"Pictorial depictions of the Prophet Muhammad are forbidden in Islam."

That's because even the muslims know that Mohound was so damn ugly.

Posted by: Gorkhali at October 21, 2005 6:44 AM

Cartoons of Mohammed offend them, yet 3,000 + Islamic terrorist outrages in the name of Mohammed & Allah since 9/11 does not even merit a murmur out of them?

Again we see the dual duplicity of all Muslims.

The Terrorists & the Ambassadors are members of the same death cult, with the same wishes, desires & demands.

The more bolshy they get, the better for us.

The more they expose themselves for the 7th century suicide death cult they are, the better for us.

The more they expose their Islamofascism, the better for us.

The more they limit our hard won Western freedom, culture & heritage in our own backyards, the better for us.

So, Denmark has had the threats, the "diplomatic" rebuke, so we must assume, according to their form, that mass slaughter of Danish citizens is to follow shortly.

And when Denmark does take mass civilian casualties (& it is "WHEN"), will these same said "Ambassadors" be so vocal against their own fellow Muslims?

Posted by: albion at October 21, 2005 6:57 AM

Comics, but not comical:

http://islamcomicbook.com/

http://islamcomicbook.com/lyrics.htm

Posted by: sheik yer'mami at October 21, 2005 7:09 AM

Did you see the episode of Seinfeld where Kramer discovers what he terms Pigboy? Well Pigboy was actually a Mohammed look-a-like.

Posted by: JanuaryMan at October 21, 2005 7:11 AM

I notice that this campaign against free speech by Muslim ambassadors in Denmark has a precedent in Norway:

http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article836294.ece

A Norwegian politician's recent assault on Islamic fundamentalists continues to spur reaction. Now a group of ambassadors have taken the unusual step of blasting Progress Party leader Carl I Hagen in a letter to newspaper Aftenposten, but Hagen isn't wavering. Ambassadors to Norway from Egypt, Indonesia, Pakistan and Morocco, as well as the charge d'affaires from Tunisia, claim in their letter that Hagen has offended 1.3 billion Muslims around the world. They also contend that Hagen has violated the principles of tolerance, understanding and cultual freedom on which the Norwegian society is built. They wrote that they find it difficult to find any justification for the harsh language used by Hagen, when he claimed at a Christian summer gathering in Bergen earlier this month that Mohammed was likely to exploit children in his efforts to "Islamify" the world. Hagen also claimed that Muslims already had come far in Africa and were making inroads into Europe, something that Christians must oppose. At one point in his remarks, Hagen compared Islamic fundamentalists to Hitler.

Posted by: Fjordman at October 21, 2005 7:16 AM

"Pictorial depictions of the Prophet Muhammad are forbidden in Islam."

First off, you ain't in an islamic state....

Posted by: Gary at October 21, 2005 8:57 AM

Muhammad should've been forbidden,period. He was a 7th century nut case criminal. A thug, and nothing more.

Posted by: DCWatson at October 21, 2005 9:03 AM

Pictorial depictions of the Prophet Muhammad are forbidden in Islam.

So is extending equal rights to women and non-muslims, alcohol, pork, eating or drinking during Ramadan, sculpture, music, theater, gazing in awe at artistic expressions of the profound beauty of the nude human form, laughter, unfettered scientific inquiry, free speech, democratic legislation, and the sanctity of human life. Adherence to the UN Declaration of Human Rights is also forbidden in Islam.

Isn't it about time for islam to be forbidden on the planet and to be tossed into history's dustbin of failed ideologies? Like a metabolic disease, it is incompatible with human life.

Posted by: Hulegu Khan at October 21, 2005 10:10 AM

Little known fact:
Originally Muhammed had many pictures of him drawn and plastered on all the telephone poles in Muslimland. There was an evil Jew who erased the beard on the pictues and left just a Fu Manchu. This irritated MoMo (his friends called him that) because his chin was very recessive. MoMo was very self conscious of his lack of chin. From that point on MoMo had his posters removed and would allow no more renderings of him.

Posted by: KingTesticle at October 21, 2005 10:53 AM

Here are the cartoons
srcoll to bottom of page
http://www.fomi.nu/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1627&start=15&sid=e29acdda0573f829d7256cdae21a9630

Posted by: shiva at October 21, 2005 11:42 AM

Hi Shiva,
The picture of the beheaded little girl is one of the saddest things I've ever seen. How can these monsters live with themselves? Oh, now I remember...they are consumed by evil. Their "god" is evil personified.
BTW, now you can expect "Kahen" to threaten you for linking the pictures.

Posted by: Carolyn2 at October 21, 2005 12:06 PM

One more thing about the little children killed in such a horrific manner...if it were "palestinian" children, there would be hell to pay. It would be on every front page of every major newspaper and on the 24 hour news channels. Remember the story of how the Israelis supposedly shot the little boy? (and it ends up that the paleos shot him)

Posted by: Carolyn2 at October 21, 2005 12:11 PM

Misspelled Kahenn's name,
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/008516.php#c132373

Posted by: Carolyn2 at October 21, 2005 12:17 PM

Carolyn2:

Thanks for the DryBones URL. You've possibly read other articles about the campaign to recognize the "Rachels" other than Corrie who really were deliberately murdered, but Tom Gross in The Spectator has really done it well in "Dead Jews Aren't News". You may have to register, but registration is free:

http://www.spectator.co.uk/article.php?table=§ion=&issue=2005-10-22&id=6796

Posted by: waterdragon52 at October 21, 2005 12:45 PM

waterdragon52,
Thanks for the link, I makes me so angry how Jewish kids (just this week) are not as important as "paleos".

Posted by: Carolyn2 at October 21, 2005 1:13 PM

This is IMO one of the most important battles.

If people in the West can criticize mohammad with
impunity, and start asking mohammadans about all of
the awful stuff he did, the assassinations, the murders, the rapes, and start making fun of this
bizarre cult, without fear, then we'll win.

Posted by: American at October 21, 2005 1:19 PM

Carolyn2
That picture also upsets me,plus the one of the Dayak holding another childs head.
Just goes to show how much evil brings out from men
Now folks here at JW/DW may-be can understand my anger towards Islam is so strong
It is a pity these pictures cannot be submitted on this forum,so as we can see the constrast of what offends moslems,and what offends us Infidels.

Posted by: shiva at October 21, 2005 1:45 PM

Karen Hughes no doubt feels their pain. Perhaps she'll dialogue with them, try to raise their self-esteem, give them more jizya. Shiva, I tend to agree with you on many points, this one being that the proper response to illogic and irrationality isn't more dialogue and greater understanding but graphic.

The Muslim world has numerous "Islamic" nations. There is not one solidly "Modernist" nation on Earth. We must make one. (Let me know if that's opaque.)

Posted by: sonofwalker at October 21, 2005 2:52 PM

Opaque only to resident apologists, walker.

Kt - that means you.

Prophet Geoff
Beer Be Upon Me

Posted by: Geoff at October 21, 2005 3:00 PM

shiva

Thanks for the link though it has put me in a bad mood.

BTW is that your site?

Posted by: DP111 at October 21, 2005 5:14 PM

Why don't we ALL draw a cartoon of Mohammad, whether or not we can draw, and put the word Mohammad after it, and leave it in a public place, preferably near a mosque.

Let's show some solidarity with the Danes.

Posted by: Voltaire at October 21, 2005 6:35 PM

DP111
Sorry to say,I am not sorry about your mood.
Just goes to show how much evil Islam brings out from men
No it is not my site,it is a Swedish site.
The last few months,since there was a discussion to close the comment here I have been commenting on various other sites
As for the pix,I started the thread
THE ILLASTRATED P.I.G TO ISLAM (p.g.)(as quoted above by sonofwalker) that the proper response to illogic and irrationality isn't more dialogue and greater understanding but graphic.
http://www.fomi.nu/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1627

Posted by: shiva at October 21, 2005 11:48 PM

These hypocrites are so maddening I could just scream! How dare they "protest" what transpires in a sovereign nation and proceed to lecture its leaders on acceptable behavior and decorum! I hope the Danes tell these muslim ambassadors to clean up their own cesspits before sticking their noses in the business of Denmark.

KT does not believe that Islam is a nation?! How blind can one be?

Posted by: Susanp at October 22, 2005 1:03 AM

Shiva, that's incredible stuff you're posting. I put up a link in the hope than my millions of readers will get a sense of it. Unfortunately, some idiot posted a letter showing that's not always the case.

So, my point, a little more clearly, is that there is no reasoning with the irrational, there is only force, the kind of thing they do is what they know and understand. That seems to be the only way to reach them. Graphic images come from graphic actions. At some point we must take the lead and force the primitives to behave like tame animals or face the consequences. We need a nation. We need the backing of a legitimate nation of law in which to work.

I'm not sympathetic to pacifism. When people are so violent and evil that nothing else will reach them, violence is commendable. I like the fact that you posted on Grotius. To be just and measured on ones response is a sure sign of sanity, something we'll need a great deal of in this struggle against the savages who did the things we see posted at your link.

(Susan P., you never call, you never write; I'm losing weight.)

Posted by: sonofwalker at October 22, 2005 1:57 AM