FrontPageMag.com By Robert Spencer By Hugh Fitzgerald Books Jihad Watch Robert Spencer Islam 101 Qur'an Blog
 
« Executed for the crime of entertaining non-Muslim children | Main | Muslim women fight to exercise away from men »

April 22, 2006

Fitzgerald: A tribute to Romano Prodi

Jihad Watch Board Vice President Hugh Fitzgerald hails the new leader of Italy:

Prodi is awful, as awful as all those who rise high in the E.U. bureaucracy -- Javier Solana and Chris Patten come to mind. Those Solanas, Pattens, Robinsons, and Moratinoses are all imbued with the Eurabian desire to throw Israel to the wolves, to distance Europe from the United States, and to find some kind of phony common ground with the Arab Muslims, beginning with those deux-rivistes (about which see my article here) in France -- who appear to believe that what separates France from the Maghreb is merely a matter of the Mediterranean, and not an entire world-view.

That Berlusconi, crook and clown, managed almost to win, shows just how awful Prodi is. Berlusconi is not readily yielding power, but this is not as much infuriating as it is comical -- possibly because so many just do not want to see Prodi actually come to power. And Prodi has a history of making remarks in the Eurabian vein, such as his address at the Library of Alexandria two or three years ago -- as perfect an example of Bat Ye'or's thesis as could be imagined.

He does have that Christian-Democratic dullness, but Andreotti, for example, was far more lively in his clever nastiness, or nasty cleverness, than Prodi could ever be. Dull, dull, dull. Not Paul-Henri Spaak workmanlike dull. Really dull.

Meanwhile, after the suicide bombing in Tel Aviv the other day, most of those interviewed on the left minced no words, and their words were good. Walter Veltroni, the Mayor of Rome, was particularly lucid. But then there was also, to remind us of another current in the Italian left, the intolerable Francesco Caruso, the "no global" boy, who immediately began talking about the poor "Palestinians" and how this kind of thing (the suicide bombing) should not be allowed to damage their cause, etc. etc.

Oriana Fallaci and Magdi Allam have had an effect. And the Vatican is having an effect. Michele Pera has had an effect. And that effect will not let Prodi be Prodi. At least, one hopes it won’t.

Perhaps the rule should be: anyone who "believes in Europe," and anyone who has spent a lot of time working for the E.U., should be disqualified from running for office at the level of the mere nation-state. Yes, until the whole sickening E.U. itself dissolves, that could be a good way for countries to proceed in order to avoid that Chris-Patten-Javier-Solana problem.

In the United States, and especially in Wasington, it is not understood that for three decades -- since OPEC's "money weapon" began to be brandished -- there has been a steady, persistent, increasing islamization of European foreign policy, beginning, but not ending, with the so-called Euro-Arab Dialogue. It is not a dialogue but a diktat. The one calling the tune is the Arab League, and the dancers, who must forever pick up their step, faster and faster, are the hapless members of the EU. Agents of, or apologists for, Islam have simply seized the entire EU bureaucracy, as they have that of the UN. Patten, Solana, and Prodi are among the anointed quislings -- who of course cannot dare to look directly at the demographic conquest of Infidel Europe by its overbreeding, and o'erbearing, and expensive (to monitor) and dangerous Muslim population.

How much easier it is to allow oneself to believe that as long as Arab demands in "Palestine" are satisfied (which is to say, not that justice is done, but that Israel is thrown to the wolves), there will be no problem, and all manner of things shall be well. It is nonsense. It would mean a great betrayal of the right of the most persecuted tribe in human history. But more than that, it would be to surrender a sliver of land that is equally important to Western civilization, to those who do not, and never have, wished anything for that non-Muslim civilization except for its subjugation and ultimate disappearance.

Prodi and company are not part of the solution. They are the problem.

The United States must look on Europe as Occupied Europe. It must exercise all of its art and cunning to articulate the reality of the contemporary situation for the mute and helpless and increasingly inglorious Europeans, who live their lives in a world where a campaign of vilification against Israel and America is the daily fare, and where no one is allowed to criticize Islam or even to tell a few oblique truths about it without being hounded or otherwise censored.

In the late 1940s, despite the fact that American troops had liberated western Europe and the Red Army had seized all of eastern Europe, the two largest political parties were the Communist parties of Italy and France. The so-called "intellectuals" (an idiotic word, really) were almost entirely supporters of the Soviet Union. But the Communists were eventually rolled back -- with the spending of large sums of money and subventions to non-Communist parties such as the Christian Democrats in Italy (who later became intolerably corrupt, but served a purpose then). Money also went to support non-Communist newspapers such as Der Monat and to found the Congress for Cultural Freedom, which in turn gave birth to Encounter, the best English-language magazine in the world, to support for conferences and seminars to and fro across the Atlantic, often conducted by ex-Communists such as Koestler, Moravia, Crossman, and others. It took money, planning, and guile. It worked.

Instead of wasting money and time in Iraq, the main focus of anti-Jihad efforts should be in western Europe. To those in eastern Europe, including such countries as Bulgaria that have historic memories of the devshirme (the Ottoman levy of Christian children for the armed forces) and Rumania, an appeal can be made to enlist their service in helping to convince the decadent and foolish states of western Europe that they must cease to be handmaidens of the Jihad, but instead recognize not the pseudo-link that geography provides ("the North" and "the South" -- les deux rives -- of the Mediterranean), but the real link of culture and ideas. Spinoza and Hume, Leonardo and Pushkin, La Fontaine and Melville, Jefferson and Lincoln and Mill and Raymond Aron -- these are the links that count, not the fact that Muslims live in North Africa and the Middle East and have forced their way again into Europe under the benevolent eyes of very foolish elites (elites whose members have betrayed their own peoples and countries and cultures, and cannot for one minute allow themselves, much less those peoples, to realize it -- it would be simply too horrifying).

When the Prodis and Solanas and Pattens and Mary Robinsons and other who think of Europe as merely a Big Market (for to them, what else is there but markets, big or little?) are all seen for the sinister quislings (with some outright antisemites among them) and fixated anti-Americans they are, American policy will be vindicated -- as it was in Italy, when De Gasperi led that country, and the largest political party in Western Europe, that of the Italian Communists, was effectively blocked from power.

Posted by Robert at April 22, 2006 7:50 AM
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us

Comments
(Note: Comments on articles are unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Dhimmi Watch or Robert Spencer. Comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying may be summarily deleted. However, the fact that particular comments remain on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Robert Spencer of the views expressed therein.)

I never much cared for Hannah Arendt's banality of evil thesis. But I must say there is something extremely banal about Prodi and the other colourless Eurabian functionaries who seem to have no compunction about turning over their portion of Western civilization to the bad guys--and there is something truly evil about that.

Posted by: scaramouoche [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 22, 2006 9:39 AM

Italy exchanges a flea-ridden guard dog with one tooth, Berlusconi, for a mutt with nothing but gums, named Prodi.

I hope they enjoy the trade.

Maybe its results will prod[i] them toward someone more serious than either next time.

But they have a tendency to let the mafia or homegrown terrorists kill their better leaders when they raise their heads above the ramparts.

Their ancient curse for not supporting Brutus over Augustus?

Et tu, Prodi?

Posted by: profitsbeard [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 22, 2006 9:57 AM

I would like to remind the non-italian or not living in italy that crook or clown there are millions of people that voted for berlusconi, or better, for the right coalition which is always to be preferred to the leftist scum that's currently plaguing the planet with their fake PC, pro-islam and anti-western stands and communist nostalgia.

Posted by: poisonr [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 22, 2006 11:32 AM

I await Paolo's post, which will no doubt, with a bewilderingly sweeping and apodictically obvious reconfiguration of the facts, turn Hugh's essay on its head.

Posted by: Television [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 22, 2006 12:07 PM

The problem with Berlusconi, is the problem with the right in general, which is also the problem with Islam.. religionized politics.

I think that the Italians rejected, barely, not only his financial monopoly power in Italy (especially the media) but his own "calvinistic" catholic version of politics..his own culture war that extends beyond and thus dilutes the real culture war, that between Islam and the west.

I communicate and debate with many a liberal and leftist, who sympathize with Muslims because they perceive that Muslims are victims of the self righteous intolerance of the right, especially the religious right, which has on their plate an agenda contra secularists and "liberals". They perceive the right as being self righteous, bigotted, uptight because of the rights position on "social issues", and it is an almost impossible task of convincing the liberals and left that Islam is more of a threat than the right, especially since Islam is not a major power, does not have the numbers, and has mastered the art of whining and crying persecution. And playing the persecuted is the game to be played in the west, it doesn't play at all in Islamic societies, as the notion of guilt (which is operative in the west) is alien to Islam. Muslims don't champion the underdog, they play the underdog, and they play it well, but they can only play it because the "right" in the west is so good at creating "underdogs" and demonizing peoples for such stuff as lifestyle choices, or merely the desire to remain sovereign and exercise the freedom of choice.

Posted by: Nariz [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 22, 2006 12:15 PM

nariz, I don't which "leftists" you talk to. But have you reminded them that Islam does have big bucks, big dinars and riyals, and so on? For people who produce little with their own hands, they make a hell of a lot of money, mainly from natural resources [that is, oil] in the countries that they control. Don't your "leftist" friends know about the Saudi, Kuwaiti, Qatari, etc. billionaires? How about the way foreign workers are treated in the oil rich Arab states? Aren't those workers exploited by the very fact that they are workers, wage slaves, according to the Marxist definition?

Posted by: Eliyahu [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 22, 2006 3:52 PM

I've got to say, as bad as Prodi is... it seems like the Italian populace is worse. In my four months here in Italy, every Italian I have spoken to so far about the Islam Question (to phrase it in a sense reminiscent of other great Questions in the Italian political realm) seems awfully sympathetic to the Palestinian/Islamist cause.

I found it very surprising, mostly because Italians (at least Florentines) are so suspicious of the African immigrants (legal and otherwise) roaming around their townsquares, peddling the odd pair of rip-off designer sunglasses or mini-folding camera tripod... and often all these people have done to them is illegally enter their country and hustle cheap goods on the streets. Not to say it's acceptable that they do this, but it's a minor nuisance when compared to an entire sect of people who are ready and determined to blow-up and behead every last one of the Italiani, and perhaps enslave some of the survivors for good measure.

Yes, politics is always a tough, sensitive subject to approach, and even more so when you have a language barrier in place, but everytime I hint at the "what do you think of the jihad?" question, my interviewee becomes worried and compassionate looking and begins to relate to me how we need to work better to understand these people and get along.

Call it decades of socialist/Communist sentiment, call it a loss of a sense of self, call it a loss of a common cultural heritage... call it what you may, it certainly doesn't help that the only alternative, (the DC and related parties before 1993, and Forza Italia and Aleanza Nazionale, the Casa della Liberta since) is seen as corrupt because of the tangentopoli scandal, or corrupt and out of touch with the electorate in the case of Italy's richest PM ever, Berlusconi. A lot of the time, people see elections as a "lesser of two evils" situation, and unfortunately misguidedly vote for the greater of the two evils (this was evident in Bush vs. Kerry, as well, at least from the anti-jihad angle).

Regardless, Prodi is certainly awful. It's just too bad that the alternative botched a lot of major foreign policy decisions, in the eyes of the electorate, along with bungling the economy, in the eyes of the electorate. Berlusconi can obviously be contemptible in his own ways, but at least he didn't spend his first few days in office telephoning Hamas and seeing how they were doing.

"Ciao ciao Hamas, come fate? Come state? Che bellisimo!"

Posted by: sologue [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 22, 2006 9:04 PM

Prodi may be a blessing in disguise. If he is a bad as projected, it just might revive the regional politics in Italy that was co-opted and undermined by Berlusconi. They may now actually secede to create a non-Dhimmi state of Padania in the north.

Posted by: Provoslavni [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 23, 2006 12:45 AM

Television - I sometimes disagree with Hugh, even on matters of substance. However, there is no displeasure or disgust in arguing with him, for he is a civilized person. However, some other presences in this thread make me feel that to intervene in this discussion would be to demean myself. To take a position, any position, in this sequence of poisoned statements would be the same as to place myself in league with the most base and contemptible kind of opponent, and although (as old-timers on this site know) I am perfectly capable of answering such persons on their own level, I would rather keep my self-respect. I am sick and tired of "fighting the base with base weapons". Disagreeing with Hugh is one thing. Disagreeing with racist scum, and having to answer what passes for their points as though they had any merit, is another.

Posted by: Paolo [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 23, 2006 7:48 AM

Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.