FrontPageMag.com Articles By Robert Spencer Articles By Hugh Fitzgerald Books Islam 101 Qur'an Blog Robert Spencer Bio
 
« Pakistan involvement in Mumbai jihad attacks? | Main | "A kind of slow motion, under the radar attack on America" »

November 27, 2008

Mumbai: Indian forces besiege Jewish Center held by jihadists

More on this story. "URGENT: Indian Forces Assault Besieged Jewish Center in Mumbai," from AP, November 27:

MUMBAI, India — Security forces assaulted a Jewish center in Mumbai where Muslim militants were believed holed up with possible hostages Friday, with black-clad commandos dropping from a Indian helicopter as sharpshooters opened fire on the five-story building.

The attack came as Indian commandoes scoured two luxury hotels room-by-room for survivors and holed-up militants, more than a day after a chain of attacks across India's financial center by suspected Muslim militants left at least 119 people dead.

The well-coordinated strikes by small bands of gunmen starting Wednesday night left the city shell-shocked, but the sporadic gunfire and explosions at the Taj Mahal and Oberoi hotels dwindled overnight, indicating the siege might be winding down.

At the headquarters of the ultra-orthodox Jewish outreach group Chabad Lubavitch, a commando assault began shortly after dawn following a tense night in which six trucks of soldiers had been brought in to surround the building.

Snipers stationed in buildings opposite the center began the attack, with sustained fire on the building as at least nine commandos lowered themselves by rope onto the roof from a circling Indian air force helicopter....

Read it all.

Posted by Robert at November 27, 2008 11:06 PM
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

Comments
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)

I wish everybody would stop referring to these pigs as "militants." They are terrorists, pure and simple.

Posted by: Steve [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 27, 2008 11:57 PM

Just too note, it's always phrased
'Ultra-orthodox'

as in
At the headquarters of the" ultra-orthodox "Jewish outreach group Chabad Lubavitch, a commando assault began shortly after dawn following a tense night in which six trucks of soldiers had been brought in to surround the building.
--------

There's nothing 'ultra' about them. They are observant jews, very nice, very friendly, and they convert no one and force their religion upon no one who is not a jew, and have no theology, as judaism has no theology about converting others or such a need
Unlike Islam.

Whom are called 'militants' when they slaughter women, children, babies, innocents, anyone, everyone, for the sake of 'Jihad'

The chabad are merely religious and no threat to anyone.... anywhere, period.

It should matter here on Jihadwatch, if not in the mass news media. The meaning of 'ultra orthodox' and such words.

Especially, and in comparison to the same media's use of the term
'militants'

Mark

Posted by: mgoldberg [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 28, 2008 12:13 AM

Yes, I noticed that sudden appearance of the deliberately intensifying "ultra-orthodox" -- a verbal hint at the notion that these Lubavitchers are those dangerous things -- "fundamentalists" or "fanatics" -- when they are nothing of the kind. Indeed, there seems to have been a transfer of epithets, a kind of sinister hypallage -- for those words "fundamentalist" and "fanatic" (hinted at in "ultra-orthodox"), should in a well-ordered univese be applied the Muslims (those now so often in reports identified as the "militants" or "the extremists" while the words "Muslim" and "Islamic" and "Islam" are so carefully withheld), not to the mild and unworldly people who run such things as that Chabad House.

I concur completely with the verbal analysis provided above.

Posted by: Hugh [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 28, 2008 12:26 AM

Muslims have become a protected class here in the West thanks to the self-loathing liberal intelligenisa that controls the MSM.

60 years ago the MSM would have made good Nazis.

Posted by: waltc [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 28, 2008 2:01 AM

Hugh, Mark - I agree.

Three of the most enjoyable, witty, amusing English-language Jewish Israeli bloggers whose blogs I regularly read, are Orthodox, that is, observant Jews.

They have taught me a lot!

I am praying very, very hard for the rabbi and his wife. I am very much afraid that they have been murdered by the jihadist assassins, and my heart breaks for their little boy who was rescued by the cook.

Posted by: dumbledoresarmy [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 28, 2008 3:00 AM

These individuals are terrorists and should not be treated as humans despite what the left believes.

Christopher Hamilton
The Right Opinion, for the Right Wing

Posted by: Christopher Hamilton [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 28, 2008 3:48 AM

For humanity sake these r not humans but islamic pigs. They need to be shot on sight and no mercy shown. The world can do without the islamic pigs.

My heartfelt sympaties to the victims and their families. Also the forces fighting them are great and let them have all the courage. Hope the captives r freed soon.

Posted by: greaticon [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 28, 2008 4:27 AM

Dear All,
Please don't waste time crying for the Indians (Hindus). They will forget and forgive the Jihadis the next second when there is a CRICKET Match or a new bolloywood movie. Instead save your energy to protect yourself against any attacks by the JIHADIS on your respective countries. HINDUS ARE A LOST CAUSE.
As a Hindu myself the most we will do is to CONDEMN the Jihadis perhaps even adding the worn out sentence 'This is a cowardly act' and that’s the end of it and continue watching another round of CRICKET or Gossiping about some bolloywood Muslims actors bedding Hindu actresses.
We are a PATHETIC, Sorry to say

Posted by: Raja [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 28, 2008 4:29 AM

I wish everybody would stop referring to these pigs as "militants." They are terrorists, pure and simple.

They are not terrorists, per se. Nor are they extremists, fundamentalists, radicals, insurgents, or whatever the hell else.

They are Moslems, pure and simple. What is being done now in South Bombay is what Moslems do. They do Islam.

The only difference between these murderers and the millions of so-called hundreds of millions of Moslem Moderates silently pulling for them tonight is that they are activists. Moslem activists who make th emselves so by acting on the commands of Islam.

Give these Moslem gunmen their due credit. They're acting on Islam, and doing a damned good job at it. They are prototyped Moslem Heros.

* 33:21 ** 33:21 ** 33:21 ** 33:21 ** 33:21 ** 33:21 ** 33:21 ** 33:21 ** 33:21 ** 33:21 *

The word terror apprears all over the Islamic scriptures. Not so the words fundamental, extreme, or radical.

I shall terrorize the infidels. So wound their bodies and incapacitate them because they oppose Allah and His Apostle (Mohammed).
-- Koran 8:12

The only thing unclear about this Koranic command, and others like it, is how the persona of Mohammed bleeds into that of Allah.

It almost seems as if the god Allah was cooked up by Moahammed to advance his own empowerment. As he recited the Koran, Mohammed was prone to refer to himself in the third person repeatedly.

Was he the Allah making commands or Mohammed making up Allah? The stupid Companions didn't bother to niotice, they did, and still do, his bidding. Do just whose bidding? Why, Mohammed's. Or maybe Allah's. Or maybe both, who were, and are, one and the same anyway.

6:70-8:12-10:4-14:16-22:19-37:67-40:72-44:46-47:15-55:44-56:42-56:93-78:25-88:5

Millenia and thousands of people were spent to build the Torah, the Old Testament, the New Testament, the Vedas and the Upanishads, the Avesta, the Three Jewels and the Buddha, and other traditions that religions comprise.

Islam is not a religion, it's a belief system built around a fake religion used to disguise a takeover operation. It's designed from the ground up to win, to do battle and prevail.

Yes, all religions have their prophets, as individual men, who revealed their respective ways, but only one belief system, Islam, stakes everything on what was said and done by a single man, and one man only: Mohammed.

That's why the Koran was promulgated as self-contained and immutable. Something not to be handed down, but only to be handed off.

The whole Islam package is an inpenetrable shit-bomb originally and currently intended to spread itself like a virus, a highly adaptable engine of trouble and misery that mutates that allows itself to mutate on its edges, but remains always the same at its poisonous center.

This is what makes Islam unique. This is what makes Islam almost impossible to beat. This is why the Moslems seem to always win. This is what makes Islam great and makes Moslems victors sooner or later, your choice.

Do you want to take your Infidel fucking hard and fast or slow and easy? Again, the Moslems will let you have your choice. What's not your choice is whether you you'll take the screwing or not. That is strictly the choice of Moslems.

Get your check book out, drop your drawers, and bend over that table. The Moslem Activists are here.

Posted by: 33:21 [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 28, 2008 4:49 AM

Storming and rampaging in a hospital for women and children is an unhuman and cowardly tactics terrorists were employing in Budenovsk back in 1995. Jihadists stormed into small town killing everyone in sight and took the hospital hostage, propping pregnant women against windows so that special forces could not shoot.
The reacent attack is very similar to that one. Luckily women and children hostages were rescued by substituting them with adult men. Otherwise this would turn out a far greater disaster. All of the jihadists managed to escape justice that time except Basaev who was tracked down and killed some years later. Jihadists in Budenovsk proved that such an attack could be carried out with success. The international community whined much about those "Freedom Fighters" being pushed to commit such an act but tell me are there other people than muslims who can be "pushed" to harm innocents so willingly and with a purpose?
------------------------------------------
Odin guide my sword! © Unleashed

Posted by: Hell Awaits [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 28, 2008 4:57 AM

OT

Appears some of the Mumbai gunman were Pakis from Britain.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1089711/Mumbai-gunmen-BRITISH-Indian-authorities-say-arrested-militants-UK.html

Posted by: km [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 28, 2008 5:48 AM

I hope that our pro islamic leftist jews in Holland read it too;Too much people listen to what tey are saying.

Posted by: luckybee [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 28, 2008 6:11 AM

km

Gordon Brown is reluctant to comment on the Paki Brits who participated in this operation on the Jihadi side. Given the way Mohammedan activity is reported in the British MSM, I suppose we could describe the 2 Paki Brits who participated (can't tell yet whether they're dead or not) as British terrorists. There! Congratulations, New Labour, for your latest export from the Ummah Kaliphate. UK exporting Jihadis to India (via Pakistan).

On this story, the operation is still going on - at the time of this writing, commandos are now in the 3rd floor (they landed earlier on the terrace and worked their way down the 5th, 4th and now the 3rd floor of the building. It's like watching reality TV.

Posted by: Infidel Pride [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 28, 2008 7:46 AM

Looks like the Nariman House operation has ended.

Posted by: Infidel Pride [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 28, 2008 7:54 AM

"ultra-orthodox".
I am so sick of so-called journalist pretending to be so factual in their reporting. Why don't they stick to the facts and drop their commentaries?
You cannot read a news article without encountering some commentary, which undoubtably exposes the reporter's bias and deceit. They have no credibility in my eyes. The business of journalism rests on objectivity and honesty. If they do not have credibility, their product is trash.

Posted by: norman [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 28, 2008 8:07 AM
Post a comment


Web Site Counter