FrontPageMag.com By Robert Spencer By Hugh Fitzgerald Books Jihad Watch Robert Spencer Islam 101 Qur'an Blog
 
« Christmas for Iraqi Christians: Three bombs and a Fatal Shooting | Main | Dhimmitude at the Vatican »

January 8, 2004

Europe's Arab gambit

According to the pioneering historian of dhimmitude, Bat Ye'or, Europe's current explosion of anti-Semitism and rapidly rising Muslim population are the results of a strategy implemented long ago. Caroline Glick has the story in today's Jerusalem Post: "The poll conducted recently by the EU which found that Europeans consider Israel to be the single greatest threat to world peace shocked many and caused the EU’s political leadership to cringe with embarrassment. And yet, according to Geneva-based historian Bat Yeor, the results are the culmination of a European policy now three decades old.

"Yeor was born in Egypt and as a Jew was forced to renounce her Egyptian citizenship in 1955 when she fled with her family to Britain. In 1960 she settled in Geneva and has, over the past 30-odd years been a trailblazer in the study of how Muslims have, throughout Islamic history, mistreated their non-Muslim minorities and indeed, how Muslims today attempt to take over non-Muslim societies.

"Bat Yeor was in Israel last month giving a series of lectures on her newest book, Eurabia. In it she presents her thesis that today Europe is both consciously and unconsciously surrendering its Judeo-Christian roots and embracing new cultural and political identities in which Arab and Islamic traditions, including the tradition of dhimmitude (the subservience of non-Muslims to Islamic culture and expansionism), are its central unifying themes. In line with her analysis, Yeor defines the new anti-Semitism in Europe as 'an expression of the mutation of Europe into a new culture and society linked with profound cultural and religious transformations.' During her visit, she discussed with the Jerusalem Post what she sees as the results of Europe’s abandonment of Israel.

"'After the [1962] French withdrawal from Algeria, [French President Charles] De Gaulle, who up to that point favored Israel, completely changed France’s policy toward the Arab and Muslim world. There was a convergence between France’s embrace of the Arabs and its attempt to weaken the Atlantic alliance with America. The Arabs were to give France strategic independence from the US. France’s attempt, first through the European Economic Community and now through the European Union to create a unified European foreign policy, in competition with the US and led by France, sees European alliance with the Arab world as one of the primary sources of this strategic independence.'

"While, in Yeor’s view, 'De Gaulle’s strategy was in the abstract,' the European embrace of the Islamic and Arab at the expense of Israel and the US became a concrete policy in the wake of the 1973 Yom Kippur War and the subsequent OPEC oil embargo of the West.

"In November 1973, French president George Pompidou and German chancellor Willy Brandt met in Paris and proclaimed a joint resolution aligning EC policy with the Arab demands against Israel. This, according to Yeor was the first official European declaration of a unified foreign policy.

"'After this proclamation, the Arab League opened a formal dialogue with the EC. It was not a simple exchange between elites from the two sides. It established three bodies that would regulate European-Arab relations regarding the US, Israel and Arab immigration to Europe.'

"The aim of these joint policies was to force an Israeli withdrawal to the 1949 armistice lines, to enable free immigration of Arabs to European countries and to apply consistent pressure on the US to end its support for Israel, she says.

"The main organ of this new framework was the European-Arab Dialogue, or EAD. The EAD encompassed political, parliamentary and cultural dialogues and also oversaw the European agreement to allow unimpeded immigration of millions of Arabs to Europe. According to Yeor, 'the volume of this population flow was unprecedented in the history of European colonialization. And also unprecedented was the European decision to allow and encourage the new immigrants to maintain their ties to their countries of origin and thus prevent their integration into European society.'

"In a continuous flow of joint resolutions, Arab and European officials called for the diffusion of Arabic and Islamic culture in Europe through European universities. A pinnacle of these efforts, Yeor argues came during French President Jacques Chirac’s 1996 visit to Cairo.

"'During that visit Chirac proclaimed that Europe and Muslims should write history together.'

"As to Arab cultural autonomy in Europe, the resolution of the 1975 conference of the Parliamentary Association for Euro-Arab Cooperation anchored this effort by calling for the European governments to facilitate 'the creation of generous means to enable immigrant workers and their families to participate in Arab cultural and religious life.' The results of these policies on Europe have, according to Yeor, been nothing short of disastrous.

"'What the Europeans did not realize at the time was that their embrace of the Arab and Muslim world did not simply involve their abandonment of Israel. What they were actually destroying was themselves.

"'Europe is a continent built on the roots of Judeo-Christian traditions and history and values. By allowing unlimited Arab immigration and the Islamization of their universities, they were destroying their own culture. The new culture that has taken form in Europe is one of subservience to Islam. The new religion, in the post-Christian Europe is "Palestinianism" whose core belief is the need to destroy Israel and replace it with a Palestinian state. Palestinianism replaces a Jewish Jesus with a Muslim Jesus.'

"For Israel, the European decision to merge its foreign policy with the Arab world has led to diplomatic isolation and demonization, according to Ye’or. It was in the wake of the Yom Kippur War and the increased European cooperation with the Arab League that European countries began voting against Israel in the UN and seeking to isolate it in international bodies. The 1975 UN General Assembly Resolution that equated Zionism with racism was a capstone of these efforts.

"'Since the intifada broke out in 2000, the rejection of Israel and the embrace of Palestinians has taken on cult-like attributes,' Yeor notes. 'Every manifestation of public and political life must take up the Palestinian cause. In a very real way, the embrace of the Palestinians provides a mask for the expression of traditional European anti-Semitism.'

"Europe’s embrace of the Arab political agenda for Israel lies, according to Yeor, at the root of European unwillingness to cooperate with the US on the war on terror. 'Until September 11, Chirac and Villepin always said that the root cause of terrorism is the Israel-Arab conflict. This is of course the Arab-Islamic view. Like the Nazi vision of the centrality of Jews as the root of all evil, it is a vision long developed and adopted by Europeans. When George Bush said, after September 11 that "you’re either with us or with the terrorists," he didn’t understand what was going on in Europe. The truth is that for 30 years the Europeans were with the terrorists. They can’t fight the Arabs; they have allowed the Arabs to dictate their policy since 1974. It is a huge problem. Part of the reason is also that they are terrified of terrorism. Their decision was to be subservient, not to fight and that has been their policy for 30 years. By attacking Israel, they believe they are saving themselves, but really, they are destroying themselves.'

"'Increasingly,' Yeor notes, 'the European-Arabian alliance has led to the increase in European anti-Americanism. For the Arabs, President Bush’s quotations from the Bible and allusion to the Judeo-Christian roots of America is anathema.'"

Posted by Robert at January 8, 2004 9:06 AM
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us

Comments
(Note: Comments on articles are unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Dhimmi Watch or Robert Spencer. Comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying may be summarily deleted. However, the fact that particular comments remain on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Robert Spencer of the views expressed therein.)

The French, so concerned about Disney and McDonalds, will not make a peep when Norte Dame of Paris is converted into a Mosque.

Posted by: Infidel at January 8, 2004 2:52 PM

it is both fascinating and terrifying to see
the convergence of daniel's 5th gentile empire
(daniel 2.41-45);

islamic/arabian and western/christendom'

coming together to try and eliminate the jewish
state.

sorry... :)

its not going to happen!

Yeshua has reserved for Himself the pleaure of
rescuing israel in its dire need and of course
justly punishing the anti-semites of the world.

forrestshalom

Posted by: forrestshalom at January 9, 2004 12:45 AM

Everything Bat Yeor is true and painfully obvious to any honest observer. However, events are moving quickly. What happens when you have democratic, pro-American governments in Iraq, Afghanistan (and soon, who knows, maybe Iran)? Will this cause an acceleration of the movement of the Jihadi center of gravity out of the middle east and into Europe? Or will the Europeans save themselves (note Chircac's recent religious head dress decision, which will of course overwhelmingly affect hijab-wearing muslims)? The demographics are so badly stacked against the Europeans that I would not count on it. America is not safe either - the immigration policies that allow millions of muslims into our country will ultimately pose very serious problems. Perhaps Europa once and for all rotting out from its center and falling into obscurity is just what the world needs; a kind of flypaper strategy where the worst of the Muslim world will go to Europe (where they will find a warm reception) and thus leave the middle east to the more moderate and sane Muslims who are perhaps capable of forming normal societies. Maybe.

Posted by: Rafael at January 9, 2004 1:31 AM

This is the scariest and most depressing thing I've read in a long time. And I've been reading a lot of scary and depressing things lately. Looking into the future, I see a fundamental new major alliance keeping the world from descending into Islamic totalitarianism: The United States, India and China; opposing them will be the Arab states and Europe. Are these to be the Allies and Axis of World War IV (if you consider the current war on terror to be the beginnings of WWIII, as I do)? It looks like we eventually may need to liberate Europe again (as we did in 1944-5), but this time we may need to "destroy the village in order to save it," to quote from a lesson learned in an earlier war.

Posted by: tad at January 9, 2004 2:55 AM

Bat Ye'or believes, unlike the American foreign affairs analyst Robert Kagan, that the insinuation of Arab/Muslim interests begun through the aegis of the European Arab [League} Dialogue in 1977- post the oil crisis of the Yom Kippur War, is really what divides America from "old Europe." Certainly recent announcements of EU external relations Commissioner, the Rt. Hon Chris Patten, after the late 2003 Naples and Tunis conferences to establish developmental banking among the Mediterranean Arab/Muslim nations and the EU confirm Bat Ye'or’s forecast. The worst excesses of what Bat Ye'or has warned about has been the volcanic French Muslim Jew hatred—burning synagogues and businesses, beating, intimidating Jewish students and adults and, as Alyssa Lappen and Nidra Poller have chronicled, murdering Jews. These atrocities are dramatic evidence of the Islamic hatred and rapidly growing demographic presence in Europe, especially France.

Bat Ye'or fervently believes that the US is the last best hope because of its fervent Judeo Christian ethos to combat the threat of islamization both here in America and around the globe. Copies of Bat Ye’or’s new book, Eurabia, this spring should be "must reading" at the White House National Security Council, the DoD, JCS and the several subject foreign affairs committees of the US Congress.

Posted by: Jerry Gordon at January 9, 2004 11:17 AM

I think Bat Ye'or often isn't given the credit she deserves. I think she is the BEST analyst of Islamic terror, even better than people like Bernard Lewis and Daniel Pipes. I wish she would do TV interviews.

Posted by: Me at January 10, 2004 8:52 PM

As an American missionary living in Berlin the past 2 years, this article is extremely helpful in understanding why the Europeans & the Moslems both say what say and do what they do here. And it is clearer now more than ever why the Lord brought me here: to share a message of Hope to a people living in darkness and deception. Thanks for your prayers...

Posted by: Cathy Palmer at January 12, 2004 5:44 PM