That's one girl that gets around a bit - one minute she's spouting off on the telly next minute she's going swimming in pyjamas. Whatever next? Teaching?

Posted by: Sir Henry Morgan at December 9, 2006 8:35 AM

I am laughing out loud.. Until I think that the Brits have gone over the edge....

Posted by: lonewolf at December 9, 2006 8:51 AM

This reminds me of black and white only segregation during the 1960s in the States. I hope that their is a public outrage about this in Britain and that this is stopped.

Posted by: Monkeywho at December 9, 2006 9:10 AM

Sorry... that THERE is a public outage.

Posted by: Monkeywho at December 9, 2006 9:11 AM

Ahh don't they look lovely
http://static.flickr.com/47/148331455_78e59c4392.jpg

Posted by: hierophant at December 9, 2006 9:13 AM

Another precedent has been set. What next? Partitioned fitness centres to keep men and women separate?

Stop the world, I want off!

Posted by: Sir Oinks Alot at December 9, 2006 9:17 AM

I want to know when they are running the special sessions for the nudists. I don't see why should discriminate against that peace-loving group.

Nude, though commonly misunderstood from its nordic roots, has nothing to do with nuke and as an example of our inclusive non-bigoted multi-cultural society we should embrace nudists in our pools.

Nude comes from the word peace and i expect fellow readers will join with me in ending nudeophobia.

Posted by: exposesithlords at December 9, 2006 9:17 AM

This *is* segregation. I hope enough people protest and put a stop to it. The word apartheid springs to mind.

It's a slippery slope. Once something is accepted as common practice, on what grounds can such segregation be stopped? And how easily would it be to convince the courts to enforce it? "Pool X and Pool Z do it, so Pool Y must do it, also."

It would be much harder to reverse once it gained a foothold and became common practice.

This is Muslims getting special treatment that no other group is permitted. This is racist. This is sexist. This is discriminatory. This is wrong.

Posted by: Josephine at December 9, 2006 10:15 AM

People complain that there isn't enough effort to integrate the muslims into mainstream society and that they're at a disadvantage and discriminated against because of that. Actions like these show they don't care to be integrated.

Posted by: haffee at December 9, 2006 10:51 AM

I'm curious if there are differing expectations of rescue and resuscitation efforts for the burkha buoys. After seeing what happened to the unveiled schoolgirls in the burning Saudi schoolhouse, I presume their male masters would prefer they drown to being "inappropriately" contacted or "unveiled" for CPR (horrors!).

Posted by: Concerned Citizen at December 9, 2006 10:51 AM

All i can do is LAUGH!

No other response is neccessary.

Posted by: DUGGY at December 9, 2006 10:52 AM

I did another blog this morning entitled Sophia Operates Even Through Muhammad and George Bush that has a lot to do with Islam's attitudes towards women. The "link" I refer to is at the top of the blog and references the Wikipedia entry on Aisha.

Several things are striking about the life of Muhammad from my position as a Gnostic. One was the fact that, despite all his wives and temporary wives and slaves he never, with one exception, had a biological son who survived to adulthood. He'd adopted a son with this first wife, and in fact he ended up taking up with one of his wives, which is quite properly a scandal we Christians should always bring up with Muslims.

Interestingly enough, he did have one beautiful boy, but even there we have a story. It was with a Christian woman named Maria al-Qibtiyya who'd been given to him as a slave by a "Byzantine official." Or at least that's what the Muslims say. We have no idea who the hell this "Muqawqis" really is. He was certainly not the fucking Partriarch of Alexandria.

(God damn these people lie with every breath.)

But the boy died when he was eighteen months old.

Daughters. Daughters. Daughters.

Maria never married him despite most claims to the contrary. She was a beautiful virgin given as a whore to a dirty old pedophile. Please note in the link above how these dirtbags can't even get their story straight about her; either how she came into his possession or what her status was. Just as in the Catholic Church Mary is the image of Sophia, Maria is the image of Sophia enslaved in Islamic theology and law by Jehovah's prophet. You need look no farther than that for an explanation for this religion's explosive hatred of women and gays. You must not be reminded of the suffering of your Mother!

Then there was the matter of Muhammad's death: poison. He'd been poisoned years before by an old woman but he stopped eating the meat before its effect was immediately fatal. But he'd had enough, and even as he died in horrible agony he knew it was the crone bitch who'd done him in.

And where did he die? In the arms of his favorite wife Aisha, who he'd raped... er... consummated his marriage with when she was only nine years old.

(Feel free to bring that up when debating a Muslim and enjoy watching him squirm. The earliest and most reliable hadiths are quite clear about her age. When she moved into his tent she took her toys with her. You don't have to let him get away with lying about this, which his will almost certainly do.)

The Sunni-Shia split came about as a direct result of Aisha, who was quite clear that Muhammad never said nothin' about his nephew Ali being the next caliph. "I should know!" she said. "He died in my arms!" Years before, in an incident involving another man that could have ruined her life, Ali had made an off-handed comment to his uncle that he shouldn't worry too much about her. There were plenty of fish in the sea!

Yes. And plenty of them are clever little buggers with nasty little bites.

All this is very similar to what happened this week. As you may know, George H. W. Bush (King George I) broke down in tears in public. This isn't the first time it had happened. It was only a week before that he cried in front of a bunch of people in some pathetic little Islamic sultanate. In fact he'd done it a least a couple of times before these past six years in response to the dead-on criticism of his little idiot son.

In the incident this week I was reminded of 1994, when I lived in Florida, of the race for governor Jeb lost against incumbent Lawton Chiles. It was that incident, as a matter of fact, that brought on the old psycho's latest breakdown. It's been brought to my attention that as a result of this loss Jeb wasn't properly positioned to run for President in 2000. Though he was, of course, properly positioned to steal the election in that state.

Jeb is the favorite son of George I. He was the one who was supposed to run, and not the idiot son from Texas. Had the Bush cartel succeeded in their dirty little plot facism would have had a competent face; though certainly a cruel and relentlessly corrupt one. The job of defending our liberities would have been much harder.

But that did not happen because Christ defeated Jehovah on Calvary. There, married to Sophia, whose stolen light animates this world, he started the process that will inevitably result in the final defeat of Jehovah. According to the Apostle Paul the old man will turn from his evil in the end. It's good for him that on that day I will not be in judgement of his fate, because I don't know if I have it in me to forgive him for his sins.

Hail Sophia, filled with light; the Christ is with thee. Blessed art thou among the Aeons, and blessed is the liberator of thy light, Jesus. Holy Sophia, mother of all the gods, pray for us thy children both now and in the hour of our deaths.

Final note. I'm listening to my iPod, and just as I finish this posting Angel by Sarah McLachlan is playing. It's one of the few slow songs on my playlist, which is otherwise almost exclusively made up of dance music I listen to while working out. This synchronicity tells me she has blessed my interpretation.

I'm thinking of getting a PhD in Islamic studies. My views are desperately needed.

Posted by: pneumatikon at December 9, 2006 11:11 AM

We are not giving preference to any one group...

Oh, yes you are!

Posted by: Borg at December 9, 2006 11:18 AM

My views are desperately needed.
Posted by: pneumatikon

I wouldn't say "desperately", but the first part was ok (sans a couple of Sophia references).

Or maybe just "My views are desperate", or "My views are disparate".

Posted by: Concerned Citizen at December 9, 2006 11:29 AM

Great Britain, stand up!
This cannot be allowed!
Whose country is this anyway?

Posted by: Carolyn2 at December 9, 2006 11:41 AM

Christ defeated Jehovah on Calvary
Huh?
Should read "Christ defeated Satan on Calvary"
/I hope

Posted by: Carolyn2 at December 9, 2006 11:47 AM

pneumatikon -

I was just communing with Sarah McLachlan and she told me to tell you to just bless us with the wisdom of a link next time and not to do the "copy and paste of your entire blog entry" thingie. Last time Sarah checked, this was Robert Spencer's blog.

Posted by: Josephine at December 9, 2006 12:26 PM

"We are not giving preference to any one group"...

"The Hatter opened his eyes very wide on hearing this; but all he said was, `Why is a raven like a writing-desk?'
'Come, we shall have some fun now!' thought Alice. `I'm glad they've begun asking riddles.--I believe I can guess that,' she added aloud. `Do you mean that you think you can find out the answer to it?' said the March Hare.
`Exactly so,' said Alice.
`Then you should say what you mean,' the March Hare went on.
`I do,' Alice hastily replied; `at least--at least I mean what I say--that's the same thing, you know.'
'Not the same thing a bit!' said the Hatter. `You might just as well say that "I see what I eat" is the same thing as "I eat what I see"!' `You might just as well say,' added the March Hare, `that "I like what I get" is the same thing as "I get what I like"!'
`You might just as well say,' added the Dormouse, who seemed to be talking in his sleep, `that "I breathe when I sleep" is the same thing as "I sleep when I breathe"!'
`It is the same thing with you,' said the Hatter, and here the conversation dropped, and the party sat silent for a minute, while Alice thought over all she could remember about ravens and writing-desks, which wasn't much."

and henceforth the Mad Hatter rules... up is down and down is up... and Alice couldn't remember very much anymore.

Posted by: George Mc. at December 9, 2006 12:34 PM

And I thought it was only the women in Islam who had to be modest. Ridiculous beyond belief.

http://www.cafepress.com/uncovered_meat

Posted by: pigtails not veils at December 9, 2006 12:35 PM

I am in italy and as the rest of southern europe we are always reminded from our "superior" countries in north europe how we are corrupted, stupid, backwards etc.

Considering we suffer this imposition, we never DARE criticizing UK or many other norther EU countries, because the deep sense of shame they have always forced on us.

The independent farts and we bow down to their judgement and so on.

I was shocked to hear the news saying that UK has got PC gone crazy.

This is the first time that publicly our knee-jerk press recognizes the situation in UK is out of hand.

Posted by: StillFedUp at December 9, 2006 12:55 PM

Aren't all of these Halloween Ninja costumes a safety hazard if they're being worn in a swimming pool?

Posted by: DCWatson at December 9, 2006 12:56 PM

I am laughing out loud.. Until I think that the Brits have gone over the edge....

Posted by: lonewolf

Be prepared, we now have Michiganstan where women will be allowed to board busses in full facial mask.

http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com

Posted by: pigtails not veils at December 9, 2006 1:03 PM

great brittain is owned by the saudis and uae.

Posted by: callmeinfidel at December 9, 2006 1:36 PM

Please be aware that we here in the UK will never surrender our values to any body. This is another threat to these isles. We have had to defend our selves a few times in the past. when it comes down to it our "leaders" will have to do what they are told by our people. We are governed by concent. Chamberlin comes to mind.I just hope you lot dont go woobly on us.

Posted by: defender at December 9, 2006 1:58 PM

sorry to quote from an old book but thought this was apt

“When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.”
Apostle Paul, 1 Corinthians 13:11

This is really getting rather tiresome. Moslems please grow up..... Enough allready.

So F***ing tedious

Posted by: hierophant at December 9, 2006 2:00 PM

"I am in italy and as the rest of southern europe we are always reminded from our "superior" countries in north europe how we are corrupted, stupid, backwards etc."

Hi StillFedUp
Sorry to see you feel this way
Speaking as an Englishman I certainly don't look down on Italy and I don't think my compatriots do either. We all have our faults and none of us are perfect. In fact we admire the Italians and all European culture even the French! (don't like to admit that very often though)

Have enjoyed holidays in Italy and I will continue to go there. However I have to say you are rather bad drivers, and can be a bit over dramatic on the football field though!

Posted by: hierophant at December 9, 2006 2:12 PM

I vaguely remember reading on this blog that Muslims were pushing for this at a swimming pool in the US a while ago. They've also been given a seperate Muslim-only beach in Italy.It seems that this area of activity is on their wish list for the introduction of Sharia in the west. Personally I think they should be told to build their own private swimming pools and stop trying to force everyone else to take their cultural neurosis about exposure of the human body seriously.

Posted by: wallyUK at December 9, 2006 2:15 PM

Another precedent has been set. What next? Partitioned fitness centres to keep men and women separate?

Stop the world, I want off!

Posted by: Sir Oinks Alot

allready happened,in dearbornistan,michigan.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-04-21-muslim-exercise_x.htm

Posted by: Patriot8 at December 9, 2006 2:24 PM

read what happens in china

(taken from a post on danielpipes.org)

The Chinese had once a very serious Moslem problem in Eastern Turkestan or the Xinjiang province , by far the biggest Chinese region. It had been under the nominal Manchu sway since the 18th century but around 1860 the local uprisings and the weakness of the Peking court tore if off China. Yukub Beg from Kokhand established a short-lived Moslem khanate playing off the Russians against the Chinese. Yet in 1877 he lost power and after negotiations with Russia the Manchu recovered the province.

But the Moslem Uighur majority was a source of constant trouble , especially after the fall of the Manchu central government in 1911. Between 1884 and 1949 , when the communists won the civil war and re-established the central government , more than 40 bloody anti-Chinese revolts took place and there was constant guerrilla warefare which peaked in 1933 when the Moslem Uighurs established a short-lived " the Islamic Republic of Uighuristan" with shari'a and all other Islamic paraphernalia. It was with the Soviet help that Uighuristan was overthrown. The same episode occurred between 1944 -1949 where the Uighur Moslems re-estabished the Islamic Republic but this time it was Mao-Tse Tung that suppressed the violent Islamic movement . The head of Uighuristan Aysa Beg ran away to "secular" Turkey . Around 500 000 Uighurs fled the province for Soviet Central Asia where they recently formed the Committee for Eastern Turkistan , one of the most radical Moslem organizations in Central Asia . More 150 000 Uighurs live in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia and they will never forgive the Chinese for what they did to Moslem Uighuristan.

Quite aware of the Moslem threat the Chinese have conducted ever since a very judicious and far-sighted demographic and re-settlement policy to make Xinjiang a secure place and eradicate Islam with the final aim of assimilating and de-Islamizing the Uighurs and other ethic minorities. And this could be achieved at first only and exclusively by reducing the proportion of the Moslems in the province (96% before 1949 ! ), that is to say by importing the Han race majority to the province. Before 1949 there were only 300 thousand Chinese settlers in Eastern Turkestan . The Uighurs and other Moslem groups eamounted up to c. 7 000 000 .

Now after two generations there are more than 6 million Han Chinese , which is more than 50 % and with the Chinese family policy the assimilation of the Uighur Moslem group is a question of a few more generations. They can't breed as they do in the West. This is further re-inforced by the fact that the government conducts a vigorous school policy in the province and favours other less violent ethnic and religious groups at the expense of the Uighurs . The Uighurs live under rather primitive conditions whereas the better educated Han Chinese get better jobs.

At the same time the Chinese were determined - and knew how - to crush the hydra of Islam in the province. Quranic schools were closed, suspect imams and Moslem scholar jailed or persecuted or even sentenced to death, violent Moslems rounded up ruthlessly , new mosques were not allowed to be built. In 1990 in the town of Akto the last circumstance formed a pretext for Moslems to demonstrate against the Chinese. Riots started and the Chinese responded with radically efficient means. 60 Moslems were killed and soon almost 8000 were arrested with different criminal charges raised against them .

The Chinese see a Moslem problem largely as a criminal problem. Moslems become criminal so they are treated as such. No holy nimbus of religion protects them as it happens in the West where criminal Moslems can break the law as often as they want unpunished as long they do it in the name of Islam. In China on the contrary but logically enough , being a Moslem only aggravates a criminal's situation! In February 1996 riots started as the news spread among Moslem "youths" that the authorities had arrested 60 well-known Moslem activists and "scholars". The Chinese were forced to shoot at the enraged Moslem crowds and thus quickly ended the Moslem riots. All attempts to re-establish Uighuristan or Islam in Xinjiang have failed and the tendency is clear for an Islam-free eatsern Turkestan.

Well , the Chinese are actually doing what some more far-seeing Westerners might only be dreaming of whispering it so silently that no "politically correct" informer denounces the dreamer to the Saudi-subsidized mass-media !

Well, some things would no doubt attract the Chinese so much that they could unconditionally support the possible struggle of the world community against Islam , the more so as this struggle -as we can see in Xinjiang - is in the self-interest of the Chinese themselves ... I mean in exchange for Taiwan or stopping the hypocritical outcry policy over Chinese measures in Tibet the Chinese might be prone to do many things for America. Perhaps it might include sending troops to Iraq , Iran , Afghanistan or even to Saudi Arabia . They are ones of few who really know how to deal with "the religion of peace" .

Posted by: StillFedUp at December 9, 2006 2:44 PM

"The Muslims refuse our culture and try to impose their culture on us. I reject them, and this is not only my duty toward my culture-it is toward my values, my principles, my civilization."

-Oriana Fallaci

Posted by: Madduck at December 9, 2006 4:22 PM

"The moment you give up your principles, and your values, you are dead, your culture is dead, your civilization is dead. Period."

-Oriana Fallaci

Posted by: Madduck at December 9, 2006 4:24 PM

wallyUK,
You are correct in saying that 'muslim only' swim time was being pused for in the US, and unfortunately succeeded:

http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/007681.php

"August 15, 2005
Seattle: taxpayer-funded discrimination?
This Seattle Times story, "Preserving modesty, in the pool" (thanks to T-ham), emphasizes that the Muslims-only days in Seattle's Meadowbrook Pool are paid for as private rentals:

It's Saturday evening, the end of a hot day, and a group of women and children have gathered at North Seattle's Meadowbrook Pool for their monthly swim.
Most of the pool staff has left, except for two female lifeguards, who on this day will be on duty for the next two hours.

The women and children — all Muslims — have been swimming in private once a month at Meadowbrook as part of a program organized by the North Seattle Family Center.

Because Islam requires Muslim women to fully cover themselves in public, swimming in pools or the ocean is largely off-limits for many.

But across the Puget Sound area, that's starting to change as public and private pools at times are sending home their male staff members, covering up their windows and allowing women of faith to swim alone and in private.

It's occurring here as it has elsewhere across the country, as the Muslim population increases and families seek more ways to stay active.

Access to these pools is not free; the groups, like all others that use these facilities, pay a rental fee.

However, the Sound Politics blog (thanks again to T-ham) has discovered that the Muslims are not the ones paying the rent:

I made some calls and learned that the program, called "Muslim Sister Swim", is treated by the city's Meadowbrook Pool as any other private rental, which would be exempt from the city non-discrimination policy. However, the outfit that organizes and pays for the Muslim Sister Swim is the North Seattle Family Center, a unit of the Children's Home Society, a non-profit that gets most of its money from various government sources. As such, it should strictly comply with non-discrimination guidelines. Nevertheless, the Muslim Sister Swim is open exclusively to Muslims, no infidel women need apply. I asked a representative of the North Seattle Family Center to explain this, and she told me that it was to respect these immigrant women's culture.
But if there's ever a reason for taxpayer dollars to be used to support an immigrant's culture, it should be to support them in learning to shed whatever aspects of their culture are incompatible with American culture. The last thing we need to teach immigrants is to expect publicly-subsidized religious apartheid.

Would the Children's Home Society fund a Whites-Only Pool Night? A Christians-Only Pool Night? Where is the ACLU?

Posted by Robert at August 15, 2005 09:41 AM
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us

Posted by: No_Mooselimbs at December 9, 2006 4:37 PM

And now Blair says that a Muslim can be the PM of the UK

http://uppompeii.blogspot.com/

Posted by: DP111 at December 9, 2006 5:07 PM

DP111,

Yes, and Bush is going to replace Bolton with a Muslim as UN Ambassador.

Posted by: Concerned Citizen at December 9, 2006 5:50 PM

Muslims are strange they try to hide the fact that women have bodies that look good to men and 99.9% a Western man would not touch a woman without an invitation the other .1% or hopefully in jail where they belong, but judging from all the rapes that have been happening in the Middle East and Scandinavia and the attitude of Muslim rape gangs were recently jailed in Australia Muslim men are so sex starved that what we consider normal at the beach or swimming pool site of a woman in bikini or one piece in a suit that we consider modest they consider an invitation for rape the entire Muslim attitude on body modesty belongs back in 688 A.D. not not in 2007 A.D. and then we are dealing with what essentially is a tribal culture frozen in time whose attitudes have not changed in over 1700 years Islam seems the same way unlike Christianity. And Mohamed said he was all right with having sex whatever you want and with any captive women, so could it be not modesty Islamic women are protecting from any man but there bodies from being violated by oversexed Muslim males and painting the rest of us the same brush because they cannot trust their own men to behave if they were wearing a bikini or one piece bathing suit, and judging how Muslim men act when they come the West treating Western women working as maids in hotels as prostitutes I can't blame Muslim women for being afraid to let any man her husband sees them given how badly Moslem men act towards women they consider it modestly dressed.

Posted by: islamakapigeaters at December 9, 2006 6:23 PM

Apparently, attire for female Muslims is quite practical-you can walk in public in that getup, swim in it, even conceal an AK-47 in it. Perhaps Western women should adopt this shroud-it'll make shopping for clothes so much easier.

Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS at December 9, 2006 6:27 PM

"It seems the issue here is over modesty. Surely if Muslims want to swim then they should just turn up with their modest swimwear at the same time as everyone else."

I'd like to invite these moslems to swim in the Hudson. May I suggest some modest foot attire made of cement?

Here they can swim anytime day or night with no impure infidels around... I invite as many as can fit. And I promise I'll have the cement shoes handy for any and all. :-)

Posted by: germaninamerica at December 9, 2006 8:54 PM

I was just communing with Sarah McLachlan

[...]

Posted by: Josephine

Forgive my ignorance.. Who is Sarah McLachlan? Is she an anti-jihadist recording artist? Do tell..

Posted by: germaninamerica at December 9, 2006 9:16 PM

http://flickr.com/photos/ozan_d/288750829/in/pool-islam/

What a sickening sight right in the Heart of Europe. And nothing but moslem and dhimmi comments on that one too!! GOOD GRIEF!! They WELCOME the ENEMY!!!!!!

They have this on flickR: See if YOU can find "YOUR" country on this list. I was certainly DISMAYED to find mine. My one living grandma said today she thinks Hitler is responsible for this islamic mess we are in. We murdered all the Jews who were thinking people as she called them and we traded them in for an army of hostile belligerent losers who hate the people of the countries they move into. I couldn't have said it better myself. And so Herr Hitler still reaches all of us from the grave. The Nazis won't rule Europe and the World. Islam is poised to be the Evil Empire that will soon outlaw "European-ness" in Europe.

About Muslim Cultures

Traditional Islamic arts, food, architecture, events, and daily life from around the world.

Themes: architecture, calligraphy, food, mosque, patterns, people (kids, women, men), prayers, Quran, wedding

Nations: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Arabia, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Bosnia, Brazil, Brunei, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burma, Cambodia, Canada, Chile, China/Xinjiang, Cyprus, Dubai, Egypt, Ethiopia, Eritrea, France, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Ivory Coast, Japan, Jerusalem, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Korea, Kosova, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Libya, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Mauritius, Mecca/Medina, Morocco, Mozambique, Netherlands, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Russia, Senegal, Singapore, Somalia, Somaliland, South Africa, Spain, Sudan, Sweden, Syria, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Thailand, Tibet, Trinidad/Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, UAE, UK, Ukraine, USA, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, Yemen

Posted by: germaninamerica at December 9, 2006 9:32 PM

"Forgive my ignorance.. Who is Sarah McLachlan? Is she an anti-jihadist recording artist? Do tell.."
Posted by: germaninamerica

She's a Canadian singer-songwriter. Sort of folky, I guess. She's had at least one hit that Americans would know but I can't remember which song it was. ("In the Arms of the Angels"?) I don't know if she's political but she seems to have sent her psychic blessing to the poster above.

http://www.sarahmclachlan.com/

Posted by: Josephine at December 9, 2006 11:11 PM

germaninamerica

Can't say I know a lot about Sarah McGlaughlin, but one way or the other I'd recommend you acquire "Angel". Beautiful track, well worth listening to.

Posted by: Wishbone at December 9, 2006 11:36 PM

Ok. I was hoping she might be anti-jihadist. We are desperate for voices besides the internet. The few freedom-loving among us are crying out for an eloquent expression of our concerns in the artistic realm.

Where is Pablo Picasso to paint us a Guernica in these dark days?? Were is Heartfield/Herzfeldt?

Posted by: germaninamerica at December 10, 2006 1:38 AM

Just a question, Barrack Obama is poised to be the next Democrat contender for the White House in 2008, is this likely? 'cos most demo's dont want clinton n the hu the fuck will vote repub after Iraq. (I support the war by the way)

Posted by: Vishant at December 10, 2006 6:50 AM

On the lines os the Sarah Mclaughlin comments.
Check this guy out, Roy Harper. He wrote this song in 1989, it's called "The Black Cloud of Islam".
Roy Harper must have seen it coming as this song is more relevant now than ever. Here is a link to the lyrics and a few words from Roy

http://distributedresearch.net/blog/?p=96

I would also like to assure the readers around the world that Jihad will never win in the UK. No matter what our trendy apologist politicians think, we won't allow this islamisation of the UK to continue.
Every "ordinary Joe" I talk to has had enough of this madness and wants our government to act, we want this creeping takeover stopped. Every day hundreds more illegal immigrants arrive here, the religion of most of them? You guessed it!

Posted by: bob_bournemouth at December 10, 2006 7:20 AM

A spokesman said: "Muslims are not allowed to show intimate parts of their body. This is non-negotiable. Muslims have as much right to go swimming as anyone else."

Since when is swimming a "right"??

Posted by: redshirt at December 10, 2006 4:26 PM

A spokesman said: "Muslims are not allowed to show intimate parts of their body. This is non-negotiable. Muslims have as much right to go swimming as anyone else."

I'd like to invite any moslems who feel like making a spalsh to come to New York city where I'll be glad to accomodate them to swim in the Hudson River. Complete with a view of the statue of Liberty and beautiful downtown Manhattan. Note the missing World Trade Towers on your left.

To ensure proper modesty for all - except of myself since I am an impuer kuffar - I will provide each of the moslem bathers with a nice pair of lead shoes.

Best of all: It's FREE!

Posted by: germaninamerica at December 10, 2006 6:45 PM

So F***ing tedious

Posted by: hierophant

THAT was funny!

Posted by: germaninamerica at December 10, 2006 6:47 PM