Terminator

I can't get through to Susan. She's not answering my emails. I don't want to give my email in this very public forum. I'm going to ask a favour from Robert. I'll ask if he can send you my email address. Then we can email each other privately.

Remember 14th June is International Apostacy Day. I'll tell you more about that later.

Posted by: Voltaire at May 20, 2005 7:55 AM

Terminator

Robert's email address is Director@Jihadwatch.org

Hoping to hear from you.

Posted by: Voltaire at May 20, 2005 7:56 AM

Conyers?

From Michigan?

A Democrat?

Ain't Dearborn in Michigan?

Who'd a thunk it?

Posted by: PRCS at May 20, 2005 8:00 AM

It must just be me I cant seem to muster a great deal of respect for holy text that calls for my families enslavement and my death.
I may be a bigot.

Posted by: KAOSKTRL at May 20, 2005 8:09 AM

PRCS,

Yes, you are right, Conyers' district covers Hamtramck and large parts of Dearborn.

Posted by: Elephant at May 20, 2005 8:10 AM

No worries,Voltaire!

I am presently in Hong Kong and I can send e-mails, but I can not receive any somehow...

Will be back Sunday morning.

Robert does have my e-mail, so that's cool!

Posted by: Terminator at May 20, 2005 8:45 AM

The resolution, to be introduced by Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), also "condemns bigotry and intolerance against any religious group, including our friends, neighbors and citizens of the Islamic faith."

Hmmm. So, one must uncritically accept Islam in order to avoid the smear of "intolerance". Interesting. Intellectual integrity and religious belief must be set aside so as not to offend muslims residing in the U.S. (I somehow find "muslim-american" an incompatible mixture.)

Intellectual critics of Islam must leave off critical examination of Islam?

Christians, Jews and members of other religions must not scrutinise Islam too closely or note why their beliefs are superior to or different from Islam?

The basis for friendship and shared community is RESPECT. Conyers fails to understand that Islam does not RESPECT infidels.

Posted by: info_tech_guy at May 20, 2005 9:08 AM

This is a possible dangerous threat to are first amendment rights. It may be worded diffrently, but it is the same thing as we find in Australia and in Europe ( remember the Preacher that was arrested for violating Australias new laws that do not allow you to critisize religion when he preached the truth against what he saw in the tenets of Islam. I hope our politicians are not as ignorant as those in Australia and some European countries, or where in trouble.

We need to keep an eye on this CAIR Bill, I mean Conyers Bill to be sure that it does not take away our first Amendment rights to critisize religion or anything else. This has the ingredients to be a serious challenge without question .

We should all contact our congressman if we get any hint that this is what the bill is calling for.

DON'T LET CARE DICTATE AND RUN OUR GOVERNMENT AS THEY ARE CONSTANLTY TRYING TO DO. Always keep in mind that Islam is the most antisemeitc religion on the planet and this just another effort to suppress and control us as a free people.

Posted by: Mackie at May 20, 2005 9:28 AM

I just called my congressman and asked him to NOT support this measure.

Posted by: Mike H at May 20, 2005 9:34 AM

Do call and write your Congressmen. This is a first step toward limiting and finally abolishing first amendment rights.

Rapid conquest comes through war. Slow, inexorable conquest comes in steps. In order to guard against the loss of our culture and our freedoms, we must be ever vigilant to take countermeasures before we find ourselves facing the same conditions as do the Europeans and Australians.

Posted by: epg at May 20, 2005 10:09 AM

I am searching the House website and cannot find the resolution. Does anyone have a link?

I would like to see the actual text, and have its number before contacting my representative. Am I correct in my understanding that the text will be available before the members vote for endorsement? Can Conyers just stand up and announce it for an immediate vote?

Posted by: St_James at May 20, 2005 10:26 AM

If Congress caves in to the demands of C.A.I.R., it will prove without a doubt that our leaders are more concerned about political correctness and muslim votes than representing those who elected them.

First of all, this resolution is unprecedented. How many religions are practiced in America? How many muslims live among the almost 300 million of us? Why do they need a special resolution for Islam? They already have the same protection under the Constitution that all of us have, and that is far more than this predatory death cult deserves. If they had done their homework, Congress would know that Islam is incompatible with democracy and they would introduce legislation to make it illegal in the U.S.

Not that I expect any consideration of my opinions, I have nonetheless faxed them to my clueless representatives in Washington. If this resolution passes and they vote for it, they will not get my vote in the next election.

The best way to make our politicians listen to us is to stop sending them money. When I get solititations from the Republican Party or any Conservative organization, I write a short message advising them that when President Bush secures the borders and stops lying to the the public about Islam, I will resume my contributions. Until then, they can go broke for all I care.

Posted by: Susanp at May 20, 2005 10:30 AM

http://www.congress.org/congressorg...erslist/?id=327
Send this ass hat a message

http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issuesaction/letters/

Posted by: KAOSKTRL at May 20, 2005 10:36 AM

Susanp,

You're gonna stop paying taxes too?

Kind of ironic that they'll send you to the Muslim Church to serve your time...

Good Luck!

Posted by: St_James at May 20, 2005 10:41 AM

"We have made the job of our enemies all too easy by sanctioning torture and by whitewashing prisoner abuse investigations," Conyers said in a press release issued by CAIR. "We also need to embrace the Muslim people and tolerance if we are truly interested in supporting democracy around the world." ---Rep. Conyers

" Rep. Conyers is clearly pandering to his Muslim constituency, or shows a total and complete ignorance of the Quran and the hadith.

Though calling for a resolution to be adopted in congress does not make it an inforcible law, many things can happen in committee if pandering politicians who are ignorant of the raging antisemitism in the tenets and practices of Islam may choose to pursue that kind of venue that could try to undermine our first Amendment rights.

AAt the time of the articles writing , Rep. Conyers has not of yet introduced the resolution. Lets not let happen to America what has happened in Australia.

Posted by: Mackie at May 20, 2005 10:54 AM

KAOSKTRL: I'm only just beginning to understand what you guys are up against in the US of A!

This site is the ultimate Moonbat- eldorado!
http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issues/alert/?alertid=7625336&content_dir=ua_congressorg

Posted by: Terminator at May 20, 2005 10:58 AM

Susanp,

You're gonna stop paying taxes too?

Kind of ironic that they'll send you to the Muslim Church to serve your time...

Good Luck!

Posted by: St_James at May 20, 2005 10:41 AM

I'm sorry, but I don't follow you. No, I'll continue to pay taxes. Taxes pay for many things that benefit me, and many things that don't. I think we could all agree on that.

There are no muslim churches. Those who worship in churches pay tribute to a different God than muslims, who grovel to a demon in mosques. I will admit that being sentenced to life in a mosque would be a punishment worse than death.

Posted by: Susanp at May 20, 2005 11:02 AM

Respecting the Qur'an is precisely the problem; it is a reason is why thousands of Americans are dead and thousands more abroad fighting a war that bears a false name.

The issue is not respect or disrespect, but confronting what that book and the Sunnah really say, and why these sources, Islamic practices and history inspire the madness that threatens the lives of millions and the fabric of Western civilization.

Posted by: JTF at May 20, 2005 11:15 AM

'This is a possible dangerous threat to are first amendment rights.'~ Mackie

And I will Bet Kennedy, Kerry and cronies support it as well. At least kj will have the satisfaction of seeing FrontPage and Campus Watch shut down for 'hate speech' if this and more get thru.

This is the long weekend in Canada, we are off to cottage country. Everyone, Stay Safe!

Posted by: Gary at May 20, 2005 11:22 AM

This is from Rep.Conyers own website dated May 19.2005--It is 2nd comment down

http://www.conyersblog.us/

Introduction of Resolution Condemning Religious Bigotry

Today I introduced a straightforward Sense of the Congress Resolution that would simply condemn bigotry and intolerance against any religious group, and recognize that the Quran, as any other holy book of any religion should be treated with dignity and respect. The full text of the resolution should be available on THOMAS TOMMORROW

I would have thought that in the wake of the Newsweek controversy and all of the lingering doubts about U.S. policy toward Muslims in general and the Koran in particular, that this resolution would be something that all Members of Congress could support. Instead of devoting so much time and energy towards blaming Newsweek, and figuring out who in the Pentagon cleared the story, shouldn’t we just end the doubts by saying once and for all it is not our official policy to denigrate the Muslim religion?

I sent a dear colleague to every Member of the House asking for their support, and so far Reps. Jackson Lee, Eshoo, Filner, Kucinich, Meehan, Pascrell, and Serrano have signed on. I may be naive, but I would really hope the Republicans as well as President Bush would jump on my resolution so we can at least begin to mend fences with our friends. Unfortunately, I hear that the Republicans are instead working on a Newsweek bashing resolution.

Posted by: Mackie at May 20, 2005 11:42 AM

Susanp,

My comments were supposed to be sarchastic.

The point was supposed to be that even though you don't give to the parties, they can still tax you and use that money to support the jihad.

The Muslim Church = United States prison system. Which is where you'd end up if you didn't pay your taxes to support the jihad.

Posted by: St_James at May 20, 2005 11:55 AM

Just emailed my congressman. These CAIR snakes are going to try to use our freedom when they can, if that doesn't work, then they will try to change our laws to suit themselves. Conyers is a loon, a racist loon.

Posted by: Carolyn2 at May 20, 2005 12:00 PM

Conyers submitted a "Sense of the Congress Resolution" -- not a bill. Bills can become laws. This isn't going to become a law.

But, the passage of such a resolution is intellectually disarming, allowing islamists and dhimmis to press forward with more ambitious projects -- actual laws which would limit free speech critical of Islam.

Since there is no real evidence of anti-muslim acts of violence in the U.S. (CAIR's "evidence" is fraudulent and the Newsweek story is erroneous), there is no reason for such a resolution. It gives credence to claims by CAIR and elevates Conyers and CAIR to a level of importance they do not deserve.

Kucinich is from Cleveland and is shameless in his pandering to muslim voters in his district. Conyers is, no doubt, also pandering to his muslim constituency in Dearborn.

Posted by: info_tech_guy at May 20, 2005 12:02 PM

Have fun up there in Commie-da with your socialist medicine plan and Francophilia, Gary!

I would love to see frontpagerag shut down. Campus Watch, on the other hand, is irreplacable and necessary in the campaign to resist Jihad/anti-Semitism.

I, unlike SOME people, will admit that I am ashamed of Conyers. Let's just see the repubs stand up to this. Or better yet, if the dems all throw their hats in the ring and get a few rep dhimmis to go along, let's see a core of brave, conservative reps stage a FILLIBUSTER. Let's just see how it all shakes out, shall we. Remember, Dhimbya can always veto it.

I stand by my promise that if the Dem. candidate for president calls for the ruin of Israel like Cynthia McKinney and David Duke, I will vote a straight republican ticket in 2008. (Assuming the Rep. isn't bought out by Saudi as well.)

I'll do it absentee ballot, sign it, put a stamp on it, and put it in a locked mailbox slot, AND I'll get the whole thing on camcorder and send the proof to anyone that wants it. (My Aunts will want a copy.)

YOUR president is the one who (and who's staff) goes OUT OF THEIR WAY to praise Islam and appease our "allies" in Saudi Arabia. IF any of you had the hutzpah to watch Farhenheit 911 you'd see that the Saudi Embassy is guarded by the Secret Service ON YOUR DIME. Wake up and stop trying to make all this pandering about politics.

It's not about political idealogy; it's about Saudi money. THAT'S what gets their preachers into our prison system. THAT'S what gets their way at the UN. THAT'S what gets them their tax-payer funded security at their embassy. THAT'S what got their preacher to speak FIRST at the National Cathedral on 9-11 Memeorial Day. THAT'S what gets their boy the Whitehouse to fellate the Koran. THAT'S what paid for 9-11. THAT'S what finances the madrassas all over the world preaching hate, homophobia, jihad, misogyny, anti-Semitism, and anti-Americanism.

Of course, we could cut the Saudis off and buy more oil from Venezuala... oh wait, we can't do that because Bush says that Chavez likes Castro.

Posted by: kj at May 20, 2005 12:11 PM

Why does the House not say anything about the desecration of Christian and Jewish symbols in the Islamic world?

Because the Saudis aren't Jews or Chrisitans. They killed all their Jews and Christians.

Posted by: kj at May 20, 2005 12:12 PM

"...and citizens of the Islamic faith."

Gee, and I thought muslims living in the United States were called citizens of the United States?

It just goes to show that Conyers is more savvy about Islam than most people think. His language portrays an intimate knowledge of the Islamic goal towards world domination. His concept of the ummah is also in line with Islamic doctrine.

Posted by: Skeet Street at May 20, 2005 1:00 PM

Check out the Conyersblog noted above by Mackie.

Comment #5 is by Bill. Our BillR?

Comment #6 is, I'm sure, by a previous JW/DW poster.

I'll be sending emails to my elected officials on the Conyers resolution today.

Posted by: PRCS at May 20, 2005 1:45 PM

PRCS,

Comment posted on Conyer's blog.

Posted by: Skeet Street at May 20, 2005 2:04 PM

I commented ,too. Everyone go to Conyer's blog and tell him about his favorite religion. But be civil, we do not want to be rejected off-hand as right wing nuts, even though last time I looked right wingers were still Americans.

Posted by: Carolyn2 at May 20, 2005 2:14 PM

'Have fun up there in Commie-da with your socialist medicine plan and Francophilia, Gary!'~ kj

Hey, good joke! I just found out this week what the dentist are like, who knew a water pic could hurt as much as a drill?

My wife is looking at an ecology position at the far end of Lake Ontario. I told her it would probably be bi-lingual: English and American.

Heading for Conyer's blog...

Posted by: Gary at May 20, 2005 2:19 PM

By any chance, is the Dishonarable John Conyers the representative from this district?

Should the resolution single out the koran and islam, and by way of passing only mention "other" religions, is that not elevation of one religion thereby making the "other" subservient in contradiciton to the establishment clause of the first amendment?

Posted by: Lisa at May 20, 2005 2:42 PM

Gary:

Give Conyers a piece of your mind. Tell him your liberal friends are mad at him too. Remeber that part of his range is Dearborn, and those are the people that will or won't re-elect him. And remember that you can attract more flies with honey than with shit.

Are you sure that waterpic wasn't a water-powered drill? Water-jet cutting technology is amazing. It's a clean cut on anything, depending on the velocity and silica that's added. It doesn't work well on paper for obvious reasons, but paper cuts so easily anyway, what the hell. Doctors really like it because there's no friction, even when cutting bone (or drilling teeth.)

More great technological achievements improving the lives of everyone, brought to you by "The Great Satan." You know, those money-hungry Jews and Crusaders that have invented pretty-much everything.

Posted by: kj at May 20, 2005 2:42 PM

Left wing politicians like Rep. Conyers have been apparently cozying up to CAIR quite often. Conyers has referred to President bush as "the un-elected president , he has asked to have Defence Secretary Rumsfeld thrown out,He has attacked General Boykin for his remarks about militant Islam, he has asked for investigations into arms deals with Israel,he has cozied up to The Nation of Islam leader who has defiled Jews with Antisemitic remarks.

http://cairhouston.org/press/111303.htm

http://www.cair-net.org/default.asp?Page=articleView&id=1026&theType=NR

http://www.cair-net.org/asp/printthis.asp?id=87&page=AA

http://www.caircapac.com/?cls=News&id=1

Posted by: Mackie at May 20, 2005 2:47 PM

This is his email address

campaign@johnconyers.com

And this is a letter I sent him

Dear Representative Conyers:

I have been made to believe that you are sponsoring a bill that would protect the Muslim "holy" book, the Koran, from "desecration."

If this is true I would like to know whether you intend to also sponsor legislation that will protect the Bhagavad Gita, the Buddha Sutras, the Torah, the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Tibetan Book of the Dead, and all other "holy" books from "desecration."

I do NOT respect the Muslim "holy" book and neither--in my opinion--should anyone. Furthermore, the United States Constitution expressly forbids your and your Hill colleagues from establishing any law that does so.

Representative Conyers, I am not writing to you as an angry, right-wing, Christian trying to punish Muslims. I am writing as a life-long liberal and registered independent that usually sides with the democrats. I am neither a Christian nor a Jew. Muslims (and everyone else) neither need nor deserve special treatment to protect them from their own irrational, childish, over-the-top, reactionary fetish for any book.

Please recall the worldwide reaction from the Buddhist community four years ago when the murderous Taliban destroyed the priceless, irreplacable, incredible, Ancient-Wonder-Of-The-World statues of Buddha in Afghanistan. There were no riots. There were no calls for revenge from any pulpit. There was no murder. There was no persecution of innocent Muslim anywhere. There was no demand for punishment. Can you guess why?

I can only hope that your intention of this legislation is to protect Americans serving and living abroad from attack. If this is the case I applaud your efforts but would like to advise you that appeasement of irrational people in general--and Muslims in particular--is historically shown to merely forestall confrontation.

I think your efforts would be better spent trying to help reasonable people here at home than pandering to a handful of people who really believe that murder is a just repsonse to the "desecration" of ANY book. The people that would be appeased by the passage of such a bill would merely change the pretext of their mob behavior to fit the bill.

Should you wish to help secular, liberal, humanist, progressive Muslims in their heroic efforts to bring their culture in the modern age, I would suggest that you visit www.secularislam.org.

Thank you very much for your time.

Sincerely,

Kenneth J. XXXXXXXXXXXX

Hastings, Michigan

Posted by: kj at May 20, 2005 3:45 PM

Oh my, the selective outrage.

DESPARATELY trying to keep us distracted with meaningless partisan attacks, Mackie whines:

Left wing politicians like Rep. Conyers have been apparently cozying up to CAIR quite often. Conyers has referred to President bush as "the un-elected president , he has asked to have Defence Secretary Rumsfeld thrown out,He has attacked General Boykin for his remarks about militant Islam, he has asked for investigations into arms deals with Israel,he has cozied up to The Nation of Islam leader who has defiled Jews with Antisemitic remarks.

But if anyone points out that:

Right wing politicians like Pres. Dub have been apparently cozying up to Saudi Arabia quite often. Bush has referred to Islam as "the respectful and peaceful religion", he has asked to have lawsuits against Iraq for tortured Gulf War POWs thrown out, He has attacked Saddam Hussein for his threats against the militant Islamic leaders of Saudi Arabia, he has blocked investigations into arms deals with Al qaeda, he has cozied up to The Nation of Saudi Arabia leaders who have defiled Jews and all other non-Muslims) with Antisemitic remarks.

...how would Mackie repsond?

Posted by: kj at May 20, 2005 3:55 PM

Well, we are considered right wing "people like this in the country". It is really funny how muslims are worth protecting but we are "people like this"*spit*. (at Conyer's blog)

Posted by: Carolyn2 at May 20, 2005 3:56 PM

KJ, I must say, that was a well thought out letter you wrote to this Representative. I don't dig this paddy cake crap that our officials are playing with the Infantile Islamos.

If there's one thing we can see from this, it's that politicians on both sides of the political fence are doing it, and all of them need to have their hand slapped and to be told no.

Posted by: DCWatson at May 20, 2005 4:15 PM

Good letter to the wannabe dhimmi kj. I likewise have written to him expressing my views on his naive proposal. Similarly, I've written my congressman asking him to oppose this assault on my 1st ammendment right. I view this resolution as the Islamist's opening salvo in their assault on our freedom and way of life. People, this is more serious than it appears as regular JW's will know that once you give the Islamists an inch, THEY WILL DEMAND A MILE! I urge all of you to contact your political representatives demanding they vote against this fascist-like piece of koranic toilet paper, Conyeers' "Sense of Congress" resolution.

Posted by: William The Crusader at May 20, 2005 4:20 PM

KJ, great letter and well put.

Rep. Conyer is either pursuing this because he has converted to islam, is trying to get votes, or wants to money that he knows is in the pockets of CAIR and the Nation of Islam.

None of the reasons are ethical. But then on the issue of Islam the lack of ethics are appearing in all political parties on both sides of the isle.

Posted by: alaskan1000 at May 20, 2005 4:54 PM

So when Imams stand in Mosques and denounce Jesus as the Messiah for Christians will these same House leaders back a motion to respect
Christian tenets.
Maybe they should actually read the Quran
and see exactly why someone would want to
burn or deface the book from Muhammed the Pedophile.

Posted by: ala-sux at May 20, 2005 5:01 PM

The "Religious Anti-Vilification Law" is only in Victoria not in other Australian states(The rest
want nothing to do with it).Send the congressman the story about the two Pastors from Victoria that have been convicted by this stupid law.Mind you,just last week in New South Wales a Muslim girl won the rite to wear a MANTOO at a public school but you can't wear a scarf supporting you're football team?We have plenty of Dhimmis in Australia also(and pissweak Polititians).
I keep getting told how tolerant Islam is,but I never see that tolerance from them.WHY?
Maybe Shukri or ia786 can explain that to me ,without lying or Islamic propaganda

Posted by: D.T. at May 20, 2005 5:27 PM

Is there any doubt that the latest Indian riots are time for this proposed bill?

Manipulative little scums, aren't they?

Posted by: BillR at May 20, 2005 6:27 PM

Call, email or write your Congressional rep.s and tell them to condemn this assinine resolution. Send to them DhimmiWatch's url and some of the many, many stories of descrations of Christian and Jewish religious symbols...and people!

Redhot!!!
:(

Posted by: Freedom1 at May 20, 2005 7:05 PM

I just emailed my California Congressional Representative:

Dear Congressperson ------,

I just read on the internet about John Conyers,Jr.'s "Introduction of Resolution Condemning Religious Bigotry". This resolution should be soundly condemned. This is shameless pandering to the Islamic community without any regard or respect for any other religious community. Why were there no resolutions introduced in the House of Representatives when Saudi Arabia recently arrested 40 Christians (confiscating their Bibles) for praying in Saudi Arabia? What about the desecration of the Church of the Nativity by Islamic Palestinians a couple of years ago? Those Muslims used ancient Biblical pages as toilet paper, yet Christians did not riot in the streets nor did any Congressional Representative introduce a "Resolution Condemning Religious Bigotry".

Vote NO on this resolution.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
------- --------

Posted by: Freedom1 at May 20, 2005 7:29 PM

Kj:

I certainly don't agree with the actions of President Bush on several issues . But for me; he is the man in the drivers seat and his overall Ideology plays better with me than Representatives like Conyers, Kucinich, Kennedy, Boxer ,Kerry, Pelosi,Etc.---

If you are not in my Choir, thats fine. I don't want to be a fence sitter on this particular issue, as you have so aptly chosen not to either. Sometimes we have to choose our battles one issue at a time.

My complements on your letter.

Sincerely Mackie

Posted by: Mackie at May 20, 2005 7:47 PM

Cowards. Fools. Ignoramuses. Dolts. Dimwits. Daft Democratic vote pimps.

READ THE DAMNED KORAN!

It is Mein Kampf in Arabic.

What's next? A plea for tolerance and respect for "our native Neo-Nazi believers in the teachings of the warlord from the holy ayran cult of blood purity and national socialism"?

I feel like going to D.C. and heaving a column of projectile vomit onto the steps of the Capitol to show my estimation of the level of headlessness shown by the dhimmi lawmakers we now have in these once-hallowed halls.

Self-gelded stooges of theocratic psychopathia.

May they be the victims of their own colossal cerebral corruption!

Posted by: BigSleep at May 20, 2005 9:29 PM

German Shari'a Watch / From LGF:

German state to offer Islam class in every school.

The western German state of Hesse expects to offer instruction in Islamic religion for Muslim students in every school in the state, a state official said Friday.

At least one school in every district in the state will offer Islamic instruction in the new school year, and at some point classes will be spread to every school, Culture Minister Karin Wolff said. The teaching will be phased in and a specific time plan will become clearer in the future, she said.

PROST!

Posted by: Terminator at May 21, 2005 12:54 AM

This is sick.

Enshrining a manual of hate, murder, and mayhem is a tragic mistake. It is weird how people bend backwards to accommodate these bastards, as if 9/11 never happened. Have we forgotten so soon how the followers of this satanic manual saw the necks off innocent humans they kidnapped (like some 7th century bloodthirsty savages which they effectively are thanks to the manual which this lawmaker says we are to revere), and blow to bits people on the street going about their everyday lives, with zero sense of humanity or decency, just a manic "Allahu Akbar". It is madness to pander to these savages.

If we go down this road, giving in to these bastards, and calling the source of their teaching a revered document, it won't be long before the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave will become the Hellhole of the Totalitarian Mullahs, and the Home of their murderous followers.

Bye bye America. Destroyed by decency, stupidly misplaced.

Posted by: skidd at May 21, 2005 10:16 AM

German state to offer Islam class in every school.

What's wrong with Westerners?

The more these bastards spew their filth, the more we want to propagate it??

We Must Be MAD!!!

Posted by: skidd at May 21, 2005 11:42 AM

Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America

Amendment 1
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right to peaceably assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Ratified effective December 15, 1791.

I would like to see how this Democrat-sponsored resolution will attempt to circumvent the first Amendment.

An Islamic civil rights group is urging all "people of conscience" to support a Democrat-sponsored resolution recognizing that the Koran, like the holy book of any other religion..

"In today's climate of heightened religious sensitivities and cultural clashes, now is the time for people of all faiths to better acquaint themselves with Islam's sacred text," said CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad in a press release announcing the Koran giveaway.

It was on Sep 11, 2001, when a number of Americans woke up to the truth about Mohammadanism. That is the individual cause of these so called “heightened religious sensitivities”. I do take notice of the fact that moderate Moslems work, albeit in a different fashion towards the very same goals of extreme Mohammadanism. Mohamed Atta practiced jihad of the sword while Mr A wad of trumpery practices jihad of the mouth.

Posted by: Bar at May 21, 2005 12:40 PM

Bar,

Awad was on cspan this morning. Great taquiyya! I only watched a few minutes while I was channel flipping.The dingbats calling drive me nuts so I move on.

Posted by: reset at May 22, 2005 10:56 AM