| FrontPageMag.com | Articles By Robert Spencer | Articles By Hugh Fitzgerald | Books | Islam 101 | Qur'an Blog | Robert Spencer Bio |  |
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Don't murder just one
Plan for genocide. Note also: he says that 50-60 people died in the Holocaust. Al-Rashudi hopes it will be more next time.
"Saudi Scholar Dr. Walid Al-Rashudi: 50-60 People Perished in Jewish Holocaust. The Killing of All the Jews Will Not Be Satisfactory Compensation for the "Real Holocaust" in Gaza," from MEMRITV (thanks to Barbara):
Following are excerpts from a speech delivered by Dr. Walid Al-Rashudi, head of the Department of Islamic Studies at King Saud University, Saudi Arabia, which aired on Al-Aqsa TV on February 29, 2008.Walid Al-Rashudi: One of the important things that we must tell people is that what is going on in Palestine today is a real holocaust. This is the real holocaust. A holocaust is not the burning of 50-60 Jews in Germany or Switzerland, but the Jews continue to call it the Holocaust. In case you don't know, let me tell you that more than 90% of the Muslims in the world do not know that the Jews receive reparations from Germany and Switzerland for the so-called Holocaust affair. We believe that there was indeed a holocaust, but how many died? 50-60 people? Afterwards, they used it to blackmail these two countries.
So what are we supposed to say in the face of the Gaza holocaust? What compensation will satisfy us? By Allah, we will not be satisfied even if all the Jews are killed.
Posted by Robert at March 13, 2008 1:09 PM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
|
But I thought if we said nothing when they came for the Jews, we would be safe!
Posted by: Karl2![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.jihadwatch.org/nav-commenters.gif)
at March 13, 2008 1:29 PM
Cheney says, "We freed 50,000,000 people" in Iraq and Afghanistan. Ergo: Saudi Arabia must already be free, and Wahabi clerics are instruments of "freedom."
Posted by: supercargo at March 13, 2008 1:37 PM
Funny you should mention that. Too many think that if they go after the Jews we will be safe. Again, no one reads the koran - the muslims want ALL of EVERYTHING for their moon god, allah. The West is currently going through different phases of jihad and it is helped along by our own stupid ones in charge - Universities, politicians, the media, even businesses.
Posted by: R_not at March 13, 2008 1:38 PM
Only 50 to 60 Jews killed, huh? Did they recycle those "few" corpses in dramatic low tech repeater-shots for the MASSIVE piles of human remains filmed before the advent of CGI?
What a moron. Yes, I called him a moron!
But in his defense, he probably can't even count past 50 or 60 ...
Posted by: Lori B. at March 13, 2008 1:41 PM
Isnt anyone in the West lisrening? Its not like our enemy is shy in saying what they mean.
Posted by: Elric66 at March 13, 2008 1:42 PM
Do you ever get the feeling muslims will never be satisfied, period?
Posted by: ImNoDhimmi at March 13, 2008 1:44 PM
When they start sagely wagging that finger you know some pure 100% hi-octane horse-shit is about to come at you. WOW! IS that thing HUMAN???
Posted by: poetcomic1 at March 13, 2008 1:54 PM
I wasn't being fair. He'd look kind of cute on my lawn.
Posted by: poetcomic1 at March 13, 2008 1:56 PM
The Brits finally discover the muslim plague. Even al-guardian is on the defensive.
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/ruqayyah_collector/2008/03/white_lies.html
Posted by: supercargo at March 13, 2008 2:00 PM
Do you ever get the feeling muslims will never be satisfied, period?
Posted by: ImNoDhimmi at March 13, 2008 1:44 PM
Only every waking minute of every day.
Posted by: awake at March 13, 2008 2:03 PM
Meanwhile, now there are 2 carpet humpers in the US Congress. Bush is right: Islam is peace and muslims seek only free exercise of their faith.
Posted by: supercargo at March 13, 2008 2:05 PM
Neanderthal or Cro-Magnon? I can't decide.
Posted by: Hugh at March 13, 2008 2:05 PM
This quote is appropiate for this thread.
"Freedom of speech should reach the point of attacking or showing disrespect for others point of views," said Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal in one of many speech which condemned "defamation" of Islam."
Irony is not in the Islamic dictionary.
at March 13, 2008 2:10 PM
Hugh: They are neither; those people would be an improvement upon the muslims.
Muslims are simply the devils agents, having heard and rejected the Truth, they have fabricated their own "religion" devoid of any Godliness whatsoever. They are (one billion) anti-Christs.
They are the false prophets referred to in 2 Peter, ".....like brute beasts made to be destroyed....."
Posted by: n.a. palm at March 13, 2008 2:17 PM
"By Allah, we will not be satisfied even if all the Jews are killed"
....and turn Mother Earth into Cockroach Planet?
Not gonna happen!
Islam be gone!
Posted by: champ at March 13, 2008 2:21 PM
Elric, I think that they hear what they want to hear. They hear the sound of saudi money in their pockets. The others who just blindly accept the taqiyya/kithman of the 'moderate' muslims see only coy, little muslimettes and just can't fathom that the jihadist follows them, as they have done in every single country muslims have migrated to.
And of course, don't forget that our schools don't teach history anymore - at least a truthful history - so that our children and our young adults can learn from history so as not to repeat the mistakes. Now they have 2 weeks of learning and dressing and behaving as muslims, they learn the 5 tenets, and a totally wrong version of what mohammed was and did, and don't forget - they blame the Christians for all what happened.
And no ACLU to wail that the separation of church and state is not happening! hhhmmm, maybe the ACLU knows that islam is not a religion at all and only a poses as a religion and that is why they are allowing the teaching of it in our schools.
Posted by: R_not at March 13, 2008 2:22 PM
OMG! - maybe we do come from apes - hard to argue against photographic proof.
Posted by: champ at March 13, 2008 2:23 PM
He'd look kind of cute on my lawn.
Posted by: poetcomic1
Yeah ... right next to the creepy Argentinian gnome:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,336750,00.html
Posted by: Lori B. at March 13, 2008 2:29 PM
"Neanderthal or Cro-Magnon? I can't decide."
Hugh -
I think the position is a little lower on the evolution ladder.
Tanstaafl
Posted by: tanstaafl at March 13, 2008 2:30 PM
r not,
I think I am just living in an episode of the Twighlight Zone. Nothing makes sense. Good is evil, up is down, and black is white.
Posted by: Elric66 at March 13, 2008 2:32 PM
Yet another racist bigot on arab tv.
I am glad all this is being recorded as it is a perfect testement to what they really are.
at March 13, 2008 2:32 PM
This guy would have more credibility if he wasn't wearing that Pizza Hut table cloth on his head.
at March 13, 2008 2:32 PM
Even if and when they do conqueor the entire world, they still won't be peaceful. Just look within that moral paradise of 'Dar al Islam'. Murder, rape, 'honor killing', extreme violence, oppression of the poor, corruption, totalitarian politics, discrimination of minorities within Islam itself, etc. etc. not to mention their numerous wars between their own nations! The only wealth they have is due to the natural resources the kuffars extract from their lands, and then pay for. Their nations that are poor in resources; are piss poor! What great science, literature, culture and art they add to the world, such advancements to mankind! Anyone who tolerates this 'religion' is stupid, and anyone who defends it is either ignorant or just plain evil. Even if you count their so called 'golden age' of which they constantly exagerate and point to, the Jews alone have easily outdone them at least 10 to 1 . Unfortunatly for us these beasts are probrably going to win, but I for one will never submit to their satanic god.
Posted by: CJK at March 13, 2008 2:34 PM
CJK.
You think these people are going to win?
They will with people like you.
They will never win, never, never, never.
at March 13, 2008 2:47 PM
Ken CleanAirSystem,
Unless the West has a radical change in its mindset, they will win. Unless you think we can win the way things are right now.
Posted by: Elric66 at March 13, 2008 2:48 PM
No Ken, listen to Elric. If everyone or if even 30% of us thought like me they wouldn't have a chance. It's because there's not enough people like me that they're going to win. In my opinion people who say they'll never, never, never win with such assurance are part of the problem!
Posted by: CJK at March 13, 2008 3:02 PM
What is it with the finger? It seems that every rabid Islamist strikes the same pose with the right forefinger - this creep, Osama Bin Laden, Adam Gadahn, Ayman al-Zawahiri, Tube bomber Mohammad Sidique Khan. Is it just ordinary deranged ranting, or does it have some Islamic significance?
Posted by: Matamoros at March 13, 2008 3:04 PM
The result of over 1000 years of inbreeding and Islamic indoctrination.
Posted by: sheik yer'mami at March 13, 2008 3:12 PM
CJK,
I think Ken's problem is twofold. He underestimates the desire and determination of Islam and he overestimate's the West's willingness to fight to win. I think we can win, we just cant win the way things stand right now. We need people like Geert Wilder in leadership positions all over the West.
Posted by: Elric66 at March 13, 2008 3:18 PM
He'd look kind of cute on my lawn.
posted above
I think he would look better under my lawn.
Posted by: pismopal at March 13, 2008 3:27 PM
Can someone tell me again: why is Islam able to be legally practiced in the United States???
Posted by: pythagoras at March 13, 2008 3:27 PM
pythagoras,
You got me. Its incompatible with democracy. My only guess is the US has a deathwish.
Posted by: Elric66 at March 13, 2008 3:29 PM
"Universities,politicians,the media,even businesses." -R_not
Let's not forget that great apologist and enabler which is hungry for "interfaith" dialogue and seeks to usher in a new era of unity and "cultural" understanding- the Christian left. Regrettably,these rascals don't make near enough headlines,as those on the "other" side of the aisle/pew who are portrayed by the media as theocratic state wishing,backward inbreds. Any wonder which poses a greater threat toward Western civilization?
"What are we supposed to say in the face of the Gaza holocaust?" -"Dr" Al-Rashudi
Say that it is the only holocaust/genocide to have ever resulted in a greater population density.
OT-
France's last World War I veteran dies at age 110.
Sarkozy statement: "It is to him and his generation that we own in part the peaceful and pacified Europe of today. It is up to us to be worthy of that."
You really cannot script this stuff.
at March 13, 2008 3:43 PM
memo to elric66: A lot of things are incompatible with democracy and exist anyway in America (bona fide Communist political pressure groups like 'Code Pink' for one)--and we manage to survive with them here as they do not pose much of a threat.
The REAL trouble here is that Islam calls for FIRST DEGREE MURDER and GENOCIDE against "unbelievers" and is an actual, certifiable menace to the life and limb of virtually every living human being in our nation (partly because it hides its homicidal tendencies behind a veil of religious propaganda). Even using nuclear weapons would not be out of line with the Kuran's teachings--and there's have plenty of Muslims worldwide attempting to deploy these here in America!!!
After all this there's still of course the reality that Islam mandates Muslims subvert non-Islamic goverments and populations and then subjugate these with shari'a'at.
Posted by: pythagoras at March 13, 2008 3:44 PM
There's no doubt that we can win, I just don't think we're going to. Our chance for victory is rapidly fading away. The E.M.P. from just one well placed nuclear explosion could and probrably would send us back to the late 19th. century. We debate on whether to keep less than 200 thousand troops - 200 thousand only - in Iraq while they are researching 'balls out' on how to destroy us! We're dead asleep, I'm afraid we're gonna wake up too late to a BOOM! The largest arm of our defense establishment is not the 5th. armoured, no it's not the 5th. airforce either nor the 5th. fleet no, it's the 5th. column. I love this country and I'm not a defeatist, but I have to force myself to be realistic. It really is like a 'Jihad' episode in Twilight Zone.
Posted by: CJK at March 13, 2008 3:44 PM
CJK,
5th collumn is right. Its hard to win a war when your second front in inside your house. The irony is these 5th collumnists have more to lose to Islam than we do.
Posted by: Elric66 at March 13, 2008 3:48 PM
What's that about a Religion of Peace® ?
Posted by: interestinconundrum at March 13, 2008 4:01 PM
Saudi Scholar Dr. Walid Al-Rashudi
The word expert was debased a long time ago. Now, "scholar" means absolutely nothing.
Posted by: Pelayo at March 13, 2008 4:05 PM
Hey you guys, don't forget Bill Clinton's most famous finger wagging scene: "I did not have . . . "
Posted by: Pelayo at March 13, 2008 4:09 PM
Hugh, they are neither. Both groups were interested in survival. Sure they would put their lives on the line, going against a wooly mammoth or saber toothed tiger with stone tipped spears is no picnic, but it was for reasons of survial of the clan. It's a long way from subsistance hunting to flying planes into buildings. The jihadist defy comparison to any other life form.
Posted by: Balrog at March 13, 2008 4:09 PM
Speaking of experts, Fox News (I think) has a body language "expert" on every once and a while. I wonder how body language mystics, uh, experts interpret the wagging finger.
Posted by: Pelayo at March 13, 2008 4:16 PM
Speaking of experts, Fox News (I think) has a body language "expert" on every once and a while. I wonder how body language mystics, uh, experts interpret the wagging finger.
Posted by: Pelayo
------------
Dunno what the "experts" interpret but seems to be popular amongst the maniacs
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/914240.stm
Posted by: DeeMack at March 13, 2008 4:44 PM
I guess the definition of and qualifications to be a Muslim Scholar are somewhat out of sync with Western standards. Well.... maybe not considering what passes for scholars at Harvard, Yale, Berkley and a host of other Dhimmi "institutes of higher learning".
Posted by: ARAKIS at March 13, 2008 4:46 PM
The imams and mullahs are demonstrably ignorant. Neutral Switzerland was never part of Nazi-occupied Europe or of the Axis. Aloof, double-dealing, or indifferent, the Swiss didn't perpetrate The Holocaust.
Posted by: John C at March 13, 2008 4:47 PM
yawn. I guess I'll go oil my shootin' irons and, then, take a good, long nap.
Posted by: HotSpur at March 13, 2008 4:50 PM
Sarc on:
How could a Saudi Islamic "SCHOLAR" misunderstand the Qur'an & Islam so much?! Silly misguided misunderstander of Islam. He really needs to read the Qur'an. Some scholar he is!
Posted by: champ at March 13, 2008 4:54 PM
Another demonstration that moderation requires "two to tango" and that, despite what our State Department says, the most realistic definition of the "moderate" approach to dealing with extremists is appeasement.
A moderate approach will never successfully negotiate, nor "moderate" extremists. If it could, the extremists wouldn't be extremists. See definition of moderate and extreme.
Extremists will, in the end, be moderated by those willing to use extreme methods to kill or force moderation upon them. The sequence has been the same throughout history: war, defeat, surrender, and occupation. Then, negotiation is superfluous.
An open, free civilization is an intellectual construct and social agreement that requires cooperation between the great majorities of its participants, not a force of nature that evolves on its own. It requires the self discipline and energy of those involved to survive.
This should not be a hard concept to grasp.
at March 13, 2008 5:01 PM
At the end WW2, German troops caught out of uniform were often summarily shot. During the Battle of the Bulge, German troops disguised themselves with American uniforms. When captured, they were summarily shot. Back in those days, if an enemy was caught in the act of violating the rules of war, it would be his last mistake. I don't see any reason that we (and Israel) shouldn't summarily try and execute anyone caught in the act of using a human shield, other than the fact that many of these terrorists "love death", and thus will gladly die if they can take some infidels with them.
Posted by: Bigfoot at March 13, 2008 5:02 PM
Can someone tell me again: why is Islam able to be legally practiced in the United States???
Posted by: pythagoras
Islam needs to be banned - without a doubt. It's a cult that guises itself as a religion. There's nothing peaceful about it. 10,712 violent terror attacks worldwide since 911 should tell us that.
Posted by: The Cool Ghoul at March 13, 2008 5:16 PM
Why is it that these guys are always photographed waving around a finger? What's up with all the finger wagging?
Seriously, it appears that nothing will ever satisfy those who are in control of that religion. They thrive on constant turmoil.
Posted by: Jebat at March 13, 2008 5:30 PM
Excerpts from the Islamic dictionary:
Imam - propaganda minister
scholar - one who studies the techniques of propaganda and intimidation
believer - one who implements techniques of propaganda and intimidation
martyr - low speed, self guided anti-personnel bomb
mosque - war college & weapons depot
science - the study infidel of vulnerabilities and the knowledge gained by exploiting those weaknesses
income - money gained by intimidating infidels
innocence - being muslim
peace - war
freedom - submission
faith - submission
duty - submission
at March 13, 2008 5:40 PM
CJK and Elric66.
I am sorry but I have to disagree here!
I do not underestimate the situation here.
I have been all over the muslim world, in the middle east and south east asia and I assure you I know what I am talking about.
I underestimate these people?
This is a weak dhimmi attitude from you and shame on you for that.
I spent over 5 years in Saudi Arabia alone ( the birthplace of islam ) and spent most of that time studying the people and their ways.
What I saw has molded me into the person I am today.
Please do not insult my intelligence.
You display a dhimmi attitude for simply suggesting these backward people are "winning" and as such, I do not trust you for this attitude.
at March 13, 2008 5:40 PM
People, I went to "King Saud U" and did not find any "Dr. Walid Al-Rashudi." See for yourself:
http://www.ksu.edu.sa/sites/Colleges/Education/Islamic_Studies/Pages/DepartmentHeads.aspx
Posted by: darcy at March 13, 2008 6:14 PM
Anybody else think he looks like this guy?
Posted by: Concerned Citizen at March 13, 2008 6:15 PM
So, what do you think? No "Dr. Walid Al- Rashudi."
A decoy?
Posted by: darcy at March 13, 2008 6:16 PM
I don't see any reason that we (and Israel) shouldn't summarily try and execute anyone caught in the act of using a human shield, other than the fact that many of these terrorists "love death", and thus will gladly die if they can take some infidels with them.
Posted by: Bigfoot
The fact that they "love death" shouldn't stop us from executing them. Once they're dead, they can't kill anyone else. As long as they're alive, we'd have to feed and clothe them or else release them to kill again. Kill them and be done with it.
The human shields might also be killed but there have been civilian casualties in every war. They cannot all be avoided. We cannot try to fight a perfect war. It has never happened in history and it never will.
Those who are true Muslims should not mind being martyred (as their religion says they would be). If the shields are infidels or unwilling prisoners, you're likely to hear that they would gladly give their own lives if it meant the animals who were using them would die and that others could be spared the same experience. They are the true martyrs.
at March 13, 2008 7:00 PM
I don't need to insult your intelligence, you're doing a stellar job on your own by calling me a dhimmi. If you read what I said you will see I am the antithesis of a dhimmi. People sitting around saying there's no way we can lose, we're gonna beat them etc. , without seriously facing and analizing the very real threat to our existence are dumb even though they talk alot. We're gonna do this, we're gonna do that, but we can't even seem to keep an army in the field and take minimal - yes minimal casualties. If we had any sense we would stop restraining Israel, and begin a policy of all out drilling in our own country (for oil). If we took this 'war' seriously we would have about 3 million troops in Iraq threatening Iran and all other takers. Actually we should have already siezed the major oil fields. I personally wouldn't exclude the use of nuclear weapons either. Anyone with half a brain knows that our enemies WILL use them the first chance they get. Nobody seems to realize the seriousness of this threat. Therefore, I sadly conclude that we're probrably on our way to defeat.
Posted by: CJK at March 13, 2008 7:03 PM
CJK.
You are obviously a defeatist.
Get a grip man...
at March 13, 2008 7:28 PM
According to Saudi Scholar Dr. Walid Al-Rashudi, "We believe that there was indeed a holocaust, but how many died? 50-60 people?"
He doesn't know, and clearly doesn't care, this finger wagging neo-Nazi with shit for brains, a.k.a., a model Muslim "Scholar."
Of course, it follows that he would be the head of the Department of Islamic Studies at King Saud University, Saudi Arabia! No doubt he has had all of his devout students include as part of their five daily prayers the oath, "By Allah, we will not be satisfied even if all the Jews are killed."
Then what would satisfy your insatiable and merciless bloodlust, you f-ing whackjob?
Would it do any good to complain to the Saudi Embassy?
at March 13, 2008 7:32 PM
Even if and when they do conqueor the entire world, they still won't be peaceful.
CJK,
Don't they figure they won't need to? They don't care about their resource-poor nations. Why should they? Once the world is Islamic the imam will rise again and their glory will be evident for all the angels and the animals to see (since all the dhimmis will be gone).
In your last post you said:
"If we took this 'war' seriously we would have about 3 million troops in Iraq threatening Iran and all other takers."
Why is it up to the US? We can't fight this war on the ground all alone. Rather than go into their countries keep them out of ours. I would like to know why we can't have a policy of MAD - MECCA'S Assured Destruction.
This war is being fought by civilians. Why aren't we waging war on the civilians? By that I mean, for starters, we close this country to all Muslims all over the world, regardless of their ethnicity. Why must our young men and women give their lives for people who aren't worth it?
Tell the people of Iran if they want to avoid destruction they will do what is necessary to get rid of the mullahs. Otherwise they will die if a Muslim nuke is used anywhere. It's their choice. They can't say they weren't warned and they have no right to sit back and wait for American soldiers to do their fighting for them.
Yell at the people of Europe (they seem to be deaf, so maybe sign language would be better) that any nuke detonated against Israel or any US target in the Middle East will affect them as well. The Russians couldn't prevent radiation from a failed nuclear reactor from reaching western Europe. Russian workers died putting out that fire and containing the reactor but radiation was still set loose in the atmosphere. What do Europeans think will happen if a nuclear weapon, no matter how primitive or rudimentary, is purposely detonated?
at March 13, 2008 7:36 PM
Israel hasn't totally given up. They nailed the planners of the seminary murders.
http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=58773
Posted by: PMK at March 13, 2008 7:57 PM
I think we need to revisit the idea of Mutually Assured Destruction, and apply it to the Muslim world. If any Muslim terror group or state uses any kind of weapon of mass destruction (bio, chem, and nuclear)we nuke some Muslim cities. Randomly. We hold them all responsible for the jihad, which they should be. And even then, I'm not sure MAD would work anyway, but at least we will impose a cost of doing business on these people.
Look, our lives are cheap to them. Our existence precipitates no moral obligations from them. You cannot reason with people who are caught up in this kind of fantasy ideology. They cannot be reasoned with, and those who think they can be surely are of questionable sanity and intelligence themselves.
We contained the Soviets and beat them. And their economy was more robust and productive than the Muslim economies are. Without oil, these people are nothing. We need a containment strategy coupled with MAD. They can breed like rabbits in their s**t holes, but in the end they can only eat their own.
It's time to finally slay this beast. Our ancestors who were conquered by these savages failed in the early centuries of the jihad to take these people seriously. We should be capable of learning from history and apply the lessons going forward.
Containment and the real threat of extreme violence will work.
at March 13, 2008 8:47 PM
Killing all the Jews is just a little 'disproportionate', isn't it hypocrite. Someone throw that guy off the train...
Posted by: duh_swami at March 13, 2008 9:27 PM
"...Dr. Walid Al-Rashudi, head of the Department of Islamic Studies at King Saud University, Saudi Arabia..."
Apparently the Saudis also have problems with quality control in academic hirings.
With guys like this as heads of departments, is it any wonder there are comparatively few research papers originating from Islamic universities in the thousands of research journals in the world?
Check out the web site of King Saud University at
http://www.ksu.edu.sa/Students/CurrentSite/Colleges/Pages/default.aspx
Poke around a bit. Especially look at the academic credentials of the faculty. In the sciences their degrees are invariably from the West (where else?), with PhD's from places like Stanford, Oxford, Univ. of Ohio, etc. The courses in physics and astronomy appear to have the standard content as in Western universities (how could they otherwise?). These guys we probably don't have to worry about. They're bright, stick to doing their job, and are probably forced to keep whatever positive opinions about the West they may have to themselves.
It's in the Social Sciences where the Saudis seem to have problems similar to what we have in the West, with know-nothing "professors" using their positions as a platform to spout nonsense. It looks like they have more or less hired from within, i.e., most of the faculty comes from other Islamic universities.
With a split like that I shudder to think what faculty politics must be like.
Posted by: Eastview at March 14, 2008 12:02 AM
'Scholar'???????
A life time of study produces this guy? Oh, I forgot, He studied Islam.
at March 14, 2008 1:04 AM
darcy,
A Dr. Walid b. Uthman al-Rashudi
Professor of Islamic Studies, Teacher's College, Riyadh did sign a public letter which condemned the Riyadh bombings of 2003. That letter criticized the perpetrators (al-Qaeda) for killing believers [muslims] and causing strife [in saudiland]. That letter would qualify him as an authentic moderate, from the saudi viewpoint.
http://www.islamtoday.com/showme2.cfm?cat_id=29&sub_cat_id=551
From the faculty listing at the Department of Islamic Studies in the College of Education at king saud university (english website version), the current department chairman is Prof. D. Suliaman Bin Qassim Al-Eid. The list of department chairmen shows Prof. Suliman Bin ghasim Al-Eed as the 13th and current chairman of the department, with no mention of al-Rashudi. A small curiosity is the smaller font size and differing font type of this last individual, as if the web page has been hastily edited in order to airbrush away a mention (at least on the english version) of al-Rashudi.
at March 14, 2008 1:09 AM
Dr. Walid isn't so much a "raghead," he's more of a tablecloth head. What do you think?
Posted by: Bingo at March 14, 2008 2:58 AM
Talib, is that you?
Posted by: sheik yer'mami at March 14, 2008 3:25 AM
He looks like the Arabic version of Adam Gadahn.
Posted by: Sneakyzionistcrusader at March 14, 2008 8:51 AM
I agree with sneaky zonist crusader.
Posted by: Bingo at March 14, 2008 9:56 AM
Don't you just love the way this guy is described as a "Saudi Islamic Scholar" - how is it even remotely possible to use the word 'scholar' alongside what is passing for cerebral activity inside his dysfunctional mind?
And is that raised single digit illustrating the upper limit of his numeracy skills?
Posted by: Kev at March 14, 2008 10:59 AM
"Neanderthal or Cro-Magnon. I can't decide."
How about primordial slime?
Posted by: Chatillon at March 14, 2008 11:10 AM
The text in Arabic reads:
"Now watch my finger closely -I shall demonstrate that frontal lobe is a wicked Jewish lie. Long live Islamic science!"
Posted by: thomas. h at March 14, 2008 12:31 PM
An example of Islamic "interfaith" at work for all the world to gawp at.
Posted by: pythagoras at March 14, 2008 12:34 PM
Caption:
"I have One brain cell - and No - my wife does not object to me wearing her kitchen linens"
...or...
"Rule # One: No smiling in Islam - as allah forbids it"
Posted by: champ at March 14, 2008 3:55 PM
Of course they wouldn't be satisfied. there is another 4-5 billion Infidels to go. Good thing there are only 91 Million who think like him. We would have some serious problems if not...
Posted by: flowerknife_us at March 14, 2008 5:44 PM
I don't know what is more disgusting and revolting; his ideology (Islam) or his appearance.
Posted by: Xero G at March 14, 2008 8:14 PM
Wow.
The intellectual rigor of Islamic "scholars" just boggles my mind.
See also
http://www.memritv.org/clip_transcript/en/1349.htm
http://www.memritv.org/clip_transcript/en/1085.htm
http://www.memritv.org/clip_transcript/en/1642.htm
http://www.memritv.org/clip_transcript/en/1684.htm
Chuckle away!!!!
Posted by: A_Nonny_Mouse at March 15, 2008 10:57 PM
Caption:
"Jesus Is The Way!"
(no longer a closet Christian)
Posted by: champ at March 16, 2008 2:28 AM
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)