| FrontPageMag.com | By Robert Spencer | By Hugh Fitzgerald | Books | Jihad Watch | Islam 101 | Qur'an Blog | Raymond Ibrahim | Robert Spencer |  |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
For the Grand Rapids file: "Girl gang terrorised old women," from The Local, with thanks to Miss Kelly:
A group of five teenage girls have been accused of a wave of vicious attacks against old women in Stockholm. Fifteen women have been mugged by the gang, according to police.The girls, aged 17 and 18, have been remanded in custody for attacking the women in Tensta and Rinkeby, suburbs of the capital. Their victims, mostly in their seventies and eighties, were usually mugged outside their homes, reports Aftonbladet.
In one of the muggings, the girls stole a 71-year-old's handbag and pushed her down a flight of steps. In another case, a 78-year old woman was pushed to the ground and kicked where she lay.
The girls worked in groups of two or three and wore veils during the attacks, making it harder for the police to identify them. Police were aided in identifying the girls after they took photos of each other at a wedding using a stolen mobile phone.
Two of the girls have denied all charges against them, while the other three have made partial admissions.
One of the girls admitted pushing over an old woman and stealing her handbag, but said she did so because the woman used racial insults against her. She also claims that another of the accused girls kept forcing snow into a victim's mouth until she let go of her handbag, Aftonbladet writes.
Money was the only motive given for the muggings.
But of course. What else could it possibly be about?
Posted by Robert at March 9, 2007 4:58 PM
Print this entry
| Email this entry
| Digg this
| del.icio.us
more info needed...
Posted by: exsgtbrown![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/nav-commenters.gif)
at March 9, 2007 5:10 PM
Anyone hear of the story about muslim youths in Stockholm wearing T shirts emblazoned with the year in which they expect to take over Sweden? I read it somewhere, but can't remember where or how accurate it was.
Posted by: Celsius at March 9, 2007 5:15 PM
Thanks for the link DebV.
Posted by: Celsius at March 9, 2007 6:09 PM
There have been similar cases here in Scandinavia of violent female Mohammedan adolescents, although this is the first I have heard of where the swine were wearing veils.
As repulsive as this type of crime is, it serves as a reminder that although "women," generically, are repressed and victimized by Islam, the individual woman may in many cases herself be part of the problem, and as such guilty as hell. Expect social scientists to come rushing to their defense/apology and educating us about the poor perps who are being caught between two cultures, and thus victims themselves.
One more point of note: explanations/apology may emphasize the social aspects of this form of delinquency, rather than being an explicit case of jihadism, but notice how the victims in these cases are always us dirty kuffars, and never Mussies. Never.
Posted by: anti-uffe at March 9, 2007 6:13 PM
This is bizarre...
"another of the accused girls kept forcing snow into a victim's mouth until she let go of her handbag"
Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!
"Money was the only motive given for the muggings."
but
"One of the girls admitted pushing over an old woman and stealing her handbag, but said she did so because the woman used racial insults"
Hmm...
Well, if that doesn't work, they can always claim that they were abused as prisoners.
at March 9, 2007 7:01 PM
If these punks were Muslims then let sharia be applied to them-whatever the Koran calls for as punishment for this crime should be administered to them by the state.
Posted by: ISLAMSFORLOSERS at March 9, 2007 10:29 PM
Unless I'm badly mistaken, that would be cutting a hand off of each one of them.
Posted by: joeblough at March 9, 2007 11:56 PM
Please don't let sharia law be applied to these creatures................................
Sharia must not be allowed in the West forany reason.....ever......even jokingly.
Posted by: marilyn at March 10, 2007 1:45 AM
One thing easy to forget, because the victimization of women in Islam is so bald and profound, is that many female practitioners of this ideology are enthusiastic participants.
"Little" Aisha herself became just as vicious, venal, and brutal as her owner after his death. Females are the ones who generally perform Islamic genital mutilation of little girls; females are now suicide bombing (in hopes of what, one wonders? Hanging around a locked pavilion waiting for some appropriate owner to finish with the celestial whores?); females hide bombs, feed terrorists, loan them burkas and veils for escapes, and the more verbally skilled of them are turning into MSM-favored apologists and da'wa artists.
Confident in the ascension of Islam, females like these are becoming as aggressive as their future owners. Even Muslim girls just gotta have fun -- at least until they're locked into their homes, breeding and feeding.
Posted by: Marwan'sDaughter at March 10, 2007 3:03 AM
a few things:
(i) wearing of veils as a disguise no more makes the perps Moslem than the wearing of "hoodies" makes the perps "Chavs" or the wearing of a handkerchief around the face makes the perps "western style bank robbers" (even if they wear black hats)
(ii) out-of-control criminal teenage girls are not a western thing - other countries have it just as well
the extra facts place it in more context - like they were in a barrio known for its high content of Moslems etc.
but as exsgtbrown said:
"we need more info"
and as Marwan'sDaughter said:
"One thing easy to forget, because the victimization of women in Islam is so bald and profound, is that many female practitioners of this ideology are enthusiastic participants."
I like your style "Marwan'sDaughter" - keep it up - if anything can cause a rift amongst the left apologists for Islamic Patriarchy - then the women's issue is it ...
Posted by: drk at March 10, 2007 4:19 AM
ISLAMFORLOSERS,
" If these punks were......."
Why if? Of course they were. And they are . Recently I was thrown into closest possible encounters with them both females and males. They are the most merciless , unrepentant ,incorrigibly supercilicious punks--practically all of them. Not just adoloscents. Seamlessly anchored in thuggery, thievery and terrorism. The world would indeed have peace only without them and their appeasers.
Forgive me God for writing comments. I just could not restrain myself.
Posted by: Crows&Cows at March 10, 2007 4:51 AM
But whatever is kuffar (non-muslim), it is okay for you to hurt or steal from that person...
Posted by: eloivsdiablo at March 10, 2007 5:16 AM
Truly disgusting. These Muhammadan punks need to be flogged and pilloried. Have their victims spit in their faces
I can easily imagine that some elderly Swedes are trapped in traditional neighborhoods that have gone to Muhammad. And now have to watch their step in the land they have lived in for countless generations
Posted by: dennisw at March 10, 2007 9:05 AM
But whatever is kuffar (non-muslim), it is okay for you to hurt or steal from that person...
Exactly what some Scandinavian Imam said a while back. He said - steal from the country that gave you refuge. That it's Jizya and the infidel owes ya!
Posted by: dennisw at March 10, 2007 9:07 AM
this is the reason why europe is swinging to the extreme right. the reason that the british national partie's membership applications now have a 3 month back log.
Posted by: leonthepigfarmer at March 10, 2007 9:38 AM
When I go shopping in a muslim newsagents, if they ever give me the change back using their left hand, I always make sure that next time, I give them the money from my left hand. That's the unclean hand. I'm sure everyone knows why.
Posted by: Celsius at March 10, 2007 1:11 PM
I guess the swedes are no longer known for their pretty blond and blue-eyed gals. Wonder if their hot chocolate will still be as good. I'm gonna miss Sweden.
Posted by: kelisw at March 10, 2007 5:39 PM
Off with their heads!
Posted by: lonewolf at March 10, 2007 6:50 PM
kelisw: 'I'm gonna miss Sweden.'
Yes, and The Netherlands, France and U.K.
at March 10, 2007 8:06 PM
celsius
boycott muslim shops, tell your friends to stop going to them, we need to drive them out of the UK.
Posted by: leonthepigfarmer at March 10, 2007 11:47 PM
How convenient! Having burqas, veils and other Islamic garb serve a dual purpose by masking the identity of Muslim criminals!! I wonder if Muhammad ever thought of that?!?
Posted by: CAIRfreefuture at March 11, 2007 3:22 AM
leonthepigfarmer, believe me, I spend as little as I can in them.
Some of the newsagents have the "No dogs allowed" signs on the window. Fair enough, lots of places do. The difference is, the muslim newsagents don't have the "Guide dogs excepted" bit added on like other civilized shopping places.
Posted by: Celsius at March 11, 2007 9:45 AM
When do we start the evacuation of art and sculpture? I would hate to see all of the beauty that has withstood generations be destroyed by the "no fun bunch".
Really, it's like being over-run by extra-terrestrials.
at March 11, 2007 12:19 PM
"Please don't let sharia law be applied to these creatures................................
Sharia must not be allowed in the West forany reason.....ever......even jokingly."
from a post above.
Sharia must NEVER be allowed by the state, however it would be appropriate to organize vigilante gangs to protect kaffirs from these young muslim thugs. As soon the see the purse snatching or any other assault, grab the perpetrators, forcibly unveil them, and then chop off their right hands as a warning to other muslim criminals. Do this to a few of these thugs and none would dare commit any more assaults in the future.
Muslims commit violence against us because they know they can get away with it. It's time to turn the tables.
Posted by: Provoslavni at March 11, 2007 8:12 PM
Comments are turned off and archived for this entry.
(Note: The Comments section is provided in the interests of free speech only. It is mostly unmoderated, but comments that are off-topic, offensive, slanderous, or otherwise annoying stand a chance of being deleted. The fact that any comment remains on the site IN NO WAY constitutes an endorsement by Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch, or by Robert Spencer or any other Jihad Watch or Dhimmi Watch writer, of any view expressed, fact alleged, or link provided in that comment.)