FrontPageMag.com By Robert Spencer By Hugh Fitzgerald Books Dhimmi Watch Islam 101 Qur'an Blog Raymond Ibrahim Robert Spencer
 
« Suicide bomber kills 40 in attack on Indian embassy in Kabul | Main | Fitzgerald: What everyone continues to fail to grasp »

July 7, 2008

Fitzgerald: Children of the Jihad

"Al Qaeda has successfully established a network for recruiting boys as young as 12 from across central Asia as it seeks new volunteers to enlarge its team of prospective suicide bombers and militants fighters, senior security officials from the Middle East have revealed to CBS News." -- from this news article

Toward the end of World War II, Adolf Hitler and his millions of willing collaborators put into service younger and younger members of the Hitler Youth. They sent them to man anti-aircraft stations and to be part of the last-ditch resistance. But no one should complacently assume that the similar use of such young boys -- sublunary "pearly boys" akin to those promised to shahids in the Muslim Paradise, with some of them no doubt having been put to other uses by their Al Qaeda or Talibanesque masters, as is so common a practice in that region, especially but not only in Afghanistan -- spells an end to Jihad.

Jihad has no end. The Nazis could be defeated. They could be so crushed that Nazism as a menace was ended. But there are still Nazis around, and endless vigilance must be taken, and is taken, quite rightly, in Germany to monitor them. Mussolini was crushed, but there are still Fascists. The Emperor-worship of Japanese militarists, the cult of Kodo, was crushed by American military victory in the Pacific, but there are still those in Japan, a very small group, who would if they could resurrect the dreams of the old militarists. Soviet Communism has lost its power, to be replaced not by democracy but by a parody of capitalism that exhibits all of that capitalism's worst features and none of its benefits (crony or state capitalism, whereby what had been owned by the state is un-nationalized, but essentially handed over, in the case of the largest businesses -- oil and other resources -- to a handful of the rulers and their well-connected courtiers). But Communism as an ideology is not dead.

And Islam has more than a billion Believers. Some are more dangerous than others, and that danger depends on the precise degree of belief in Islam. The greater that belief, the greater the willingness to participate in Jihad directly rather than merely indirectly, as part of the Umma, offering moral and perhaps financial support. And the greater the willingness to participate directly not in other (possibly more effective) forms of Jihad, but in violent Jihad. Islam is forever. It can be contained. It can be weakened. Appeals can be made to the 80% of the world's Muslims who are non-Arabs to recognize Islam as a carrier or vehicle of Arab supremacism. The ethnic, sectarian, and economic fissures within the Camp of Islam can be exploited. Even within the sub-camp of Arab Islam, the resentments can be exploited that sometimes appear between the "Arabs of the North" (i.e., Syria, Lebanon, Iraq) and the "Arabs of the South" (Saudi Arabia, the U.A.E., Kuwait, Qatar, etc.). The “Arabs of the North” consider themselves civilizationally superior to the infuriatingly much richer “Arabs of the South.” And the "Arabs of the South" resent those who, while looking down upon them, also are keenly aware of the riches that some Arabs in the North naturally believe should be shared to a much greater extent by the rich "Arabs of the South." Meanwhile, some of those "Arabs of the North," as in Syria, seem willing to support Iran in its own territorial claims in the Gulf (as with the Tunb Islands) and in other claims to better represent the pan-Islamic cause.

These are all fissures to be identified, studied, and intelligent plans made to exploit them, by at the very least doing nothing to try, as in Iraq, to make those fissures less wide -- to make Sunni and Shi'a, for example, compromise with each other, or to force the Kurds to give up their hopes for an independent Kurdistan, when such a chance, for them, may never come again.

But the use of child-martyrs means nothing to the Muslims. The PLO and its latest avatars -- Hamas among the Gazan Arabs, Islamic Jihad among the "West Bank" Arabs, and no doubt Hizballah too, have all been willing to sacrifice not only the willing True Believer, but also the unwilling or unaware, such as those who are mentally retarded, or children too young to know what is going on.

What do you think was the final disposition of Mohammad al-Dura? Do you think he was allowed to live, so that he might someday be identified? Don't be silly.

Posted by Hugh at July 7, 2008 9:15 AM
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Comments
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)

"Children of the Jihad"

You mean like "Children of the Corn." !

Posted by: darcy [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 7, 2008 9:24 AM

How do you win ?

By killing those trying to kill you.

And killing lots of them. Pour encourager les autres.

Not by making "nice".

Unfortunately life aint like a kindergarden house with the affable Mr. Rogers in charge.

The basis behind the success of the West is the spirit in the Western soldier.

We owe our freedom to the soldier, not the liberal campus weenie or radical.

Posted by: dgene [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 7, 2008 10:12 AM

How do you win ?

By killing those trying to kill you.

And killing lots of them. Pour encourager les autres.

Je suis d'accord, dgene.

Posted by: darcy [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 7, 2008 10:58 AM

How do you appeal to non-Arab Muslims, especially those who hold positions of power because they are Muslims. Why would they give that up? Islam is forever. And the ones who consider themselves subdued? They're just waiting for their chance to rule an Islamic power, as in Europe. CAIR in America is biding its time. Muslims believe it is their divine right to rule the world.

If people whose children and other family members were arbitrarily taken away and killed by the man formerly known as Saddam Hussein think it's okay to fight in the name of Islam why wouldn't all Muslims feel that way?

Islam is forever? That means the Islamic goal of global dominance is forever. It may have begun with Arabs and they may have forcibly converted the first non-Arabs they came into contact with but it has been 1400 years. Generations of non-Arab Muslims grew up believing that everything was owed to them because they worshipped Allah. If you believe in Islam you believe in the forcible conversion, subjugation or elimination of all who don't worship your god until all the world is just like you.
Chechens, Turks, Albanians and many others aren't likely to give up the dream of global dominance without first giving up Islam. But Islam is forever.
Are the Darfurian Muslims likely to accord their fellow Africans who are Christian the freedom and respect that Islam denies all others or would they impose their own brand of sharia rule?

Posted by: PMK [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 7, 2008 11:23 AM

darcy,

Or "Children of the coran", a Steven Sking story, about green fields and the malevolent and bloodthirsty cult of something which doesn't quite have a name -- or nobody knows its name. Hmm.

Posted by: del [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 7, 2008 3:17 PM

Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.


Web Site Counter