An outstanding video!

I've posted it at my web site.

Posted by: Always On Watch at March 25, 2008 8:24 AM

The Five Point Plan in Human Events is what this FNC news anchor should have been promoting yesterday--instead of dhimmitude:

[C]owardice and dhimmitude made their appearance yesterday afternoon, when a Fox News Channel anchor said something like this to Ms. Gabriel: "Don't you think that the Pope's baptism should have been done in a less visible manner? Some people might get upset."

One of these days, I've going to have a stroke at such displays of dhimmitude.

I've searched in vain for a link to that particular broadcast on FNC. But I know full well what I saw and heard. It ruined the rest of my day.

Posted by: Always On Watch at March 25, 2008 8:31 AM

What does the "Leader of the free-world" have to say, about OIC's War on Free Speech?

Posted by: Alert at March 25, 2008 8:44 AM

Today a Dutch man witch the nick Sagunto got an email from Youtube:
“..Beste lid:
De onderstaande video is om zijn ongepaste aard verwijderd nadat deze door leden van de YouTube-community is gemarkeerd en door YouTube-personeel is beoordeeld.
In English:
"This video is removed due to its unfit character when members of the youtube-community flagged it and youtube-staff made their judgement."

Now it shows "This video has been removed due to terms of use violation." instead of ... videos containing "What the west needs to know" with Dutch subtitles.

Posted by: FransG at March 25, 2008 8:48 AM

Double whammy black male threat from the Death Cult trying to cover all the bases that will soften the direct confrontation with the caliphate in the future. Exercise free speech now, comes the threat of physical violence...or the threat of legal terrorism backed by oil money filtering down through out the world to sCAIR and others.

The more Dhimmis cowering in the rear means less brave souls on the front lines in the war.

Posted by: SoteriA at March 25, 2008 8:53 AM

As usual, everything's in reverse concerning Islam.

No, it's not the religion of peace. Rather, it's the religion of war.

No, Islam is not under attack. Rather, it's the non-Islamic West that is under attack from Islam.

Free Speech should not be "limited" to prohibit criticism of religion ("blasphemy"). Rather, Free Speech should continue to allow any and all "religions" to be scrutinized, criticized, mocked, ridiculed, defamed, what have you.

And I say that as a Christian, not as an atheist.

Without Free Speech, we're all done for. Finito.

Posted by: darcy at March 25, 2008 9:04 AM

since when have any of member nations of the oic ever allowed free speech among there own people let alone infidels

Posted by: crusader at March 25, 2008 9:15 AM

Freedom of speech is non-negotiable.

Posted by: tanstaafl at March 25, 2008 9:31 AM

So, according to the Organization of the Islamic Conference, "Islam is under attack." Now, where have we heard this before? Oh, yeah--from Osama Bin Laden, Muslim clerics, and their like. Does it not follow, then, that all Muslims have an obligation to wage "defensive" jihad, including, most especially qitaal, literal combat?

The OIC is itself theatening the peace of the world.

Posted by: John C at March 25, 2008 9:34 AM

We have not seen this type of mass dilution since the 30's.

Posted by: Ruebacca at March 25, 2008 9:38 AM

Ruebacca,

Surely you mean, mass delusion. And you are absolutely right, except that this mass delusion grips more than just one nation, or one continent.

Posted by: John C at March 25, 2008 10:55 AM

Actually, I kinda like the malapropism "mass dilution." It fits. European culture has been diluted (weakened) by the enormous numbers of Mohammedan immigrants and their subsequent enormous birthrates.

Posted by: darcy at March 25, 2008 11:14 AM

The OIC is for today what the Axis was in the 1940s and the Warsaw Pact was for the next 50 years.

The day someone threatens them, you can be sure that the Infidel members of that group - Guyana, Suriname, Mozambique, Cameroon and a whole bunch of West African coastal nations would flee it like rats deserting....

Posted by: Infidel Pride at March 25, 2008 1:37 PM

Bravo! Anothe great video! Complete with a cameo appearance by Rage Boy.

Posted by: Xero G at March 25, 2008 2:37 PM

Very useful video.

Posted by: traeh at March 25, 2008 3:15 PM

British school teacher Gillian Gibbons got sued by Sudan for "insulting religion and inciting hatred" because of a teddy bear. She faced 40 lashes, 6 months in jail and deportation.

As she was led into the courthouse her lawyer was locked out. After a half-hour standoff he pushed through the crowd and began shouting at the police. He was let in but his assistants and embassy staff had to wait a further hour - during which time they witnessed two offenders being flogged with a rubber hose in the court corridor.

In the UK earlier this month blasphemy laws were finally abolished. Dr Williams the Archbishop of Canterbury opposed this decision.

Posted by: Rob at March 25, 2008 5:12 PM

The enemy of muslims is within. If Islamic leader cared about Islam then they would start taking responsibility instead of blaming others.

The picture of a muslim woman holding the Quran in one hand and a machine gun in the other. Is that not a bad image for Islam? Where are the demonstrations? Or is it only a bad image for Islam if someone runs a photoshop cartoon filter over it?

Posted by: raven_ at March 25, 2008 5:17 PM

>>The picture of a muslim woman holding the Quran in one hand and a machine gun in the other."

Poor misguided Muslim lady. Doesn't she know her "role model" Mo said that all women go to Hell? Hey - he saw 'em hanging on his Night Journey! You gotta believe! /sarc

Posted by: darcy at March 25, 2008 5:44 PM

Sorry I was wrong about the Archbishop of Canterbury position on the UK blasphamy laws.

"The Archbishops of Canterbury and York, Dr Rowan Williams and Dr John Sentamu, said in a joint letter on Friday to Hazel Blears, the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, that the Church of England would not oppose the abolition of the blasphemy law, provided that individuals and society are given the necessary protection.

But the Archbishops expressed “serious reservations” about the timing of the repeal, “and especially as part of a Bill introduced to deal with quite different matters”. They warned that it was too early to be sure how the new offence of incitement to religious hatred will operate in practice"

http://www.churchtimes.co.uk/content.asp?id=53079

Posted by: Rob at March 25, 2008 6:22 PM

Here's an odd fact about the OIC: Guyana is a member. Guyana? I checked, and less than 10% of the population is Muslim. That's a similar proportion as France and the Netherlands, and not far ahead of Britain. So half the countries of Europe would, at this rate, be eligible for OIC membership. You have seen the future...

Posted by: The Heresiarch at March 26, 2008 4:30 AM

Heresiarch,

Wow, what a strange coincidence - I was about to say the exact same thing last night on a European blog.

I was shocked to learn that Guyana and Surinam are both OIC members.

Then the mystery? Why? Probably just to curry favor with the minority Muslim population.

Posted by: boneshack at March 26, 2008 5:57 PM