![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
Clash of civilizations in Como. From NBC, with thanks to Ali Dashti:
ROME - An Italian woman who is married to an Arab man and converted to Islam, has been ticketed twice in the past week for wearing a burqa in her small village in the province of Como.The dispute, which may eventually reach Italy's highest court, highlights growing unease in this staunchly Catholic country over a growing Muslim population.
Many Italians are unhappy with the impact of immigration from Islamic countries. Prior to the controversy in Como, there was a public outcry when a judge agreed last October to a Muslim activist's demand that a crucifix be removed from his son's classroom wall.
The number of Muslims in Italy is growing. According to the latest data, there are now between 700,000-1 million Muslims living in the country, out of a population of 57 million.
Convert to Islam
Many right-wingers in Italy believe that the violent world triggered by 9/11 is simply today’s version of the Moors versus the Crusaders of a thousand years ago.
To them this is a clash of cultures, east against west, Christ against Mohammed, harsh theocracy versus indulgent democracy.
In Drezzo, on the outskirts of Como in northern Italy, a skirmish is under way.
Sabina Varroni is a 34-year-old woman who has lived in Drezzo for many years. She’s married to a Moroccan man with whom she has four children, Sarah, 10, Omar, 9, Delel, 7, and Imen, 5.
Now that she has converted to Islam she has decided to observe her religious obligations by wearing the full burqa, the solid veil covering the entire face rendered infamous by the Taliban in Afghanistan.
When she started wearing the burqa in public, Mayor Cristian Tolettini got an earful of complaints from local women who didn’t like the new style one bit and were not about to tolerate it.
The mayor gave in to the pressure and instructed the one municipal policeman in town to crack down on Varroni with a ticket.
Violation of arcane law
The ticket was based on the violation of Article 85 of a package of security laws imposed in 1931 under the fascist dictator Benito Mussolini, which forbids citizens to “mask themselves in public.”
But the text of the law is not specific as to the covering of one’s face.
Indeed, in that interpretation, people would not be able to celebrate Carnival here and even nuns' habits could conceivably be in violation of the law.
Michele Ainis, a law professor at the University of Teramo told the Italian daily Corriere della Sera that he’s certain that the mayor will lose the legal battle when the issue goes to Italy’s constitutional court.
He said the security decree was one of the “most fascist laws in 20 years of fascism,” and each time any part of it has come before the court it’s been thrown out as unconstitutional.
Posted by Robert at September 22, 2004 9:18 AM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
Molto, molto buono.....
Posted by: DCWatson
at September 22, 2004 10:16 AM
This is not a religious problem, it is a public safety issue. Who or what is under that burqa. Is there an assault rifle, a bomb, a man or a woman? Muslims continue to force dangerous, if not annoying, habits on the West.
Posted by: epg
at September 22, 2004 11:12 AM
Three men in London robbed a jewellry store. They wear all wearing a burqa.
Posted by: Voltaire
at September 22, 2004 5:31 PM
Voltaire, I know you meant 'burqas,' plural... but the first thing that came to mind was all three men wearing One burqa. I could just hear the dialogue as they tried to move around:
"Spread out!"
"You gotta lotta noive!"
"Why I oughta-"
*shakes head* I seem to be stuck on Three Stooges this week...
Posted by: Gary
at September 22, 2004 7:44 PM
Harsh theocracy versus indulgent democracy? Nonsense. Islam is not a theocracy, but a clerocracy. The meteor god Allah is not God, so a state run in its name is not under the rule of the God who is there.
Further, our Western ideals of rule of law and consent of the governed were part and parcel of the 16th and 17th century Calvinist search for a society under God (which sounds theocratic to me: theos=God; kratos=rule). Calvin urged aristocracy tempered with Democracy as the best government, because he did not trust kings to do what was right. The Scots Presbyterians early recognized the monarch's subordination to law and the commons; plus a right of rebellion against a tyrant (a line of thinkers stretching from George Buchanan in the 1560's, through Samuel Rutherford in the 1640's, and the framers of the Claim of Right in 1689). The Dutch national anthem, written by a Calvinist, is a poetic retelling of William of Nassau's struggle of conscience concerning his loyalties to God and people versus his feudal obligation to the King of Spain. Let's also not forget the Huguenot tract _Vindiciae Contra Tyrannos_, or Johannes Althusius' plea for federalism in _De Politica_ (1613).
Mr. Spencer writes:
**Violation of arcane law
**The ticket was based on the violation of Article 85 of a package of security laws imposed in 1931 under the fascist dictator Benito Mussolini, which forbids citizens to “mask themselves in public.”
Interestingly enough, many jurisdictions in the American South had anti-mask laws in the 1920's and '30's because of Ku Klux Klan activity. The power of the Klan in the 1920's was one factor in turning many such laws into dead letters.
at September 22, 2004 8:01 PM
Gary, you made me laugh.
Posted by: Voltaire
at September 22, 2004 8:39 PM


(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)