Disgusting, Britain needs to wake up soon.

They will soon go the way of the French, I have to post this again, French police have 2500 casualties in one year from Muslim Intifada.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/10/05/wmuslims05.xml

Who would trust an officer like that to protect you from utes like those in France.

He should be fired.

Posted by: km at October 5, 2006 6:58 AM

Another example of Muslims being exclusively and unquestionably loyal to only Islam and fellow Muslims. That's a very dangerous aspect of the Muslim population in the West.

Posted by: Jesus Christ Supercop at October 5, 2006 7:00 AM

From The Times here .

Posted by: Granny Weatherwax at October 5, 2006 7:04 AM

Yes, and we know what an urgent review in the Metropolitan Police gets you: that's right, promotion! The more you mess up, the higher you can climb.

I feel sorry for the ordinary police man because when I was a lad I was frightened stiff of the local Bobby. Now, at best they are a joke, at worst they are just down right dangerous. And all because the Lunatics have taken over the Asylum.

Ian Blair, like His 'onour, the despicable Livingstone, is an international embarrassment. And the worrying thing you have to ask yourself is after the eavesdropping thing where he bugged the Attorney General; and the execution of the Brazillian, and then the promotion of Dick; and the comments about it being safe enough to go out and leave your door unlocked - proving that he is delusional (on his own or as a part of the mass Labour delsuion); and his insensitive comments about the dreadful Soham case, why can't we, the people, in a democratic country get him and his disgusting ilk ousted from their jobs?

At least the mechanism was there to suspend the anti-semite Livingstone from his job (whoever heard of it - the Mayor of an International city being suspended for bringing the position into disrepute). But sadly, some people just keep voting him in (and once again I am talking about the accursed Left and its good friends the "oppressed").

Posted by: FREE LEE at October 5, 2006 7:10 AM

No doubt if it had been the other way around ie. the Israeli Embassy saying they didn't want moslems on the security detail we would be seeing a march organised this weekend to protest at "Israeli racism"

Sack him and all other moslems in the police and armed forces, deport them and their families.

AI

Posted by: apostate_islam at October 5, 2006 7:14 AM

Sack him and all other moslems in the police and armed forces, deport them and their families.

Muslims should at least be barred from entry into any profession that serves to protect the crown.

Posted by: km at October 5, 2006 7:20 AM

Disgusting, yet another Muhammedan proving that the only loyalty Maslums have is to Islam and the infernal ummah. Muslims have no place in western police forces or militaries, all that are already in should be offered conversion to a superior non-muslim faith or be immediately fired. The PC traitors who infest our governments,schools and churches should be tried for treason and used for decorations ala Mussolini and his lover.

Before all is said and done, I believe that violence, balkination and civil war is coming to the west. It cannot and will not be avoided at this point. There is not,cannot and will not be co-exisitance and mere accomodation of Islam in Western countries. It sadly and truely is us or them, their values or ours. Could the unthinkable happen and England become a enemy of America? Before anything like that could ever happen I hope the English people rise up in fury, comperable to English civil war or the French revolution and strike the enemies of the realm, both foreign and domestic. The train has left the station, it is too late for democratic,electoral based, ever so nice-solutions. The most humane thing would be a Benes decree type deportation and population swap for Non-Muslims in selected Muslims countries.I hope all the traitors in the West are happy with what they hath wrought. The New Europe will fail and look a whole lot like the old Europe. What is happening in the West is breaking my heart. When can we say enough is enough?

Posted by: abdulalshirk at October 5, 2006 8:44 AM

Today Sir Ian Blair, the Metropolitan Police commissioner, said he had ordered an investigation into how the decision was made.

"Having learned of this issue I have asked for an urgent review of the situation and a full report into the circumstances, " he said.

Let me translate: Ian Blair, "We give in to your demands."

Posted by: Seymour Paine at October 5, 2006 8:50 AM

When the time is right . . . the masses of perpetual rage will seek police protection from fed up citizens- then, British police should return the favor.

Posted by: miira at October 5, 2006 8:57 AM

Jews were accused of dual loyalty (still are--see Walt and Mearsheimer) on the basis of fabrications, while Muslims displaying dual loyalty for all to see aren't enough to convince the Left of the problem.

Score another one for the Torah-true view that G-d is in full control of history.

Posted by: ZionistYoungster at October 5, 2006 9:04 AM

It is my firm belief that some Muslim governments do already stop Jewish police officers guarding their embassies. After all I've read they don't allow British instructors of Jewish origin to lecture to Saudi military officers sent to Britain for advanced weapons systems training and other advanced military and IT studies. It seems therefore rather likely that the Saudis and other Arab states tell the Metropolitan police commanders not to send anyone of Jewish origin to guard their embassies. What I can't understand is how it is that with only a tiny handful of Muslims in the Metropolitan police they have three officers of high rank and large profile including an Assistant Commissioner who makes childish and antagonistic comments in support of Muslims. The furore over the officer who refused to guard the Israeli embassy exists because the story was leaked. I rather suspect many other stories involving Muslim police in England never get out.

Posted by: moris2 at October 5, 2006 10:07 AM

Would that mean if police offers can refuse to guard Muslims/Muslim buildings on the moral grounds to protest their continued suicide bombings? I didn't think so.

Posted by: computernerd at October 5, 2006 11:48 AM

So what is this muslim saying? Would he defend the embassy if it was attacked? Would he have defended a Jewish member of staff if he was mugged while outside the grounds at lunch? Would he have defended a Jewish female member of staff if she was sexually assaulted?

Where, precisely, was he willing to draw the line?

Posted by: Celsius at October 5, 2006 12:31 PM

IT is only a matter of time before he refuses to protect infidels from the ummah since it is against his religion. Why are such people hired and trained at taxpayers' expense?

Posted by: lonewolf at October 5, 2006 1:26 PM

Free Lee - I didn't see George Galloway in your list of degenerates.

Galloway is a plague on both houses - the house of lords and the house of commons.

I saw a clip on him making solicitations for money from al Jazeera watchers. What a specimen.

Posted by: A_Plague_on_Both_Houses at October 5, 2006 1:39 PM

The reason he was excused duty had nothing to do with him requesting to be excused or being a Muslim. Even though this is what the BBC have been saying all day.

BBC 7.00pm News announced that Commissioner Blair has found out that the decision was actually taken by his superiors and based on a "Risk assessment". You can see why that man keeps his job with BS skills like that.

Come to think of it does that mean they thought he.....?

Posted by: Fred at October 5, 2006 2:16 PM

people, would you feel safe with a muslim police officer?

that's like allowing a pedophile being a teacher...

Posted by: StillFedUp at October 5, 2006 2:50 PM

Britain's most senior policeman has called for an urgent review into the decision to excuse a Muslim police officer from guarding the Israeli embassy in London on moral grounds. Pc Alexander Omar Basha, part of the Metropolitan Police's Diplomatic Protection Group, asked for special dispensation not to work at the embassy because of his ethical objection to Israel's bombing of Lebanon, according to the Sun newspaper.

Actually, this guy never should have been guarding the embassy for security reasons. Is it really wise to have a Muslim guarding the Israeli embassy? But then again the police would have been vilified on the grounds of committing that heinous sin of profiling. At least the guy did everyone a favor by asking out of this assignment although I find the "moral grounds" excuse somewhat amusing, given what we see in the press everyday of Islamic "morality".

Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS at October 5, 2006 3:16 PM

Using Moslem policemen to protect us from Moslems. Brilliant!

Like using Shiite police and army units in Iraq to protect Sunnis from Shiite militias. Or vice versa.

There shall be no discrmination whatsoever when it comes to who protects whom from whom.

How could a Moslem policeman interfere if he sees fellow Moslems beating a Jew? You know what the good book--er--the Holy Q'uran says about that, don't you?

They use trained, domesticated foxes in the UK to protect henhouses from the bad foxes that want to eat the hens, don't they?

Posted by: unicorns62000 at October 5, 2006 11:59 PM