"Danish Muslim"......

......No such thing, only "a muslim doing demographic jihad in Denmark".

Muslims will not recognise any nationality, as they believe all the world is allahs(hawk!!!spit!!!).

Posted by: Rikki at September 28, 2004 8:29 AM

By muslim logic ALL christians should be at war with islam because of the genocide committed BY muslims AGAINST Christians in Sudan. I wonder what would happen to a native Dane if he said something like that in Denmark. It's sickening the way our governments and media apply double standards to the muslims . and you have to ask the question why. The muslims are doing what good little robots do and trying to destroy the west from within (that's what they do -it's what they are) but why are our powers-that-be giving them so much help? It can't be for cheap labour because there are millions of hard-working Christian East Europeans who would move to the West in a moment if given the chance. Maybe it's Saudi money sliming it's way through our body politic and media ? Maybe it's this leftist goal of destroying judeo-christian culture once and for all and the right go along with it because Pakistanis and Arabs will work for minimum wage (while raising their dozen children on state benefits). Either way I think we have to accept that our leaders are in on the islamification of our society. It seems increasingly that the answer lies in the extremist fringe parties who aren't corrupted by saudi money or PC notions. The old ideas of left and right have to go - as someone once said "Islamophobia means survival". Time to choose whose side we're on.

Posted by: Son Of Albion at September 28, 2004 8:49 AM

We might have to wait until Islamist HIT THEIR LEGITIMATE TARGETS! Guess it will then be too late for dim Dhimmi Danish Ministers...Poor stupid
sods!!

Posted by: Morgane at September 28, 2004 11:55 AM

Some "moderate" Danish Muslims rush to take distance from what the Guantanamo guy said. As usual, they are worried about Islam's image, not about those threatened (it's just a couple of days since the previous PR error: a mufti blaming unveiled women in Denmark for defiling society and provoking rape).

And their recipe to make things better? More Islamic schools in Denmark!

A couple of translated quotes from the comments:
Pakistani-born sociologist Mustafa Hussain: "...It is not what all Muslims think, he has no authority on Islam. He has hurt a lot of Muslims in Denmark, there is already skepticism about Muslim groups... There is a need for a debate at another level... Islam from Morocco to Indonesia can be interpreted according to each country's own needs... THEREFORE, I WARMLY SUPPORT THE IDEA OF DANISH ISLAMIC EDUCATION"

And Syrian-born Fahmy Almayid, an immigrant consultant:
"He can't speak on behalf of Muslims.... The Muslim community is split in Denmark. There are lots of self-proclaimed imams and theologists, fighting each other. WE HAVE AN ENORMOUS NEED FOR ISLAMIC THEOLOGICAL EDUCATION HERE IN DENMARK".

(Originals: http://www.berlingske.dk/indland/artikel:aid=487240/; http://www.berlingske.dk/indland/artikel:aid=487246/)

Just how helpful is the proposed solution, knowing what is generally taught in Islamic schools? How much does a country like Denmark need "its own interpretation of Islam"?

Does anyone know why the Danish Muslims can't become moderate in regular public schools? Isn't it a bit too comfy: first the militants stir emotions up, then the "moderates" use the situation to promote Islamic schools (and demand state financing for them)? The claims for state financed Islamic schools in Scandinavia were also made after the Madrid bombings - there were kind of "see what happens if we don't feel at home here" - arguments. Doesn't it sound like blackmail?

Posted by: Scandie at September 28, 2004 12:06 PM

The Defence Minister said afterwards that he did not know whether these intolerable and offensive threats were illegal.

In the USA, is it illegal to call for "terror" against those associated with CAIR, the EXISTING islamist doorway into America? If someone were to say "stand up for the US, CAIRs heads are legitimate targets!" would that statement be against the law? RS?

Posted by: yahudimrevenge at September 28, 2004 5:24 PM

Scandie raises some very good points. In Britain too the extremist muslims say something controversial and then the "moderates" come along and spin their soothing words which usually include an invite to study islam (under their guidance of course). I wonder how much of this is coordinated between the "good cop - bad cop muslims" ? It's like when politicians want to bring in a new law - they drop advance hints that it's going to be really radical - everyone gets worried about it and then, when it does come out and isn't as bad as people were led to believe they accept it more readily. Some one else can probably explain the concept a lot better than I just did but I hope you get my drift.

Posted by: Son Of Albion at September 28, 2004 6:35 PM

Son of Albion:

Got it. No need for anyone else to explain it further. If this Islamic technique is publicized widely, no one will fall for it in future.

As for the Guantanamo alums:

Seems like these guys should not be graduated from there except feet first. No need for Red Cross and the media to supervise the treatment of these "enemy combatants," nor for Islamic clerics, to reinforce their Islamic fervor.

Although the Geneva Convention is not applicable to the inmates, because they are not POWs, treatment for these jihadists--because every Moslem that ends up there has been apprehended while engaged in jihad--leaves them as fully committed to their mission as before capture.

Would rabid dogs when captured and quarantined and still found to be rabid be released to keep on creating havoc?

Well, then why do we have to read about one barking and foaming at the mouth in Denmark?

Posted by: unicorns62000 at September 29, 2004 2:27 AM

Blair , in his speech, gave a thorough reasoning for the Iraq war, and in the process revealed that he is quite aware of islams role in worldwide terror, hate being preached on our streets and the genocide in Sudan (as well as a long list of other islamic attrocities from recent times).
His speech was emotional, well spoken, direct, and factual.
And after this it really made me wonder if the government are actually totally clued up as to what jihad is, and have other motives for allowing them to islamify the UK (as Son of Albion put it).

I came up with a number of theories, one of them being that we are allowing them to plot and scheme on our land to spy on them (keep your friends close...your enemies even closer...),
or another theory (and this is really extreme but....who knows...???) is that the government are actually aware how out of control the islamic problem has got, and feel powerless to stop it, and daren't tell the public for fear of a bloody civil war ( the left would be their spies in that scenario).

Either way I opt for a nation-wide uprising to tear this plague apart.

Posted by: Rikki at September 29, 2004 8:09 AM