islam?

Posted by: John C at February 18, 2008 2:13 PM

In the West, young children, play "Cowboys and Indians" promoting genocide against an entire ethnic group. Adolescent kids play video games where they can gleefully kill everyone from zombies to policemen in full-color high-definition bloody carnage.

Imagining killing an adversary is not only fun and entertaining for children, but perfectly normal. Why are we suddenly concerned when a child from a different culture wants to join in the fun and play, "Martyrs and Kuffars"?

/moral equivalence

Posted by: Xero G at February 18, 2008 2:49 PM

Results of Islamic Education & Cultural Understanding Level One.

"I suspected that my daughter had a relationship with a man and I had to stone her to death as she had besmirched my honour. I had no other choice."

Of course!

From AKI (thanks to all who sent this in):

Tehran, 18 Feb. (AKI) - A man known as Sharif has reportedly stoned his fourteen-year-old daughter to death in southeastern Iran because for allegedly having a relationship with a man.
Sharif's wife reported him to police after he and a friend killed the girl in Zahedan, capital of Baluchistan province.

Sharif showed no sign of remorse, telling police who interrogated him: "I suspected that my daughter had a relationship with a man and I had to stone her to death as she had besmirched my honour."

"I had no other choice," he said, telling police how he had carried out the stoning....

Grade A*

Posted by: ericthekuffar at February 18, 2008 2:51 PM

Xero G,
I played cowboys and indians all the time as a kid. It was spontaneous and not encouraged or influenced by any adults. It was play and we all knew that it was not to be taken into the real world. There was no confusion between play and reality. That means that I knew perfectly well that killing Native Americans was not right and that I was not practicing to go out and do so. That's a huge difference and I'm sorry if you cannot make such an elementary distinction.

My Dad never stood over me telling me to "Kill, Kill, Kill. I wasn't taught to kill through my schoolbooks or by any literature distributed by my church. Quite the contrary, I was taught to respect life, yes American Indians too.

As for your video games comments, I happen to agree that the violent video games are harmful and this is a big concern to me. Still, it is very different than children being indoctrinated with a lust for death by their parents, schools, mosques, and all the people and institutions they most respect.

I think the difference can be summed up by one word that you used repeatedly in your post: "play." We are playing and we know it. They are NOT playing, and they know it.

Posted by: cumulusnine at February 18, 2008 3:21 PM

A "zebibah"?
Aw, I was hoping he had resisted arrest.

Posted by: Mr Ape Pig at February 18, 2008 3:31 PM

Xero G,
Your "moral equivalence" of playing cowboys and Indians doesn't quite work, since we played both sides, and one might find oneself a cowboy on one day and an Indian on another. It would be comparable to Moslem kids playing "infidels and believers" where one might be on either side, and either side might win. Not quite the same thing as being forced to memorize a litany of hate.

Posted by: ebonystone at February 18, 2008 4:15 PM

cumulusnine,
I was purposefully glib in my post to hopefully elicit a cogent response, and you stepped up to the task...well done. Indeed, there is a HUGE difference between child's fantasy-play and real-life homicidal indoctrination by the parent. Sometimes I just need reaffirmation that others out there also "get it".

Posted by: Xero G at February 18, 2008 4:23 PM

I read that this ding-bat was living off the State hand-outs, and he was doing the real Muslim thing, Jihad, they call it Finance Jihad against the West.

Will our leaders ever learn that we have invited living pests onto our shores, and they are here to destroy, and we aint stopping them either. Perhaps we deserve all we get, because we don't have the ability to change that.

Posted by: MusHuntCowboy at February 18, 2008 5:15 PM

Shame they don't have parquet floors in mosques with little circular patterns.

That way it would leave a convenient bull's-eye.

Islam: headbangers from gehenna.

Posted by: profitsbeard at February 18, 2008 6:52 PM

Islamic parenting at its very best, no doubt.

This example shines some light on how these folks can behave they way they do--by indoctrinating hatred to their own children and cloaking it as a religion.

Posted by: PorkFatRules at February 18, 2008 7:29 PM

yes, feel the love from this porkistani. this is typical attitude of these muslim people about all other people. I hope some people got a clue why hindus can not get along with these people. the following is the bmost irksome question when asked by these ignoranmouses. it goes something like this " but why can't the hindus and muslims of the subcontinent get along when they are bascially the same people and same basic culture?" now you know why.

Posted by: desidude at February 18, 2008 9:57 PM

Well at least he doesn't look inbred.

Posted by: ewha1 at February 19, 2008 3:51 AM