![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
Opponents of jihad ideology are often accused of identifying culture practices with the religion of Islam, and thus blaming Islam for things for which it is not responsible. But this is generally a false charge: I for my part am happy to draw this distinction whenever it genuinely applies, and this is one such case. The Qur'an and Islamic law specifically forbid the practice, which apparently was common in pre-Islamic Arabia, of killing female infants. The testimony of these girls to the circumstances of their deaths is even invoked as a feature of the day of judgment:
When the sun is overthrown, And when the stars fall, And when the hills are moved, And when the camels big with young are abandoned, And when the wild beasts are herded together, And when the seas rise, And when souls are reunited, And when the girl-child that was buried alive is asked For what sin she was slain, And when the pages are laid open, And when the sky is torn away, And when hell is lighted, And when the Garden is brought nigh, (Then) every soul will know what it hath made ready. (Qur'an, Sura 81:1-14)
That said, it is likely that Islam's ingrained misogyny contributed to this man's sense of frustration and rage. And his bizarre defense — that he killed them "because he feared that they would one day become promiscuous" — recalls the rationale behind honor killings, a cultural practice that has been defended on Islamic grounds. From AP:
SOHAG, Egypt (AP) - A man angry with fathering no sons stabbed four of his seven daughters to death as they slept and seriously wounded the other three, police said Monday.Abdel Nasser Ibrahim, 47, a muezzin, or mosque prayer caller, in the Sohag provincial town of Tima, 345 kilometres south of Cairo, repeatedly stabbed his seven sleeping daughters with two knives in a rampage that lasted several minutes, a police official said on condition of anonymity.
Killed were Samar, 15; Isra, 10; Fatima, 8; and Zeinab, 7. The screams of the three wounded daughters alerted neighbours to the pre-dawn crime and they later contacted police.
Ibrahim's wife of 18 years left the house before the killings to go and stay with her parents following an argument she had with her husband over failing to give birth to a son, the official told The Associated Press.
Police arrested Ibrahim who later claimed to have stabbed his daughters during a moment of temporary insanity because he feared they would one day become promiscuous. Police also quoted neighbours as saying Ibrahim had not allowed his girls to attend school.
Posted by Robert at November 1, 2004 2:48 PM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
Jordan quashed the anti-honor killing law because it would "destroy family values." Ibrahim killed his daughters because they MIGHT one day be promiscuous, inferring that HIS honor might some day be sullied…and he had no son, or brother to the girls, to do the dirty deed if they might do this or to carry on the family name! Tsk, tsk. I wonder if he will be charged with a crime or suffer any punishment.
The practice may not be Koranic, but it seems to be widespread throughout the Muslim world, even with immigrants that have come to the West.
Posted by: epg
at November 1, 2004 3:23 PM
thank god ,i was born in America ,,
what a bunch of less then human people
Posted by: mark7762
at November 1, 2004 7:01 PM
The koran might forbid doing this, but the misogyny of Islam allows men to feel that their daughters aren't worth as much as men.
As far as chaperoning is concerned: in the 19th century, when girls were chaperoned in the west, they didn't need a male to chaperone them, only another female, such as their sister or a maid. Even in those days, women in the west were way ahead of their muslim sisters.
Posted by: Voltaire
at November 1, 2004 7:03 PM
Very sad, and the fact is the male sperm determines the sex of a baby is not known by this man who kills his children so easily.
Posted by: Carolyn2
at November 1, 2004 7:05 PM
Yes, Carolyn, funny that in this day and age, some men still go around believing their wives are at fault for not "giving them" sons. But it goes along with the whole female-hatred philosophy of Islam. I'm sure they don't tell their flock the real reason behind who or what determines the sex of a baby. Just as they go along with keeping ancient customs that subjugate and enslave women, like honor-killings, FGM, blaming the rape victim for rape, hiding her under metres of drapery and making her ashamed of showing her face and hair, etc. Why throw away those old customs & beliefs which fit in so nicely with the general 'man is superior, woman is merely a possession and a breeder' belief? They so come in handy even today.
Posted by: feralee
at November 1, 2004 9:00 PM
How typically and diabolically ignorant.
Doesnt this loser know that the male determines the sex of a child?
Posted by: DianaC
at November 1, 2004 10:28 PM
You know the most compatible marriage in mankinds history is that of Islam and the Arab mind.
Posted by: Joe Bananas...in Pyjamas
at November 2, 2004 7:03 AM
i guess this could be categorized as pre-emptive honor killings
Posted by: ted
at November 2, 2004 10:26 AM
Diana,
It can't be HIS fault. After all, he is a Muslim male. And I wonder if refusing to accept the will of Allah makes him an apostate?
at November 3, 2004 11:32 AM


(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)