FrontPageMag.com By Robert Spencer By Hugh Fitzgerald Books Dhimmi Watch Islam 101 Qur'an Blog Raymond Ibrahim Robert Spencer
 
« Pakistani lawyers: "United States of Al Qaeda, Allah willing" | Main | Bolton, Spencer, Pamela »

August 22, 2008

Gulf News editor defends Muslims accused of terrorism, descries "harsh" sentences

Oddly enough, instead of targeting the Amish, "Sentences show anti-terrorism law targets Muslims," by Dr Abdul Hadi Al-Timi (Abu Dhabi Editor), for Gulf News, August 21:

Dubai: The recent sentencing of two British Muslims under anti-terrorism law will not be the last in a long series of court judgments and imprisonments of members of the Muslim community since 2001.

The long sentences of 10 and 12 years were handed down on Aabid Khan and his cousin Sultan Mohammad, both 23 years old and from Bradford in central England, after they were convicted of "possessing or making documents promoting terrorism".

Yes, very "harsh" indeed. I'm sure infidels captured in Mecca trying kill and wreak havoc would be treated much more leniently.
A third person, Hammaad Munshi, will be sentenced next month. He was just 16 when he was arrested on his way home from school and is already described as Britain's youngest convicted terrorist.
Yes, surely an unfair appellation. After all, he only wanted to "wipe out all infidels" from the face of the planet, and was reading a "how-to" book to that end.
These types of sentences and the attitude of the British authorities against the Muslim community had created controversy and disruption of inter-communal relations in the UK.
Here's a solution: Muslims living in the UK, stop plotting to destroy it and the latter will not prosecute you.
They had also led to sectarian and racist attacks against Muslims as well as drawing angry and strong protests and criticism from human rights and religious bodies. Despite the authorities' denials, those sentences are seen as racially and religiously motivated.

Posted by Raymond at August 22, 2008 11:00 AM
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Comments
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)

If German nationals were found to be actively aiding Nazi Germany in 1940, nobody would have been surprised if they received a death sentence.

Posted by: Jerry M [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 22, 2008 11:34 AM

Yes the UK has treated Muslims with unbelievable brutality and insensitivity.

Posted by: poetcomic1 [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 22, 2008 11:35 AM

muslims like the gulf news editor aka winer alwas seem to think any sentances given to muslims by infidel courts are too harsh , after all we cant have animals (non muslims)punishing human beings and in muslim eyes your only human if you join the cult of islam right???

Posted by: ISLAMSNOTFORME [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 22, 2008 11:36 AM

Despite the authorities' denials, those sentences are seen as racially and religiously motivated.

Whine, whine and whine again.

Not harsh enough sentences IMO.

Posted by: gymgal [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 22, 2008 11:48 AM

Another Muslim cry baby! Never look inward, always blame others. The infidels have had enough of Islamic taqiya.

Posted by: IndianTiger [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 22, 2008 12:21 PM

Another example of why so many of these thugs need to get their asses beat. Bad.

Posted by: undaunted [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 22, 2008 12:29 PM

"Despite the authorities' denials, those sentences are seen as racially and religiously motivated."

Actually, it's their CRIMES that are religiously motivated.

Posted by: Bigshaker [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 22, 2008 12:47 PM

They had also led to sectarian and racist attacks against Muslims ...

Ah, if only this were true. But I doubt that it is.

Posted by: Rick [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 22, 2008 1:22 PM

They seem like pretty substantial sentences to me, given that the two men did not carry out any physical attacks. And that is proper. This shows just a glimmer of hope for the U.K.

Posted by: Richard [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 22, 2008 2:16 PM

"They seem like pretty substantial sentences to me, given that the two men did not carry out any physical attacks. And that is proper." - Richard

Umm, should we wait until they DO carry out physical attacks, causing mass deaths and mayhem, before we hand out stiff sentences? Call me a hard-liner, but I think we ought to come down like a sledgehammer on people plotting terrorist acts and who have demonstrated an ideological willingness to carry them out.

Posted by: Bigshaker [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 22, 2008 3:02 PM

Yea, what Bigshaker said.

Posted by: undaunted [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 22, 2008 3:12 PM

perhaps we should try sowdi justice on these islamists, heads would roll!

Posted by: ZenaWarriorPrincess [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 22, 2008 9:33 PM

I guess that is where the slang expression "Heads will rolls" came from.

Posted by: Spot on [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 23, 2008 8:02 AM

Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.


Web Site Counter