![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
Burak Bekdil in Kathimerini (thanks to Ali Dashti) asks some much-needed questions about Turkey's radical Muslims and its hopes to enter the EU:
This column has invariably argued that Recep Tayyip Erdogan was a reformist, but an overrated one. He has reformed some of Turkey’s laws, not necessarily because he genuinely believed in reforms, but because he wanted to win a date from the European Union, a date which would minimize the military’s powers and earn him a second and perhaps a third term in power in a country where three in every four support the idea of membership in the EU. Inevitably, the time has come for Mr Erdogan’s alter ego to speak on his behalf....Mr Erdogan, apparently under pressure from his party’s Islamist flank, wants to outlaw adultery despite increasingly loud warnings from the EU that if he went ahead with the plan Turkey would not be given a date to start membership talks. Mr Erdogan is dangerously zigzagging between his broader goals and his own roots. Guenter Verheugen, enlargement commissioner, had to remind Mr Erdogan of the bitter truth: that Turkey wants to join the EU, not vice versa....
Mr Erdogan hopes, first and foremost, to reward the “greener” of his party members and grassroots supporters. He has failed to please them in matters like removing the headscarf ban — a dispute seen by many as the symbol of the clash between political Islam and secularism and one of Mr Erdogan’s pre-election pledges. Larger groups of Islamists tend to protest that Mr Erdogan, once their much-praised “Imam of Istanbul,” has failed to keep his “greener” promises....
There is something deeply wrong in the thinking of the “reformist” and his men. They claim that they are the “real secularists.” But it is an open secret that they want to outlaw adultery because it is a sin under the Koran (as in other holy books). This is dangerous thinking. With a clear majority in Parliament, Mr Erdogan’s men may one day wake up with the idea of criminalizing alcohol or pork, for both are banned under the Koran.
Also, Mr Erdogan thinks that EU understanding on criminalizing adultery would show that the bloc was taking Muslim values into account. This mind-set is not healthy. Confident that a date was in sight, Mr Erdogan wanted to test the waters to see what Muslim values he could impose on the non-Muslim club during accession talks. The answer to his curiosity lies in Mr Verheugen’s clear-cut reply to his bravado — that the EU was not a sine qua non for Turkey. A smart man, Mr Erdogan should be able to get the message. But he has made things more difficult for himself.
When he bluntly played down the EU criticism on the adultery dispute and delivered stronger messages to his “greener” grassroots, Mr Erdogan tied himself to his promise to outlaw adultery. If, under EU pressure, he steps back, he will once again ridicule himself in the eyes of the Islamists whom he cannot give up.
The solution is simple. Mr Erdogan must decide on his true identity at once. He must either completely break with the Islamist past and walk toward the center, or give up his reformist, pro-EU rhetoric. He cannot continue to be both. Besides, Mr Erdogan should be able to understand that he cannot change the rules and values of the club he hopes to join one day.
Posted by Robert at September 22, 2004 9:13 AM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
Good. But Turkey now has no chance of being admitted, and it should not be. And the Turks should put the blame primarily on Arab Muslims, and their activities. It will help them to recover their Kemalism, and to use Turkish nationalist fervor among secularists to outweigh, or overcome, that of their Muslim opponents. Then they should learn the same lesson that the Iranian leftists now in exile from the Islamic Republic of Iran have had to painfully learn: Islam does not go away. Islam can only be tamed, and constant vigilance is required. Ataturk was a successful despot. Shah Reza Pahlavi was an unsuccessful despot. The former constrained Islam and made Turkey a much better place. The latter enriched himself, had grandiose visions of Iran as the "second industrial power" in Asia. Follow the former, not the latter.
Posted by: Hugh
at September 22, 2004 9:44 AM
Turkey should not be allowed into the EU. It is said that Turkey is a secular democracy. Maybe, but only of sorts. The heavy hand of the military is constantly necessary to ensure that a modicum of democracy prevails. If Turkey comes into Europe, this military interference will not be acceptable. So what then?
Europe is based on a Judeo-Christian tradition. However, it has become increasingly secular. We can argue about the merits of this; but in any case, democracy and freedom prevails.
Islam is totally and utterly incompatible with democracy and freedom. In addition, Christianity is weakening in Europe. By contrast, Islam is gaining strength all over the world, even in the West.
If we wish to leave Europe free and democratic for our children, and our children's children, then we need to say 'NO' to Turkey. If we need a population increase, which we so obviously do, then WE ourselves need to procreate. We shouldn't rely on immigrants to fill the gap. Only this will secure our future!
at September 22, 2004 10:12 AM
Why does this man strike me as a Turkish John Kerry?
Posted by: Rottweiller
at September 22, 2004 3:18 PM
Maybe Europe (along with America and Canada) needs to re-appropriate its Christian past. As for a law against adultery, I'm sure all those Voltaire wannabes who think Turkey "barbaric" for wanting to criminalize adultery would still like to run rapiers through anyone they find in bed with their wives (since they look back to an 18th century mentor).
Posted by: Kepha1
at September 22, 2004 7:50 PM
Consenting adults have the right to have sex with other consenting adults. To throw some-one into jail for having sex with some-one else is immoral.
Posted by: Voltaire
at September 22, 2004 8:43 PM
So, Voltaire, you'd politely bow and leave the room if you found your wife in bed with another man (or woman?) and feel that everything's OK?
Three Christian cheers for Turkey!
Posted by: Kepha1
at September 23, 2004 11:44 PM


(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)