![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
In 70 years, from roughly 1918 to 1988, with its Comintern, and Willi Munzenberg, and subventions to "The Morning Star" and "L'Humanite" and "L'Unita," and to such people as Gus Hall, and to pay for all those Peace and Youth Conferences -- in Helsinki, for example, with its trademark Dove of Peace by Picasso -- and with all the magazines about the wonders of the Soviet Union and the Building of Communism, and pull-the-wool-over-the-eyes trips for journalists, and all kinds of other propaganda designed to fool or inveigle the West, the Soviet Union spent between eight and nine billion dollars.
The total amount spent by just one Muslim country (admittedly the richest), Saudi Arabia, in furthering the cause of Islam over the past three decades, is close to 100 billion dollars. Think of all the mosques built and maintained, all the imams on the payroll, all the missionaries conducting Da'wa in American and British prisons, all the Western hirelings, in the capital of every Western country, whose full-time job is to explain away the Al-Saud, and the mutawwa of Saudi Arabia, and Islam itself, its texts, its tenets, its attitudes, its atmospherics.
Add in the amounts spent by the Emirates, by Kuwait, by Qatar, by Libya and by Iran, by the O.I.C. itself (funded by the rich Arabs), and the amounts sloshing about the foundations of the Western world, causing the pillars of its stability to crumble, and the promise of ever-more trillions to be accumulated by Saudi Arabia and its Companions For The Promotion Of Islam, and who would not, or should not, be alarmed?
The American government, and other Western governments, should long ago have taken steps to interdict the flow of funds from outside, especially from the Gulf, that flow to the West in order support Muslim expansion inside the Infidel lands. If local Muslims can raise the funds for their own mosques, that would be one thing. But something else is going on. Foreign funds, every bit as disturbing as the flow of money from the propaganda units of the Soviet or Nazi regimes, are being used to establish outposts of power deep within what Muslims see as enemy territory, Dar al-Harb, by whatever means are possible and effective.
And qitaal, combat, is not possible now, and not effective. But campaigns of Da'wa, carefully targetted at economically or psychically marginal or determinedly alienated groups and individuals, make use of this Saudi and other Muslim oil-state wealth, to pay for these propaganda campaigns, and to build, everywhere they can, vast edifices, mosques with, ideally, those bristling and aggressive minarets, designed to overawe those in the surrounding communities -- and the communities chosen are often those peopled by the economically marginal, who are deemed ripe for conversion, or "reversion." When one sees a mosque go up in a poor town, a mosque that costs fifteen or twenty million dollars, and discovers that there are no more than a hundred Muslims in that town, and at the same time, with thousands of congregants, churches are closing for want of funds, one understands that it is not those local Muslims paying for that mosque. Something else, something disturbing and sinister, is going on.
See, for example, the whole saga of the Boston Mosque, deliberately built in Roxbury, where it is hoped that the circumambient black Muslim population will grow, and where, all along, Saudi money, and a Muslim deep within city government, but promoting Saudi and larger Muslim interests, together managed to produce this mosque that will unsettle the old-line appeal of the black Christian churches, and is meant to do so.
It should not be beyond the wit of the American government to find ways to halt this flow of foreign Muslim money, either by seizure as money that is being used for purposes that naturally tend to increase the threat to national security, or by demanding of the Saudis that they stop that flow -- on pain of having all kinds of things happen, beginning of course with exposure and Congressional hearings about this Saudi money, and what it buys, and about all the Western hirelings who, over the years, have done the Saudi bidding.
The American public needs to become aware of how the Saudi lobby has prevented not only an intelligent understanding of what Islam is all about, but -- far more important to many -- has prevented a sensible energy policy from being put in place thirty years ago, with a steadily-rising gasoline tax, and all sorts of other measures (subsidies to trains and other forms of mass transit, subsidies to solar and wind energy, a campaign to make clear how important -- even indispensable -- nuclear power is, and the building, by the government, of nuclear reactors on the French model and at the French rate). Then there will be, as there should be, palpable rage at the Al-Saud, and at meretricious Saudi Arabia, which has never been our ally, even when, temporarily, our interests (say, in Afghanistan with the Soviet army) may have temporarily overlapped, but rather has always and forever been our mortal enemy.
Posted by Hugh at May 20, 2008 12:50 PM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
Hugh just for my own reference, not to dispute you, could you cite your source for the claim that "The total amount spent by just one Muslim country (admittedly the richest), Saudi Arabia, in furthering the cause of Islam over the past three decades, is close to 100 billion dollars.".
Thanks.
Posted by: Gnosis
at May 20, 2008 1:00 PM
Great stuff Hugh. The only thing overlooked was the most pernicious use of Saudi money to date: the growing use of litigation to silence the voices of the anti-Jihad.
Posted by: Cornelius
at May 20, 2008 1:03 PM
Gnosis.. that must include support for the terrorists as well.
Posted by: lonewolf
at May 20, 2008 1:25 PM
". . . the Saudi lobby has prevented . . . a sensible energy policy from being put in place thirty years ago,"
In connection with this, I wonder how much funding of environmentalist groups has come from the Saudis and/or the other Arab oil states. The environmentalists have fought every attempt to discover and exploit new oil fields, to build new pipelines and refineries, and to build nuclear power plants.
at May 20, 2008 2:05 PM
Lets not forget all the "Educational" institutions they've funded to further their agenda in the Cam"pus"es in the west. They're even buying Universities in England, probably elsewhere.
["pus"
a yellow-white, more or less viscid substance produced by suppuration and found in abscesses, sores, etc., consisting of a liquid plasma in which white blood cells are suspended. ]
at May 20, 2008 2:25 PM
And all those billions still haven't been able to cover up the pig stink of islam and it's true believers? Go figure.
Posted by: Rick
at May 20, 2008 3:45 PM
Another, rather stealthy, form of Da'wa has been the Saudi funding of all those university chairs in Islamic Studies and Middle Eastern Studies departs at colleges throughout the West. In many cases, these departments have become frank propagandists for Wahabbism.
Then there is the still unfolding situation with the University of California at Berkeley--my alma mater--where Saudi Arabia is trying to buy legitimacy for a Saudi "partner" college in exchange for hard cash.
Luckily some faculty and students are questioning just what sort of school, with what sort of teachings and what sort of admissions policies, they may be lending their luster to.
The jury is still out on this one.
Posted by: gravenimage
at May 20, 2008 4:33 PM
I too would like to know the source of the 100 billion figure.
Ref Gravenimage's comment on funding of Universities: when I was in Australia recently there was a bit of a kerfuffle when a Queensland University Vice-Chancellor (President) was sprung having cribbed info from Wikipedia, in an apologia for accepting Saudi money for a Chair in ME Studies. The only thing he changed in lifting a chunk from Wikipedia? He changed "Wahabism" to "Unitarianism"!!
BTW: he's not been forced to retire, as far as I know.
Keep up the good work Robert and Hugh!
Cheers
at May 20, 2008 9:24 PM
Hugh Fitzgerald.. you are a far better writer and you know much better how to rationally express your sentiments and your logic..
I too have never understood why the American Public Transport infrastructure was left to this callous form of neglect which must be considered as hostile given the obvious benefits which maintaining and expanding the American railway and related public transport systems would have.
Thank You for your eloquence in stating that which many of us are thinking and aren't quite confident and sure of ourselves to express in such a cogent manner.
The need is certainly there more than ever before and I am studying the writings of people like you and also Robert Spencer and Serge Trifkovic and many others.. Sheik Yermami.. Fjordman.. forgive me for leaving out many more whom I should mention in this group.. like Hirsi Ali and Geert Wilders.. and those who have died for us like Theo Van Gogh and Pim Fortuyn.. anyone who reads this will know they all are meant to be mentioned and included.
This is not so much about "inclusion" as it is about SURVIVAL and in this spirit I know that those who have not been specificvally included know that in this very SPIRIT they have been.
Oriana Fallaci.. Brigitte Bardot.. o how could I forget the brave women manning the intellectual front!!
Brigitte Gabrielle.. and the ever intrepid Debbie Schlussel.. and Pam of Atlas Shrugs.. And Whafe Sultan who singlehandedly goes on Al-Jazeera to face down these devils inside the very heart of enemy propaganda!
Yes, you all should be honored and I hoe the day will come when artists will paint your portraits in murals and sculptors will create monuments in your likeness to grace the plazas and the freeways.. nice word there.. freeways.. of our indeed wonderful world.
Posted by: Ummah Gummah
at May 21, 2008 3:12 AM
And why is Rudy missing from the Race.. he who called it as it is.. ISLAM's WAR AGINAST US!!!
Wish McLAME would make him or Tom Tancredo his running mate!
Fat chance though I know.
Posted by: Ummah Gummah
at May 21, 2008 3:16 AM
Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.


(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)