Atlas Shugs has done some background work on Obama's connetion to Kenya jihadists and Odinga.

Posted by: Elric66 at February 25, 2008 8:24 AM

"Now don't get all excited. Is that really all that different from this?" --RS

Well, I think that it is. The Sioux American Indian was not trying to take over the world. Rendering the Coolidge pic amusing and fun.

Islam, is, however, trying to take over the world.

Rendering the Obama pic frightening as all-get-out.

Posted by: darcy at February 25, 2008 8:32 AM

Darcy,

I agree. It would be like a candidate dressing up like a Nazi in 1940.

Posted by: Elric66 at February 25, 2008 8:35 AM

On a side note, my father used to say, "that's a bunch of hooey" (nonsense). The phrase reminds me of him. He was also fond of the word "malarkey," or "foolish talk."

"I do, however, think that the identification that he evidently feels with the Islamic world, and they with him, will lead to disastrous concessions that could serious imperil U.S. security." --RS

Now, that is neither hooey nor malarkey.

Posted by: darcy at February 25, 2008 8:37 AM

I note that you didn't show an recent pictures of Bush with the Arabs rulers. I have no idea of what Obama would do or how he feels about Muslim terrorists but the Republicanas have done little except talk to step the spread of Saudi paid for mosques in this country.

Posted by: Jerry M at February 25, 2008 8:44 AM

"I note that you didn't show an recent pictures of Bush with the Arabs rulers." --Jerry M

Can anyone find that photo of Bush brandishing a sword with the Muslim who is also brandishing a sword that was posted a few weeks ago?

Posted by: darcy at February 25, 2008 8:52 AM

Whether he's a muslim seems almost beside the point. His close relationship with Odinga and that man's connections to terrorists suggest Obama's got a serious conflict of interest.

Posted by: savitch at February 25, 2008 8:58 AM

I think that picture adds necessary context to Obama not putting his hand over his heard during the Pledge or refusal to wear an American Flag.

It's his connections with Odinga which are truly incriminating and create a conflict with what should be US foreign policy.

(Not much different from Bush unfortunately.)

Posted by: Beagle at February 25, 2008 9:00 AM

JerryM:

I note that you didn't show an recent pictures of Bush with the Arabs rulers.

I don't believe you. You're a liar.

Bush with sword and Arab ruler:

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019538.php

Cordially
Robert Spencer

Posted by: jihadwatch at February 25, 2008 9:01 AM

I think "JerryM" is a covert something or other. My little bird is chirping.

Posted by: Beagle at February 25, 2008 9:04 AM

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/01/obamas_nation_o.html

EXCLUSIVE - Obama's Nation of Islam Staffers, Edward Said & "Inflexible Jews" Causing Mid-East Conflict: An Obama Insider Reveals the Real Barack
Printer Friendly

By Debbie Schlussel - Copyright 2008

**** EXCLUSIVE: Must Cite Debbie Schlussel and/or DebbieSchlussel.com ****

Responding to criticism by Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen, Barack Obama declared his strong opposition to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan:

I decry racism and anti-Semitism in every form and strongly condemn the anti-Semitic statements made by Minister Farrakhan.
Obama also went on to condemn his Church's award to Farrakhan and his minister's tight relationship with him.

But a former Obama insider says that Obama's sudden aversion to NOI and Farrakhan is belied by the fact that Obama employed and continues to employ several Farrakhan acolytes in high positions on his Illinois and U.S. Senate campaign and office staffs. I have verified that this person--who agreed to talk on the condition of anonymity--held a key position in the Obama campaign. The insider was so close to Senator Obama that they frequently personally discussed and exchanged direct e-mail messages on campaign and policy matters. This person is not connected with the Clintons and is not a disgruntled employee.

Posted by: GrennBeck at February 25, 2008 9:08 AM

Can anyone find that photo of Bush brandishing a sword with the Muslim who is also brandishing a sword that was posted a few weeks ago?

Posted by: darcy at February 25, 2008 8:52 AM

Thank You Mr. Spencer!

Y'see, Jerry M?

Posted by: darcy at February 25, 2008 9:11 AM

I didn't recognize Obama. Seriously--I thought it was a picture of an old man with some woman. In a dress, with his head swathed in a white turban, and held at that angle, Obama looks effeminate.

A Somali elder? Ridiculous. First, he would have to be Somali. Second, he'd have to be older. What I see is Obama in a dress.

Posted by: Abscedere at February 25, 2008 9:13 AM

Robert sez:

I do, however, think that the identification that he evidently feels with the Islamic world, and they with him, will lead to disastrous concessions that could serious imperil U.S. security.

I second that. However, was there any president in the last 40 years who was not compromised by the Arabs?

http://sheikyermami.com/2008/02/25/oh-what-a-bommah/

Posted by: sheik yer'mami at February 25, 2008 9:22 AM

UPDATE:

Posted by Robert at February 25, 2008 8:07 AM

Good Grief. How sickening, Hillary. Chelsea, too. You should have more sense.

Posted by: darcy at February 25, 2008 9:25 AM

Whatever he is, he is not kosher and too islamic for me.

This is not a suitable leader for America. No way.

Posted by: sheik yer'mami at February 25, 2008 9:58 AM

But I believe he's more of a muslim than anything else..... his behavior tells me so.

I do NOT believe he's a 'born again' christian.......

Posted by: n.a. palm at February 25, 2008 10:00 AM

Now don't get all excited. Is that really all that different from this?

You betcha. Compare the pics. Coolidge is still wearing his suit and has only donned the feathers.
Obama (how could anyone recognize him, since his face is lowered?) has donned the full gear.

I stand by my assessment of the "Obama-Is-Secretly-A-Muslim" rumors -- "That's a lot of hooey":

Here, too the question isn't whether Obama is "secretly" a Muslim. It's whether his familial ties with Islam (or did his father cease being a Muslim?) will cloud his judgment. Where is his heart? THAT is the question he has yet to answer.

Posted by: PMK at February 25, 2008 10:18 AM

A lot of hooey. I agree completely.

And the hypocracy of Hillary, circulating this picture of Obama, while she allowed Bill to dress her AND Chelsea in headgear to be inoffensive to Islamolunatics, (for SHAME, Hillary, FOR SHAME!) ought to be the last nail in the coffin of her run to be the CEO of the USA.

Posted by: Goob at February 25, 2008 10:23 AM

I only have one question about the Senator's visit to Kenya: would the moslems (sheikh is a moslem leader, right?) have dressed the Senator as an elder if they knew he is a Christian? From what I have learned here at JW, I'd say no they wouldn't. Where does that leave us then?

Posted by: eve_anne_gelical at February 25, 2008 10:45 AM

For those who want to hear Obama's "Shahada", here it is, in an interview with Christianity Today magazine: http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2008/januaryweb-only/104-32.0.html

CT: You've talked about your experience walking down the aisle at Trinity United Church of Christ, and kneeling beneath the cross, having your sins redeemed, and submitting to God's will. Would you describe that as a conversion? Do you consider yourself born again?
Obama: I am a Christian, and I am a devout Christian. I believe in the redemptive death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. I believe that that faith gives me a path to be cleansed of sin and have eternal life. But most importantly, I believe in the example that Jesus set by feeding the hungry and healing the sick and always prioritizing the least of these over the powerful. I didn't 'fall out in church' as they say, but there was a very strong awakening in me of the importance of these issues in my life. I didn't want to walk alone on this journey. Accepting Jesus Christ in my life has been a powerful guide for my conduct and my values and my ideals.
There is one thing that I want to mention that I think is important. Part of what we've been seeing during the course this campaign is some scurrilous e-mails that have been sent out, denying my faith, talking about me being a Muslim, suggesting that I got sworn in the U.S. Senate with a Quran in my hand or that I don't pledge allegiance to the flag. I think it's really important for your readers to know that I have been a member of the same church for almost 20 years, and I have never practiced Islam. I am respectful of the religion, but it's not my own. One of the things that's very important in this day and age is that we don't use religion as a political tool and certainly that we don't lie about religion as a way to score political points. I just thought it was important to get that in there to dispel rumors that have been over the Internet. We've done so repeatedly, but obviously it's a political tactic of somebody to try to provide this misinformation.

.....well, maybe he hasn't made a Shahada. I think Hillary and McCain will be nicer to Saudi than Obama. Obama's got my vote.

Posted by: WC at February 25, 2008 11:19 AM

Whatever he is, he is not kosher and too islamic for me.

This is not a suitable leader for America. No way.

Posted by: sheik yer'mami at February 25, 2008 9:58 AM

I am so with you, shiek. I'll take "Headgear Hillary" before Hussein.

But, hopefully, we'll get McCain.

Posted by: darcy at February 25, 2008 11:21 AM

I am just writing in because I have had a crush on Calvin Coolidge for a long time. I cannot thank you enough, Mr. Spencer, for posting a picture of him.
He's such a dreamboat.
*sigh*

Posted by: AnneCrockett at February 25, 2008 11:23 AM

I agree with darcy - the Sioux and other American Indian tribes were not trying to take over this country, convert us to their religion, or ask for special compensation as to footbaths, etc. They were just trying to survive our government supported efforts to annihilate them. Something this govt has not considered for our jihadi enemy of today. Now it's all about accomodation and making them like us.

Obama and his wife have some serious issues about being Americans of color - of course, his family history is such that he has not suffered from slavery. And their propensity for viewing most/all things in shades of Black/Good and White/Evil mean they have no hesitations about selling out this country in a heartbeat if only to confirm their beliefs that White American is the true evil in this world.

Posted by: HOV Dummy at February 25, 2008 11:26 AM

"I am respectful of the religion," --Hussein Obama on Islam

Oops, that's not good. Respectful of a "religion" that has a primary goal of making the world "all for allah" by the annihilation of other peoples?

Anyone who "respects" Islam is a huge problem.

Posted by: darcy at February 25, 2008 11:28 AM

To Robert Spencer.

>"I note that you didn't show an recent pictures >of Bush with the Arabs rulers."
"I don't believe you. You're a liar.

Bush with sword and Arab ruler:..."

Not a liar, in the post as it was before 8am CST, there was a recent picture of Obama and an ancient one with the Indians. You should have included the link when you posted it. If it was there and I missed it I apologize

I am well aware of Islamic militancy and I think the Democrats have no policy, but the Republicans, when in office haven't done much at all.

Posted by: Jerry M at February 25, 2008 11:41 AM

JerryM:

You said:

I note that you didn't show an recent pictures of Bush with the Arabs rulers.

The link that I posted:

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019538.php

...was put up at this site on January 12.

I don't expect you to know everything that has been put up here, but I do expect that when you say something was NOT put up, that you would at least check first to see if it HAD been put up.

Cordially
Robert Spencer

Posted by: jihadwatch at February 25, 2008 11:51 AM

WC posted an interview with O about his conversion.
I saw a very similar interview on a site called beliefnet.
It was amusing that when he spoke of "the prayer I say to myself each night", a commenter said 'He prays to himself?, enough evidence for me!" LOL

Islam IS a problem for the West.
Why doesn't O speak out one way or the other on this subject, if he really wants the White House?

Has anyone heard about the Secret Service standdown order in Dallas? It's all over the internet that they were told to stop security checks, metal detecting, etc.
???

Posted by: Aunt Bea at February 25, 2008 11:52 AM

"I have no idea of what Obama would do or how he feels about Muslim terrorists but the Republicanas have done little except talk to step the spread of Saudi paid for mosques in this country."

Yep, the Right as well as the Left have been happy to suck up to them. It's vital we don't have blinkers on.

On another topic did anyone else think the recent Tom Hanks film was a bit loose with the truth?

Go Mujehadeen go, go, go, d'oh.

Posted by: Big Luke at February 25, 2008 12:05 PM

This picture makes me no difference.
BHO may not be a practicing moslem, but he is a "Black Identity christian" {small c}
http://www.tucc.org/about.htm
The information at the site has changed since the campaign started.
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59600
In a sermon filled with profanity, Wright also blamed the war on "Bush administration bulls--t."

Those are the types of statements that have led to MSNBC's Tucker Carlson describing Wright as "a full-blown hater."
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/8/8/194812.shtml
If a member of the "Christian Identity" movement was running for POTUS, how far would he get?
This church has honored Louis Farrakhan as "Man of the Year".
Who will he have in his Cabinet? God Forbid!

Posted by: interestinconundrum at February 25, 2008 12:13 PM

from Obama's 1995 memoir. {edit: Steve Sailor}
And in that single note -- hope! -- I heard something else; at the foot of that cross, inside the thousands of churches across the city, I imagined the stories of ordinary black people merging with the stories of David and Goliath, Moses and Pharaoh, the Christians in the lion's den, Ezekiel's field of dry bones. These stories -- of survival, and freedom, and hope -- became our story, my story; the blood that had spilled was our blood, the tears our tears; until this black church, on this bright day, seemed once more a vessel carrying the story of a people into future generations and into a larger world. Our trials and triumphs became at once unique and universal, black and more than black... And if a part of me continued to feel that this Sunday communion sometimes simplified our condition, that it could sometimes disguise or suppress the very real conflicts among us [Obama is referring to an earlier discussion of class conflicts among blacks within black churches here -- the "us" does not include nonblack human beings, such as, say, his mother, sister, and maternal grandparents] and would fulfill its promise only through action [i.e., politics], I also felt for the first time how that spirit carried within it, nascent, incomplete, the possibility of moving beyond our narrow dreams.
Soon, Obama breaks into tears.

To be crass about it, this strikes me not as a religious conversion but as the moment when Obama finally feels Black Enough. -Steve Sailor

Posted by: interestinconundrum at February 25, 2008 12:29 PM

It would be like a candidate dressing up like a Nazi in 1940.

Then why are we bothering in Iraq and Afghanistan? (Forgive me if this has been addressed before.)

Posted by: baldilocks at February 25, 2008 12:34 PM

I bet there are loads of pictures of assorted Western leaders in Islamic garb.

Dhimmi Prince Charles in his little hat springs to mind immediately.

Posted by: Celsius at February 25, 2008 1:05 PM

Like Robert, I disagree with what Obama stands for on the issues, but Farrakhan's endorsements notwithstanding, I fail to see how Obama is worse than either Clinton or McCain. While the Clinton's dressing up like Laura Bush did as Muslimahs may be just cosmetic (but a very disturbing symbolism), what's more disturbing is her past friendships with Suha Arafat, as well as the fact that it was she who at the behest of Paki lobbyists managed to get BJ add Pakistan to his Indian itenarary in 2000, even though Pakistan (like India) was under sanctions for its nuke tests.

As for McCain, his stands on Gitmo, and his willingness to try enemy combatants in US courts, as well as his constant carping on the war staring with Operation Enduring Freedom in 2001 is what makes him a good friend to the Jihadis. Nor would he stop Jihadis from coming into this country, and his recent statements on the border can't be taken seriously. If, as a senator he fought tooth and nail for amnesty (his current denials notwithstanding) and defied his party base, how can one seriously believe that as president, he'll have a different stance with so much more power? Doesn't add up.

As for the above photo, it does not jump out at me as Muslim garb. Yeah, it is Somali garb, and Somalis are Muslims, but that isn't the costume that one normally sees Muslims wearing. Had Obama dressed up like the Saudis, or like a Mullah, that would have been worth a mention. Right now, it's not that different from Calvin Coolidge with the Sioux, or say, a president visiting New Zealand and dressing up in Maori garb on a tour.

So, no, I don't like Obama's policy, but he's the one I endorse: I can't stand the idea of either Clinton nor McCain in the White House.

Posted by: Infidel Pride at February 25, 2008 1:25 PM

Regarding the update with the photo of Her Royal Thighness in a head covering, there was also the photo of her smooching Suha Arafat on the White House Lawn. That picture's gone down the memory hole.

Posted by: Rick at February 25, 2008 1:44 PM

Teflon.

All of this muslim crap just doesn't stick to Obama because he is not a muslim.

First Lady Bush covered her head during a visit to islamic lands. Does this mean that she is a secret islamic sympathizer?

The photo is a non issue as Robert has well written, but the point is that an attempt is being made in all corners to paint Barack Obama as somehow being an evil creation, just waiting to show his colors once elected.

Which is, of course, absolute hooey.

Teflon.

Posted by: bonncaruso at February 25, 2008 2:11 PM

I note that you didn't show an recent pictures of Bush with the Arabs rulers.
-- JerryM

I don't believe you. You're a liar.

-- Robert Spencer

Man, Spencer, relax. He probably meant you didn't show a picture of Bush on this particular thread.

Instead of calmly giving "Jerry" the benefit of the doubt and simply saying -- "Jerry, if you mean I have NEVER shown pictures of Bush with Arabs, you're wrong: here it is, etc" -- you go right for the jugular and call him a "liar", when there's no need and no proof he is such a bad thing.

Posted by: cantor at February 25, 2008 2:37 PM

What - Obama is merely changing into his bed sheet. Is this what he means about "CHANGE"?

Posted by: champ at February 25, 2008 2:54 PM

Cantor,

Coming from anyone but you, I might credit that, but your pattern is too well established by now.

By the way: "I don't believe you. You're a liar" is a quote, of Bob Dylan, when an audience member shouted out "Judas!" at him at a celebrated concert many years ago.

Cordially
Robert Spencer

Posted by: jihadwatch at February 25, 2008 3:02 PM

Obama would be the first US president to not spend his entire life residing inside the US.

The first with a parent and siblings not living in the US. How will he deal with the immigration issue?

He would be the first president to not spend his formative years and early schooling in the US. How will he deal with the islamic textbooks in US schools?

He would be the first from a polygomous family. How will he deal with this issue?

He would be the first with muslim siblings and parents. How will he deal with the islamic threat? Will he even see islam as a threat when he has immediate, not distant, muslim relatives? Will they talk to him and influence his decisions? Will he decide that terrorists are just criminals? Ease up on security? How does he feel about the NOI?

He would be the first president with an Afro-centric ancestry instead of European. Will he try to spend billions to 'save' Africa? Or at least Kenya? Will he intervene in African countries where the US has no economic or strategic interest? Will he show any loyalty to European allies?

How does he feel about reparations? Even though he has no ancestors that were slaves would he endorse this? Or authorize it?

Will he defend always, a country that he hasn't always been proud of growing up? That his mother didn't seem proud of either. That his father didn't seem to like? And his wife, "MO", hasn't always been proud of? Even when he was made a senator?

Will his 'Afro-centric' church ever be looked into?

What kind of cabinet choices would he make when he has already listed Brezinski, Dhimmi Carter's man, as one choice.

This blogger doesn't like Obama but his facts seem accurate.
http://www.freedomsenemies.com/_more/obama.htm

Will reporters question any of the things he wrote in his first book?

Will reporters answer any of these questions? Normally, they would be ripping apart the candidates but instead they are tip toeing around.

How about after the election? Will they be afraid to question anything he does? Afraid to be called racist? Will they swoon when he starts talking like a preacher? Or listen to the words? And ask questions?

Posted by: Borg at February 25, 2008 3:16 PM

Look, here is my 2 cents on this matter. http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/apec_photo.jpg

Here are our leaders happily dressing up in the clothes of a foreign totalitarian power.

Impeach them all eh?

Posted by: payingattention at February 25, 2008 3:29 PM

I'm not voting for Obama bin Clinton anyway - no need to pursuade my vote against those two - but that third guy sure looks promising :-)

Posted by: champ at February 25, 2008 3:41 PM

A Somali elder? Ridiculous. First, he would have to be Somali. Second, he'd have to be older. What I see is Obama in a dress.

Posted by: Abscedere

I agree. I thought it was a still of one of Scarlett's maids from "Gone with the Wind" until I noticed the wristwatch.

Posted by: ebonystone at February 25, 2008 3:46 PM

My biggest question? What about Israel? Will he abandon them?

Posted by: Borg at February 25, 2008 3:47 PM

Laura Bush wearing scarf:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2118/1744437066_7a9536cb1e.jpg

And Condi too:

http://www.seeingtheforest.com/STFphotos/condi.jpg

Posted by: skylights at February 25, 2008 3:56 PM

Bruce Bawer wrote a stinging review of Obama's 1995 autobiography...in which - Bawer claims - Barak clearly identifies more with his Kenyan patrimony than with being American.

According to Bawer, Obama accuses his white Grand-parents who helped raise him in a loving, stable environment...of being "racists"...and yet repeatedly sings the praises of the Muslim, African father whom he scarcely knew.

I want to read the book for myself...but if Obama is anything close to being as Afro-centric in his outlook as Bawer suggests, I find it disconcerting that the Illinois Senator has scarcely said a thing about race throughout this campaign.

His mumness about race is certainly good politics and has taken him far (I've been very impressed by his oratory skills), but the question begs to be asked: Who is the real Barak Obama?

Posted by: Cornelius at February 25, 2008 4:15 PM

RS:

I had the same take on that exchange as Cantor's ["Hi, Remote!"]; and I didn't know that you were quoting the legendary Bob Dylan.

Anyway, I'm trying to reconcile myself to the strong possibility of President Barack Hussein "We Can Change The World" Obama leading The Land of The Free and The Home of The Brave toward the miraj of a Promised Land.

The shock of that happening would jolt me as much as my belated realization of Islam's inherent malice did.

Reminds me of the anecdote about two Nineteeth Century Russian Jews, one young, one old: "Old man," asks the younger, "Why do you pray for the Tsar?--to which the elder responds, "Son, I have lived long enough to know that the next Tsar is always worse, so I pray for the Tsar!

Posted by: John C at February 25, 2008 5:00 PM

Note to Anne Crockett:

Don't get hot and bothered, but instead stay cool, with Coolidge. It's the only way.

Posted by: Hugh at February 25, 2008 5:18 PM

Barack's pop had identity problems and was a Catholic before he switched to Islam to get the four-wives bonus! I think Barack's religious affiliations are unimportant. What is important is that he may have that stupid gene possessed by Jimmy Carter, you remember the Panama Canal? The Neutron Bomb? Selling out the Shah?

We don't need another serial eff-up in the White House.

Posted by: daveinboca at February 25, 2008 5:43 PM

Not a Moslem--perhaps, but not adverse to sympathizing with the Islamics. Afrocentrists have bought into the fable of "under Islam, all-- black, white, brown, tan, yellowish--are equal." This,as we all know is a bunch of hooey, as at the top of the Islamic hierarchy are the Arabs. These people, among whom Islam originated, feel and act superior to all non-Arabs (Pakis included, although these refuse to accept that).

As for Africans, if they think they're equal to the Lords of Mecca--forgeddaboutit!

Posted by: unicorns62000 at February 25, 2008 6:36 PM

Farrakhan says BHO is the "hope for the entire world."
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=29048_Farrakhan-_Obama_is_Hope_of_the_Entire_World&only
Of course he also claims white people were invented by an evil scientist.
http://www.muslimhope.com/BlackMuslims.htm

Posted by: interestinconundrum at February 25, 2008 6:37 PM

Abscedere,

"Some woman in a dress?"

At first glance I though that I was looking at a pageant re-enactment of the pre-bellum Old South (Aunt Jemima).

Posted by: unicorns62000 at February 25, 2008 6:43 PM

John C,

You said: "Anyway, I'm trying to reconcile myself to the strong possibility of President Barack Hussein "We Can Change The World" Obama leading The Land of The Free and The Home of The Brave toward the miraj of a Promised Land."

but there's always a possible antidote to that: THE REVOLUTION . . ., provided it's not led by that president--in which case we can look forward to joining the Chavez-Castro-etc. socialist dictatorship axis, which allies itself with originators of the jihad.

Posted by: unicorns62000 at February 25, 2008 6:52 PM

I agree with Mr. Spencer. This is not that big a deal. Obama is NOT a moslem.

Many diplomats wear garb to accommodate the traditions and culture of the country they are visiting at any given time. Remember Nancy Peloosi and her headgear? That was just a few short months ago. Laura Bush also donned islamic head gear for a meeting with some sowdi women.

If you REALLY want to expose Barack Hussein Obama, you should research his Black Supremacist church. There you will find his connection to the NOI's Louis Farakaan. The NOI is a Black Supremacist movement wrapped in the appropriate cloak of a form of islamism/racism. They are both supremacist movements; one is an Arab movement (Islam) and the other is a Black Supremacist movement (NOI).

Come on JW's... get the word out by researching Obama's 'church'.... don't focus on the esoteric issues which are so easily dismissed. Focus instead on what this man and his wife are truly about.

Posted by: Laughs_at_Silly_Jihadis at February 25, 2008 6:55 PM

Lots of hooey eh? Well, let's just have a look at Obamah's chruch ... here's the official mission statement ....

Mission Statement: What Trinity Is About

Trinity United Church of Christ has been called by God to be a congregation that is not ashamed of the gospel of Jesus Christ and that does not apologize for its African roots! As a congregation of baptized believers, we are called to be agents of liberation not only for the oppressed, but for all of God’s family. We, as a church family, acknowledge, that we will, building on this affirmation of "who we are" and "whose we are," call men, women, boys and girls to the liberating love of Jesus Christ, inviting them to become a part of the church universal, responding to Jesus’ command that we go into all the world and make disciples!

We are called out to be "a chosen people" that pays no attention to socio-economic or educational backgrounds. We are made up of the highly educated and the uneducated. Our congregation is a combination of the haves and the have-nots; the economically disadvantaged, the under-class, the unemployed and the employable.

The fortunate who are among us combine forces with the less fortunate to become agents of change for God who is not pleased with America’s economic mal-distribution!

W.E.B. DuBois indicated that the problem in the 20th century was going to be the problem of the color line. He was absolutely correct. Our job as servants of God is to address that problem and eradicate it in the name of Him who came for the whole world by calling all men, women, boys and girls to Christ.

http://www.tucc.org/mission.htm

Now let's see who they partner with ....

Barack Obama is a member of Chicago's Trinity United Church of Christ. Its minister, and Obama's spiritual adviser, is the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. In 1982, the church launched Trumpet Newsmagazine; Wright's daughters serve as publisher and executive editor. Every year, the magazine makes awards in various categories. Last year, it gave the Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. Trumpeter Award to a man it said "truly epitomized greatness." That man is Louis Farrakhan.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/14/AR2008011402083.html

I find it curious that this reference to Louis Farrakhan was actually part of Obamah's church website, but now it seems to have been removed.

Could it be that the church is trying to hide Wright's apparent affection for Mr. Farrakhan -- and Wright is someone who Obamah cherishes as a friend mind you.

But wait, there is this ...

JERUSALEM – The board of a nonprofit organization on which Sen. Barack Obama served as a paid director alongside a confessed domestic terrorist granted funding to a controversial Arab group that mourns the establishment of Israel as a "catastrophe" and supports intense immigration reform, including providing drivers licenses and education to illegal aliens.

http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=57231

And Farrahkan seems to think highly of Obamah

"Farrakhan praises Obama"

http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=57279

Lot's of hooey? Maybe, where there is smoke there is usually fire --- and there is lots of smoke swirling around Obama from what I can tell.

Posted by: witness at February 25, 2008 7:13 PM

Great info, witness!

Appreciate your providing not only those links, but the Mission Statement as well. I find this comment from the Mission Statement to be especially odd: "....and that does not apologize for its African roots!"

Why is that in there? Did someone want them to apologize for their African roots or something? I have Irish/French/English roots, but no one has ever asked me to apologize for my roots. Not unless this church has an agenda.

What do you make of that statement?

Posted by: champ at February 25, 2008 7:45 PM

Someone needs to ask Obama if he ever pledged the Shahada as a child.

It seems unlikely that some old imam in Indonesia didn't see the kid Barack in a madrassa and ask him to take the oath of entrance to Islam.

I'd like to hear Obama's answer.

If it were a flat denial, then his Indonesian childhood acquaintences could be asked if he was being accurate.

I find him to be a lightweight, and wouldn't vote for him because of his glaring inexperience, but this avenue needs to be explored, also.

Posted by: profitsbeard at February 25, 2008 9:37 PM

Champ

I think the statement speaks for itself -- also, someone ought to ask if he ever met with Farrahkan and ask what he thinks of him and his statements.

Also, three things that worldnetdaily.com brought up about Obama over the last couple of weeks:

1. George Soros of Open Society fame is funding Obama

2. George Soros is and has been funding McCain for several years

(Soros has a very specific agenda -- what is Obama's position regarding Soros? )

3. Several people seem to be making Obama a diety of sorts and there seems to be a "cult" emerging -- is Oprah who is also funding Obama -- using her New Age leanings sculp Obama into a god figure? Some claim he IS Christ and has returned.

Perhaps Obama is not directly responsible for these things -- but clearly his handlers and money backers are -- where does he stand on these issues I wonder?

And he refuses to wear the American flag on his lapel -- because why???

I have my doubts....

Posted by: witness at February 25, 2008 9:46 PM

What a bunch of Chicken Littles in this forum.
Let me see, Obama is an Islamic, Marxist, Black-supremacist threat to the United States of America. You guys need to get out more…as in out of the U.S.
I’ve spent a good bit of time out of the US, in the defense of the US, and part of that was living embedded in the culture of and speaking the language of my host nation (exchange officer assignment). I think Obama’s upbringing during early childhood in Indonesia is a positive thing. His Kenyan roots are a positive thing.
Of all the candidates, Obama probably has the best understanding of Islam, and of the world. I don’t think that makes him the one most likely to be soft on terrorism. I do think it makes him the most likely to support effective information campaigns, something our current strategy is sorely lacking.
Will he bomb Iran? Probably not, so if that’s something you think is necessary, better vote for Hillary, because she is the only one stupid enough to do that.
I’m a white republican, and Obama is the closest thing to Ronald Reagan I’ve seen in some time...and I'll be happy if either Obama or McCain are elected.
The sky isn’t falling.

Posted by: WC at February 25, 2008 9:53 PM

witness - That TUCC website is much tamer than it used to be!

Posted by: Borg at February 25, 2008 9:58 PM

If it were discovered that McCain, or, what the hell, Hillary; if it were discovered that either one of them belonged to a church with a website and a Mission Statement that included a statement like the one representing Obama's church, then don't you think that the media would be all over it? Don't you think that there would be a public outcry? Of course there would be. They would tear McCain or Hillary apart over a similar statement; so why is Obama practically getting away with this?!

Read this segment from Obama's churches Mission Statement again:

"Trinity United Church of Christ has been called by God to be a congregation that is not ashamed of the gospel of Jesus Christ and that does not apologize for its African roots!"

OK - so focus on the "African roots" part - because this is key!

Now imagine a similar statement being made by McCain's or Hillary's church:

"___________Church of Christ has been called by God to be a congregation that is not ashamed of the gospel of Jesus Christ and that does not apologize for its White/European roots!"

African Roots seems to be an acceptable remark, but would White/European Roots be treated with the same acceptance? I highly doubt it. Does anyone else agree with me? Disagree with me? Come on people, this is outrageous!

The fact that there isn't more media attention on this important detail surrounding Obama really surprises me - any yet - it doesn't surprise me. Why? Either the media has a liberal bias, or we have come to accept statements like this as OK and normal. Since when should it be OK? Sorry, I'm just so pissed at this one.

Posted by: champ at February 25, 2008 10:06 PM

Borg- You said Obama would be "the only president not to have spent his entire life in the US.." You forgot that McCain was born in Panama.

I give Obama a pass on the dressed photo. Plenty of presidents and VIPs have worn the ooga-booga garb over the years while in foreign lands.

The McCain-Obama debates are going to be classics. I don't see how Big Mac can overcome the visuals. But maybe the Nervous White Male vote will put him over the top.

Posted by: Bingo at February 25, 2008 10:23 PM

The Panama Canal Zone was under US control at that time.

Posted by: Borg at February 25, 2008 10:38 PM

TELL IT, WC, TELL IT!

YOU THE MAN!

Posted by: SmartGrowthAdvocate at February 25, 2008 10:41 PM

Witness -

Yeah, I know that that statement speaks for itself, I was just curious if perhaps you found it as outrageous as I did.

But hey, not as outrageous as those who seem to claim that Obama is Christ returned. That's a good one, alright!

I never watch Oprah, so I had no idea that she subscribed to any New Age BS. Well - betweem she and Obama - all I can say is: God help us!

Posted by: champ at February 25, 2008 10:47 PM

I would consider a US Airbase the same as the US, much like an Embassy. Especially since the personnel are loyal US citizens. (Or they used to be at least until Sgt Hasan Akbar types came along.)

Posted by: Borg at February 25, 2008 10:48 PM

I’m a white republican, and Obama is the closest thing to Ronald Reagan I’ve seen in some time.
What is that rolling sound?

Posted by: interestinconundrum at February 25, 2008 10:53 PM

Barack is a scary unknown. He is a great speaker, not a Ronald Reagen, but knows how to speak political.

What little he has said is all couched in the idea that we are wrong and our way of life is wrong. He does not come out and say it directly but says enough for people to connect the dots if they are already convinced of the philosophy. He also phrases things in almost a spiritual or religious tone. Or has spin doctors expand on these themes.

This country is divided right down the middle IMO. He represents one half of the country. The election is still months away a lot can and will happen between now and then. Hopefully more people will wakeup to the real threat (and it isn't be overweight).

He probably is not a muslim and as far as I can tell he is not a Christian. The church he is affiliated with has black pride and race stamped all over it. Its agenda is to correct the wrongs of slavery. This is a dead house but a foolish part of the population think it still an issue. The ones (this church included) leading this issue are seeking more power and money for their own gain. By contrast, Jesus helped the oppressed, he did not use them to create a base to correct the wrongs of the world, he died for the wrongs. Chicago's Trinity United Church of Christ, uses the correct God words but like many others does not have Christ as the head of the church. Instead Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. is the head man.

All in all, if half of his unknowns are what have been mentioned here, Islam will be getting a free ticket for the next four years.

Posted by: Im.mad.as.HELL! at February 25, 2008 10:54 PM

"Trinity United Church of Christ has been called by God to be a congregation that is not ashamed of the gospel of Jesus Christ and that does not apologize for its African roots!"

I like all of that mission statement. If I was Obama I wouldn't run away from that. The early Church made many big decisions in Africa, and Augustine of Hippo, an african, was a big player. The canon for the church was finalized at a council in North Africa. The Church has African roots, and I'm also proud of those roots. It would be great to make the muslims of North Africa aware and proud of their Christian African roots.

Posted by: WC at February 25, 2008 10:56 PM

Erm? I thought all US Presidential candidates (and in fact, anyone in the chain of succession) had to be US-born citizens. Would that not mean that McCain was disqualified from running, unless Panama was US territory at the time (which it was, I'm sure)?

Anyways, it's impossible to spend your whole life in the USA. I mean, it's not impossible, but McCain was in Vietnam for a while, you know. Not his choice, exactly, but still. Unless you mean formative years. Then yeah, OK.

And anyways, Robert is a great guy. If he decides to be curt on his own blog, so what? I *still* like the Indonesian translation of his book title. Even if he had nothing to do with it. It still cracks me up every time.

Posted by: gkong3 at February 25, 2008 11:04 PM

Here's the news from CTV.ca:

U.S. Democratic rivals Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton are trading barbs over a photo of Obama dressed in traditional local garments during a visit to Kenya in 2006.

The Associated Press photo, which is circulating on the Internet, shows Obama wearing a white turban and a wraparound white robe. The garments were given to him by elders in Wajir, in northeastern Kenya.

Obama, whose late father was Kenyan, visited the country in 2006.

The gossip and news website the Drudge Report posted the photograph Monday, claiming it was being circulated by "Clinton staffers."

Drudge also cited an email from an unidentified campaign aide but did not include evidence of the correspondence.

Posted by: Comment at February 25, 2008 11:18 PM

I note that you didn't show an recent pictures of Bush with the Arabs rulers. I have no idea of what Obama would do or how he feels about Muslim terrorists but the Republicanas have done little except talk to step the spread of Saudi paid for mosques in this country.
Posted by: Jerry M

Boy you're naive, and typical of Obama supporters. The native garb he's wearing is his heritage, whereas Bush or Coolidge dressing up is strictly PR for the country or organization they're visiting. Obama supporters are not able to see or realize the consequences of Obama's actions if he's elected. He will pull troops out of Iraq immediately and the entire region will explode causing our gas prices to triple, which in turn will cause our products to go way up. His foreign policy adviser was also Jimmy Carter's adviser and we all know how that failed miserably, causing him to go down as one of the worst presidents in US history. Besides that his radical minister is a supporter of Louis Farrakahn. He and his wife are anti-American white hating racists. Knowing that he is the most liberal Senator, he will probably bring back partial birth abortion and weaken our laws which will aid Islamic terrorists to operate in our country more freely. He has done nothing for this country and isn't even remotely qualified for the highest job. His wife will be a laughingstock in Europe because she has no class or sophistication. The only people abroad who will embrace him will be Africans and Arabs. If he is elected there will be complete anarchy in the US and anyone who supports him is not very bright.

I predict Obama will be elected, get assassinated, come back to life and proclaim himself to be the Messiah.

Posted by: Bonniea at February 25, 2008 11:44 PM

I’m a white republican, and Obama is the closest thing to Ronald Reagan I’ve seen in some time...and I'll be happy if either Obama or McCain are elected.
The sky isn’t falling.

Posted by: WC at February 25, 2008 9:53 PM

How can you say that?!!! Ronald Reagan was not a Marxist and strongly supported capitalism, smaller government, individual responsiblity, and equal opportunity for all Americans to achieve fame, fortune, or whatever they aspired to achieve. Obama has the most liberal voting record in the U.S. Sentate. He is backed by every far-left organization in America and abroad, including the U.S. Communist Party. He is a SOCIALIST who believes in big government, tax increases, massive entitlement programs, open borders, abortion on demand, more U.N. control of America, and the pathetic list goes on and on! He has accomplished absolutely nothing during his short stint in the Senate except to promote the far left agenda, including several U.N. initiatives aimed at sucking more money out of the United States for U.N. global poverty projects or millenium goals---typical U.N.corruption and thievery at the expense of American taxpayers.

Compare this communist soothsayer and wannabe messiah to Hillary Clinton; they are ideological soul mates who want to transform this country into a replicate of socialist Europe---the ultimate nanny state. George Bush has been a huge disappointment and I utterly loathe John McCain but I doubt if America would survive four years of Clinton or Obama. Obama is a mesmerizing speaker, but so was Bill Clinton. At least Bill Clinton said something when he spoke; Obama does not. Since I am nauseated by left-wing doublespeak, I haven't been captivated by Obama's charm and charisma. He has some very disturbing affiliations with certain islamic organizations and individuals, as well as with communist and socialist groups. I think his idea of a perfect America is a Marxist state.

Posted by: Susanp at February 25, 2008 11:56 PM

Susanp,
One of Ronald Reagan's greatest strengths was an ability to stay positive and humorous. He was able to get huge numbers of Democrats to vote for him because of that. He liked to have Tip O'Niell over for the evening after they both had gone at it with each other all day. He was a true uniter.
I don't feel the "Louis Farrakhan angry black man" vibes from Obama. I don't feel "I'm indebted to the Republican establishment" vibes coming from McCain. I think both of them will have the ability to stay positive and humorous, although McCain can sometimes be a bit too flippant for my taste.
Obama isn't a Marxist. He is actually right of Hillary (which the Democrats let him get away with because he's black). Remember when Hillary and Bill were chastising him for talking respectfully about Ronald Reagan? Obama probably planned that, and Bill and Hillary jumped at the bait.
Obama has an ability to stand up to the established powers (in this case the Clinton machine) and succeed.
My original post above (the Christianity Today Obama interview quote way up above) proves to me that Obama is not a muslim. My reading of his website proves to me that he is not a Marxist.

Sorry to hear that none of the candidates in this race measure up to your standards.

Bonniea wrote:
"He will pull troops out of Iraq immediately and the entire region will explode causing our gas prices to triple, which in turn will cause our products to go way up...The only people abroad who will embrace him will be Africans and Arabs. If he is elected there will be complete anarchy in the US and anyone who supports him is not very bright."
Bonniea, that is truly great satire. I wish I could write that well! (Until that last sentence, you almost had me believing you were serious!) Great job!

Posted by: WC at February 26, 2008 12:30 AM

I don't really care what happens to Iraq after we leave.

Posted by: Bingo at February 26, 2008 12:44 AM

CW: "Obama isn't a Marxist. He is actually right of Hillary..."

Actually, Barak Obama has the most Liberal voting record of any member of Congress. He may not be a Marxist, but he is very, very Left of Center and only the naive could believe that from his Left-wing perch, he could unite our country.

http://nj.nationaljournal.com/voteratings/

Posted by: Cornelius at February 26, 2008 1:27 AM

Yes, the two top Dem. nominees are huge libs, and either one of them will unite us in defeat as they tax us to death while deciding who "deserves" our money while promoting class warfare.(Marxism for the uninitiated)
McCain is not conservative and does not stand for the Constitution.
I don't care about Baraks' costume, it's the socialism he represents that cannot be allowed to run roughshod over our form of limited government.
By the way, how do we get the federal government to honor the Constitution and restore our freedoms and what about this mythical limited government?
How do we rip ourselves from the abundant clutching teats of federal largesse?
We elect Wayne Root...Libertarian for president.
Then we elect a whole bunch more Constitutionalists until we get it right...limited government and maximum individual liberty.
Ahhhhhhhhh...too easy...never work...hrmpfh...

Posted by: HawkWatcher at February 26, 2008 7:10 AM

He is also the first to admit to using cocaine.

If you want to split hairs George Washington didn't live in the US for his early life, since there was no US at the time. But I think you know what I mean. And Army service doesn't count as 'residing' in another country either. You are still a US citizen with a legal US address working for your country. Especially Vietnam, which had a draft and WWII which had a draft, and Korea, where the soldiers couldn't wait to get home and kiss the ground of their country.

He reminds me more of ex-DC mayor Marion Barry than Ronnie. At least Ronnie could tell a good joke. And wasn't a socialist.

Posted by: Borg at February 26, 2008 7:12 AM

I don't feel the "Louis Farrakhan angry black man" vibes from Obama.

Yep, it's all about feelings.
Please folks use your brain before you vote.
A man who wants to do something very badly can wear many hats as we see in the picture.

Posted by: interestinconundrum at February 26, 2008 8:55 AM

WC,

Ha ha ha, you never know.....check this out:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=57090

People around the world are proclaiming him to be the Messiah, King of Kings, Prince of Peace. In a speech he says a light will shine down on people and tell them to vote for him. I've never heard anything like this in a presidential race ever. If he's the Messiah, then I'm the Queen of England.

Cordially,
Bonnie

Posted by: Bonniea at February 26, 2008 8:55 AM

I suggest we elect Robert Spencer for President, he would sort things out !

Posted by: ericthekuffar at February 26, 2008 9:01 AM

Obama stikes back.
http://www.thenoseonyourface.com/2008/02/25/fighting-back-obama-staffers-leak-old-clinton-image-that-reveals-senator-is-a-woman/

Posted by: interestinconundrum at February 26, 2008 9:03 AM

ericthekuffar:

If nominated, I will not run. If elected, I will not serve.

(That, like the above statement to which Cantor -- "Hi, Remote!" -- took umbrage, is a quote also.)

Cordially
Robert Spencer

Posted by: jihadwatch at February 26, 2008 9:05 AM

Compare this communist soothsayer and wannabe messiah to Hillary Clinton; they are ideological soul mates who want to transform this country into a replicate of socialist Europe---the ultimate nanny state. George Bush has been a huge disappointment and I utterly loathe John McCain but I doubt if America would survive four years of Clinton or Obama. Obama is a mesmerizing speaker, but so was Bill Clinton. At least Bill Clinton said something when he spoke; Obama does not. Since I am nauseated by left-wing doublespeak, I haven't been captivated by Obama's charm and charisma. He has some very disturbing affiliations with certain islamic organizations and individuals, as well as with communist and socialist groups. I think his idea of a perfect America is a Marxist state.
Posted by: Susanp

I totally agree and share the same viewpoints. In fact, I am nauseated just by looking at him and his wife. They are too trashy for my taste, Obama that is.

Posted by: Bonniea at February 26, 2008 9:06 AM

Hmmm
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=57341

Posted by: interestinconundrum at February 26, 2008 10:02 AM

WC

If you are not one of those swooning..cult of personality..Obama groupies, you should be able to document the reasons for your confidence in him. Something more than, " he probably has a better understanding of Islam." So he has traveled a little and that experience makes him a better candidate? What about McCains travels to southeast asia and his long layover in Hanoi? I have not been able to find anything in Obama's background that would cause me to have any confidence in his ability to lead this country in a direction that ensures our survival.
I don't think it is too much to ask...that you educate us about Obama's leadership qualities. I am not at all confident that you can do that..sorry.

Posted by: pismopal at February 26, 2008 10:56 AM

Good point, pismopal!

IMO, the problem that most Obama fans face is that Obama is very vague on what he means by "CHANGE". One cannot rely on his television ads or even the debates to get 'real' clarity to that slogan he literally crams down our throats. Too much mystery surrounds the man, which is the last thing the American people need right now: More Mystery and Intrigue!

I would rather have a rough-around-the-edges leader in the Oval Office who is an open book, than a man-of-mystery Any Day!

Posted by: champ at February 26, 2008 2:16 PM

Susanp,

Excellent description of this would-be Messiah. Only his speechifying doesn't mesmerize me. He is a loud-mouth preacher-like orator "who struts upon the stage . . . full of sound and fury, signifying nothing."

The Clinton woman, in spite of all her antics--trying to appear soft, cuddly, and feminine at times--is a mean person, unforgiving, hard, determined to break the nation to comply with her will.

McCain was my less-than-last choice on the Republican roster. There were--there must have been--some shenanigans--what with Giuliani conveniently dropping out, exactly at the right time to let McCain sprint ahead of Romney. But no matter, there is not much that can be done on that side (the people who gave us George W. Bush--who was still better than John Kerry).

The Obama man is a a perfect (albeit hidden) example of the point where Marxism meets Islam. Too many protest "Oh, but he is not a Muslim!"--whether he is or not, technically, he is a fellow-traveller on the train from Mecca.

Bonniea,

Yes, the Obama couple are nauseating. He reeks of ambition--a child of a drop-out child of the 60s who yearned after "exotic" men--determined (he) to rise to a position of power.

The Obama woman--not proud of this country until her political and racial choice is in reach of the presidency--is the product of the country that afforded her every opportunity for education and professional positions. She, as well as the Obama man, does not have the appearance of wanting to reach out to any one except the adulators of this would-be Messiah. She reeks of bottled-up resentment and anger--because the country is not yet run by an African-American power elite.

Afrocentricity is not a desirable quality in a President of the United States. Africa is not an example to be emulated. It never was. It appears to be unable to climb out of the savagery that is its prime heritage. Do we want a President who looks towards Africa as an example to be followed?

Posted by: unicorns62000 at February 26, 2008 2:48 PM

Pismopal,
Fair enough. I'm not a die hard Obama fan, although I do find it entertaining how he takes the fight to Hillary, and has the ability to keep her off balance and reacting. He is completely inside her "OODA Loop" (Observe-Orient-Decide-Act). She is in total reaction to his moves.
That alone is a strong accomplishment. The Clinton machine is not easily thwarted, and may still pull this out. But the ability to generate support from in and outside the black community, to organize, pull in cash, and parry and thrust with Hillary and Bill, that is no light matter.
I said earlier that Obama was the closest thing to Ronald Reagan that I've seen in some time, and here is the crux of the matter: Obama has an ability to create a vision that people can act on. He is a true leader in that regard, much as Ronald Reagan was. I would rather see Reagan's economic ideas instead of Obama's, but I'm more comfortable with Obama's views on religion:

http://www.barackobama.com/2006/06/28/call_to_renewal_keynote_address.php

Obama Qoute: "And although government will play a crucial role in bringing about the changes we need, more money and programs alone will not get us where we need to go. Each of us, in our own lives, will have to accept responsibility - for instilling an ethic of achievement in our children, for adapting to a more competitive economy, for strengthening our communities, and sharing some measure of sacrifice. So let us begin. Let us begin this hard work together. Let us transform this nation.” - Presidential Announcement Speech

He presents a much tougher challenge to the Republicans (I am a pro-life Republican, by the way) than Hillary. Competition is good for America.
I am not thrilled with Obama's stance on abortion, but after reading his religion speech, I can acknowledge his arguments, disagree with them, and try to couch my arguments in universal language (in this case by me attempting to show that the unborn child is a person according to the constitional definition of a person, and equally deserving of the rights accorded to born persons).
McCain is a hero. He is also a leader, but not in the same way as Obama. If McCain is elected, every democrat will still bitch and moan about how they aren't treated fairly, that the system is unfair, etc. If Obama is elected, and democrats cry about how unfair the US is to blacks (and gays, women, immigrants, etc.), it will be easy to point to a freely elected black president and say "try again with that argument, bubba". If Obama is elected, I think it will push folks to greater personal responsibility, which is in his statement, and which is something I hope he is able to carry out.
As Obama said: "Each of us, in our own lives, will have to accept responsibility - for instilling an ethic of achievement in our children, for adapting to a more competitive economy, for strengthening our communities, and sharing some measure of sacrifice. So let us begin." That is why I support him over Hillary, and if McCain can't generate a vision of where he wants the US to go, I'll support Obama in the general election also.
I probably didn't answer your question satisfactorily, so read up on McCain's site, Hillary's site, and Obama's site (and Huckabee's, if you think he still has a chance), and decide which one you want to be your president...one of them will certainly be, and they deserve our prayers and support.
Cheers,

Posted by: WC at February 26, 2008 2:56 PM

WC, I would suggest that you do some serious research on Mr. Obama. I think you'll be surprised at what you discover. Obama is a Marxist, just like Hillary. That is a fact, like it or not. Despite his law degrees, the United States Constitution seems to be a profound mystery to him. Why does he belong to a church with 6000 angry, hostile, white-hating members, staffed by clergy with similar sentiments?

Obama is slick; remember slick Willie? They use different techniques but the result is the same. We have yet to see the "real" Obama but he's just an average guy, nothing special, not particularly brilliant, and his wife is a real bitch which tells me plenty about him. He plans to disarm America; were you aware of that? He has some magnificent plans for us; I would suggest that you learn what they are before you compare him to Ronald Reagan. Quite frankly, his plans terrify me.

Posted by: Susanp at February 26, 2008 3:25 PM

Here is one reason Obama is worse than Clinton:
His comfort level associating with and benefiting with the following two people of Middle Eastern background and involvement in corruption is a starter: Mr. Nadhmi Auchi, and Antoin "Tony" Rezko. See the attached Timesonline article about this association:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3433485.ece

My other concern is Obama's close family relationship to Kenyan politician Raili Odinga, who secretly sought the backing of Muslims in Kenya by promising in writing a pre-election agreement that would formally recognize Sharia law for the Muslims in the country. Obama was in Kenya prior to the election, acting as a supporter. Although it is hard to know what Obama knew and when he knew it, it is hard to believe that his elevation to the highest office in the U.S. would not help the continuing efforts of Odinga to gain power in Kenya through power-sharing negotiations overseen by the U.N. coupled with civil disturbances instigated by Odinga's supporters, including the burning of Christians in their churches in Kenya.

By the way, the difference between Obama's dress-up photo and Coolidges, is that Coolidge was pandering to voters and American citizens, while Obama was just plain trying on a role that has nothing to do with Americanism or Western values.

Posted by: Karl2 at February 26, 2008 4:04 PM

Susanp,
John the Baptist and Jesus were Marxist, according to the way you seem to be using the label. It doesn't fit Hillary or Obama.

You would do better to call them socialist, which pretty much fits the whole democratic party (the Republicans are socialist only with respect to corporations, not individuals -- except when that individual owns the corporation).

Was Mohammed Marxist? Capitalist? I don't think he was either.

Posted by: WC at February 26, 2008 4:18 PM

"Responding to criticism by Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen, Barack Obama declared his strong opposition to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan".
"I decry racism and anti-Semitism in every form and strongly condemn the anti-Semitic statements made by Minister Farrakhan.
Obama also went on to condemn his Church's award to Farrakhan and his minister's tight relationship with him."

He should be called on this, He was married at this "church", and has been a member for YEARS.Says he is a close friend to this "minister" But now, he is finally speaking out. What took so long? His wife is also a regular member, and what she says fits, fits with this church in Chicago.

His "leader" of that church is a real issue, and he, Obama knows it. So now, after nearly 20 years, has found a problem.

Words , are just words.

See you next Sunday Obama.

Posted by: Islofob IS-1 at February 26, 2008 4:45 PM

Both Hillary and Obama rate as “Hard-Core Liberals” at on the issues.org

I think it was at LGF a few weeks ago a thread about Obama wanting a conference-call type of thing with the terrorist to resolve our differences.

Yeah, that will work, I can see it now, calling Osama Bin Laden you have an conference call on line 1 with the Muslim Brother hood and the President of the US.

You should has seen his church manifesto a year or so ago, it was all about Africa and nothing but Africa, they have really cleaned it up a bit although they still don’t say much about Christ or what they believe, except Africa.

Posted by: BurgerBoy at February 26, 2008 4:55 PM

time to flush the water closet

Posted by: unicorns62000 at February 26, 2008 5:21 PM

He will disarm us.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dl32Y7wDVDs

Posted by: interestinconundrum at February 26, 2008 6:24 PM

He's still a socialist - a fact that I find infinitely more objectionble than him donning some silly tribal garb in Somalia.

Posted by: Lepanto at February 26, 2008 10:43 PM

interestinconundrum- so he wants to cut spending the same way Bill Clinton did, by not spending on military weapons. That should make the Europeans feel safer since they count on US defense. And the US also, since it is already overtaxed on it's weapons that are being used up in the desert and need replacing.

That's what you get when you have someone who never served.

The Clinton presidency was the first time two lawyers were in the white house. Obama will be the second time for two lawyers.

Posted by: Borg at February 27, 2008 12:02 AM

Is it only me or does it look as if Oprahbama is wearing a Danish Flag across his torso?

Damn.. I recall the leftists gleefully cutting jokes about the "homophobe" Giuliani doing that cabaret skit in hose and heels.. I wonder if any of them will comment on the effeminacy of Oprahbama in his little sash..

Posted by: Allah Schmallah at February 27, 2008 12:12 AM