![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
Why was Al-Jazeera treated like any other news organization at the Democratic Convention? From Thomas Ryan at FrontPage, with thanks to Son of Infidel:
Despite Democratic Presidential Nominee John Kerry’s assertion that as President, he would “use every available resource to destroy terrorists and deny them sanctuary…and new recruits,” one of the invited guests at the now-concluded Democratic National Convention was an organization that has served as a terrorist recruitment tool, a communications conduit for al-Qaeda in general and Osama bin Laden in particular. This network has repeatedly described Palestinian suicide-bombers as “martyrs.” High above the platform and the sea of “Kerry-Edwards” placards, covering the convention from a skybox towering over the Fleet Center floor was Arabic network al-Jazeera, the Arab satellite news agency whose allegedly “factual and accurate” news coverage has been blatantly anti-American. The Democrats were at least savvy enough to remove the network’s banner, which had been strategically placed near the speakers’ podium. But how could any candidate or political party “serious” about terrorism make no fuss about allowing such a news group inside its convention?Al-Jazeera was founded in 1996 and is renowned worldwide for its dubious claim that it is politically independent. In reality, the agency was started with $150 million in seed money from the emir of Qatar, who continues to grant the agency annual gifts. Al-Jazeera, which has been called the “Arab CNN,” acts as a public access channel for foreign terrorists.
It would appear al-Jazeera not only shares the airwaves with al-Qaeda; it shares personnel, as well. In 2003, Taysir Allouni, a popular reporter for al-Jazeera, was arrested in Spain for having links to the al-Qaeda terrorist group. Allouni, who interviewed Osama bin Laden after 9/11, was accused of giving assistance to two al-Qaeda officials: Imad Eddin Barakat Yarkas, alias Abu Dahdah, who was arrested in November of 2001, and is believed to have been Spain’s al-Qaeda commander; and Mohamed Bahiah, alias Abu Kalhed, who is believed to be an al-Qaeda militant fighting in Afghanistan....
Terrorists are certainly interested in the elections process. It was just this past March that a series of ten bombs exploded aboard a crowded commuter train in Madrid, Spain, killing 201 innocent people, and causing Spanish citizens to elect a government that was more appeasing to the desires of al-Qaeda terrorists. John Kerry has said, “As president, I will not rest until I can look into the eyes of the American people who want a future of freedom and security, and say ‘We are as safe as we can be.’” It wasn’t only the eyes of the American people that Kerry has looked into, but also the lens of an al-Jazeera camera, a camera that has pervasively portrayed the United States as the evil antagonist, and global terrorists as the guiltless victims, but which has subsequently portrayed Kerry as a more agreeable figure than the current incumbent.
John Kerry and the Democratic Party failed this terror test.
Posted by Robert at July 31, 2004 6:23 AM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
Had occurred to me that Al Quaeda might try a repeat of what happened in Spain just before elections in U.S. This is very worrying indeed.
Qatar is where that Qaradwi fella is based who lately visited Red Ken in U.K. You know, the peaceful, pious cleric, exponent of Sharia who is in favour of Jews being killed by suicide bombers...Yeah, they're all harmless really. And these Journalists from Al Jaz could audition for Mary Poppins...
at July 31, 2004 7:46 AM
Al-Jazeera is here to give Islamists an eye into the world of Democrats. The cameras recorded a party but their reporters were out and about interviewing and making connections as would any good journalists. In other words they are spies for the Islamists and their jihadist foot soldiers.
Posted by: epg
at July 31, 2004 8:21 AM
america once saved europe from tranny
not long ago.
there is no one to save america as it swallows
islam gulp by gulp.
at July 31, 2004 11:09 AM
Forrestslalom ruminated:
"america once saved europe from tranny
not long ago.
there is no one to save america as it swallows
islam gulp by gulp."
Huh?
Posted by: Whistling Dixie
at July 31, 2004 11:54 AM
Makes sense to me.
America is drinking in Islam. With the help of the loony left. Soon America will be under siege from within. There doesn't seem to be any will to stop this infiltration of the enemy. Just as allowing their instuctors into universities to brainwash our young,so too do they take positions in all levels of government. Don't think that they aren't having effect, they are.
Posted by: Mullah_Abu_Bin_Boobie
at July 31, 2004 1:06 PM
I wouldn't care so much if the far left Democrats decide to sell their souls for a few dollars to the militant, fanatical, extremists islams but unfortunately the decisions that they make in poor judgement will affect a lot more people than just them.
Posted by: Truth
at July 31, 2004 11:36 PM
Agreed truth.
As much as I believe the Democratic party - and those who follow it - are decent Americans (for the most part), I cannot for the life of me find a reason to vote for any of their candidates. They have moved so far left of center that what is currently the right today was once the position of JFK in the early 60's.
Personally, I believe that the Democrats are making HUGE mistakes in aligning themselves with the Muslims. They (the Dems.) aren't bad people, but they are EXTREMELY naiev and just plain wrong. Sigh.
Posted by: paula
at August 1, 2004 8:28 AM
the muslims must be salivating at the bit to watch on teevee america capitulating so easily.
what a choice bush or kerry!
american tycoons have sold out the country to their
arabian masters.
at August 1, 2004 8:44 AM
This kerry is vaery dangerous, this friends are very perjudical for America and for his party. I Hope that America must stand this agression of islamism.
Posted by: Franze
at August 2, 2004 7:49 AM


(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)