FrontPageMag.com By Robert Spencer By Hugh Fitzgerald Books Jihad Watch Islam 101 Qur'an Blog Raymond Ibrahim Robert Spencer
 
« Blair Says Immigrants to U.K. Have Duty to Integrate | Main | You can swim, but you have to wear Muslim dress »

December 9, 2006

Veiled Muslim to give Christmas message on UK TV

veil19.jpg
Joyeux Noel

But some are not happy with this new expression of the utter decay of British culture. "C4 attacked for Muslim message," by Colin Robertson in The Sun, with thanks to all who sent this in:

CHANNEL 4 was blasted last night after revealing its Christmas Day message will be delivered by a British Muslim woman in a full veil.

She has been identified only as Khadija, a Zimbabwe-born lecturer in Islamic studies. It is understood she will speak about the growing influence of different faiths in Britain — and possibly about her views on the veil....

But the Christian Institute said: “This is just what you expect from Channel 4, which has shown contempt for Christianity and Christian values.”

Yes.

Posted by Robert at December 9, 2006 7:44 AM
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us

Comments
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)

Channel 4 is stirring the pot. I don't think Muslims will feel safer in Britain after this is broadcast...........then again Channel 4 might get privatised too.

Posted by: Voyager [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 7:50 AM

From what I hear Channel 4 is receiving mountains of angry complaints from all quarters of the kingdom. They still have time to abandon the idea.

Posted by: Alan(UK) [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 8:12 AM

Excuse me. Although Muslims believe in Jesus as a prophet of Islam; what does a Muslim have to do with a Christian holiday? They don't believe that Jesus was God's son. They don't believe that Jesus truly died; therefore they don't believe in his resurrection. Why would a Muslim be believing a Christmas message?

Of course I assume this means that Channel 4 will be having a Christian Evangelist giving a Ramadan speech right? Ooh-whee... I can see the Muslim riots on that one already.

Posted by: Monkeywho [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 9:14 AM

Let them do it.... Maybe it will shock and wake people up!

There is something sinister and anti-Christian about the image of a woman in a black Muslim viel. Positively not the Virgin Mary.

For Channel Four to do this is a Mockery of the Christian Faith and traditions.

It seems the left is dead set on destroying England.

I say to the English take back your country. Vote them out!

Posted by: El Cid [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 10:09 AM

Who's next, Anton LaVey?

Posted by: Josephine [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 10:28 AM


Are you sure, it was not a scene from the series "Doctor Who and the Daleks" ?.

Looking at the picture above, I recalled the old (black and white) horror films I used to watch during Xmas time when I was in the USA.

Posted by: Icarus_Project [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 10:38 AM

Although Muslims believe in Jesus as a prophet of Islam

Not so.

They have a character called Isa who did not die on a cross and was not resurrected................doesn't sound like Jesus to me.

In fact it is probably as relevant as that character in the Da Vinci Code...........he was supposed to be a fictional character based on the factual Jesus of Nazareth................

Posted by: Voyager [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 11:11 AM

I hope it is shown after the 9 o'clock threshold as I don't want my children being scared

Posted by: hierophant [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 11:50 AM

"Who's next, Anton LaVey?"

Hmmm Charles Manson?

Posted by: hierophant [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 11:51 AM

Fully veiled, her address will sound like mumble, mumble, grrp...

Posted by: PJ [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 11:53 AM

Channel 4 have used Ali G to do a christmas message.

So i guess if you dress like a clown and talk rubbish......

Posted by: BlowHammed [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 12:20 PM

I hope it is shown after the 9 o'clock threshold as I don't want my children being scared

Posted by: hierophant

Looks like a deadringer for Darth Vader. I would be scared.

Posted by: pigtails not veils [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 12:25 PM


Good, then let Santa Claus (unveiled) give a Rama Dama Ding Dong address next time the start of that murderous holiday rolls around.

Posted by: DCWatson [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 12:59 PM

The British are not christian anymore. They don't care who gives the christmas message. As long as their pubs remain open, they will be happy. Once the muslims start closing down the pubs, then the problems will begin.

Posted by: callmeinfidel [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 1:43 PM

"Looks like a deadringer for Darth Vader. I would be scared."

Yes but Darth Vader was rational

Posted by: hierophant [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 2:51 PM

The British are not christian anymore. They don't care who gives the christmas message. As long as their pubs remain open, they will be happy. Once the muslims start closing down the pubs, then the problems will begin.

callmeinfidel

I think that here in Germany the trouble will really start when the muslims say they are offended by Oktoberfest, beer gardens, the vast eating of pork, etc...

Once the Germans get riled up, what happens to the muslims may make the Holocaust look like a kindergarten field trip.

Posted by: schwaben [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 3:35 PM

This is an excellent development.
C4 the BBC and their grovelling buddies at the guardian & independent actually beleive in their oh so PC trendy, liberal lefty hearts that this will encourage us evil islamophobes to confront our "prejudice" and show tolerance to the death cult of islam.
They do not understand the people of this country because the live in ivory towers.

This will enrage the people of this country and that is what we need RAGW, RAGE,RAGE AND MORE RAGE.

Excellent the non moslems in the UK will tolerate only so much spit in their faces, so let them spit !!

Posted by: apostate_islam [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 3:53 PM

Another cheap ruse by the Jihadists because "IF" the "Person" under the veil is actually a female we still can't see the lips moving to prove the Audio is matched to the
C-4 PSA...Ergo this Video can have a Voice-over
track added on for the Arabic version that could end up as a Jihad Promo within the Mosques or on Arabic TV channels .

After all....I heard somewhere that it's possible that SOME people that are Muslims MAY tell a lie and this doesn't mean ALL of them are liars , so it could end up on AlJazeera Arabic
as a call to Females to aid in the struggle against the Crusaders and Zionist supports like the UK and the Great-Satan the USA .


BTW, I even heard that a FEW Muslim students
that wear the full Whahabbi covering actually
cheated on University exams by having a fellow Muslim take the exam for them and give their ID
knowing the University won't contest the Person in the full Islam dress .
So the next time you see a Female Muslim spewing hatred and ignorance in public while screaming Racism because they have a Phd. and can't find work , this may be one of those
cheaters that lied for Allah's cause just to
play the Victim with a BSc.,Phd.,DDS.,LLB,Msc,MBA,CPA but can't get a Jay-Oh-Bee from the Islamophobia and anti-muslim bigots.
Lets not fool ourselves either, if this is allowed now it will become a annual PSA and just another item Islam has Hijacked from secular Societies and Non-Islamic Faiths.
I trust all Muslims , but I'd have to use a Micrometer to show you the level of Trust I start at and then let them erode it to Zero.

Posted by: ala-sux [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 4:23 PM

You may be interested in this which is being emailed around the world

Please send it to Channel4 and whoever you want to, especially those companies which advertise on Channel4.

To whom it may concern.

I strongly object to the proposed "alternative speech" to be broadcast on
Channel4, reportedly during the Queen's speech.

Allegedly the "alternative speech" is to be made by a Muslim woman whose
face is to be covered by a veil.

Despite all attempts by certain sections of the media, notably Channel4,
Christmas is still very dear to English peoples' hearts.

Therefore, I feel very strongly that this "alternative speech" being made at
this particular time is a direct attack on both Christians and English
people who consider themselves to be culturally Christian.

I consider it to be deliberately provokative and offensive.

If Channel4 considers it necessary to provide "alternative speeches" on an
overtly religious basis then it could easily choose to do so during
religious festivals like Eid and Diwali, for example.

Instead it it prefers to undermine Christmas.

Therefore, in response to this, a boycott of Channel4 and Channel4
advertising is underway, spread via the internet.

Participants will watch Channel4 for only 15 minutes per day in order to
determine the companies advertising on Channel4 that day.

These companies will be added to the boycott.

An English fightback is underway by people who refuse to be subjected to
politically correct propaganda and to have their own cultural heritage
violated in such a flagrant manner.

Posted by: Al.R.O'Ackbar [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 5:10 PM

Hasn't she got lovely eyes?

Posted by: hierophant [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 5:13 PM

Never, ever, compare Darth Vader to a musbot in a veil. Lord Vader was somewhat compassionate. He could have killed Luke when he had the chance. But he didn't. He loved his son. Muslims, on the other hand, do kill their own children for far less serious offences than Luke's. After all, Luke was trying to destroy the Death Star with everybody on board. Muslims kill their children just for marrying the wrong person. Vader would never have done that. He was bad, but not that bad.

Vader was also a snappy dresser. Sure, he wore a cape, but never a robe, never a burka, never a veil, never even a headscarf. He wore a helmet but only for life support. And he was always shiny and clean. And according to the episode 6, well shaven. How many muslims are well shaven, that are NOT planning a suicide attack? Even the women need to shave but don't.

Vader may have wanted to control the galaxy, but he had no interest in what religion you were, or what dress you chose. Look at those freaks at the Mosley spaceport bar which was under imperial control, the bar where Solo met Luke. Have you seen people dressed in such bad taste? I haven't. Yet Vader and his minions let them be. This veiled monster would make everybody wear a garbage bag over their heads. Can't say that about Vader. He wasn't trying to push any ideology down anybody's throat. He was just trying to crush those rebels.

Please, I know Vader made some mistakes in his life, like destroying Alderan, but he was a secular liberal with deeply entrenched pro-western values compared to the islamic image before you at the top of this page.

If only the threat we were facing was from the Empire. I could live with that.

Posted by: August22 [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 5:29 PM

Channel 4 in UK is run by a bunch of left-wing weirdos and they pull a stunt like this almost every Christmas. Because there is a tradition that the Queen gives a speech at 3 o'clock on Christmas Day they are forever trying to come up with “alternatives”. I think a few years ago they had a Christmas address from a transvestite (Queens speech –get it?).

Anywhere else in the World Channel 4 executives would be sticking up posters on derelict buildings or in labour camps. But Britain is a civilised country so we give them a television channel to play with.

Posted by: Fred [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 6:01 PM

What's with the picture? Is it the birthday of all the "Naseems" today?

Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 6:25 PM

its sounds like channel four has been taken over by the left a gay rights and radical feminists who hate men and their lack respect for Christmas by having a Muslim it in head to toe veil giving a Christmas message the same time as the Queen shows maybe we should all write Queen Elizabeth and demand a Channel 4 broadcast license be pulled

Posted by: islamakapigeaters [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 6:39 PM

Here's a site started up as a fight-back

www.bringbackchristmas.co.uk

Posted by: Al.R.O'Ackbar [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 7:02 PM

Survey finds Christmas gone from cards

Ummah News Links

Posted by: ummahnewslinks [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 8:31 PM

"C4 attacked for Muslim message"

No No!

This is all wrong. I think you were trying to say...

"C4 attached with Muslim message"

Posted by: greatcometof1577 [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 11:28 PM

Yikes! All the photos are of the same woman!

He, he, rotlf

Allat

Posted by: allat [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 9, 2006 11:46 PM

I think it's great that a niqaabi sister chooses to give a message of peace on a day she doesn't even celebrate to a country that has chosen to bomb the mudhuts and villages of her co-religionists in 3rd world countries who are struggling to survive. To a country that gives her a passport in her land of birth but ridicules her beliefs through the press and websites like this , a country where she gets thrown off buses wearing a cloth on her face, but would be cheered if she wore a bikini or less. To a country that renders its Muslim male citizens for barbaric torture in Guantanamo, then when there are no charges, simply apologizes for the "error"....the great civilization of the West which other countries should emulate??

Come to think of it, wasn't Christmas debunked a long time ago as a false celebration with no relevance to the Prophet Jesus's birth, but instead is a mishmash of pagan practices?

http://de.essortment.com/christmaspagan_rece.htm

Despite all this, knowing she's going to be talking to people who are

1. ever more promiscuous
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4584175.stm

2. enjoy an increasing crime rate
http://www.reform.co.uk/website/crime/abetterway/imprisonmentandthecrimerate.aspx

I think she's being rather nice...

Posted by: Salahuddin [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 10, 2006 4:21 AM

1. ever more promiscuous
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4584175.stm

2. enjoy an increasing crime rate
http://www.reform.co.uk/website/crime/abetterway/imprisonmentandthecrimerate.aspx

I think she's being rather nice...


Posted by Salahuddin at December 10, 2006 04:21 AM


Salahuddin,

Should the west emulate the muslims murdering muslims in Iraq?

Should the west emulate fatah verses hammas?

Should the west emulate the muslim men who rape women and girls, with only the female victims being punished?

Should the west emulate the muslim ownership of women as chattels?

Should the west emulate the muslim treatment of women?

Should anyone trust/submit to a god, that condones taqiyah and kithman(lies and deceit) to spread it's message?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cB-F3MPDmqE&mode=related&search=

Posted by: amalteser [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 10, 2006 5:12 AM

I`ll wager she won`t be as stupid as this imbecile , it gets funnier evry time you watch it>>>>>

http://www.icjs-online.org/index.php?eid=2188&ICJS=5450&article=1136

Posted by: aladdinsane57 [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 10, 2006 6:28 AM

"Despite all this, knowing she's going to be talking to people who are

1. ever more promiscuous
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4584175.stm"

you are obviously talking about your rapist muslim friends, we all know rapists don't use condoms especially when they engage sex with goats.

"2. enjoy an increasing crime rate"

you are obviously talking about the crime rate muslims committed. We all know the high percentage of muslims in local prisons.

Posted by: StillFedUp [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 10, 2006 8:15 AM

Salahuddin

I think it's great that a niqaabi sister chooses to give a message of peace on a day she doesn't even celebrate to a country that has chosen to bomb the mudhuts and villages of her co-religionists in 3rd world countries who are struggling to survive.

YOU MEAN LIKE THE 400,000 OF HER CO-RELIGIONISTS SLAUGHTERED IN DARFUR?

Posted by: Fred [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 10, 2006 8:44 AM

Salahuddin

Thought you might to learn a little of the spirit of the country of her birth. This relates to a incident in the 1840's in China.


The Private of the Buffs

Sir Francis Hastings Doyle


Last night, among his fellow roughs,
He jested, quaffed and swore;
A drunken private of the Buffs,
Who never looked before.
To-day, beneath the foeman's frown,
He stands in Elgin's place,
Ambassador from Britain's crown,
And type of all her race.

Poor, reckless, rude, low-born, untaught,
Bewildered, and alone,
A heart, with English instinct fraught,
He yet can all his own.
Ay, tear his body limb from limb,
Bring cord or axe or flame,
He only knows that not through him
Shall England come to shame.

Far Kentish hop-fields round him seemed,
Like dreams, to come and go;
Bright leagues of cherry-blossom gleamed,
One sheet of living snow;
The smoke above his father's door
In gray soft eddyings hung;
Must he then watch it rise no more,
Doomed by himself so young?

Yes, honour calls! - with strength like steel
He put the vision by;
Let dusky Indians whine and kneel,
An English lad must die.
And thus, with eyes that would not shrink,
With knee to man unbent,
Unfaltering on its dreadful brink,
To his red grave he went.

Vain mightiest fleets of iron framed,
Vain those all-shattering guns,
Unless proud England keep untamed
The strong heart of her sons;
So let his name through Europe ring, -
A man of mean estate,
Who died, as firm as Sparta's king,
Because his soul was great.


Or more bluntly - Up yours.

Posted by: Fred [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 10, 2006 10:24 AM

I sent the letter posted by Al.R.O'Ackbar above to Channel 4, this was the response I got....

Dear Chris,

Thank you for contacting Channel 4 Viewer Enquiries.

We felt it fitting that the Alternative Christmas Message should be from a British Muslim woman in a year in which issues of religious and racial identity and freedom of expression have dominated the news agenda.

I would like to assure you that your comments are taken very seriously and have been logged. They will be seen by the appropriate people within Channel 4, all the way up to the Chief Executive.

If you require further information, feel free to email me back or visit http://help.channel4.com/tv.

Max Whitman
Channel 4 Viewer Enquiries

In other words, screw what you or anyone else thinks, we're gonna do it anyway.

Posted by: MillMouse [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 11, 2006 4:46 AM

From what I hear Channel 4 is receiving mountains of angry complaints from all quarters of the kingdom. They still have time to abandon the idea.

Posted by: Alan(UK) at December 9, 2006 08:12 AM


Newspaper editors have been known to publish "controversial letters" to spark reader reaction, so I'm highly suspicious that the Channel 4 producers responsible for this brillian idea were looking for such a response so they can do yet another program about the spread of Islamophobia in the UK.

Posted by: waterdragon52 [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 11, 2006 11:48 AM

A response to a couple of Salahuddin's comments:

"I think it's great that a niqaabi sister chooses to give a message of peace on a day she doesn't even celebrate to a country that has chosen to bomb the mudhuts and villages of her co-religionists in 3rd world countries who are struggling to survive."

- You mean the mudhuts where the Taliban forces choose to hide their cowardly asses among women and children? I can see why she'd be upset about that, especially after all the wonderful things the Taliban did, like aiding and abetting those who slaughtered 3000 people on Sept. 11/01.

I personally think its great that a country can be so forgiving and open-minded that it allows a niqab-wearing religious fanatic to speak on the public airwaves even though large numbers of her co-religionists deliberately slaughtered scores of innocent men, women, adn children in the cause of jihad on July 7 2005.

Sal-baby again: "To a country that gives her a passport in her land of birth but ridicules her beliefs through the press and websites like this , a country where she gets thrown off buses wearing a cloth on her face, but would be cheered if she wore a bikini or less."

- A country that nonetheless allows her to live freely, study, work, travel, and collect generous welfare benefits, no matter how much or how many of her co-religionists express vitriolic hatred for said country.

She was not "thrown" off a bus, as would literally happen to any woman in certain Muslim countries trying to board a bus wearing anything less than a head-to-toe sack, but was not allowed to board the bus because she was trying to use a bus pass and the driver, quite reasonably, had no way of discerning whether she was indeed the person in the photo on the ID card. In other words, he was doing his job. A capital offense in this day and age, it seems, when the person one is dealing with is a member of a poor, oppressed, despised and downtrodden minority...

Posted by: angloirishslav [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 12, 2006 9:07 PM

The station argued thus: "We felt it fitting that the Alternative Christmas Message should be from a British Muslim woman in a year in which issues of religious and racial identity and freedom of expression have dominated the news agenda."

No, issues of religious and racial identity and freedom of expression have NOT dominated the news agenda at any time, anywhere, in recent memory, for good or bad. When was the last time you saw a Buddhist, a Sikh, an Orthodox Jew, a Hindu, etc., whinging on the local news about how discriminated against he or she is? Or come to think of it, when was the last time you saw thousands of any of these people rioting in the streets because their religion was insulted? How many fundamentalist Christians rioted over The DaVinci Code?

Issues of MUSLIM religious and MUSLIM "racial identity" (whatever the hell that means, as Islam is not a race)and MUSLIM freedom of expression have dominated the news agenda ad nauseum, or to those who don't know Latin, to the point of one wanting to puke, because that is precisely what the political Islamists wanted. They get the attention because they are the loudest, the meanest, and the scariest. They are dangling the well-meaning left-liberal media like puppets.

Feel free to forward this message to Channel 4. I'm not a British citizen (although could become one quite easily, having been born there!) so there's not much
I can do about their "F**K Christmas" message. But hopefully all sensible Brits, and not only Christians, will let it be known what they think of this idiocy.

Posted by: angloirishslav [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 12, 2006 11:22 PM

Britain is doomed.

Posted by: US_infidel [TypeKey Profile Page] at December 14, 2006 3:32 PM

Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.


Web Site Counter