| FrontPageMag.com | Articles By Robert Spencer | Articles By Hugh Fitzgerald | Books | Islam 101 | Qur'an Blog | Robert Spencer Bio |  |
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
What goodwill? "Pakistan warns India against attack accusations: Says linking it to Mumbai terrorism would 'destroy all the goodwill,'" from AP, November 27 (thanks to Chaza):
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan - Pakistan warned India against accusing of it links to the Mumbai terror attacks Thursday, saying doing so would "destroy all the goodwill" between the two nuclear-armed rivals.The remarks by Pakistan's defense minister came hours after Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said militants based outside his country carried out the atatcks [sic].
Singh did not single out Pakistan, which New Delhi has accused of complicity in terror attacks on its soil before, but his remarks are likely to be taken as a sign here that India suspects Pakistani links somewhere in the plot. [...]
Pakistan Defense Minister Ahmed Mukhtar condemned the attacks, but said "we should not be blamed like in the past."
"This will destroy all the goodwill we created together after years of bitterness," he told The Associated Press. "I will say in very categoric terms that Pakistan is not involved in these gory incidents."...
Sure. But of course the double game that Pakistan has been playing for years must lead open-eyed analysts to regard such claims with skepticism.
Posted by Robert at November 28, 2008 6:11 AM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
|
Goes to show that when there is terrrorism, world-wide Muslim community plays the deniel game. But then again, to them, deniel is a river in Egypt.
Posted by: bigcatgirl13106![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.jihadwatch.org/nav-commenters.gif)
at November 28, 2008 7:07 AM
Of course not. Never mind the fact that many of the jihadis came by boat from Karachi.
Posted by: Infidel Pride at November 28, 2008 7:50 AM
Destroy the goodwill, eh?
"But you knew I was a scorpion ... it's my nature to sting."
Posted by: Lori B. at November 28, 2008 8:46 AM
What goodwill?
Posted by: senor doeboy at November 28, 2008 9:07 AM
One might ask the millions of Hindus driven out of Pakistan and East Pakistan (Bangladesh) about Pakistani "goodwill".
On Islamic goodwill in general, one might ask the many, many million non-Moslems driven out of Morocco, Algeria, Turkey, Iran, Kosovo, etc. about that. Or ask the non-Moslems who remain in e.g. Egypt and Malaysia about Islamic goodwill.
at November 28, 2008 9:22 AM
Yes, our intelligence service orchestrated this event but lets not mention that,it might destroy the good will....yeah
Posted by: porkchop at November 28, 2008 9:45 AM
Whatever you do, people, don't deal in reality. Deal in some invented sicko/pervert some parallel universe wherein Muslims aren't terrorists, Pakistan doesn't churn them out like sausage machines, and those terrorists didn't arrive in rubber dinghys from Karachi. Just feed one of the two Muslim delusions, which exist side-by-side, namely the one that they put up for liberals and journalists whereby terrorists are never Muslim and when they are they are a tiny minorty of extremists who are impoverished and disenfranchised, never the one that exists when they speak among themselves and they high-five each other and ululate over stuff like this.
Posted by: jdamn at November 28, 2008 9:47 AM
Hmmm.
The Pakis are demanding that India not correlate the Islamist killers in "Mumbai" (aka Bombay) with Pakistan.
However, the Pakis are doing the usual: condemning the attacks to the outside world, while simultaneously protecting their ilk.
It is the same game they have long played with the USA , where the Pakis protect the AlQaida types in the mountains.
Demanding that the US notify the Paki govt before any attacks.
Which attacks with notifications have never worked, but the attacks w/o notifications lately ARE working, but the Paki govt is screaming and hollering.
at November 28, 2008 10:30 AM
There is no good will with Islam. Islam has no intention of having good relations with the kafir that the rest of world not under Islam. Pakistan is a place that we have posted on before many times, the Islamic Jihad continues unabated. This clearly shows together with the London bombings that Western Muslims can get easy access to terrorist training in Pakistan. Any Pakistani descendant living in the west does not have to get a Pakistani visa to enter as long as he is Muslim.
The war on terror has failed with all the hoopla and cooperation between governments has been a facade. Pakistan and Islamic countries have played India the US and the west like a poker game, fooled the west and will again get away without any repercussions for these terrorist acts. Islam and Muslims have and are having a field day. They are practicing their religion freely. Kill non Muslims as sacrificial lambs to Allah. Gain Islamic territory, mass birth rates, deceive the non Muslims. Getting billions in jizya. Not bad for the religion of peace.
Posted by: savsiv at November 28, 2008 10:40 AM
Pakistan and Saudi Arabia were responsible for 9-11. Pakistan funded and supported the Taliban. Gave them weapons, intelligence, and ended up giving a safe place to hide from American (and NATO) forces once we entered.
The Arabians (along with the UAE and other gulf states) have funded all these jihadist groups over the years. Most of the front line hijackers in 9-11 were from that state. Yet both of them are still called our ally, or have not been bombed and invaded. We invaded Iraq. We invaded Afghanistan (which is in truth no-mans land).
We must cripple the economic engine of Jihad. To do that we must crush the Arabian states, and must crush Pakistan. I am not saying invade, and try to win hearts and minds. No, I mean crush their ability to fund wars, and attacks around the planet. It is time for the Arabian states to understand that the US military is not a private security force meant to protect them. It is time we act like the Russians, or Chinese.
Sometimes you just have to act like a superpower, and big time people. I say the Arabian oil supplies would be fair compensation for our pain and suffering. We can share it with the Russians, Brits and Chinese. That should get the UN security council on our side. The rest of the world might complain. The Islamic states will try to fight it. However, if it is clear we will divide the spoils (the oil fields) with Russia, EU, India and China…really who the hell is going to stop us. It is clear the Arabians are not responsible states, so for the good of the world the major powers must step in, and restore economic order by supplying a oil (energy supply) that is safe and in which the monies will be kept in responsible hands. Don’t worry we will allow the Muslims to keep Mecca and Medina. For now…
It is for the good of the world…
at November 28, 2008 11:05 AM
India has no choice but to invade Pakistan.
Posted by: cicereaux at November 28, 2008 11:11 AM
Does anyone still remember the saying that "A thief is usually the first one to accuse other of stealing" .
Lets do a minor revision.
A hate-filled murderous revengeful thug is usually the first one to accuse a victim of wanting revenge".
Ergo....the Muslims that keep worrying about the "Backlash" that never seems to happen.....do so because that's how they would respond and merely assume everyone else is a mindless idiot and predisposed to violence as we see from far too many followers of Muhammad's Communism/Faith.
Just ask yourself what you think would happen if non-Muslims Hijacked a fully loaded 747 and flew it into the Black-Cube during haaj and slaughtered 3000 Muslims.
Would Muslims call for calm and not rush to judgement for a scapegoat to attack, would CAIR tell Muslims not to become "Infidelophobes" and fear every non-Muslims.
I'm sure you know the answers and have already pictured the Global response from this Peaceful/Forgiving faith .
at November 29, 2008 4:10 AM
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)